I'm sorry, but no. At some point you have to realize that it's not a game
of how far can we push it and still not be sinning. Sexual intercourse is
sexual intercourse and that should be the point of the marital act. Just
because technically some sperm *could* get to the vagina and the act *could
* still be open to life doesn't make it right. It's not the same as
intercourse.

I truly feel for those who are not able for one reason or the other to come
together in the marital act. My marriage has had its own challenges with
abstinence. The remedy is not see how far we can go without sinning, but
to pray and try our best to stay faithful to each other and our marriage
covenant.

Jennifer

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:52 PM, <Ruthjoec@...> wrote:

>
> In a message dated 10/7/2008 2:17:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> cinnfp@yahoogroups.com <cinnfp%40yahoogroups.com> writes:
>
> Basically it boils down to
> preserving the dual purposes of sex, the unitive and procreative.
>
> A question for the group: Would those ends be preserved if they manually
> stimulated each other, but at the time he climaxed he put his penis outside
> her
> vagina, but near the opening so that some semen might enter her? There have
>
> been pregnancies reported from such behavior.
>
> **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your
> destination.
> Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!
> (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]