THE JUSTICE DEPT AND INFANT SCREAMS - AND MARK LEVINE: "THE UPCOMING WAR AGAINST
THE JEWS"

OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below.

Mark Levine
Former congressional attorney serving a high-ranking representative on the
Judiciary and Homeland Security committees
Currently hosts The Inside Scoop
Via Mark@...

Mark,

You mentioned "the up-coming War Against the Jews."

http://www.alternet.org/rights/141161/why_the_fbi_squelched_an_investigation_of_\
a_post-9_11_meeting_between_white_supremacist_and_islamic_extremists/?page=entir\
e

You might want to mention "The Secret War Against the Jews" a 1994 book by
Loftus and Aarons.

From the postscript below...

>
>Using unnamed "intelligence sources," former Justice Department Attorney
>John Loftus and Mark Aarons make some rather astonishing assertions about
>Richard Nixon and Nazis - and about a Zionist cell codenamed "Max" that
>orchestrated the deaths of about 20 million Russians and Germans as six
>million Jews were slaughtered. See Loftus and Aarons. The Secret War
>Against the Jews. 1994.
>

Your article discussed Justice Department cover-up of POTENTIAL crimes
(potential "terrorist acts")...

You might want to mention the Justice Department covering up - remaining silent
about - ONGOING crimes - ongoing MEDICAL crimes - like mass baby asphyxiation by
OBGYNs (and worse) - and mass birth-canal-closing by OBGYNs (and worse)...

See AMA (SOPP) and CPR: MASS OBGYN CHILD ABUSE: PLEASE REPORT IT IMMEDIATELY
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3698

One of the ongoing medical crimes is en masse MD ripping and slicing of infant
penises - which is NOT the same as the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of
the foreskin on the penis. See below.

I am in favor of a religious exemption from the child abuse statutes for the
ancient Jewish ritual.

Most people are not aware that most ritual circumcisers - most OBGYNs and
mohelim - are TOTAL foreskin amputators who ignore the fact that the Jewish God
originally/reportedly commanded leaving most of the foreskin on the penis. See
below.

When American MDs were exposed using phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology,
they created an obvious HIV hoax that perpetuates the infant screams.

Exposing the obvious HIV hoax that makes infants scream could mean an end for
the HIV/AIDS hypothesis itself - if Janine Roberts is right.

Check out Janine Roberts' evidence that the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is a hoax
created by Robert C. Gallo, MD...

See An obscene HIV/AIDS hoax makes infants scream...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3592

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA
todd@...

PS I've notified the US District Court for the District of Oregon (Magistrate
Judge Dennis Hubel) that US Attorney Karin J. Immergut and her Assistant US
Attorney Bob Nesler are failing to prosecute obvious medical and chiropractic
crimes promoted by the United States of America.

>
>See United States of America v. Todd D. Gastaldo
>CIVIL NO. 09-310-HU
>MOTION TO DISMISS
>ALSO: URGENT: REPORT OF SUSPECTED MASS CHILD ABUSE BY OBGYNs^^^
>
>^^^Filed May 26, 2009
>
>NOTE: US Attorney Karin J. Immergut and her Asst US Atty Bob Nesler have asked
the court for an extension to July 10, 2009 so that the US Department of
Education can help them respond to my Motion to Dismiss.
>
>Both my Motion to Dismiss and US Attorney Immergut/Nesler's request for
extension are reproduced in a post which focuses on a mass infant penis ripping
and slicing crime of OBGYNs...
>
>See An obscene HIV/AIDS hoax makes infants scream...
>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3592
>

July 9, 2009 UPDATE: On July 6, 2009, US Attorney Karin J. Immergut and her
Asst US Atty Bob Nesler moved for summary judgement - without even
addressing/mentioning the obvious medical and chiropractic crimes...

I will cc US Attorney Karin J. Immergut and her assistant US attorneys Bob
Nesler and Neil Evans via
karin.immergut@...,bob.nesler@...,neil.evans@....

WARNING: CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST: The wife of US Attorney Immergut's boss - US
Attorney General Eric Holder - is an OBGYN and may have committed/may be
committing the OBGYN child abuse crimes. There may be a conflict-of-interest
REASON that US Attorney Immergut and her assistant US attorney Bob Nesler and
Neil Evans are not investigating the mass OBGYN child abuse.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA
todd@...

This post will be archived for global access at
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/

















-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: tgastaldo@...
>Sent: Jul 7, 2009 10:39 AM
>To: chernus@...
>Cc: chiro-list@yahoogroups.com, chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Zionism and 'babies can't feel pain' - and Prof. Ira Chernus
>
>ZIONISM AND "BABIES CAN'T FEEL PAIN" - AND PROF. IRA CHERNUS
>
>Prof. Chernus, please see my Open Letter to you below. My Zionism discussion
is in the postscript.
>
>"BABIES CAN'T FEEL PAIN"
>
>Strange as it seems, tacit state protection of the obstetricians' bizarre
>"babies can't feel pain" behavior^^^ is rooted in a brand of Judaism foisted
>onto Jews by the "four great powers" back in 1919. See the postscript.
>
>^^^American obstetricians are still being allowed to rip and slice infant
penises en masse - FOR NO MEDICAL REASON - even after being discovered using
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology...
>
>See HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland, AAP and infant circumcision
revisited
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
>
>A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION
>
>I am in favor of a religious exemption from the child abuse statutes for the
ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis. See Fact
#1...
>
>TWO IMPORTANT FACTS
>
>1. American ritual circumcisers - OBGYNs and mohelim - are TOTAL foreskin
amputators who ignore the fact that the Jewish God originally/reportedly
commanded what have been called "tip" circumcisions or "mini-circs" - leaving
most of the foreskin on the penis...
>
>See Pediatrician 'ethics' (Attn: Gesundheit et al.)
>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/199fecec9021ed16
>
>2. After being discovered using phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology,
American MDs created an obvious HIV hoax that perpetuates the infant screams and
is the only thing keeping American MDs out of prison for their ongoing mass
infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
>
>See again: HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland, AAP and infant
circumcision revisited
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
>
>OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below.
>
>Ira Chernus, PhD
>Professor of Religious Studies
>University of Colorado at Boulder
>Via chernus@...
>
>Ira,
>
>I was stimulated to write after reading what you recently wrote about Zionism
in your blog entry, "Charge of Anti-Semitism."
>http://www.truthout.org/063009C
>
>As you might imagine, I, too, have been called an "anti-Semite" for criticizing
the obviously illegal American medical practice of ripping and slicing most
infant penises for no medical reason.
>
>Here is part of my response to a man calling me an "anti-Jew":
>
>"I am no more of an “anti-Jew” than the “pro-Jew” who, sincere in his
or her spiritual motives, holds down the infant Jew and mutilates his penis....I
believe I am just as sincere - and more informed about Jewish history [regarding
circumcision] - than many if not most who call themselves Jews... Indeed, I
believe I am a Jew - in the sense noted by former U.S. Justice Department
Attorney John Loftus and Australian Mark Aaron in their book, The Secret War
Against the Jews. [1994] See below."
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.spanking/msg/c9a6388252cb548a
>
>In another of your blog entries, "Time For Jews to Abandon the Old Foundation
Myth of Israel" - I found mention of "2.775 billion a year in military aid" to
Israel, as in,
>
>"Of course Netanyahu knows full well that Israel can show its vaunted strength
only as long as the United States pays the bill. He could not simply bite the
hand that feeds him $2.775 billion a year in military aid..."
>http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/international/1579/time_for_jews_to_a\
bandon_the_old_foundation_myth_of_israel?page=2
>
>I am pretty sure that that $2.775 billion a year is aid to AMERICANS (and
others) who manufacture weapons sent to Israel. Correct me if I am wrong.
>
>A STRANGE OMISSION
>
>As you wrote about the Old Foundation Myth, you made no mention of the
FOUNDATION of the Old Foundation Myth. You made no mention of the myth that the
Jewish God promised Jews all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates as long
as they sliced off infant penis tips in perpetuity.
>
>I liked your phrase "considering the suffering the old myth has produced."
>
>The FOUNDATION of the Old Foundation Myth causes very real suffering everyday -
infant screams - sometimes loss of infant penises - and even infant death.
>
>It's time to look closely at the myth that is causing all the infant suffering.
>
>It's time to point out that the Jewish God reportedly/originally commanded
leaving most of the foreskin on the penis.
>
>See again: Pediatrician 'ethics' (Attn: Gesundheit et al.)
>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/199fecec9021ed16
>
>BACK TO ALL THE LAND THAT GOD PROMISED...
>
>"The Orthodox settlers may also be sincerely convinced that the one and only
God of the universe gave their ancestors all the land between the Mediterranean
Sea and the Jordan River."
>
>I just found this quote in your Alternet article, "FORBIDDEN ISRAEL: SEX AND
THE SETTLERS"
>http://www.alternet.org/world/141123/forbidden_israel%3A_sex_and_the_settlers_/
>
>However much land the Jewish God gave to the Jews - the FOUNDATION of the Old
Foundation Myth is that Jews only get the land if they slice off TIPS of infant
penises.
>
>Please do not forget to mention the FOUNDATION of the Old Foundation Myth - and
the fact that it was converted into TOTAL foreskin amputation by ancient rabbis.
>
>For details of the ancient rabbinical shift to total foreskin amputation...
>
>See again my response to the man who called me an "anti-Jew"...
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.spanking/msg/c9a6388252cb548a
>
>Thanks for your blog entries and your Alternet article.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Todd
>
>Dr. Gastaldo
>Hillsboro, Oregon
>USA
>todd@...
>
>PS ZIONISM AND "BABIES CAN'T FEEL PAIN"
>
>GEOPOLITICAL REASONS FOR THE ONGOING MASS CHILD ABUSE
>
>>>>>BEGIN excerpt of Dr. Poland suing Gastaldo?
>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/b102fa0f001349b8
>
>Strange as it seems, tacit state protection of the obstetricians' bizarre
>"babies can't feel pain" behavior is rooted in a brand of Judaism foisted
>onto Jews by the "four great powers" back in 1919.
>
>"The Covenant idea is the polar opposite of democracy" [Cantor F. The
>Sacred Chain. NY: HarperCollins 1994:21]
>
>In 1919, presumably basing his reasoning primarily on the Biblical
>foreskins for land "Covenant" (quoted from the Bible; see below), Lord
>Balfour committed "the four great powers" to Zionism "for better or
>worse"; and proclaimed that the needs of Palestinian Zionists were of
>"far greater import" than the needs of Palestinian Arabs. [Lord Balfour
>quoted in Mansfield The Arabs 1985]
>
>According to Mansfield [1985], it is "astonishing" that the four great
>powers adopted Zionism, because prior to WWI, most Jews in Palestine
>"regarded Zionism...as sacrilege," and "the majority of prominent and
>influential Jews in Europe were unsympathetic to Zionism."
>
>"Indeed," continues Mansfield, "the two most representative bodies in
>British Jewry - the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the
>Anglo-Jewish Association - had actually begun a campaign to persuade the
>British government to resist the demands of the Zionists." [Mansfield The
>Arabs 1985:181,175,175]
>
>Long before Hitler came into power, the Zionists began telling the
>British anti-Semitic things about German Jews - and Winston Churchill, of
>all people, joined in the anti-Semitic chorus. See below.
>
>In 190_, Weizmann told the British, "[Zionists], too...believe that
>Germans of the Mosaic faith are an undesirable, demoralizing phenomenon"
>[Weizmann quoted in Reinharz Chaim Weizmann 1994];
>
>And Weizmann later wrote, "[T]here arises in me a terrible hatred towards
>'Jews' who turn away from [Zionism]. I perceive them as animals unworthy
>of the name homo sapiens." [Weizmann quoted in Rose Chaim Weizmann 1986]
>
>In 1920, Churchill told the British that Jews created "the Antichrist"
>(Bolshevism) and that Zionism was "the antidote." [Churchill. Zionism vs.
>Bolshevism: a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people. Illustrated
>Sunday Herald, Feb. 8, 1920]
>
>Even pro-Zionists admit "the essential accuracy" of author Aharon
>Megged's statement that "hundreds of [Israel's] leading writers,
>intellectuals, academics, authors and journalists" believe that Zionism
>amounts to "an evil colonialist conspiracy to exploit the people dwelling
>in Palestine, enslave them, and steal their land." [Halkin H. Israel
>against itself. Commentary 1994;98(5):33-39.]
>
>But who is conspiring?
>
>Not "the Jews" - or "the British" - or "the Americans" - or "the
>Russians"; though persons of all these descriptions seem to have
>participated.
>
>According to Rothschild family biographer Frederick Morton [1962], the
>Rothschild's became monied interests when in 1804 Prince William of Hesse
>secretly saved from bankruptcy his uncle and father-in-law, the King of
>Denmark - using Myer Anselm Rothschild as a secret go-between. [Morton F.
>The Rothschilds. NY: Atheneum 1962:22])
>
>Prince William had plenty of money to secretly loan to his royal uncle,
>the King of Denmark, because he had grown wealthy selling Hessian
>citizens trained as military officers, to his cousin George III, Elector
>of Hanover (Germany) and King of England.
>
>The U.S. Declaration of Independence was precipitated when King George
>publicly declared he would be using cousin William's Hessians to keep
>order in the American colonies. [Butterfield LH. Psychological warfare in
>1776: The Jefferson-Franklin plan to cause Hessian desertions.
>Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1950;94(3):233-41.]
>
>According to Morton [1962], "Everytime a Hessian was killed, the prince
>received [from George III] extra compensation to soothe him for the
>victim's trouble. The casualties mounted, and therefore his cash..."
>
>It was this arrangement that Jefferson and Franklin exploited in their
>psychological warfare against the Hessians. See Butterfield [1950]
>above.
>
>Morton [1962] notes that the Rothschilds made vast financial gains due to
>19th century military exertions of Napoleon and Bismarck; but claims that
>the Rothschild family nearly lost everything during WWI and WWII.
>
>Significantly, however, Morton notes that the French Baron Edmond de
>Rothschild (the youngest son of the youngest son of old Mayer Anselm
>Rothschild) "special[ized in] dividing the world's oil with Shell and
>Standard Oil" [1962:197] even as he engaged in "ostensibly non-Zionist
>efforts toward the realization of Israel." [1962:205]
>
>After years of being "hostile" to Zionism (p. 101), something strange
>happened. Edmond suddenly "now sounded more Zionist than the Zionists"
>(p. 148). [Rose Chaim Weizmann 1986]
>
>"Immediately after Britain's declaration of war against Turkey" (p. 146),
>writes Rose [1986], Edmond told the Russian Zionist, Chaim Weizmann, to
>"Prepare the ground carefully with the British government...Work
>secretly..." (p. 148)
>
>Weizmann had already been preparing the ground. Years before Edmond
>Rothschild encouraged him, Weizmann proposed to the British that, "An
>imperial synthesis between England and Jewry would be the greatest thing
>imaginable." [Weizmann quoted in Reinharz Chaim Weizmann 1993]
>
>Why would Baron Edmond Rothschild, initially "hostile" to Zionism,
>suddenly become so rabidly Zionist in 1914? And why would he advise
>Weizmann to "secretly" prepare with the British government?
>
>Some prime real estate was coming available. The Ottoman Empire was
>about to fall. In exchange for ignoring the Turkish genocide of one
>million Armenians, monied oil interests in the West would conclude World
>War One with vast oil concessions in the Middle East. [Simpson The
>Splendid Blond Beast 1993]
>
>In 1914 the powerful "British" arm of the Rochschild bank was no doubt
>assisting the British in finding "a fuel obtainable only from overseas" -
>for the British Empire's (Winston Churchill's) brand-new, oil-fired
>Dreadnought class of battleships: According to Massie [1991]:
>
>"Converting dreadnoughts to oil meant...basing British naval supremacy on
>a fuel obtainable only from overseas...
>
>"[In early 1914], Parliament authorized the spending of £10 million for
>[oil] storage tanks. Churchill simultaneously sent experts to the
>Persian Gulf to examine the potential of oil fields in that region. In
>July 1914, another £2.2 million was authorized to acquire a controlling
>interest in the Anglo-Persian Oil Company..." [Massie RK. Dreadnought NY:
>Random House 1991:785]
>
>WWI oil concessions in the Middle East were secured by WWII...
>
>Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, Churchill was in Washington insisting that
>the Americans NOT attack Hitler in Europe. ("[General George] Marshall
>insisted - despite British reluctance - [on] an amphibious assault upon
>the coast of France and an advance into Germany...Churchill...argued
>[instead] for...land[ings] in Algeria and Morocco." [Deighton 1993:599])
>
>Quoting Kilzer [1994],
>
>"Winston Churchill had no intention of creating a second front [for
>Hitler] in 1942, as he would have no intention of doing so in 1943, or
>indeed even in 1944...Churchill...seemed to be exploiting the
>German-Soviet bloodbath to secure British colonial interests in the
>Middle East." [Kilzer, Churchill's Deception 1994:283,286]
>
>"Rommel was in North Africa because the British were in North Africa.
>And the British were there because of oil." [Kilzer 1994:270]
>
>"[T]he security of the great oil fields of the Middle East was...the true
>heart of British foreign policy." [Kilzer LC. Churchill's Deception: The
>Dark Secret that Destroyed Nazi Germany. New York: Simon and Schuster
>1994.]
>
>According to Yahil [The Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1991],
>before Hitler's ascension to power, "no special importance was attached
>to the small Zionist movement in Germany, and the German Zionist supply
>of immigrants to Palestine was barely a trickle."
>
>This accords with Mansfield's report [1985] that when "the four great
>powers" adopted Zionism, most Jews opposed it.
>
>According to Yahil, German Zionists were "the first to conceive the idea
>of conferring with the German authorities to facilitate emigration to
>Palestine" - with the Zionist Chaim Arlosoroff "hop[ing] to engage the
>German authorities in negotiations on the organized emigration of Jews to
>Palestine while taking their assets with them..." (p. 98)
>
>Yahil continues, "The 1933 Zionist Congress, accepting a [transfer]
>proposal originally advanced by Arlosoroff, decided to establish a body
>under the aegis of the Zionist Executive to be headed by Weizmann." (p.
>99)
>
>"Initially," says Yahil, "Nazi propaganda organs attacked the Zionist
>movement...However, this approach changed following the 1993 Zionist
>Congress" (p. 100), after which Hitler himself "decid[ed] in favor of
>emigration" - both in 1935 and again in 1938. (p. 103)
>
>According to Yahil, "As early as January 1937, the SD called for
>concentrating the management of Jewish emigration in the framework of a
>special office of the Gestapo and the SD." (p. 105)
>
>In the same chapter in which Yahil discussed how the Nazis created "the
>paradox of the Jewish condition" ("anti-Semites accusing Jewry of the
>very thing it lacked: the power to control world politics"), she admitted
>that it was the German Zionists - adopted by "the four great powers" -
>who first suggested emigration to the Nazis - thus giving life to the
>paradox. Head-Zionist Chaim Weizmann thought "an imperial synthesis
>between England and Jewry...the greatest thing imaginable" - and thought
>German Jews "an undesirable, demoralizing phenomenon." [Weizmann quoted
>in Reinharz Chaim Weizmann 1993]
>
>Paraphrasing Weizmann (quoted in Yahil), let's be frank. Let's admit
>that the Zionists politically defeated non-Zionist German Jews who wanted
>to create an international boycott of Germany instead of moving out.
>Let's admit that neither the British nor the Zionists wanted the gates of
>Palestine thrown open to just any refugee. Let's admit that rich
>refugees were most desirable, and that Weizmann's "demoralizing,
>undesirable" rich German refugees could become desirable (in Weizmann's
>eyes) by either sending money to Palestine or by moving themselves and
>their money to Palestine. Again quoting Yahil (quoting Weizmann), "You
>cannot flood Palestine indefinitely with a population recruited from all
>over the world without running a grave risk of endangering the very
>structure which we are trying to create." [Weizmann quoted in Yahil
>1991:99]
>
>The foregoing, I believe, resolves Yahil's "Jews have no political power"
>paradox. Certain Jews did have political power, i.e., the British gave
>the Zionist Weizmann his "greatest thing imaginable," an "imperial
>synthesis of England and Jewry." And the British very likely created
>Hitler out of the ashes of WWI to take care of the Weizmann's
>"demoralizing, undesirable" German (and East European) Jews. Most people
>in the world still aren't aware that Weizmann said these things or that,
>paraphrasing Balfour, the four great powers had indeed "committed to
>Zionism, "blatantly disregarding the "desires and prejudices of the
>700,000 Arabs who [then] inhabit[ed] that ancient land." [Balfour quoted
>by Mansfield. The Arabs. 1985:189]
>
>I submit that British and American (Jewish and non-Jewish) financiers
>adopted Zionism, Hitler and WWII: 1) to get a real foothold in the region
>to protect their WWI oil concessions (Simpson Splendid Blond Beast 1993);
>and 2) to keep the Arabs politically out of balance. (Mansfield The Arabs
>1985)
>
>Zionism seems to have been perverted into an international codeword for
>obtaining petroleum reserves. And both militant Zionism and Nazism seem
>to be creations and/or tools of the monied interests. According to
>Simpson's Splendid Blond Beast [1993], the American's claimed to be
>de-Nazifying Germany following WWII; but in fact they did quite the
>opposite.
>
>Lord Balfour's 1919 racist, false, "four great powers" form of Judaism
>currently costs Americans about $3 billion dollars per year - about $9
>million dollars per day - in addition to the $200 million dollars per
>year spent to make American infants scream and writhe and bleed through
>orthodox medicine's bastardization of Judaism's mythical "Covenant."
>
>This multi-billion dollar annual foreign aid boondoggle may be part of
>the reason why that mainstay of government - mainstream medicine - used
>HIV/AIDS lies to perpetuate infant screams of circumcision and $200
>million in medical profits nationwide.
>
>Using unnamed "intelligence sources," former Justice Department Attorney
>John Loftus and Mark Aarons make some rather astonishing assertions about
>Richard Nixon and Nazis - and about a Zionist cell codenamed "Max" that
>orchestrated the deaths of about 20 million Russians and Germans as six
>million Jews were slaughtered. See Loftus and Aarons. The Secret War
>Against the Jews. 1994.
>
>In all this mess, I know two things for sure: Ronald Poland, MD
>perpetuated organized medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain"
>neurology...
>
>And "the four great powers" had no business "adopting Zionism for better
>or for worse..."
>
>I sincerely believe Judaism was hijacked and modern medicine was
>hijacked. Paraphrasing Loftus and Aarons [1994], "We are all Jews..."
>
>>>>>END excerpt of Dr. Poland suing Gastaldo?
>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/b102fa0f001349b8