Dear Sir,
I have received these kind of questions regarding specific patients using urotherapy for cancer and I have answered that the question has (and must ) be answered by the medical community doing proper research on my hypothesis. Unfortunately, till this moment the medical community ignored it and there is no article published on MEDLINE based on my hypothesis: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9160284&dopt=Abstract
Recently, in the following book by the American Cancer Society:
Urotherapy for Cancer is mentioned among other "Complementary and Alternative Cancer Methods".
Urotherapy for Cancer is mentioned among other "Complementary and Alternative Cancer Methods".New Book Raps "Alternative" Cancer Treatments
The American Cancer Society's Guide to Complementary and Alternative Cancer Methods, published last year discusses more than 100 methods that it characterizes as "complementary" (used along with standard treatments, often with the hope of providing symptomatic relief) and/or "alternative" (used instead of standard methods).
Each entry provides a brief description and overview followed by information on the claims, treatment form, and the history behind it. It also looks at the evidence for or against it, and provides references.
People searching for "miracle cures" won't find any listed, but the book offers reliable advice on what to avoid.
The book states that there is no scientific evidence that any of the following can cure or influence the course of any cancer:
Acupuncture, aloe vera, alsihum, amalgam removal, antineoplaston therapy, applied kinesiology, aromatherapy, astragalus, aveloz, bee venom therapy (apitherapy), bioenergetic therapy, biofeedback, black cohosh, black walnut, bodywork, CanCell, cancer salves, cassava (tapioca), castor oil, cat's claw, cell therapy, centella (gotu kola), chaparral, chelation therapy, chiropractic, chlorella, colon therapy, comfrey, craniosacral therapy, crystals, cupping, curanderismo, cymatic therapy, DHEA, Di Bella therapy, DMSO, electromagnetic therapy, enzyme therapy, Essiac tea, evening primrose oil, faith healing, fasting, feng shui, flaxseed, flower remedies, Fu Zhen therapy, germanium, Gerson therapy, ginkgo biloba, ginseng, goldenseal, grape cure, Greek cancer cure, guided imagery, HANSI, holistic medicine, homeopathy, Hoxsey herbal treatment, humor therapy, hydrogen peroxide, hydrotherapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, hypnosis, visualization, immuno-augmentative therapy, inosine pranobex, kampo, kombucha tea, krebiozen, labyrinth walking, Laetrile, larch, light therapy, lipoic acid, Livingston-Wheeler therapy, macrobiotic diet, magnetic therapy, maitake mushroom, meditation, metabolic therapy, moxibustion, mugwort, Native American healing, naturopathy, neuro-linguistic programming, Noni (morinda) plant products, ohashiatsu, oleander leaf, orthomolecular medicine, osteopathic manipulation, oxygen therapy, pau d'arco, polarity therapy, poly-MVA, potassium supplements, pregnenolone, psychic surgery, qigong, rabdosia rubescens, red clover, reflexology, reiki, Revici guided chemotherapy, Rosen method of bodywork, Rubenfeld synergy method, saw palmetto, sea cucumber, 714-x, shamanism, shark cartilage, Siberian ginseng, snakeroot, tai chi, Tui-Na, urotherapy, Vitae Elixxir, vitamin K, Watsu, wheatgrass products, and yoga.
The book's publication reflects a change in the Society's policy toward nonstandard methods. For more than 30 years, the Society listed and published detailed reports on what it called "unproven" or "questionable" methods.
In recent years, however, it has softened its terminology and issued only brief reports on "complementary and alternative methods." The overall message, however, has not changed: Be skeptical of any method that that is promoted as a "cure" but has not undergone scientific testing.
http://www.canoe.ca/HealthAlternativeColumns/011115.html
http://www.canoe.ca/HealthAlternativeColumns/011115.html
I agree with the author that "scientific testing" should be done on cancer urotherapy. Unfortunately, this is not the case till now.
I am forwarding this email also to Coen van der Kroon's address for his reply.
Sincerely,
Joseph Eldor, MD
----------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: "Joseph Eldor" <a1b2c3d4@...>
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Urotherapy for patients with cancer
> Hello Sir
> I have been trying to find Coen van der Kroon's address on
> the net and even by international operator but no success.I find
> myself here. I have recently read your article entitled "urotherapy
> for patients with cancer" so I would very much appreciate your
> advice in the case of my uncle.I cannot use medical terms to describe
> his case very well but he has melanoma,many tumours on the brain,in
> the groin and throughout his body.He has been sent home (a while
> back) saying nothing can be done about him and even as i speak he has
> been given the last rites and is soon to be given morphine eventhough
> he is not in any pain (so says himself) He has defied doctors many
> times.Some of the family feel we would like to try the urine with
> him.But to be honest he's not well enough to give consent and his
> young wife is very dubious. As you well know there are many issues in
> all of this but really what I wanted to ask you,coen vdk or anybody
> else is: although he has little or no control over the body and is
> quite weak,slipping in and out of consciousness a lot as well as
> having seizures-would the body still react to the antigens in the
> urine and produce antibodies to fight the cancer were he to take it?
> Is it ever too late to administer urine? I realise this is very basic
> information but any advice would be very welcome.Thank you in advance
>