Stuart,
Your response seems not so much an invitation, but an attack on my
intentions. I've introduced myself and have made considerate posts to this
list in the past and have gotten no response, except a terse message from
the list moderator when I sent a text file attachment. I have no idea who
you are from any other member of this list. I thought that your post
appeared to be spam, but left that determination to the list moderator.
There has been no response other than yours and I have no desire to dabate
you over this list group. If this is as good as it gets then I would like to
be removed. BTW... The file section of this listgroup has more spam in it
than anything useful.
Respectfully submitted,
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: <detox@yahoogroups.com>
To: <detox@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: [detox] Digest Number 210
>
>
> There are 2 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. Re: Lead in Lipstick
> From: "Sungold Soap" <sungoldsoap@...>
> 2. CFS Research
> From: cherielj@...
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:04:09 -0000
> From: "Sungold Soap" <sungoldsoap@...>
> Subject: Re: Lead in Lipstick
>
>
> Hello Jack:
>
> If you read the FAQ on Alkali on my website, you should be able to
> verify that soaps which use Mercury Cell alkali can very well
> contain mercury. There are numerous sources which verify that
> Mercury cell technology leaves some mercury residue in the alkali
> product. This alkali is then used in the soapmaking industry (and
> other industries) by some soap manufacturers. Please read the FAQ.
> http://www.sungoldsoap.com/FAQS.html
>
> My email address on this list is supposed to be "sungoldsoap"
> at "hotmail.com". However, for some reason, I think yahoo may still
> use an old email address. If your point is that I am the owner of
> the website that contains the information about mercury in soap,
> that is absolutely true. I don't see, though, why that would lead
> you to conclude that I am a spammer. I just don't follow that logic.
>
> Do I suffer from chemical sensitivities? Yes.
>
> Do I run a website? Yes.
>
> Am I a spammer? No.
>
> If you are really interested in proof of mercury in some soap
> products, please just ask. I am happy to present the facts. The
> logic that this phenomenon can't be true because you were not able
> to verify it on your Internet searches does not make it false and
> does not make your assertion of "spam" to be true.
>
>
>
> -Stuart
> Fragrance is the culprit, and the answer is:
> http://www.sungoldsoap.com/
>
>
>
> > I couldn't find any information on mercury in soap and could find
> nothing at all on the subject of murcury in soaps at snopes. This
> appears to be spam to our listgroup as the email contact Sungold
> Soap is the same as the commercial website, but I would rather have
> the listgroup moderator make that determination.
> >
> >
> > Blessings,
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "Sungold Soap" <sungoldsoap@h...>
> > Date: Tue Sep 28, 2004 12:51 pm
> > Subject: Re: Lead in Lipstick
> >
> >
> >
> > And watch out for mercury in soap:
> > http://www.sungoldsoap.com/FAQS.html#ALKALIS
> >
> >
> > -Stuart
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 04:15:05 EDT
> From: cherielj@...
> Subject: CFS Research
>
>
> In a message dated 10/8/04 7:01:13 PM, DSNurse@... writes:
>
> << Altered central nervous system signal during motor performance in
chronic
> fatigue syndrome.
>
> Journal: Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2372-81.
>
> Authors: Siemionow V, Fang Y, Calabrese L, Sahgal V, Yue GH.
>
> Affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Lerner Research
> Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue,
> Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
>
> NLM Citation: PMID: 15351380
>
>
> Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether brain
> activity of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients during voluntary
> motor actions differs from that of healthy individuals.
>
> Methods: Eight CFS patients and 8 age- and gender-matched healthy
> volunteers performed isometric handgrip contractions at 50% maximal
> voluntary contraction level. They first performed 50 contractions with a
> 10 s rest between adjacent trials-'Non-Fatigue' (NFT) task. Subsequently,
> the same number of contractions was performed with only a 5 s rest
> between trials-'Fatigue' (FT) task. Fifty-eight channels of surface EEG
> were recorded simultaneously from the scalp. Spectrum analysis was
> performed to estimate power of EEG frequency in different tasks. Motor
> activity-related cortical potential (MRCP) was derived by triggered
> averaging of EEG signals associated with the muscle contractions.
>
> Results: Major findings include: (i) Motor performance of the CFS
> patients was poorer than the controls. (ii) Relative power of EEG theta
> frequency band (4-8 Hz) during performing the NFT and FT tasks was
> significantly greater in the CFS than control group [Formula: see text]
> (iii) The amplitude of MRCP negative potential (NP) for the combined NFT
> and FT tasks was higher in the CFS than control group [Formula: see text]
> (iv) Within the CFS group, the NP was greater for the FT than NFT task
> [Formula: see text] whereas no such difference between the two tasks was
> found in the control group.
>
> Conclusions: These results clearly show that CFS involves altered central
> nervous system signals in controlling voluntary muscle activities,
> especially when the activities induce fatigue.
>
> Significance: Physical activity-induced EEG signal changes may serve as
> physiological markers for more objective diagnosis of CFS. >>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>