Hello Jack:

> Your response seems not so much an invitation, but an attack on my
> intentions. I've introduced myself and have made considerate posts
to this
> list in the past and have gotten no response, except a terse
message from
> the list moderator when I sent a text file attachment.

Please do not misunderstand my post. It was meant as a rebuttal to
an assertion you had made...no more, no less.
If my focus on the issue you raised of me being a spammer went off
course, I would gladly apologize. I had tried to stay on topic.
The post was not meant to be an attack on your intentions but to
rebuff the argument you had presented.

>I have no idea who
> you are from any other member of this list.

I had made several previous posts to this particular list. However,
I had recently changed my yahoo information to reflect a new email
address. But you can see my previous posts under "Soapy Sales".

> There has been no response other than yours and I have no desire
to dabate
> you over this list group.

I believe there was one other response if you trace back this topic.

>If this is as good as it gets then I would like to
> be removed. BTW... The file section of this listgroup has more
spam in it
> than anything useful.

We are really on the same team, and I think we value the same
things. I think there are enough things in this world that need
changing and that can use our focus and energies. We are better off
trying to stick together to address the issues in our society that
both you and I are too familiar with.

So, I hope you will stay. I think it is important for those with
chemical sensitivities to stick together.

Sincerely,

-Stuart


> > Hello Jack:
> >
> > If you read the FAQ on Alkali on my website, you should be able
to
> > verify that soaps which use Mercury Cell alkali can very well
> > contain mercury. There are numerous sources which verify that
> > Mercury cell technology leaves some mercury residue in the alkali
> > product. This alkali is then used in the soapmaking industry (and
> > other industries) by some soap manufacturers. Please read the
FAQ.
> > http://www.sungoldsoap.com/FAQS.html
> >
> > My email address on this list is supposed to be "sungoldsoap"
> > at "hotmail.com". However, for some reason, I think yahoo may
still
> > use an old email address. If your point is that I am the owner of
> > the website that contains the information about mercury in soap,
> > that is absolutely true. I don't see, though, why that would lead
> > you to conclude that I am a spammer. I just don't follow that
logic.
> >
> > Do I suffer from chemical sensitivities? Yes.
> >
> > Do I run a website? Yes.
> >
> > Am I a spammer? No.
> >
> > If you are really interested in proof of mercury in some soap
> > products, please just ask. I am happy to present the facts. The
> > logic that this phenomenon can't be true because you were not
able
> > to verify it on your Internet searches does not make it false and
> > does not make your assertion of "spam" to be true.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Stuart
> > Fragrance is the culprit, and the answer is:
> > http://www.sungoldsoap.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > > I couldn't find any information on mercury in soap and could
find
> > nothing at all on the subject of murcury in soaps at snopes. This
> > appears to be spam to our listgroup as the email contact Sungold
> > Soap is the same as the commercial website, but I would rather
have
> > the listgroup moderator make that determination.
> > >
> > >
> > > Blessings,
> > > Jack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "Sungold Soap" <sungoldsoap@h...>
> > > Date: Tue Sep 28, 2004 12:51 pm
> > > Subject: Re: Lead in Lipstick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > And watch out for mercury in soap:
> > > http://www.sungoldsoap.com/FAQS.html#ALKALIS
> > >
> > >
> > > -Stuart
> >