I know of a case where a patient with implanted Harrington Rods got great relief from this.
Peace
-Jeff McCloskey DC
Adrian Larsen <alarsen@...> wrote:
Ty,I most generally find it with battery powered jewelry, though I have seen it with crystals and Q-links. There can also be other kinds of allergies to jewelry. Topical, ingested (for tongue pierces), etc. So you can challenge with general allergy and then check the sub modes. Also check toxicity and metal toxicity for metal jewelry contacting the skin, and use Remote to check for remote effects.They often can be desensitized by following typical allergy protocol. I haven't tried spinning non-battery powered jewelry. Some types cannot be desensitized, and they must be avioded alltogether.This is just my experience, and I'm sure others have more ideas than me. Anyone else want to chime in?--Adrian Larsen, DCOn Nov 30, 2006, at 7:58 PM, doctycobb wrote:Thanks, Adrian.
Does this only apply to watches with batteries?
What about other types of jewelry that cause problems with energy
fields?
Can they be desensitized in any way or do you just have to tell the
patient not to wear them anymore?
Do you usually become aware of these by finding an electromagnetic
allergy?
The two times that this issue has come up for me were both from
priority at master point taking me to electromagnetic allergy. Will
passing any type of jewelry across the midline tell you if there is a
problem? Do you routinely check all the metal and jewelry that a
patient wears and if so, how?
Just trying to get all of this straight. Thanks again.
--Ty Cobb, DC
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at Yahoo! Answers. Try it now.