Hi Leslie,

CranioSacral Therapy, being very naturalistic in its approach -- working
with the body's self-corrective process rather than doing something to the
body as is the case with more invasive therapeutic modalities, can deliver
sustainable results which do not require on-going maintenance. However, for
it's ability to release stress and optimize functioning of nervous and
other physiological systems, many people chose to include CST as part of
their regular healthy life-style. Some pursue on-going craniosacral
treatment for self-awareness and personal/spiritual growth.

Congratulations on discovering CST. It's has been miraculously
transformational and healing for thousands of people, myself included. Let
us know how it's working for you.

Warmly,

Oleg


On 7/28/06, octafish2003 <octafish@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Oleg/others,
>
> Thanks for asking, I do have another question.
>
> I found a therapist quite close to where I live and she seems very
> skilled. I'm looking forward to our sessions; I saw her for our
> initial hour yesterday and will go Monday for 2 hours. She's trying to
> target 4 hours/month initially and thinks 2 hours together is a good
> thing.
>
> I wondered, and I didn't think of this question until after I left the
> session but I'd like other opinions anyway, if you think craniosacral
> therapy has the potential to be curative. I've heard that, say,
> acupuncture can be curative, but chiropractic manipulations tend to be
> something you need to keep getting sort of on a maintenance basis,
> though less frequent as time goes on if you stay healthy. So, in your
> opinions, would craniosacral therapy results be more akin to
> acupuncture, i.e., potentially curative, or chiropractic medicine,
> wherein long-term upkeep is needed to maintain results?
>
> Just curious.
>
> Thanks,
> Leslie
>
> --- In
craniosacralnetwork@yahoogroups.com<craniosacralnetwork%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Oleg Geller"
>
> <oleggeller@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Leslie,
> >
> > You are welcome. Let us know if you have any other questions.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]