I'm out
Kim Collins, DoulaMomma
Childbirth Services For Mommas & Their Families
917.992.4424 doulamomma@...
http://www.doulamomma.com
Read my blog at http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
> From: tgastaldo@...
> To: doulamomma1@...; carter19604@...; liduggan@...; lencat@...; askconsumeraffairs@...; ishi@...
> CC: jerb40@...; nwwlc@...; drkugler@...; info@...; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com; etienne.deharven@...; robert.leppo@...; peter.duesberg@...; charles.geshekter@...; roberto.giraldo@...; claus.koehnlein@...; frank.lusardi@...; christine.maggiore@...; bryan.owen@...; david.rasnick@...; gordon.stewart@...; hiv-aids@...; wintera@...; webmaster@...; redalerts@...; aidsmythexposed@...; info@...; ihooper@...; arehab@...; arubin@...; lcatanzarolaw@...
> Subject: NJ doula/attorney fails to report mass battery/mass child abuse
> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 06:54:07 -0800
>
> Rachel Naomi Remen, MD via ishi@...: Please spread the word
> about the bizarre OBGYN birth-canal-closing and baby-blood-robbery crimes.
> MDs should be pardoned in advance. As med students MDs are TRAINED to
> "perform" these obvious felonies. See the ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training
> video, an indirect video admission, discussed below...
>
> NJ DOULA/ATTORNEY FAILS TO REPORT MASS BATTERY/MASS CHILD ABUSE
>
> Attention: NJ Attorney General ANN MILGRAM via
> askconsumeraffairs@....
>
> OBGYNs are failing to inform women that they are closing birth canals up to
> 30% and robbing up to 50% of blood volume from babies. OBGYNs indirectly
> ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely closing birth canals up to
> 30%. See below.
>
> Also, OBGYNs have been telling LIES to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies at
> the "Dents in babies' skulls" URL below.
>
> It's mass battery against children - OBVIOUS mass battery against children -
> MASS CHILD ABUSE.
>
> The mass child abuse involves mass ADULT abuse - mass birth-canal-closed
> VAGINA SLICING - the most common reason for hospitalization of women after
> childbirth. See below.
>
> NJ DOULA/ATTORNEY KIM COLLINS' FAILURE TO REPORT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE
>
> Doula/Attorney Kim Collins resides in New Jersey where failure to obtain
> informed consent is a battery.
> http://www.drlaw.com/Battery%20-%20More%20Ways%20to%20be%20Sued.pdf
>
> Doula/Attorney Collins in effect DEFINES "childbirth in America" as mass
> battery - mass failure to obtain informed consent, as in,
>
> "Immediately, I saw many parallels between [Christine Maggiore's] experience
> of being diagnosed HIV+ and childbirth in America;
> the lack of truly informed consent..."
> http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
>
> Atty Collins doesn't SAY "battery." Why not?
>
> OBGYNs are committing mass battery against pregnant women and CHILDREN.
>
> Mass battery against children is MASS CHILD ABUSE.
>
> Atty Collins doesn't SAY "mass child abuse." Why not?
>
> Atty Collins doesn't REPORT mass child abuse either - even after I noted
> that New Jersey threatens IMPRISONMENT for failure to report child abuse:
>
> > "In New Jersey, any person having reasonable cause to believe that a
> child
> > has been subjected to abuse or acts of abuse should immediately report
> > this
> > information to the State Central Registry (SCR). If the child is in
> > immediate danger, call 911 as well as 1-877 NJ ABUSE. A concerned caller
> > does not need proof to report an allegation of child abuse and can make
> > the
> > report anonymously...Any person who knowingly fails to report suspected
> > abuse or neglect according to the law or to comply with the provisions of
> > the law is a disorderly person and subject to a fine of up to $1000 or up
> > to
> > six months imprisonment, or both."
> > http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/abuse/how/
>
> Attorney Collins indicates that OBGYNs create an atmosphere of FEAR,
>
> "...the pervasive feeling that it's not okay
> to ask too many questions or to say 'No, thanks' to tests or protocols-tests
> that are sometimes flawed or have not been shown to improve outcomes-with
> matters only being complicated by healthcare economics."
> http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
>
> TERRORISTS create an atmosphere of fear.
>
> So I say again to Attorney Collins (and anyone else reading):
>
> >
> > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism. It's
> > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > just
> > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL.
>
> NOTE: Atty Collins still indicates that my comments about rampant domestic
> terrorism by OBGYNs appear to others be her comments. My comments are not
> Atty Collins comments. I am ADDRESSING Atty Collins above - not quoting
> her. Obviously, Atty Collins and I share a concern that OBGYNs are creating
> an atmosphere of fear and committing mass battery/mass failure to obtain
> informed consent. She just isn't SAYING the words "fear" - "terrorism" -
> "mass child abuse" - and more importantly - she isn't taking the minimum
> action required by law to protect children. She isn't REPORTING. She
> indicates that doing these things amounts to "spewing" "extreme views" to
> which she does not "subscribe."
>
> Since when is it OK to "subscribe" to Atty Collins' view that suspected
> child abuse - mass battery - mass failure to obtain informed consent -
> should NOT be reported?
>
> While her "extreme view" (that failure to report suspected child abuse is
> OK) may be buttressed by law enforcement failure to prosecute - that does
> not mean it is OK.
>
> MDs **KNOW** law enforcement is looking the other way. See the arrogant
> boast of Steve Harris, MD, quoted below.
>
> NJ Attorney General Ann Milgram: I've emailed you before. Please stop
> looking the other way. Please stop the mass child abuse.
>
> My apologies if you just never received or read my previous emails.
> EMERGENCY. Please take action.
>
> My further comments are interspersed ####
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: doula momma
> To: tgastaldo@... ; carter19604@... ; Lisa Duggin ;
> lencat@...
> Cc: jerb40@... ; nwwlc@... ; drkugler@... ;
> info@... ; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com ; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com ;
> etienne.deharven@... ; robert.leppo@... ;
> peter.duesberg@... ; charles.geshekter@... ;
> roberto.giraldo@... ; claus.koehnlein@... ;
> frank.lusardi@... ; christine.maggiore@... ;
> bryan.owen@... ; david.rasnick@... ;
> gordon.stewart@... ; hiv-aids@... ; wintera@... ;
> webmaster@... ; redalerts@... ;
> aidsmythexposed@... ; info@... ; ihooper@... ;
> arehab@... ; arubin@... ; len catanzaro
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 9:20 PM
> Subject: RE: NO RETRACTION - Atty Kim Collins - if you SUSPECT child abuse -
> REPORT
>
>
> Mr. Gastaldo,
>
> #### Atty Collins, your passive aggressive titular etiquette slap is noted.
> See "Correction" below.
>
> You are not quoting my article regarding Christine Maggiore...you are
> quoting the bio that accompanies every piece I write because it is part of
> my history.
>
> #### Thank you for clarifying that in EVERY piece you call yourself an
> attorney.
>
> I write for a parenting publication on pregnancy and birth and was given the
> column because of the many hundreds of births I have attended and not
> becasue I went to law school.
>
> #### I don't care why you were given the assignment. You identified
> yourself as an attorney. You ALWAYS identify yourself as an attorney.
> Again, thank you for that clarification.
>
> So if you insist on calling me an attorney,
>
> #### YOU insist on calling yourself an attorney - a "reformed" attorney -
> it's in "the bio that accompanies every piece [you] write"...
>
> then also call me a mother and wife and belly cast maker - those are in my
> bio for the magazine as well and are more relevant to the Maggiore article.
>
> #### I **DID** this - in my original post - and you still complained!
>
> You do not have my permission to use me or my biography to spew your extreme
> views - views to which I do not subscribe. I again say that your doing so
> is misleading and inaccurate.
>
> #### I do not NEED your permission to note that you - an attorney - in
> effect DEFINE childbirth as battery/crime/failure to obtain informed consent
> but fail to SAY the words "battery" or "crime." I do not need your
> permission to note that you fail to say that a crime of MASS CHILD ABUSE is
> being committed when OBGYNs fail to obtain informed consent from pregnant
> women. The accompanying mass ADULT abuse - mass vagina slicing (OBGYNs
> fraudulently/surgically inferring that everything possible is being done to
> open the birth canal even as the birth canal is kept closed the "extra" up
> to 30%) - just makes matters worse.
>
> Your refusal to retract
>
> #### Retract WHAT? I do not agree with your claim that it appears that I
> quoted you (see above) - but nonetheless I made the clarification that I was
> ADDRESSING you - not quoting you - again - see above.
>
> does not address the aggregious misquote
>
> #### I think you mean "egregious"?
>
> - you are attributing someone else's polarizing words to me and that is
> sloppy and wrong.
>
> #### No. It is sloppy and wrong for you to keep saying that I was quoting
> you - not addressing you - even after I clarified this at your request. See
> below.
>
> You might take note of the fact that I am not a public figure, but a private
> citizen.
>
> #### Your veiled SLAPP threat/libel lawsuit threat is noted. Truth is not
> libel.
>
> #### I was SLAPP'd before - before I realized that SLAPPs are easy to
> defeat...
>
> See Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing...
> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4
>
> #### Why does your blog say "former" attorney...
> http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
>
> #### ...but your history says "reformed" attorney?
> http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
>
> #### If you don't want people identifying you as an attorney ("former"
> "reformed" or otherwise) - you might just leave that bit out.
>
> Kim Collins, DoulaMomma
> Childbirth Services For Mommas & Their Families
> 917.992.4424 doulamomma@...
> http://www.doulamomma.com
>
> Read my blog at http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
>
> #### Regarding Rachel Naomi Remen, MD, you write on your blog: "She spoke
> about how the rigors of medical school and the path to becoming a physician
> can actually harm one's sense of humanity and compassion...I found her words
> so enlightening and was feeling such compassion for the doctors I have
> sometimes really resented or by whom I and my clients are occasionally
> frustrated. They have given up so much to be physicians and it hurts them
> and it hurts us, their patients."
> http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
>
> #### As I noted for Dr. Remen above: MDs should be pardoned in advance. As
> med students MDs are TRAINED to "perform" these obvious felonies. See the
> ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training video, an indirect video admission,
> discussed below...
>
> #### MDs give up a LOT as they allow themselves to be TRAINED to "perform"
> obvious felonies. They are locked in to a life of crime. Stopping the
> crimes is tantamount to admitting the crimes. Pardons in advance seem to me
> the only way out of the mess.
>
> #### Sincerely,
>
> #### Todd
>
> #### Dr. Gastaldo
> #### Hillsboro, Oregon
> #### USA
> #### todd@ chiromotion.com
>
>
> > From: tgastaldo@...
> > To: doulamomma1@...; carter19604@...; liduggan@...;
> > lencat@...
> > CC: jerb40@...; nwwlc@...; drkugler@...;
> > info@...; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com;
> > etienne.deharven@...; robert.leppo@...;
> > peter.duesberg@...; charles.geshekter@...;
> > roberto.giraldo@...; claus.koehnlein@...;
> > frank.lusardi@...; christine.maggiore@...;
> > bryan.owen@...; david.rasnick@...;
> > gordon.stewart@...; hiv-aids@...; wintera@...;
> > webmaster@...; redalerts@...;
> > aidsmythexposed@...; info@...; ihooper@...;
> > arehab@...; arubin@...; lcatanzarolaw@...
> > Subject: NO RETRACTION - Atty Kim Collins - if you SUSPECT child abuse -
> > REPORT
> > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:56:22 -0800
> >
> > NO RETRACTION: Attorney Kim Collins called herself a REFORMED attorney
> > when
> > she wrote the article I quoted. I **quoted** her calling herself a
> > "reformed" attorney. Now she is saying she did not write that article as
> > an
> > attorney. If she did not want to be identified as having written that
> > article as an attorney, she should not have noted in her article that she
> > is
> > an attorney - "reformed" or otherwise.
> >
> > REPORT: See the New Jersey suspected child abuse reporting rule, quoted
> > below.
> >
> > Atty Collins writes, "Although I am admitted, I no longer practice law."
> > If
> > Attorney Kim Collins so much as SUSPECTS mass child abuse, it is time for
> > her to practice some law to help stop the obvious OBGYN crimes. REPORTING
> > is the minimum action when child abuse is suspected - the minimum action
> > to
> > "make birth better for moms and babies..."
> >
> > READERS (including Attorney Kim Collins): If you suspect child abuse,
> > please report to law enforcement the obvious crimes being committed by
> > OBGYNs as discussed below.
> >
> > Don't miss the arrogant boast of Steve Harris, MD who indicates that crime
> > isn't crime if MDs commit it and law enforcement looks the other way. See
> > below.
> >
> > Further comments interspersed #####
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: doula momma
> > To: tgastaldo@... ; carter19604@... ; Lisa Duggin ;
> > lencat@...
> > Cc: jerb40@... ; nwwlc@... ; drkugler@... ;
> > info@... ; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com ; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com
> > ;
> > etienne.deharven@... ; robert.leppo@... ;
> > peter.duesberg@... ; charles.geshekter@... ;
> > roberto.giraldo@... ; claus.koehnlein@... ;
> > frank.lusardi@... ; christine.maggiore@... ;
> > bryan.owen@... ; david.rasnick@... ;
> > gordon.stewart@... ; hiv-aids@... ; wintera@... ;
> > webmaster@... ; redalerts@... ;
> > aidsmythexposed@... ; info@... ; ihooper@... ;
> > arehab@... ; arubin@...
> > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 3:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: Are baby screams just 'diatribes'?: Attn: Brian Carter of
> > AIDSMythExposed.com
> >
> >
> > Mr. Gastaldo,
> >
> > #### Correction: It's Dr. Gastaldo when proper titular etiquette is used.
> > You may not think I rate the title "Dr" - if so - so be it - but it was
> > while earning my doctorate in chiropractic that I learned the simple
> > neurology necessary to expose American medicine's phony "babies can't feel
> > pain" neurology and the simple biomechanics necessary to expose American
> > medicine's grisly birth-canal-closing habit.
> >
> > While I share your desire to make birth better for moms and babies,
> >
> > #### No. Your desire isn't anything like mine. My desire includes doing
> > the minimum under the law - reporting suspected child abuse - to protect
> > children. (If you don't suspect child abuse, then your desire is quite
> > unlike mine.)
> >
> > I absolutely disagree with your caustic and inflammatory tone and
> > language.
> >
> > #### I substitute graphic description for euphemism. For example, instead
> > of "routine infant circumcision" I say "mass infant penis ripping and
> > slicing." This description - however accurate - offends some people -
> > understandably - as obvious crime SHOULD offend people.
> >
> > #### I also call the OBGYN crimes what they are - crimes. We live in a
> > medico-"legal" "just us" system. An attorney who protects MD criminals no
> > longer surprises me.
> >
> > Rather, I feel it hurts the cause
> >
> > #### There are VARIOUS causes - various CRIMES. Sorry to be "caustic and
> > inflammatory" but they are OBVIOUS crimes.
> >
> > and do not wish to be associated with your efforts.
> >
> > #### If you see error in my work, please point it out. If I agree, I will
> > issue an apology. I see no error on my part.
> >
> > I am deeply concerned about the use of my name in the text below.
> >
> > #### I am deeply concerned that your train of thought takes a dirt road.
> > As
> > noted above, Attorney Kim Collins called herself a REFORMED attorney when
> > she wrote the article I quoted. I **quoted** her calling herself a
> > "reformed" attorney. Now she is saying she did not write that article as
> > an
> > attorney. If she did not want to be identified as having written that
> > article as an attorney, she should not have noted in her article that she
> > is
> > an attorney - "reformed" or otherwise.
> >
> > I stand behind the piece I wrote on Christine Maggiore,
> >
> > #### I never said you DIDN'T stand behind your piece!
> >
> > whom I now consider a long distance friend.
> >
> > #### How sad that she lost a daughter.
> >
> > However I wrote it as a doula, mother and writer, not as an attorney.
> >
> > #### FALSE. You identified yourself as an attorney. You wrote or caused to
> > be written at the bottom of the article: "Kim Collins, also known as
> > DoulaMomma, lives with her husband and three sons in South Orange. A
> > 'reformed' attorney, she now teaches childbirth classes, counsels on birth
> > options, creates belly casts, and works as a birth doula. Reach her at
> > doulamomma1@...."
> > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> >
> > #### If "reformed" attorney means you are admitted but no longer practice
> > law, then SAY so. If you don't want to be identified as an attorney, DON'T
> > MENTION that you are an attorney.
> >
> > Although I am admitted, I no longer practice law. To imply otherwise is
> > disingenuous and misleading.
> >
> > #### YOU implied otherwise by not explaining that "reformed" means
> > "admitted
> > but no longer practicing law." By your own definition, YOU were
> > disingenuous and misleading.
> >
> > Please correct this immediately by sending a retraction/correction to
> > everyone to whom this was sent and anywhere this was posted online or in
> > print.
> >
> > #### I have corrected you and this is being cc'd to the people who
> > received
> > the post to which you objected as well as being posted to the two
> > chiro-lists.
> >
> > Further, you improperly attribute the quote about OBs being domestic
> > terrorists to me and again refer to me as "ATTORNEY COLLINS". I did not
> > say
> > this.
> >
> > #### I **addressed** you, as in,
> >
> > >
> > > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism.
> > > It's
> > > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > > just
> > > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL.
> >
> > #### **I** said OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism. My
> > apologies if anyone thought I was quoting you.
> >
> > Please cease and desist from using my name in regards to this concept
> >
> > #### WHAT?! You wrote in your article: "Immediately, I saw many parallels
> > between her experience of being diagnosed HIV+ and childbirth in America;
> > the lack of truly informed consent; the pervasive feeling that it's not
> > okay
> > to ask too many questions or to say 'No, thanks' to tests or
> > protocols-tests
> > that are sometimes flawed or have not been shown to improve outcomes-with
> > matters only being complicated by healthcare economics."
> > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> >
> > #### Failure to obtain truly informed consent is a crime - a BATTERY - in
> > many jurisdictions. What is it in your jurisdiction?
> >
> > #### I SAY AGAIN...
> >
> > >
> > > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism.
> > > It's
> > > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > > just
> > > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL.
> >
> > and correct this error immediately by the means requested above.
> >
> > #### I don't see any error. People who - like you - thought I was quoting
> > you now know that I was **addressing** you - assuming they are reading
> > this.
> >
> > If there is someone else to whom I should direct my concerns, please
> > advise.
> >
> > #### Again, if you SUSPECT child abuse - REPORT - to law enforcment.
> >
> > > "In New Jersey, any person having reasonable cause to believe that a
> > child
> > > has been subjected to abuse or acts of abuse should immediately report
> > > this
> > > information to the State Central Registry (SCR). If the child is in
> > > immediate danger, call 911 as well as 1-877 NJ ABUSE. A concerned caller
> > > does not need proof to report an allegation of child abuse and can make
> > > the
> > > report anonymously...Any person who knowingly fails to report suspected
> > > abuse or neglect according to the law or to comply with the provisions
> > > of
> > > the law is a disorderly person and subject to a fine of up to $1000 or
> > > up
> > > to
> > > six months imprisonment, or both."
> > > http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/abuse/how/
> >
> > I am copying my attorney, Leonard J. Catanzaro, Esq., on this email, as
> > well
> > as my publisher at The MotherHood, Lisa Duggan, who can be reached
> > directly
> > at TheMotherHood@...
> >
> > #### I too will copy your attorney - hopefully he is LEONARD J. CATANZARO
> > Attorney at Law
> > 434 Broadway
> > Suite 900
> > New York, New York 10013
> > CONTACT US
> > Leonard J. Catanzaro, Esq.
> > Associate:
> > Steven R. Perkel, Esq.
> > Paralegals:
> > Stacey Ann Francis
> > Alicia Bucknol
> > nyc (212) 226-1234
> > nassau (516) 561-6661
> > fax (212) 226-1392
> > Via lcatanzarolaw@...
> > http://www.quicklien.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kimberley Collins, CD(DONA)
> >
> > #### You are welcome Kim.
> >
> > Kim Collins, DoulaMomma
> > Childbirth Services For Mommas & Their Families
> > 917.992.4424 doulamomma@...
> > http://www.doulamomma.com
> >
> > Read my blog at http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > In a message dated 12/6/2008 9:56:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> > > tgastaldo@... writes:
> > > CAIR: OBGYNs AS TERRORISTS:
> > >
> > > CHRISTINE MAGGIORE'S HIV+ BRUSH WITH OBSTETRICS
> > >
> > > (Attn CAIR: Jason Erb and Ibrahim and Ahmed and Amina: Please see my
> > > Open
> > > Letter below - esp. the postscript.)
> > >
> > > "When [Christine Maggiore] was pregnant...she went to several OBs and
> > > was
> > > either turned away or told she had to take AZT and have a cesarean
> > > birth."
> > > --By ATTORNEY KIM COLLINS. From the preface to an interview of Christine
> > > Maggiore by "reformed" attorney Kim Collins who "now teaches childbirth
> > > classes, counsels on birth options, creates belly casts, and works as a
> > > birth doula. Reach her at doulamomma1@...."
> > > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> > >
> > > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism.
> > > It's
> > > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > > just
> > > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL. (Attorney Sara Ainsworth via
> > > nwwlc@..., please help stop domestic terrorism by OBGYNs. Modern
> > > medicine is - in effect - a WORLD RELIGION - see the quotes below. One
> > > American MD arrogantly boasts - in effect - that crime is not crime when
> > > MDs
> > > commit it. See the quote from Steve Harris, MD, reproduced below.)
> > >
> > > OBGYNS "PRACTICE" TRULY BIZARRE DOMESTIC TERRORISM
> > >
> > > The grisly spectacle of obstetricians prescribing the DNA chain
> > > terminator
> > > AZT BEFORE birth is as bizarre as the grisly spectacle of obstetricians
> > > senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% DURING birth - by using
> > > semisitting or dorsal delivery. (The obstetric practice of routinely
> > > asphyxiating babies/permanently amputating up to 50% of their blood
> > > volume
> > > is also grisly - easily ended. See below.)
> > >
> > > BIZARRE BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING/SPINAL MANIPULATION
> > >
> > > In MOST births, obstetricians use birth-canal-closing semisitting or
> > > dorsal
> > > delivery positions - both of which close the birth canal up to 30%. (For
> > > the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and radiographic and
> > > clinical
> > > cites from the medical literature, see Gastaldo 1992, FREE ACCESS
> > > below.)
> > >
> > > WORSE: When babies get stuck, obstetricians KEEP birth canals closed the
> > > "extra" up to 30% - keep women semisitting or dorsal - as they pull with
> > > forceps/vacuums (1 in 10 births) - sometimes pulling so hard they rip
> > > spinal
> > > nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
> > >
> > > Some babies are DYING - and obstetric experts are LYING. See the Four OB
> > > Lies in "Dents in babies' skulls" URL below. (THE KICKER: Obstetricians
> > > indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely closing
> > > birth
> > > canals up to 30%. See below.)
> > >
> > > Nurses are in on the grisly gag - at least nurse leaders are...Yale
> > > CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney Burst ignored my pleas and promoted
> > > birth-canal-closing/semisitting in her Midwifery text.
> > >
> > > SPEAKING OF CHILDREN DYING...
> > >
> > > How sad that Christine Maggiore's three-year-old daughter ELIZA JANE
> > > dodged
> > > the AZT/DNA-chain-terminator bullet before birth but later died after
> > > that
> > > amoxicillin incident...
> > > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> > >
> > > INTERESTING COINCIDENCE: One of Christine Maggiore's pediatricians -
> > > Paul
> > > Fleiss, MD - protested in The Lancet [1995] another bizarre obstetric
> > > behavior - mass infant penis ripping and slicing - American medicine's
> > > most
> > > frequent surgical behavior toward males, as in,
> > >
> > > "[C]onsistent with torture...[w]ith or without anaesthesia...Despite the
> > > obviously irrational cruelty of circumcision, the profit incentive in
> > > American medical practice is unlikely to allow science or human rights
> > > principles to interrupt the highly lucrative American circumcision
> > > industry.
> > > It is now time for European medical associations to condemn the North
> > > American medical community for participating in and profiting from what
> > > is
> > > by any standard a senseless and barbaric sexual mutilation of innocent
> > > children."
> > > --Fleiss PM. Letter. Lancet 1995;345:927.
> > > http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/fleiss/
> > >
> > > DR. FLEISS ("consistent with torture") obviously suspects mass child
> > > abuse.
> > > I wonder if he ever filed a suspected child abuse report. Maybe
> > > Christine
> > > Maggiore will ask him...
> > >
> > > I wonder if *Christine Maggiore* suspects the mass infant penis ripping
> > > and
> > > slicing is child abuse...
> > >
> > > REMEMBER: The no-medical-indication mass infant penis ripping and
> > > slicing
> > > should have ended BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago -
> > > back
> > > in
> > > 1987 when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.
> > > See
> > > below. Ending the screams now - finally - instantly saves America an
> > > estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE
> > > American males can make for themselves in adulthood.
> > >
> > > I wonder if Christine Maggiore suspects the BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING is mass
> > > child abuse...
> > >
> > > I will cc silent Christine Maggiore and her fellow Rethinking AIDS
> > > mucky-mucks via etienne.deharven@...;
> > > robert.leppo@...; peter.duesberg@...;
> > > charles.geshekter@...;
> > > roberto.giraldo@...;
> > > claus.koehnlein@...; frank.lusardi@...;
> > > christine.maggiore@...; bryan.owen@...;
> > > david.rasnick@...; gordon.stewart@....
> > >
> > > I wonder if JASON ERB suspects mass child abuse...
> > >
> > > Jason "responded" to my post, reproduced below.
> > >
> > > I now reply...
> > >
> > > JASON ERB HELPS PERPETUATE MASS CHILD ABUSE.
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below.
> > >
> > > Jason Erb
> > > via jerb40@...
> > >
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > I say again: Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing
> > > keeping American MDs out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass
> > > infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > Thank you for offering your disagreement.
> > >
> > > My comments are interspersed below ####.
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Jason Erb
> > > To: Todd Gastaldo
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:36 AM
> > > Subject: Re: An 'HIV/AIDS risk-lowering' 'chop chop'?
> > >
> > >
> > > Todd,
> > >
> > > you said "Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing
> > > keeping
> > > American MDs out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime..."
> > >
> > > I disagree. The circumcision of newborn baby boys in the U.S. was widely
> > > practiced decades before Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis came on to the
> > > scene
> > > in
> > > 1984.
> > >
> > > #### Jason, IT DOESN'T MATTER how long obvious child abuse is practiced.
> > > Child abuse is a CRIME which is to be reported IMMEDIATELY - even if it
> > > is
> > > so much as SUSPECTED. Your euphemism. "Circumcision of newborn baby
> > > boys"
> > > helps conceal the fact that the crime is - literally - mass ripping and
> > > slicing of infant penises - "widely practiced for decades" with PHONY
> > > "BABIES CAN'T FEEL PAIN" NEUROLOGY AND NO MEDICAL INDICATIONS.
> > >
> > > #### In late 1987 - BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago - I
> > > pointed out American medicine's uncritical PERPETUATION of the phony
> > > "babies
> > > can't feel pain" neurology.
> > >
> > > #### In March 1988, suddenly, by voice vote of the California Medical
> > > Association House of Delegates - the no-medical-indications mass infant
> > > penis ripping and slicing became "an effective public health measure"
> > > "confirmed" in Africa to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS. By passing
> > > CMA
> > > Res. 305-88, the CMA House of Delegates in effect voted against the
> > > CMA's
> > > own Sceintific Board which had just REJECTED the Robert C.
> > > Gallo-HIV/AIDS-hypothesis-based hoax. To my knowledge, CMA Res. 305-88
> > > is
> > > still in force.
> > >
> > > ### Also in late 1987, I petitioned Congress for a religious exemption
> > > from
> > > the child abuse laws for "mini-circ" - the ancient Jewish ritual that
> > > leaves
> > > most of the foreskin on the penis. (American MDs are TOTAL foreskin
> > > amputators.)
> > >
> > > ### In the January 1988 issue of PEDIATRICS, American MDs came out
> > > against
> > > ALL religious exemptions from the child abuse laws. (An exemption from
> > > the
> > > child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish "mini-circ" would have made it
> > > obvious to all that American medicine's TOTAL amputation is child
> > > abuse.)
> > >
> > > ### In February 1988 issue of PEDIATRICS, American MDs came out in favor
> > > of
> > > anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse.
> > >
> > > ### American MDs were scrambling. Prison is not a pleasant thought for
> > > anyone. (BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
> > > students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies. See the ACOG
> > > Shoulder Dystocia training video discussed below.)
> > >
> > > ### The 1988-9 American-MD-scramble was so convincing that American MDs
> > > had
> > > to be informed that American MD-pediatricians are (officially)
> > > ANTI-circumcision, as in,
> > >
> > > MEDICAL TRIBUNE 30:16 (8 June 1989)
> > > FORGET THOSE HEADLINES ABOUT CIRCUMCISION
> > > AAP IS AGAINST ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION
> > > http://www.cirp.org/CIRP/news/1989.06.08%3aMedicalTribune
> > >
> > > ### Jason Erb continues...
> > >
> > > Also, the hypothesis isn't just Gallo's anymore but has become an
> > > entrenched
> > > worldwide socio-political-financial construct.
> > >
> > > #### One would EXPECT American MDs to tie into "an entrenched worldwide
> > > socio-political-financial construct" in their attempt to stay out of
> > > prison
> > > for their ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime. There
> > > aren't
> > > enough MDs to serve all the prison time. Remaining silent about the
> > > CMA's
> > > obvious HIV/AIDS hoax only helps keep the construct entrenched.
> > >
> > > #### As I indicated to Duesberg in 1990-1 and as I am STILL indicating
> > > to
> > > Duesberg (et al.) (as they sit in stony silence - babies be damned):
> > > American MDs USED - American MDs STILL USE the "entrenched worldwide
> > > socio-political-construct" ultimately based on Gallo's phony "antibody
> > > means
> > > current disease/HIV/AIDS" immunology - to perpetuate the mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime - yet there are STILL no medical indications -
> > > only a history of phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and
> > > American-taxpayer-funded "scientific" testing and promotion of African
> > > penis
> > > slicing in an attempt to PROVE the obvious hoax (CMA Res. 305-88) -
> > > which
> > > (I
> > > say again) is ultimately based on Robert C. Gallo's phony "antibody
> > > means
> > > current disease/HIV/AIDS" immunology.
> > >
> > > The 2600+ members of Rethinking AIDS (of which you yourself are a member
> > > as
> > > well as Peter Duesberg who you challenge) are among those who have
> > > publicly
> > > expressed their doubts about the HIV/AIDS hypothesis.
> > >
> > > "PETER DUESBERG WHO[M] YOU CHALLENGE..."
> > >
> > > #### I **thank** Peter Duesberg for pointing out Robert C. Gallo's lame
> > > HIV/AIDS hypothesis! I only challenge him to finally start publicly
> > > discussing the FACT that Gallo's lame HIV/AIDS hypothesis was invoked
> > > over
> > > the objection of the CMA Scientific Board - as part of American
> > > medicine's
> > > lame attempt to cover-up phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and an
> > > ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > So let's talk about how we can work together to subject the HIV/AIDS
> > > hypothesis to intense public, medical, and scientific scrutiny.
> > >
> > > #### I **am** talking about "how we can work together to subject the
> > > HIV/AIDS hypothesis to intense public, medical, and scientific
> > > scrutiny."
> > >
> > > If your belief proves to be true,
> > >
> > > #### I am not stating mere "belief": It is a FACT that Robert C. Gallo's
> > > lame HIV/AIDS hypothesis was invoked over the objection of the CMA
> > > Scientific Board as part of American medicine's lame attempt to cover-up
> > > phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and the ongoing mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime. See above.
> > >
> > > then you will have achieved your goal regarding the practice of
> > > circumcision
> > > as a consequence of us working together on the HIV/AIDS front.
> > >
> > > #### My "goal regarding the practice of circumcision" includes helping
> > > Rethinking AIDS answer a key question...
> > >
> > > #### As I noted in my post...
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS ASKS: ARE AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > Acclaimed AIDS expert James Chin, MD, MPH reportedly believes that
> > > AFRICAN
> > > PROMISCUITY is the reason Sub-Saharan Africa is the only uncircumcised
> > > place
> > > on Earth that suffers a heterosexual AIDS epidemic.
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > **ARE** AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > TWO GOOD QUESTIONS came from RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter
> > > Duesberg, PhD et al., emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. "Do scientific studies support the conclusion that Africans are an
> > > especially promiscuous people?
> > >
> > > 2. "And if the majority of males throughout the world are uncircumcised,
> > > why
> > > does naturally
> > > occurring male anatomy lead to AIDS only in Africa?"
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > THE SHORT ANSWER: IT DOESN'T MATTER whether Africans are especially
> > > promiscuous. Naturally occurring male anatomy leads to AIDS only in
> > > Africa
> > > because back in 1987 American MDs correctly feared that RIPPING and
> > > SLICING
> > > that very same naturally occurring male anatomy on infants leads to
> > > PRISON
> > > in America...
> > >
> > > Two questions for RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.,
> > > emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. In [1990-1], why did Rethinking AIDS member Peter Duesberg, PhD
> > > ignore
> > > the
> > > fact that American MDs had been caught perpetuating phony
> > > "babies can't feel pain" neurology as they committed obvious mass child
> > > abuse - ripping and slicing infant penises en masse for no medical
> > > indication?
> > >
> > > 2. Why did Duesberg ignore the fact that, in a lame attempt to COVER-UP
> > > their obvious mass child abuse crime, American MDs had just ignored
> > > their own Scientific Board to fraudulently declare their NO MEDICAL
> > > INDICATION mass infant penis
> > > ripping and slicing "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS (California Medical
> > > Association
> > > Res. 305-99)?
> > >
> > > Rethinking AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.) are STILL ignoring
> > > the
> > > bizarre CMA behavior - babies be damned...
> > >
> > > >>>>END excerpt of my original post - which Jason blithely ignored.
> > >
> > > REGARDING MY "RIPPING AND SLICING" PHRASEOLOGY...
> > >
> > > FIRST, INFANT PENISES ARE RIPPED...
> > >
> > > "[The first step in all circumcisions]...freeing adhesions [ripping
> > > foreskin from glans], is
> > > tantamount to cruel and unusual punishment and is unfounded
> > > physiologically and
> > > medically." [Kaplan GW: Circumcision: An overview. Current Problems
> > > in Pediatrics, 1977;7(5):8.]
> > >
> > > THEN INFANT PENISES ARE SLICED...
> > >
> > > "One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced
> > > off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald
> > > Goldman, PhD, author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)
> > >
> > > "The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
> > > about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin."
> > > http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD,
> > > author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)
> > >
> > > "[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an
> > > acknowledged
> > > hazard to health." [Katz M. Circumcision. AJDC 1980;134:1098]
> > >
> > > Attention California DAs who might be reading...
> > >
> > > IN CALIFORNIA: Prosecution of child abuse "does not require any
> > > intent to
> > > violate law, or to injure another, or to acquire any
> > > advantage." [People v.
> > > Pointer (App. 1 Dist. 1984) 199 Cal. Rptr. 357 cited/quoted under
> > > California
> > > Penal Code Section 273a]
> > >
> > > "After years of strapping babies down for this brutal procedure and
> > > listening to their screams, we couldn't take it any
> > > longer." [Sperlich
> > > BK,
> > > Conant M. Am J Nurs (Jun)1994:16.]
> > >
> > > "[C]onstitutional rights...including freedom of religion, are
> > > inadequate to
> > > prevent the states from using their authority to treat circumcision
> > > as
> > > child
> > > abuse...The most obvious way to proceed with enforcement...is through
> > > criminal prosecution under existing state laws." [Brigman WE:
> > > Circumcision
> > > as child abuse: the legal and Constitutional issues. Journal of
> > > Family
> > > Law,
> > > 1984;23(3):337-57]
> > >
> > > PARENTS CANNOT LEGALLY MARTYR THEIR CHILDREN
> > >
> > > According to the US Supreme Court writing in Prince v. Massachusetts,
> > > 321 U.S. 158
> > > (1944): "parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it
> > > does
> > > not follow they are free ... to make martyrs of their children before
> > > they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can
> > > make that choice for themselves."
> > >
> > > Most American males are still imprisoned to have their penises ripped
> > > and sliced...
> > >
> > > "In less than 30 seconds a nurse can immobilize the struggling
> > > infant securely in the correct position with Circumstraint.
> > > Soft, wide Velcro straps encircle the infant's elbows and knees,
> > > depriving him of leverage. He's held securely without danger of
> > > escape...[The Circumstraint elevates the hips]...perfectly
> > > presenting the genitalia." [From an ad for the Olympic
> > > Circumstraint, manufactured in Washington state, emphasis added.]
> > >
> > > THIS OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL TAKING OF INFANT PRISONERS (AND SLICING OFF
> > > INFANT PENIS PARTS) IS OBVIOUSLY AGAINST MEDICAL ETHICS...
> > >
> > > Here is a relevant quote from the American Academy of Pediatrics/AAP:
> > >
> > > "[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient exist
> > > independent of parental desires...A[n infant's screaming writhing and
> > > bleeding obviously constitutes the - TDG] patient's reluctance or
> > > refusal to assent [and - TDG] should...carry considerable weight when
> > > the proposed intervention is not essential to his or her welfare and/
> > > or
> > > can be deferred without substantial risk... [T]hose who care for
> > > children need to provide for measures to solicit assent and to attend
> > > to possible abuses of 'raw' power over children when ethical
> > > conflicts
> > > occur."
> > > AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
> > > Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric
> > > Practice(RE9510)
> > > Pediatrics Volume 95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317
> > > http://www.aap.org/policy/00662.html
> > >
> > > THE LONDON CASE: "JUDICIAL ABSURDITY"
> > >
> > > In 1989, Attorney Richard W. Morris called it "judicial absurdity"
> > > when California courts in effect declared that parents may consent to
> > > have MDs take their infants prisoner for the penis ripping and
> > > slicing
> > > - and the California Supreme Court silently went along with the
> > > grisly
> > > gag.
> > > http://www.nocirc.org/symposia/first/morris.html
> > >
> > > GOOD NEWS: At least one subsequent California court reportedly
> > > ignored this London precedent.
> > >
> > > "Infants, legally mentally incompetent, ARE...protected from
> > > nonrequired medical treatments under the Probate Code" (emphasis
> > > added), according to the following article...
> > >
> > > >>>>BEGIN excerpt of http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/
> > >
> > >
> > > In an unpublished 1987 decision of the Court of Appeal, 1st District
> > > No. A03040, London v. Glassner et al., petition for review denied,
> > > parental consent to "any ... medical treatment" is found to be
> > > without
> > > apparent limitation, regardless of purpose. Civil Code 25.8 cited as
> > > authority for this decision provides: Either parent if both parents
> > > have legal custody, or the parent or person having legal custody or
> > > the legal guardian of a minor may authorize in writing any adult
> > > person into whose care the minor has been entrusted to consent to ANY
> > > X-ray examination, anesthetic, MEDICAL OR SURGICAL diagnosis or
> > > TREATMENT and hospital care to be rendered to the minor under the
> > > general or special supervision and UPON THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN AND
> > > SURGEON licensed under the provisions of the Medical Practice Act or
> > > to consent to an X-ray examination, anesthetic, dental, or surgical
> > > diagnosis or treatment and hospital care to be rendered to the minor
> > > by a dentist licensed under the provision s of the Dental Practice
> > > Act
> > > or to consent to an X-ray examination, anesthetic, dental or surgical
> > > diagnosis or treatment and hospital care to be rendered to the minor
> > > by a dentist licensed under the provisions of the Dental Practice
> > > Act." (emphasis added.) This court then held "(a) circumcision is a
> > > medical, surgical treatment," rejecting plaintiff's public policy
> > > argument that children should be protected from suffering
> > > unjustifiable pain or risk - based on the premise that parents cannot
> > > consent to surgical procedures which have no medical purpose." While
> > > this section does not specifically grant any direct authority for
> > > parental consent, the trial court found the legislative history was
> > > to
> > > extend the common law authority of parents.
> > >
> > > The London decision is unsupported and contradicted by the California
> > > Supreme Court's decision in Conservatorship of Valerie N. v. Valerie
> > > N. (1985) 219 Cal. Rptr. 387). The case deals with the rights of
> > > parents of a mentally incompetent adult to consent to sterilization,
> > > a
> > > recognized medical treatment. The court found that the parents as
> > > "conservators were not entitled to have conservatee, who was unable
> > > to
> > > consent to sterilization, sterilized inasmuch as there was neither
> > > evidence of necessity ... nor sufficient evidence that less intrusive
> > > means ... were not presently available to conservatee." This court
> > > further holds "... as to those medical procedures permitted after
> > > court authorization the Legislature has required a judicial
> > > determination that the condition of the conservatee 'require the
> > > recommended course of medical treatment'" as provided in Cal. Probate
> > > Code Section 2357. subh. (h)(1). Infants, legally mentally
> > > incompetent, are therefore protected from nonrequired medical
> > > treatments under the Probate Code.
> > >
> > > [One of - TDG] the most important Supreme Court cases reflecting
> > > state
> > > and judicial intervention [is] Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158
> > > (1944)...The essence of the Prince decision is captured in the
> > > statement that "parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But
> > > it does not follow they are free ... to make martyrs of their
> > > children
> > > before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when
> > > they can make that choice for themselves." Prince, supra, 170. Under
> > > Yoder, supra 234, parental authority and discretion may be challenged
> > > "if it appears that parental decisions will jeopardize the health and
> > > safety of the child..." This demonstrates that the child's right to
> > > safety overcomes parental constitutional rights.
> > >
> > > >>>>END excerpt of http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/
> > >
> > >
> > > When the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in a religious
> > > freedom case - Oregon
> > > Employment v. Smith (1990) - the American Jewish Congress co-
> > > sponsored
> > > the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, fearing that states would
> > > invoke the Smith decision and use child protection statutes to end
> > > ritual
> > > circumcision. [Greenhouse L. NY Times 5/11/90:A10].
> > >
> > > But the American Jewish Congress needn't have bothered. The ritual
> > > mutilation of infants was illegal (but tolerated)
> > > before the Smith decision - and (most significantly) it is STILL
> > > illegal (but tolerated).
> > >
> > > Significantly, Jewish authorities (vigorously contested by other
> > > Jewish authorities) offer Jewish parents an ideological basis not to
> > > circumcise:
> > >
> > > 1) "[Circumcision] is not a sacrament which inducts the infant into
> > > Judaism: his birth does that" [Rabbi MN Kertner. What is a Jew? New
> > > York: Macmillan, 1973,1993] (Note: Adult Jews who wish to remain
> > > uncircumcised are accepted under Israel's Law of Return - and are
> > > allowed to remain uncircumcised. This suggests that "religious"
> > > circumcision is a CHOICE which may legitimately be postponed until
> > > adulthood and beyond. It makes sense for adults to be able to choose
> > > which religion to embrace, and to choose whether or not to surgically
> > > alter their bodies for religious reasons.)
> > >
> > > 2) As indicated above, modern rabbis are advocating the amputation of
> > > FAR MORE infant
> > > foreskin than God originally/allegedly intended. Quoting
> > > Wallerstein:
> > > "Originally, the surgery involved only cutting the tip
> > > of the foreskin. This was changed in the Hellenic Period to prevent
> > > [Jews from] elongat[ing] the foreskin stump in order to appear
> > > uncircumcised." [Wallerstein E. Humanistic
> > > Judaism 1983;11(4):46. (Wallerstein, a Jew, had previously won the
> > > American Medical Writers Award for his 1980 book, "Circumcision: An
> > > American Health Fallacy.)
> > >
> > > 3) "The infliction of unnecessary pain is precisely what Judaism is
> > > designed to fight against, so it makes little sense for us to be the
> > > perpetrators on our children." [Rabbi Michael Lerner. Jewish Renewal
> > > NY: G.P. Putnam's Sons 1994:387])
> > >
> > > 4) Some religions do not allow members to be circumcised.
> > > Therefore,
> > > a baby who is circumcised is denied the choice of some religions. A
> > > baby who is left intact, however, has true religious freedom, as he
> > > can
> > > choose to be circumcised or intact when he is old enough to choose.
> > >
> > > Again, that statement from Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158
> > > (1944): "parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it
> > > does
> > > not follow they are free ... to make martyrs of their children before
> > > they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can
> > > make that choice for themselves." Prince, supra, 170.
> > >
> > > The mass infant mutilation should have ended BILLIONS of dollars'
> > > worth of infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I pointed out
> > > American
> > > medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.
> > >
> > > Ending the mass infant mutilation now instantly saves America an
> > > estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE
> > > American males can make for themselves in adulthood.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason, you are helping Rethinking AIDS leaders ignore the bizarre 1988
> > > CMA
> > > "confirmed"-in-Africa hoax discussed in my original post.
> > >
> > > Please help PUBLICIZE the bizarre CMA "confirmed"-in-Africa hoax. Urge
> > > Rethinking AIDS leaders to do the same - finally.
> > >
> > > The obvious child-abuse-perpetuating "confirmed"-in-Africa CMA hoax must
> > > be
> > > noted as a potential source of bias everytime the
> > > American-taxpayer-supported "scientific" African penis-slicing promotion
> > > is
> > > discussed.
> > >
> > > I say again: Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing
> > > keeping American MDs out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass
> > > infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > TWO QUESTIONS...
> > >
> > > 1. You totally ignored the fact that the mass infant penis ripping and
> > > slicing is ongoing CRIME.
> > >
> > > WHY?
> > >
> > > 2. You totally ignored the OTHER obvious mass medical crimes discussed
> > > in
> > > my
> > > post.
> > >
> > > WHY?
> > >
> > > May I know how you happened to see my post?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > PS THE UNITED STATES IS "DENYING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM TO [TINY US]
> > > CITIZENS..."
> > >
> > > Jason, are you "Jason Erb Former National Governmental Affairs Director
> > > of
> > > CAIR...the Council on American-Islamic Relations..."?
> > > http://ldsfocuschrist.blogspot.com/2008_04_01_archive.html
> > >
> > > This just-mentioned Jason Erb, formerly of CAIR, was quoted saying in
> > > regard
> > > to denial of religious freedom: "Abuses here [in the US] certainly
> > > aren't
> > > as grave as in many countries" - this in response to the 2002 release of
> > > a
> > > US State Department report accusing governments of "denying religious
> > > freedom to their citizens":
> > >
> > > "The US State Department on Monday accused several Asian states, in
> > > particular those with totalitarian governments or predominantly Muslim
> > > populations, of denying religious freedom to their citizens...The fourth
> > > annual report report classifies abusive governments...In releasing the
> > > report, John Hanford III, US ambassador for international religious
> > > freedom,
> > > stressed that religious freedom was a potent weapon with which to 'fight
> > > the
> > > war on terrorism'...The [September 11, 2001] attacks by al-Qaeda
> > > highlighted
> > > the reality that people can and do exploit religion for terrible
> > > purposes,
> > > in some cases manipulating and destroying other human beings as mere
> > > instruments in the process," says the report's introduction. "Where
> > > governments protect religious freedom, and citizens value it as a social
> > > good, religious persecution and religion-based violence find no
> > > warrant,"
> > > it
> > > added, noting that such protections were essential to avoid a potential
> > > "clash of civilizations". 'It would be very interesting to see what the
> > > authors of this report would say if they were to look at the United
> > > States,'
> > > said Jason Erb, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic
> > > Relations
> > > (CAIR)....Some of the abuses included...police surveillance or
> > > unofficial
> > > harassment of minorities...fingerprinting visitors from Muslim
> > > countries;
> > > interviews of Muslim immigrants where they have often been asked
> > > questions
> > > about their religious practices...'Abuses here certainly aren't as grave
> > > as
> > > in many countries cited in the report, but there are certainly parallels
> > > that are interesting to note,' Erb added."
> > > --Jim Lobe. US report blasts religious intolerance. Asia Times, Oct. 9,
> > > 2002
> > > http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/DJ09Ae02.html
> > >
> > > MODERN MEDICINE - A WORLD RELIGION...
> > >
> > > >>>>BEGIN excerpt of Two days before 9/11: MDs kill - PTs silently suck
> > > >>>>up...
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1413
> > >
> > > >Karen Spencer, PT responded to Henry with an excellent question:
> > > >
> > > >"Why is it that so many health care workers always assume
> > > >that an MD has to be correct?..."
> > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pther/message/25682
> > > >
> > > >That's an easy one. MDs and the Pharmcos run the medical machine -
> > > >and...
> > > >
> > > >"[T]he intellectual foundation of medical care...is...whatever a
> > > >physician decides is by definition correct." [Eddy DM. The
> > > >challenge. (Jan12)1990 JAMA]
> > > >
> > > >Also...
> > > >
> > > >"There is one quotation that captures the essence of what
> > > >membership in both the AMA and our state medical associations is
> > > >all about...'Joining the AMA is like joining a church...'
> > > >[Hopkins D reviewing Campion FD: The AMA and U.S. Health Policy
> > > >Since 1940, 1984, Review Press: Chicago, IL. In Western J Med,
> > > >1985;142(2):273]
> > > >
> > > >In fact...
> > > >
> > > >The medical profession is such a tyrannical religion that a
> > > >federal court and a federal appeals court had to order its
> > > >largest diocese (the AMA) to let individual MDs and individual
> > > >hospitals make "individual decisions." [Wilk CA. Medicine,
> > > >monopolies, and malice. Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996]
> > > >
> > > >Incredibly, the AMA appealed!!
> > > >
> > >
> > > >>>>END excerpt of Two days before 9/11: MDs kill - PTs silently suck
> > > >>>>up...
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1413
> > >
> > > BTW JASON: THANKS! When I Googled your name, I found Latter Day Saint
> > > (Mormon) Steve St.Clair addressing "Islamic supercession" and flaws in
> > > the
> > > notion that Christianity, Judaism and Islam are "...three equivalent
> > > legs
> > > propping up a single monotheistic stool."
> > > http://ldsfocuschrist.blogspot.com/2008_04_01_archive.html
> > >
> > > Lately, I have been thinking of similar matters...
> > >
> > > Dr. DD Palmer, founder of chiropractic, posited a healing spirit which
> > > he
> > > called Innate and which he said he would rename the three monotheistic
> > > Gods....
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > MORMONS AND MOSLEMS AND INFANT CIRCUMCISION
> > >
> > > My recollection (someone correct me if I am wrong) is that Mormons do
> > > not
> > > believe in infant circumcision because infants aren't old enough to
> > > understand what is happening.
> > >
> > > My further recollection (again, someone correct me if I am wrong) is
> > > that
> > > Moslems used (some still do?) wait until age 13...
> > >
> > > Waiting five more years - until age 18 - would make for legal
> > > circumcisions - as long as no one is being forced....
> > >
> > > COPIED TO:
> > >
> > > Council on American-Islamic Relations/CAIR
> > > 453 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.
> > > Washington, DC 20003
> > > Tel: 202.488.8787
> > > Fax: 202.488.0833
> > > Via info@...
> > >
> > > Also copied to CAIR via:
> > >
> > > CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, Tel: 202-744-7726, via
> > > ihooper@...
> > > CAIR Media Relations Director Ahmed Rehab, Tel: 202-870-0166, via
> > > arehab@...
> > > CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin, Tel: 202-488-8787 or
> > > 202-341-4171, via arubin@...
> > >
> > >
> > > READERS: HERE IS THE POST TO WHICH JASON ERB "RESPONDED"....
> > >
> > > From: Todd Gastaldo <tgastaldo@...>
> > > To: RedAlerts@...; Carter19604@...;
> > > AIDSMythExposed@...
> > > Cc: drkugler@...; info@...; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com;
> > > chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com; etienne.deharven@...;
> > > robert.leppo@...; peter.duesberg@...;
> > > charles.geshekter@...;
> > > roberto.giraldo@...;
> > > claus.koehnlein@...; frank.lusardi@...;
> > > christine.maggiore@...; bryan.owen@...;
> > > david.rasnick@...; gordon.stewart@...;
> > > hiv-aids@...; wintera@...; webmaster@...
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 6:26:27 AM
> > > Subject: An 'HIV/AIDS risk-lowering' 'chop chop'?
> > >
> > > AN "HIV/AIDS RISK-LOWERING" "CHOP CHOP"?
> > >
> > > "THE CHOP CHOP"...euphemizing obvious medical crime...
> > >
> > > On Oct. 13, 2008, BRIAN CARTER (Assistant Manager of AIDSMythExposed)
> > > made
> > > light of the ongoing medical crime of mass infant penis ripping and
> > > slicing - calling it "the chop chop."
> > > http://groups.msn.com/AIDSMythExposed/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=36003&LastModified=4675693942803128318
> > >
> > > Mr. Carter was calling attention to a WebMD article about circumcision
> > > ostensibly preventing HIV/AIDS transmission during sex between gay
> > > men...
> > >
> > > Mr. Carter made NO MENTION of the fact that the same WebMD article
> > > promoted
> > > notion that the mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime prevents
> > > HIV/AIDS transmission during HETERO- sexual intercourse later in life:
> > >
> > > "It's now clear that circumcision reduces heterosexual men's risk of
> > > getting
> > > HIV from sexual intercourse."
> > > --Daniel J. DeNoon, WebMD Health News...Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD
> > > http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/news/20081007/can-circumcision-cut-hiv-in-gay-men
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below
> > >
> > > Brian Carter
> > > Assistant Manager
> > > AIDSMythExposed.com
> > > Via Carter19604@...
> > >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > BE ADVISED: THE "CHOP CHOP" IS MASS INFANT PENIS RIPPING AND SLICING -
> > > AN
> > > OBVIOUS CRIME - THERE IS NO MEDICAL INDICATION.
> > >
> > > Babies are screaming, writhing and bleeding through the mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing. Rarely, babies die or lose their penises.
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS leaders are still remaining silent about American
> > > medicine's
> > > ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime - originally
> > > perpetuated
> > > with phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology - now being lamely
> > > covered-up/perpetuated with phony "antibody means current
> > > disease/HIV/AIDS"
> > > immunology...
> > >
> > > Meanwhile a RETHINKING AIDS announcement blithely exclaims:
> > > "...REMINISCE
> > > WITH HOLIDAY CHEER!"^^^
> > >
> > > "Do you feel like a sane person in an insane world? Do you want to meet
> > > others who question openly and think freely?...RETHINKING AIDS invites
> > > all
> > > area AIDS Rethinkers to an informal meet-up for drinks and hors
> > > d'oeuvres,
> > > hosted by Brian Carter, Assistant Manager, AIDSMythExposed.com."
> > > ^^^RETHINKING AIDS Red Alert, Dec. 3, 2008, reproduced below.
> > >
> > > Brian, I feel like a sane person in a RETHINKING AIDS insane world.
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS leaders are still remaining silent about American
> > > medicine's
> > > ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime - originally
> > > perpetuated
> > > with phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology - now being lamely
> > > covered-up/perpetuated with phony "antibody means current
> > > disease/HIV/AIDS"
> > > immunology...
> > >
> > > I recently wrote to Hans Kugler, MD about DUESBERG ignoring the mass
> > > (sometimes fatal) child abuse years ago - when I discovered American MDs
> > > using the HIV/AIDS hypothesis to cover-up phony "babies can't feel pain"
> > > neurology...
> > >
> > > Bear in mind: There are NO medical indications for the mass infant penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime - none.
> > >
> > > >>>> BEGIN Bizarre HIV/AIDS factoid
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2663 (slightly
> > > edited)
> > >
> > > Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing keeping American
> > > MDs
> > > out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass infant penis ripping
> > > and
> > > slicing crime...
> > >
> > > Strange things happened after I discovered American MDs still using
> > > phony
> > > "babies can't feel pain" neurology to slice infant penises: Perhaps the
> > > STRANGEST thing is ongoing: American taxpayer-funded promotion of
> > > AFRICAN
> > > penis slicing.
> > >
> > > See below.
> > >
> > > ALSO: MASS ADULT VAGINA SLICING: American medicine is also committing a
> > > mass
> > > VAGINA slicing crime which is hospitalizing women in droves. See the
> > > postscript.
> > >
> > > Hans Kugler, PhD writes:
> > >
> > > "More and more scientific studies...don't support the [HIV/AIDS]
> > > hypothesis..."
> > > http://www.antiagingforme.com/html/sci_updates.html
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below
> > >
> > > Hans Kugler, PhD
> > > International Academy of Alternative & Anti-Aging Medicine
> > > Via drkugler@...
> > >
> > > Hans,
> > >
> > > Strange things happened in early 1988 after I exposed American
> > > medicine's
> > > phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and called for a religious
> > > exemption from the child abuse statutes for the ancient ritual that
> > > leaves
> > > most of the foreskin on the penis:
> > >
> > > In the space of three months in early 1988...
> > >
> > > 1. American MDs suddenly came out
> > > against ALL religious exemptions (Pediatrics Jan. 1988) - most likely
> > > because a religious exemption for the ancient ritual that leaves most of
> > > the
> > > foreskin on the penis would have immediately exposed American medicine's
> > > TOTAL foreskin amputation ritual as child abuse.)
> > >
> > > 2. American MDs came out in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child
> > > abuse (Pediatrics
> > > Feb 1988); and,
> > >
> > > 3. The California Medical Association House of Delegates
> > > abruptly ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote (CMA Res.
> > > 305-88) abruptly declared the no-medical-indication total foreskin
> > > amputation ritual "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa
> > > to prevent transmission of HIV.
> > >
> > > THE CMA LIED: Infant circumcision prevents HIV transmission (CMA Res.
> > > 305-88) was an obvious hoax which American MDs are STILL trying to
> > > legitimize as
> > > demonstrated by the recent US taxpayer funded NIH "scientific" slicing
> > > of
> > > African truck driver penises...
> > >
> > > See again: HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland,
> > > AAP and infant circumcision revisited
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
> > >
> > > American taxpayers are paying BILLIONS - via the President's Emergency
> > > Plan
> > > For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) - in part to publicize the
> > > US-taxpayer-financed obvious African truck driver penis slicing hoax.
> > >
> > > $15 BILLION...
> > >
> > > "In anticipation of the potential role of safe male circumcision, the
> > > U.S.
> > > President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has been a member of
> > > an
> > > international working group...PEPFAR...will support implementation of
> > > safe
> > > medical male circumcision for HIV/AIDS prevention based on requests from
> > > host governments...The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief is a
> > > $15
> > > billion, five-year initiative..."
> > > --Statement from Ambassador Mark Dybul, U.S. Global AIDS
> > > Coordinator...Released on December 13, 2006
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/press/77790.htm
> > >
> > > $30 BILLION MORE...
> > >
> > > "The World Health Organization (WHO) today warmly welcomed the United
> > > States' proposal to commit a further $30 billion to the President's
> > > Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and extend the Plan for another five
> > > years..."
> > > --WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan, quoted in WHO's online "Media
> > > Centre."
> > > http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2007/s10/en/index.html
> > >
> > > United States' President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief/PEPFAR is
> > > "Promoting male circumcision as part of a comprehensive strategy to
> > > reduce
> > > HIV transmission."
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/pepfar/press/88332.htm
> > >
> > > $26 MILLION EXPLICITLY FOR "MALE CIRCUMCISION ACTIVITIES" IN AFRICA...
> > >
> > > "In fiscal year 2007, PEPFAR allocated approximately $16 million to
> > > support
> > > male circumcision activities with that figure increased to nearly $26
> > > million in fiscal year 2008...
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/press/107985.htm
> > >
> > > "EDUCATION AND CONSENT OF THE CLIENT"
> > >
> > > PEPFAR says male circumcision is "an elective surgical procedure using
> > > local
> > > anesthesia following education and consent of the client..."
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/press/107985.htm
> > >
> > > Education of African clients should always include the fact that the
> > > HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing keeping American MDs out of prison
> > > for
> > > their ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > American medicine's mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime should
> > > have
> > > ended in America BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago - back
> > > in
> > > 1987 when I first exposed American medicine's phony "babies can't feel
> > > pain"
> > > neurology hoax.
> > >
> > > Stopping the infant screams now instantly saves America an estimated
> > > $400
> > > million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE American males
> > > can
> > > make for themselves in adulthood.
> > >
> > > On NOVEMBER 17, 2008, Robert C. Gallo, perpetrator and perpetuator of
> > > the
> > > HIV/AIDS hoax reportedly called for a DOMESTIC version of the
> > > President's
> > > Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief - "Fighting AIDS at Home: A PEPFAR plan
> > > for
> > > America's inner cities"...
> > >
> > > ...but Gallo's article made no mention of the African
> > > PEPFAR circumcision-prevents-AIDS hoax.
> > > --Gallo RC. Washington Times, Nov. 17, 2008. Article reproduced by the
> > > National AIDS Treament Advocacy Project/NATAP
> > > http://www.natap.org/2008/newsUpdates/111708_01.htm
> > >
> > > I'll copy NATAP via info@....
> > >
> > > ATTENTION NATAP: Obviously, education of African-AMERICAN circumcision
> > > clients should always include the fact that the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is
> > > the
> > > only thing keeping American MDs out of prison for their ongoing mass
> > > infant
> > > penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > One last matter...
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS AND PETER DUESBERG, PhD...
> > >
> > > Hans, I came across your article quoted above when I visited the
> > > Rethinking
> > > AIDS web site...
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS ASKS: ARE AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > Acclaimed AIDS expert James Chin, MD, MPH reportedly believes that
> > > AFRICAN
> > > PROMISCUITY is the reason Sub-Saharan Africa is the only uncircumcised
> > > place
> > > on Earth that suffers a heterosexual AIDS epidemic.
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > **ARE** AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > TWO GOOD QUESTIONS came from RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter
> > > Duesberg, PhD et al., emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. "Do scientific studies support the conclusion that Africans are an
> > > especially promiscuous people?
> > >
> > > 2. "And if the majority of males throughout the world are uncircumcised,
> > > why
> > > does naturally
> > > occurring male anatomy lead to AIDS only in Africa?"
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > THE SHORT ANSWER: IT DOESN'T MATTER whether Africans are especially
> > > promiscuous. Naturally occurring male anatomy leads to AIDS only in
> > > Africa
> > > because back in 1987 American MDs correctly feared that RIPPING and
> > > SLICING
> > > that very same naturally occurring male anatomy on infants leads to
> > > PRISON
> > > in America...
> > >
> > > Two questions for RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.,
> > > emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. In [1990-1], why did Rethinking AIDS member Peter Duesberg, PhD
> > > ignore
> > > the
> > > fact that American MDs had been caught perpetuating phony
> > > "babies can't feel pain" neurology as they committed obvious mass child
> > > abuse - ripping and slicing infant penises en masse for no medical
> > > indication?
> > >
> > > 2. Why did Duesberg ignore the fact that, in a lame attempt to COVER-UP
> > > their obvious mass child abuse crime, American MDs had just ignored
> > > their own Scientific Board to fraudulently declare their NO MEDICAL
> > > INDICATION mass infant penis
> > > ripping and slicing "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS (California Medical
> > > Association
> > > Res. 305-99)?
> > >
> > > Rethinking AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.) are STILL ignoring
> > > the
> > > bizarre CMA behavior - babies be damned...
> > >
> > > I'll copy them all (again) via etienne.deharven@...
> > > <etienne.deharven@...>; robert.leppo@...
> > > <robert.leppo@...>; peter.duesberg@...
> > > <peter.duesberg@...>;
> > > charles.geshekter@...
> > > <charles.geshekter@...>;
> > > roberto.giraldo@...
> > > <roberto.giraldo@...>; claus.koehnlein@...
> > > <claus.koehnlein@...>; frank.lusardi@...
> > > <frank.lusardi@...>;
> > > christine.maggiore@...
> > > <christine.maggiore@...>; bryan.owen@...
> > > <bryan.owen@...>; david.rasnick@...
> > > <david.rasnick@...>; gordon.stewart@...
> > > <gordon.stewart@...>
> > >
> > > Thanks for reading everyone.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > Copied to: WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan
> > > Via hiv-aids@...
> > > Also via Anne Winter
> > > Advocacy and Communications Coordinator
> > > Tel.: +41 22 791 5876
> > > Mobile: +41 79 440 6011
> > > E-mail: wintera@...
> > >
> > > PS As indicated above, American MDs are also committing a massive VAGINA
> > > slicing crime which can be stopped by applying the federal Female
> > > Genital
> > > Mutilation/FGM statute that was passed in part because of concerns about
> > > female genital mutilation in Africa.
> > >
> > > My Open Letter to the Texas Board of Nursing...
> > >
> > > NURSE/VAGINA WARNING: TRULY BIZARRE "OBGYN SPECIALTY CONTENT"
> > >
> > > "[T]he [FNP/Family Nurse Practitioner] educational program provided some
> > > content related to OB/GYN. It did not, however, include OB/GYN specialty
> > > content to the same depth that the WHNP's program did..."
> > > --Texas Board of Nursing scope of practice scenario
> > > http://www.bon.state.tx.us/practice/apn-scopeofpractice.html
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER
> > >
> > > Texas Board of Nursing
> > > Katherine Thomas, MN, RN
> > > Executive Director
> > > 333 Guadalupe #3-460
> > > Austin, Texas 78701
> > > Office: (512) 305-7400
> > > Fax: (512) 305-7401
> > > Via webmaster@...
> > >
> > > Katherine,
> > >
> > > By using semisitting/dorsal delivery, OBGYNs are senselessly closing
> > > birth
> > > canals up to 30% - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing
> > > everything possible to open birth canals - even as they senselessly
> > > CLOSE
> > > birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. See below.
> > >
> > > Please warn all Texas licensed nurses that DELIBERATE **VAGINA**
> > > INJURIES (SENSELESS BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSED EPISIOTOMIES)
> > > are causing trauma to the perineum - sending child-bearing women BACK to
> > > hospitals in droves:
> > >
> > > "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma
> > > to
> > > perineum due to childbirth."
> > > http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm
> > >
> > > The birth-canal-closed/mass vagina slicing is OBVIOUS mass sexual
> > > assault.
> > > See below.
> > >
> > > NOTE: The federal Female Genital Mutilation statute can be used to end
> > > the
> > > massive birth-canal-closed vagina slicing crime - the FGM statute
> > > applies
> > > to
> > > women 18 and under. See below.
> > >
> > > OBGYNs don't charge for their birth-canal-closed episiotomy sexual
> > > assaults - but Shiono et al. at NIH demonstrated that episiotomized
> > > women suffer 50 times more severe perineal tears (tears clear to the
> > > anus)
> > > than women who are not episiotomized - and (as indicated above)
> > > hospitals
> > > make LOTS of money treating "trauma to the perineum due to childbirth."
> > >
> > > I SAY AGAIN: "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all
> > > women
> > > is trauma to
> > > perineum due to childbirth."
> > > http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm
> > >
> > > PREGNANT WOMEN: You can help PROTECT YOUR VAGINAS: It's easy to allow
> > > your
> > > birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up
> > > to 30%.
> > >
> > > See WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE at the very end of this
> > > post.
> > >
> > > THE BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING...
> > >
> > > As I've noted repeatedly for CDC's Injury Prevention Director Ileana
> > > Arias,
> > > PhD (DIANNE CLAPP - have you forwarded to Dr. Arias yet?)...
> > >
> > > "It is established obstetric teaching that a narrow pelvic outlet
> > > predisposes to a difficult vaginal delivery..."
> > > --Ass-?rztin Dr. Andrea Froschauer-Frudinger et al. via
> > > andrea.frudinger@... [Froschauer-Frudinger et al. Br J Obstet
> > > Gynaecol 2002;109(11):1207-12]
> > >
> > > By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBGYNs are senselessly
> > > narrowing
> > > birth canals/pelvic outlets up to 30% (most births).
> > >
> > > For the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and clinical and
> > > radiographic cites from the medical literature - see Gastaldo TD.
> > > Letter.
> > > BIRTH. 1992;19(4):230-1.
> > > http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4, FREE ACCESS.
> > >
> > > WORSE: When babies get stuck, OBGYNs are senselessly KEEPING birth
> > > canals
> > > closed the "extra" up to 30% (keeping women semisitting/dorsal) - as
> > > they
> > > pull with vacuums/forceps (1 in 10 births) - sometimes pulling so hard
> > > they
> > > rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
> > >
> > > STILL WORSE: OBGYN experts have been lying to cover-up.
> > >
> > > For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...
> > >
> > > See "Dents in babies' skulls"
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e
> > >
> > > OBGYNs indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely
> > > closing
> > > birth canals up to 30%. (ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia training video
> > > purports
> > > to show how to allow the birth canal to open maximally in the small
> > > number
> > > of cases when babies' shoulders get stuck - which is the indirect
> > > admission
> > > that OBYNs know they are routinely closing birth canals up to 30%.)
> > >
> > > AGAIN: PREGNANT WOMEN: You can HELP PROTECT YOUR VAGINAS: It's easy to
> > > allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up
> > > to 30%.
> > >
> > > See WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE at the very end of this
> > > post.
> > >
> > > THE MASS VAGINA SLICING: IT'S MASS SEXUAL ASSAULT...
> > >
> > > "EPISIOPROCTOTOMIES" - slicing vaginas clear to the rectum - to widen
> > > birth
> > > canals - with birth canals KEPT closed up to 30%...
> > >
> > > When babies are stuck and forceps are applied - OBGYNs often offer
> > > "generous" episiotomies - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are
> > > doing
> > > everything possible to open the birth canal - even as they keep the
> > > birth
> > > canal closed the "extra" up to 30%.
> > >
> > > The most generous episiotomy is "episioproctotomy" - slicing the woman
> > > clear
> > > to her rectum - surgically/fraudulently inferring that everything
> > > possible
> > > is being done to open her birth canal - even as her birth canal is kept
> > > closed up to 30%...
> > >
> > > BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSED VAGINA SLICING IS MASS SEXUAL ASSAULT...
> > >
> > > No woman wants her birth canal closed, her vagina sliced...
> > >
> > > According to the National Center for Victims of Crime/NCVC:
> > >
> > > "Some examples of sexual assault include: A doctor...touching
> > > your sexual organs in an unprofessional, unwarranted and inappropriate
> > > manner."
> > > http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?db
> > > Name=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32369
> > >
> > > IT'S DELIBERATE VAGINA TEARING...
> > >
> > > Michael C. Klein, MD writes: "[E]pisiotomy is a deliberate second degree
> > > tear." [Birth. Letter.
> > > 2002;29(1):74]
> > >
> > > Some MDs are still claiming (fraudulently) that their episiotomies are
> > > *preventing* severe tears
> > > clear to the anus when in fact MDs are CAUSING severe tears clear to the
> > > anus.
> > >
> > > In 1990 the National Institutes of Health researched the issue and found
> > > that deliberate tears by
> > > MDs (episiotomies) cause fifty times MORE severe tears (tears clear to
> > > the
> > > anus) relative to leaving
> > > the vagina alone.[Shiono et al. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75(5):765-70. In
> > > Klein
> > > et al. Online J Curr Clin
> > > Trials (Jul1)1992, Doc. No. 10]
> > >
> > > The fraud is perpetuated by NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL...
> > >
> > > According to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital's Episiotomy video,
> > > episiotomy
> > > is
> > > performed,
> > >
> > > "...to prevent vaginal tears..."
> > > http://www.nyp.org/media/index.html (Click on "Topics" then
> > > "Episiotomy")
> > >
> > > THE FRAUD SENDS WOMEN **BACK** TO THE HOSPITAL...
> > >
> > > Again, OBGYNs don't charge for their birth-canal-closed episiotomy
> > > sexual
> > > assaults;
> > > but as noted above, Shiono et al. at NIH demonstrated that episiotomized
> > > women suffer 50 times more severe perineal tears (tears clear to the
> > > anus)
> > > than
> > > women who are not episiotomized.
> > >
> > > And severe perineal tears land women back in the hospital:
> > >
> > > "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma
> > > to
> > > perineum due to childbirth."
> > > http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm
> > >
> > > FURTHER REGARDING BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSED VAGINA SLICING...
> > >
> > > WHEN THE BIRTHING MOTHER IS UNDER 18...
> > >
> > > THE FEDERAL FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION/FGM STATUTE APPLIES...
> > >
> > > The federal FGM statute only exempts vagina slicing at birth if it is
> > > done
> > > for "medical purposes."
> > >
> > > Closing the birth canal and slicing the vagina (thereby pretending to
> > > be doing everything possible to open it) is obvious battery - or at
> > > least
> > > criminal negligence.
> > >
> > > Significantly, the federal FGM statute does NOT exempt vagina slicing
> > > based
> > > on mere
> > > "belief" on the part of MDs (or "any other
> > > person") "that the operation is required as a matter of custom or
> > > ritual"...
> > >
> > > Here is the US Code as quoted by Cornell University School of Law:
> > >
> > > 18 USCS ? 116. Female genital mutilation
> > > (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever knowingly circumcises,
> > > excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or
> > > labia
> > > minora or clitoris of another person who has not attained the age of 18
> > > years shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5
> > > years,
> > > or both.
> > > (b) A surgical operation is not a violation of this section if the
> > > operation
> > > is-
> > > (1) necessary to the health of the person on whom it is performed, and
> > > is
> > > performed by a person licensed in the place of its performance as a
> > > medical
> > > practitioner; or
> > > (2) performed on a person in labor or who has just given birth and is
> > > performed for medical purposes connected with that labor or birth by a
> > > person licensed in the place it is performed as a medical practitioner,
> > > midwife, or person in training to become such a practitioner or midwife.
> > > (c) In applying subsection (b)(1), no account shall be taken of the
> > > effect
> > > on the person on whom the operation is to be performed of any belief on
> > > the
> > > part of that person, or any other person, that the operation is required
> > > as
> > > a matter of custom or ritual.
> > > http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/116.html
> > >
> > > There are BILLIONS per year to be INSTANTLY saved - just by stopping
> > > obvious
> > > medical CRIME.
> > >
> > > INSURANCE COMPANIES could do the job.
> > >
> > > Insurance companies think they are paying OBGYNs to allow birth canals
> > > to
> > > open maximally.
> > >
> > > But OBGYNs are closing birth canals up to 30% - and lying to cover-up.
> > > See
> > > the Four OB Lies, mentioned above.
> > >
> > > Insurance companies could collect PAST birth-canal-closing damages using
> > > "retro-audits."
> > >
> > > See F4CP officers and Ins. Comm. Ario: MANDATORY 'retro-audits':
> > > MASSIVE
> > > ins. fraud by OBGYNs...
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1763
> > >
> > > THE PROBLEM...
> > >
> > > Law enforcement is looking the other way - and MDs know it.
> > >
> > > Steve Harris, MD arrogantly boasts:
> > >
> > > "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime.
> > > These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
> > > 28866f3384801ae9
> > >
> > > Dr. Harris' arrogant boast came after I exposed yet another mass medical
> > > crime - fraudulent promotion of vaccination using PLANNED endangerment
> > > of
> > > VACCINATED children during disease outbreaks.
> > >
> > > For details...
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > Years ago, the mass vagina slicing got babies six weeks' worth of free
> > > daily
> > > immunizations....
> > >
> > > See Breastfeed 'til your vagina heals (THANKS Martina Nicholson, MD!)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2595
> > >
> > > For further info regarding breastfeedings being free daily
> > > immunizations...
> > >
> > > ...and MDs and CDC lying by omission to DENY free daily immunizations...
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise
> > > SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > It's mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse to go along with the mass
> > > birth-canal-closing PHYSICAL child
> > > abuse.
> > >
> > > [Dec. 6, 2008 ADDENDUM: In 1995, Circumcisionist Edgar Schoen, MD told
> > > Australian physician
> > > Terry
> > > Russell,
> > >
> > > "We are now at a point that [infant penis ripping and slicing] is
> > > analogous to
> > > immunisation." Russell T. Letter. Medical Observer (20Jan)1995,
> > > Level
> > > 2, 100 Bay Road, Waverton, NSW 2060 AUSTRALIA. Note: I replaced the
> > > euphemism circumcision with "infant penis ripping and slicing."]
> > >
> > >
> > > It is federal policy to PAY obstetricians to close birth canals up to
> > > 30%
> > > and keep birth canals
> > > closed when babies get stuck (keep women semisitting/dorsal) as they
> > > pull
> > > with vacuums/forceps (1 in 10 births) sometimes pulling so hard they rip
> > > spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
> > >
> > > WORSE: It is federal (Medicare) policy to pay to TRAIN medical
> > > students to commit the obvious sometimes-fatal mass child abuse crime:
> > > (Medicare pays hospitals $100,000 per year per obstetric resident to
> > > train medical students to keep birth canals closed when babies get
> > > stuck.
> > > Medicare pays for all medical residencies - billions per year.)
> > >
> > > OBSTETRICIANS are filing FALSE CLAIMS - everyone assumes OBGYNs are
> > > doing
> > > everything possible to open birth canals when in fact they are CLOSING
> > > birth
> > > canals routinely - up to 30% - and lying to cover-up.
> > >
> > > TWO ATTORNEYS RAN THE OTHER WAY - BABIES BE DAMNED...
> > >
> > > Two False Claims Act attorneys (Shelley Slade and Janet Goldstein) ran
> > > the
> > > other way after I wrote to them...
> > >
> > > I wrote:
> > >
> > > ROBERT L. VOGEL
> > > Direct line: (202) 537-5904
> > > Email: rvogel@...
> > >
> > > SHELLEY R. SLADE
> > > Direct line: (202) 537-5903
> > > Email: sslade@...
> > >
> > > JANET L. GOLDSTEIN
> > > Direct line: (202) 537-5906
> > > Email: jgoldstein@...
> > >
> > > Robert, Shelley and Janet,
> > >
> > > Please help me use THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT to stop mass child abuse by
> > > OBGYNs...
> > >
> > > You indicate that the False Claims Act prohibits billing Medicaid and
> > > Medicare for care that is so deficient that it is "affirmatively harmful
> > > to
> > > patients," as in,
> > >
> > > "Deficient Care...a service provided in such a deficient fashion that
> > > the
> > > government payer did not get the benefit of its bargain...billing
> > > Medicare
> > > or Medicaid for care that is of such low quality and so deficient that
> > > it
> > > is
> > > affirmatively harmful to patients..."
> > > http://www.false-claims-act-health-care-fraud-whistleblower-attorney.com/about-o\
> > > \
> > > ur-firm/our-services/health-care-fraud.php
> > >
> > > EMERGENCY:
> > >
> > > STANDARD OBGYN CARE IS "AFFIRMATIVELY HARMFUL" - SOMETIMES
> > > FATAL...
> > >
> > > I'll email this to False Claims Act attorney ROBERT L. VOGEL via
> > > rvogel@....
> > >
> > > As noted above, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs because as
> > > medical students MDs are TRAINED to "perform" obvious felonies. See
> > > again
> > > the ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training video and OB Lie #4, mentioned
> > > above.
> > >
> > > Thanks for reading everyone.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > MAYBE CDC *CAN'T* TAKE ACTION?
> > >
> > > MAYBE AMERICAN MDs **MUST** "PERFORM" MASS CHILD ABUSE OR WWIII WILL
> > > BREAK
> > > OUT?
> > >
> > > LET ME EXPLAIN...
> > >
> > > Here in America, it is possible that OBGYNs are allowed to
> > > continue their gruesome birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulative therapy
> > > (and
> > > other obvious crimes) because their most frequent surgical behavior
> > > toward
> > > males is a bizarre TOTAL infant foreskin amputation version of a
> > > protected
> > > form of "religious" child abuse - the ancient
> > > foreskin amputation Jewish ritual - reportedly commanded by a God -
> > > which
> > > leaves most of the foreskin on the penis...
> > >
> > > Strange things happened in early 1988 after I exposed American
> > > medicine's
> > > phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and called for a religious
> > > exemption from the child abuse statutes for the ancient ritual that
> > > leaves
> > > most of the foreskin on the penis:
> > >
> > > 1. American MDs suddenly came out
> > > against ALL religious exemptions (Pediatrics Jan. 1988);
> > >
> > > 2. American MDs came out in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child
> > > abuse (Pediatrics
> > > Feb 1988); and,
> > >
> > > 3. The California Medical Association House of Delegates
> > > abruptly ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote (CMA Res.
> > > 305-88) abruptly declared the no-medical-indication total foreskin
> > > amputation ritual "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa
> > > to prevent transmission of HIV.
> > >
> > > It was an obvious hoax which American MDs are STILL trying to legitimize
> > > as
> > > demonstrated by the recent US taxpayer funded NIH "scientific" slicing
> > > of
> > > African truck driver penises...
> > >
> > > See HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland,
> > > AAP and infant circumcision revisited
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
> > >
> > > American taxpayers are paying BILLIONS - in part to publicize the
> > > US-taxpayer-financed obvious African truck driver penis slicing hoax.
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > BTW, I still think Congress should pass a religious exemption from the
> > > child
> > > abuse statutes for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the
> > > foreskin on the penis. I don't think observant Jews will ever be able to
> > > let go of their "mini-circ" infant penis slicing ritual.
> > >
> > > Much land in the Middle East is at stake. (The Jewish God reportedly
> > > promised Jews all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates as long as
> > > they engaged in 'mini'-circ - the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most
> > > of
> > > the foreskin on the infant penis. American MDs are performing a
> > > different
> > > ritual - TOTAL infant foreskin amputation.)
> > >
> > > The recent US taxpayer financed "scientific" HIV/AIDS African truck
> > > driver
> > > penis slicing may be the ultimate cover-up - to maintain the global
> > > post-WWII status quo...
> > >
> > > AGAIN: MAYBE CDC *CAN'T* TAKE ACTION?
> > >
> > > MAYBE AMERICAN MDs **MUST** "PERFORM" MASS CHILD ABUSE OR WWIII WILL
> > > BREAK
> > > OUT?
> > >
> > > I hope not - but stranger things have happened.
> > >
> > > I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs because as medical
> > > students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies. See the ACOG
> > > Shoulder Dystocia training video mentioned above.
> > >
> > > Again, thanks for reading everyone.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > A FAMILY NURSE PRACTITIONER PROGRAM FOR DOCTORS OF CHIROPRACTIC...
> > >
> > > Hey, why not?
> > >
> > > Scott Wofford, BS, MSPT, DC, Founder of Mid America Learning EXCLAIMS:
> > >
> > > "Use your chiropractic training as the foundation for a complimentary
> > > [sic]
> > > professional career! Become a Family Nurse Practitioner!"
> > > http://midamericalearning.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=b\
> > > log&id=11&Itemid=71
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access
> > >
> > > Scott Wofford, BS, MSPT, DC
> > > Founder
> > > Mid America Learning
> > > 342 Cedar Street
> > > Abilene, TX 79601
> > > Telephone: (325) 673-7800
> > > Fax: (325) 673-7801
> > > Via admissions@...
> > > http://www.midamericalearning.com
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > >
> > > Hopefully the Texas Board of Nursing will take immediate action to stop
> > > the
> > > massive birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation crime.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, please spread the word in your nursing program and to
> > > your
> > > fellow nursing programs.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > SCOTT: DOCTORS OF CHIROPRACTIC ARE FALLING DOWN ON THE JOB - BABIES BE
> > > DAMNED
> > >
> > > MD-pediatricians want doctors of chiropractic to join them in reporting
> > > harms related to spinal manipulation in children...
> > >
> > > A 2006 article in the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that concern
> > > for
> > > patient safety "DEMANDS" a greater collaboration "PARTICULARLY" with
> > > doctors
> > > of chiropractic "such that we can
> > > investigate and REPORT harms related to spinal manipulation together."
> > > (Emphases added.)
> > > --Sunita Vohra, MD FRCPC MSc et al. PEDIATRICS. 2007 Jan;119(1):e275-83.
> > > Epub 2006 Dec 18. PubMed abstract
> > >
> > > Yet both MD-pediatricians and DC-pediatricians remain silent...
> > >
> > > I'll cc PEDIATRICS Editor Jerold Lucey, MD via
> > > jpuskarz@..., rperelman@..., jerold.lucey@...
> > >
> > > Sadly, DC-pediatricians have not only been silent...
> > >
> > > DC-pediatricians (ICPA/Drs. Ohm and Alcantara) have CENSORED my
> > > birth-canal-closing info after citing it...
> > >
> > > It's PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE, as in,
> > >
> > > "[Withholding] information by restricting scholarly exchange...[is a
> > > form
> > > of]...psychological violence."
> > > --Ralph Crawshaw, MD. Academic sanction: targeting South African
> > > science.JAMA 1989;262(11):1499-1503
> > >
> > > ACA pediatricians Elise Hewitt, DC and Amy Watson, DC are remaining
> > > silent...
> > >
> > > See ICPA/Ohm's deletions (also: Dr. Hewitt and Dr. Watson: Do you
> > > suspect
> > > mass child abuse by OBGYNs)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2466
> > >
> > > After I called attention to ACA's birth trauma public policy, it too
> > > mysteriously disappeared...
> > >
> > > Recently, I wrote of the disappeared ACA birth trauma policy: Emergency!
> > > It's GONE.
> > >
> > > ACA alternate delegate ROBERT A. HAYDEN, DC, PhD, an ACA spokesman, did
> > > not
> > > understand the emergency ("This is an emergency?" he asked)...
> > >
> > > So I spelled it out for him...
> > >
> > > "Robert...The emergency FOR BABIES is the birth-canal-closing/spinal
> > > manipulation mass
> > > child abuse by OBGYNs - and the other obvious OBGYN crimes discussed in
> > > the
> > > post to which you replied, reproduced below....The emergency for the
> > >
> > > chiropractic profession is the mysterious deletion of
> > > ACA birth trauma policy - more on this latter emergency below...."
> > >
> > > See Emergency chiropractic for babies. Attention Robert A. Hayden, DC,
> > > PhD -
> > > ACA 'spokesman to television, radio and the printed media.'
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2485
> > >
> > > ACA's DR. HAYDEN AND CARDIOVASCULAR AND CORONARY "CARE" CHILD ABUSE...
> > >
> > > ACA alternate delegate Dr. Hayden, just mentioned, specialized in
> > > "cardiovascular and coronary care," as in, "Prior to receiving his
> > > doctor
> > > of
> > > chiropractic degree, Dr. Hayden was a critical care nurse specializing
> > > in
> > > cardiovascular and coronary care..."
> > > http://www.acatoday.org/content_css.cfm?CID=2163
> > >
> > > Mention of cardiovascular and coronary care reminds me: In addition to
> > > routinely closing birth canals up to 30%, OBGYNs are temporarily
> > > asphyxiating babies en masse as they permanently rob them of up to 50%
> > > of
> > > their blood volume.
> > >
> > > It's obvious mass cardiovascular and coronary "care" CHILD ABUSE - MASS
> > > FORCED BRADYCARDIA - MASS FORCED FETAL DISTRESS...
> > >
> > > [A GRUESOME EXPERIMENT]
> > >
> > > To demonstrate to themselves that robbing babies of up to 50% of their
> > > blood
> > > volume is a BAD IDEA, retired OBGYN George Malcolm Morley blithely
> > > recommends that obstetricians commit "lesser" child abuse - temporary
> > > baby
> > > asphyxiation - causing obvious fetal distress - 60 bpm bradycardia -
> > > [WITHOUT PROCEEDING TO AMPUTATION OF UP TO 50% OF BABY BLOOD VOLUME]
> > >
> > > "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and
> > > thumb...The
> > > [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the
> > > color
> > > will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue
> > > (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will
> > > be
> > > able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR
> > > deceleration
> > > on
> > > a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds. Common sense will
> > > soon
> > > release the finger and thumb."
> > > http://web.archive.org/web/20040929080014/www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm
> > >
> > > See Dents in babies' skulls (and SJ Doc)...
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e
> > >
> > > NOTE: Normal fetal heart rate is 100 to 160...
> > >
> > > Senselessly bringing the heart rate down to 60 is obvious child
> > > abuse/senseless fetal distress...
> > >
> > > "[E]xtreme bradycardia [heart rate under 80 bpm] is always an expression
> > > of
> > > fetal distress and is a consequence of reduced gas exchange at the
> > > placenta."
> > > --From CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS IN PREGNANT PATIENTS.
> > > By Maria Helena L. Souza, CCP (BR)* & Decio O. Elias, MD**
> > > * Perfusionist / ** Pediatric Cardiac Surgeon
> > > http://perfline.com/textbook/local/pregnancy.html
> > >
> > > [NOTE: Dr. Morley's gruesome temporary baby asphyxiation experiment
> > > above
> > > is step one in the mass baby blood robbery that is American medicine's
> > > most
> > > frequent surgical behavior toward both males and females.]
> > >
> > >
> > > WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE...
> > >
> > > > (NOTE: Women
> > > > do NOT need to squat to allow their birth canals to open maximally.
> > > See
> > > > WHAT
> > > > DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE, below.)
> > > >
> > > > Incidentally, the Great Squat Robbery was related to The Great Birth
> > > > Robbery
> > > > in British obstetrician Jason Gardosi's 1989 Lancet "randomised
> > > controlled
> > > > trial of squatting" - where nobody squatted because - said Gardosi -
> > > most
> > > > women can't squat well enough to do so during delivery - which is
> > > > false:
> > > > See Brazilian obstetrician Moyses Paciornik's report of thousands of
> > > > squatting
> > > > births in chair-dwelling women - which at my request was published in
> > > > Birth
> > > > with my letter describing the birth-canal-closing biomechanics of
> > > > semisitting delivery...FREE ACCESS above.
> > > >
> > > > OBSTETRICS: "UNCONTROLLED EXPERIMENTATION"
> > > >
> > > > In 1989, British obstetrician Richard J. Lilford noted that
> > > > obstetrics
> > > > "amounts to uncontrolled experimentation."
> > > >
> > > > See Lilford RJ. State of the obstetric art. The Lancet
> > > > (Nov18)1989:1205-1207. Reviewing Chalmers I,
> > > > Enkin M and Keirse MJNC (eds.). Effective Care in Pregnancy and
> > > Childbirth
> > > > Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989 Pp 1516 (2 vols) ISBN
> > > 0-192615580.
> > > >
> > > > That same year, 1989, Lilford forgot to inform women that
> > > > semi-dor
(Message over 64k, truncated.)
Kim Collins, DoulaMomma
Childbirth Services For Mommas & Their Families
917.992.4424 doulamomma@...
http://www.doulamomma.com
Read my blog at http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
> From: tgastaldo@...
> To: doulamomma1@...; carter19604@...; liduggan@...; lencat@...; askconsumeraffairs@...; ishi@...
> CC: jerb40@...; nwwlc@...; drkugler@...; info@...; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com; etienne.deharven@...; robert.leppo@...; peter.duesberg@...; charles.geshekter@...; roberto.giraldo@...; claus.koehnlein@...; frank.lusardi@...; christine.maggiore@...; bryan.owen@...; david.rasnick@...; gordon.stewart@...; hiv-aids@...; wintera@...; webmaster@...; redalerts@...; aidsmythexposed@...; info@...; ihooper@...; arehab@...; arubin@...; lcatanzarolaw@...
> Subject: NJ doula/attorney fails to report mass battery/mass child abuse
> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 06:54:07 -0800
>
> Rachel Naomi Remen, MD via ishi@...: Please spread the word
> about the bizarre OBGYN birth-canal-closing and baby-blood-robbery crimes.
> MDs should be pardoned in advance. As med students MDs are TRAINED to
> "perform" these obvious felonies. See the ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training
> video, an indirect video admission, discussed below...
>
> NJ DOULA/ATTORNEY FAILS TO REPORT MASS BATTERY/MASS CHILD ABUSE
>
> Attention: NJ Attorney General ANN MILGRAM via
> askconsumeraffairs@....
>
> OBGYNs are failing to inform women that they are closing birth canals up to
> 30% and robbing up to 50% of blood volume from babies. OBGYNs indirectly
> ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely closing birth canals up to
> 30%. See below.
>
> Also, OBGYNs have been telling LIES to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies at
> the "Dents in babies' skulls" URL below.
>
> It's mass battery against children - OBVIOUS mass battery against children -
> MASS CHILD ABUSE.
>
> The mass child abuse involves mass ADULT abuse - mass birth-canal-closed
> VAGINA SLICING - the most common reason for hospitalization of women after
> childbirth. See below.
>
> NJ DOULA/ATTORNEY KIM COLLINS' FAILURE TO REPORT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE
>
> Doula/Attorney Kim Collins resides in New Jersey where failure to obtain
> informed consent is a battery.
> http://www.drlaw.com/Battery%20-%20More%20Ways%20to%20be%20Sued.pdf
>
> Doula/Attorney Collins in effect DEFINES "childbirth in America" as mass
> battery - mass failure to obtain informed consent, as in,
>
> "Immediately, I saw many parallels between [Christine Maggiore's] experience
> of being diagnosed HIV+ and childbirth in America;
> the lack of truly informed consent..."
> http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
>
> Atty Collins doesn't SAY "battery." Why not?
>
> OBGYNs are committing mass battery against pregnant women and CHILDREN.
>
> Mass battery against children is MASS CHILD ABUSE.
>
> Atty Collins doesn't SAY "mass child abuse." Why not?
>
> Atty Collins doesn't REPORT mass child abuse either - even after I noted
> that New Jersey threatens IMPRISONMENT for failure to report child abuse:
>
> > "In New Jersey, any person having reasonable cause to believe that a
> child
> > has been subjected to abuse or acts of abuse should immediately report
> > this
> > information to the State Central Registry (SCR). If the child is in
> > immediate danger, call 911 as well as 1-877 NJ ABUSE. A concerned caller
> > does not need proof to report an allegation of child abuse and can make
> > the
> > report anonymously...Any person who knowingly fails to report suspected
> > abuse or neglect according to the law or to comply with the provisions of
> > the law is a disorderly person and subject to a fine of up to $1000 or up
> > to
> > six months imprisonment, or both."
> > http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/abuse/how/
>
> Attorney Collins indicates that OBGYNs create an atmosphere of FEAR,
>
> "...the pervasive feeling that it's not okay
> to ask too many questions or to say 'No, thanks' to tests or protocols-tests
> that are sometimes flawed or have not been shown to improve outcomes-with
> matters only being complicated by healthcare economics."
> http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
>
> TERRORISTS create an atmosphere of fear.
>
> So I say again to Attorney Collins (and anyone else reading):
>
> >
> > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism. It's
> > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > just
> > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL.
>
> NOTE: Atty Collins still indicates that my comments about rampant domestic
> terrorism by OBGYNs appear to others be her comments. My comments are not
> Atty Collins comments. I am ADDRESSING Atty Collins above - not quoting
> her. Obviously, Atty Collins and I share a concern that OBGYNs are creating
> an atmosphere of fear and committing mass battery/mass failure to obtain
> informed consent. She just isn't SAYING the words "fear" - "terrorism" -
> "mass child abuse" - and more importantly - she isn't taking the minimum
> action required by law to protect children. She isn't REPORTING. She
> indicates that doing these things amounts to "spewing" "extreme views" to
> which she does not "subscribe."
>
> Since when is it OK to "subscribe" to Atty Collins' view that suspected
> child abuse - mass battery - mass failure to obtain informed consent -
> should NOT be reported?
>
> While her "extreme view" (that failure to report suspected child abuse is
> OK) may be buttressed by law enforcement failure to prosecute - that does
> not mean it is OK.
>
> MDs **KNOW** law enforcement is looking the other way. See the arrogant
> boast of Steve Harris, MD, quoted below.
>
> NJ Attorney General Ann Milgram: I've emailed you before. Please stop
> looking the other way. Please stop the mass child abuse.
>
> My apologies if you just never received or read my previous emails.
> EMERGENCY. Please take action.
>
> My further comments are interspersed ####
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: doula momma
> To: tgastaldo@... ; carter19604@... ; Lisa Duggin ;
> lencat@...
> Cc: jerb40@... ; nwwlc@... ; drkugler@... ;
> info@... ; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com ; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com ;
> etienne.deharven@... ; robert.leppo@... ;
> peter.duesberg@... ; charles.geshekter@... ;
> roberto.giraldo@... ; claus.koehnlein@... ;
> frank.lusardi@... ; christine.maggiore@... ;
> bryan.owen@... ; david.rasnick@... ;
> gordon.stewart@... ; hiv-aids@... ; wintera@... ;
> webmaster@... ; redalerts@... ;
> aidsmythexposed@... ; info@... ; ihooper@... ;
> arehab@... ; arubin@... ; len catanzaro
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 9:20 PM
> Subject: RE: NO RETRACTION - Atty Kim Collins - if you SUSPECT child abuse -
> REPORT
>
>
> Mr. Gastaldo,
>
> #### Atty Collins, your passive aggressive titular etiquette slap is noted.
> See "Correction" below.
>
> You are not quoting my article regarding Christine Maggiore...you are
> quoting the bio that accompanies every piece I write because it is part of
> my history.
>
> #### Thank you for clarifying that in EVERY piece you call yourself an
> attorney.
>
> I write for a parenting publication on pregnancy and birth and was given the
> column because of the many hundreds of births I have attended and not
> becasue I went to law school.
>
> #### I don't care why you were given the assignment. You identified
> yourself as an attorney. You ALWAYS identify yourself as an attorney.
> Again, thank you for that clarification.
>
> So if you insist on calling me an attorney,
>
> #### YOU insist on calling yourself an attorney - a "reformed" attorney -
> it's in "the bio that accompanies every piece [you] write"...
>
> then also call me a mother and wife and belly cast maker - those are in my
> bio for the magazine as well and are more relevant to the Maggiore article.
>
> #### I **DID** this - in my original post - and you still complained!
>
> You do not have my permission to use me or my biography to spew your extreme
> views - views to which I do not subscribe. I again say that your doing so
> is misleading and inaccurate.
>
> #### I do not NEED your permission to note that you - an attorney - in
> effect DEFINE childbirth as battery/crime/failure to obtain informed consent
> but fail to SAY the words "battery" or "crime." I do not need your
> permission to note that you fail to say that a crime of MASS CHILD ABUSE is
> being committed when OBGYNs fail to obtain informed consent from pregnant
> women. The accompanying mass ADULT abuse - mass vagina slicing (OBGYNs
> fraudulently/surgically inferring that everything possible is being done to
> open the birth canal even as the birth canal is kept closed the "extra" up
> to 30%) - just makes matters worse.
>
> Your refusal to retract
>
> #### Retract WHAT? I do not agree with your claim that it appears that I
> quoted you (see above) - but nonetheless I made the clarification that I was
> ADDRESSING you - not quoting you - again - see above.
>
> does not address the aggregious misquote
>
> #### I think you mean "egregious"?
>
> - you are attributing someone else's polarizing words to me and that is
> sloppy and wrong.
>
> #### No. It is sloppy and wrong for you to keep saying that I was quoting
> you - not addressing you - even after I clarified this at your request. See
> below.
>
> You might take note of the fact that I am not a public figure, but a private
> citizen.
>
> #### Your veiled SLAPP threat/libel lawsuit threat is noted. Truth is not
> libel.
>
> #### I was SLAPP'd before - before I realized that SLAPPs are easy to
> defeat...
>
> See Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing...
> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4
>
> #### Why does your blog say "former" attorney...
> http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
>
> #### ...but your history says "reformed" attorney?
> http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
>
> #### If you don't want people identifying you as an attorney ("former"
> "reformed" or otherwise) - you might just leave that bit out.
>
> Kim Collins, DoulaMomma
> Childbirth Services For Mommas & Their Families
> 917.992.4424 doulamomma@...
> http://www.doulamomma.com
>
> Read my blog at http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
>
> #### Regarding Rachel Naomi Remen, MD, you write on your blog: "She spoke
> about how the rigors of medical school and the path to becoming a physician
> can actually harm one's sense of humanity and compassion...I found her words
> so enlightening and was feeling such compassion for the doctors I have
> sometimes really resented or by whom I and my clients are occasionally
> frustrated. They have given up so much to be physicians and it hurts them
> and it hurts us, their patients."
> http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
>
> #### As I noted for Dr. Remen above: MDs should be pardoned in advance. As
> med students MDs are TRAINED to "perform" these obvious felonies. See the
> ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training video, an indirect video admission,
> discussed below...
>
> #### MDs give up a LOT as they allow themselves to be TRAINED to "perform"
> obvious felonies. They are locked in to a life of crime. Stopping the
> crimes is tantamount to admitting the crimes. Pardons in advance seem to me
> the only way out of the mess.
>
> #### Sincerely,
>
> #### Todd
>
> #### Dr. Gastaldo
> #### Hillsboro, Oregon
> #### USA
> #### todd@ chiromotion.com
>
>
> > From: tgastaldo@...
> > To: doulamomma1@...; carter19604@...; liduggan@...;
> > lencat@...
> > CC: jerb40@...; nwwlc@...; drkugler@...;
> > info@...; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com;
> > etienne.deharven@...; robert.leppo@...;
> > peter.duesberg@...; charles.geshekter@...;
> > roberto.giraldo@...; claus.koehnlein@...;
> > frank.lusardi@...; christine.maggiore@...;
> > bryan.owen@...; david.rasnick@...;
> > gordon.stewart@...; hiv-aids@...; wintera@...;
> > webmaster@...; redalerts@...;
> > aidsmythexposed@...; info@...; ihooper@...;
> > arehab@...; arubin@...; lcatanzarolaw@...
> > Subject: NO RETRACTION - Atty Kim Collins - if you SUSPECT child abuse -
> > REPORT
> > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:56:22 -0800
> >
> > NO RETRACTION: Attorney Kim Collins called herself a REFORMED attorney
> > when
> > she wrote the article I quoted. I **quoted** her calling herself a
> > "reformed" attorney. Now she is saying she did not write that article as
> > an
> > attorney. If she did not want to be identified as having written that
> > article as an attorney, she should not have noted in her article that she
> > is
> > an attorney - "reformed" or otherwise.
> >
> > REPORT: See the New Jersey suspected child abuse reporting rule, quoted
> > below.
> >
> > Atty Collins writes, "Although I am admitted, I no longer practice law."
> > If
> > Attorney Kim Collins so much as SUSPECTS mass child abuse, it is time for
> > her to practice some law to help stop the obvious OBGYN crimes. REPORTING
> > is the minimum action when child abuse is suspected - the minimum action
> > to
> > "make birth better for moms and babies..."
> >
> > READERS (including Attorney Kim Collins): If you suspect child abuse,
> > please report to law enforcement the obvious crimes being committed by
> > OBGYNs as discussed below.
> >
> > Don't miss the arrogant boast of Steve Harris, MD who indicates that crime
> > isn't crime if MDs commit it and law enforcement looks the other way. See
> > below.
> >
> > Further comments interspersed #####
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: doula momma
> > To: tgastaldo@... ; carter19604@... ; Lisa Duggin ;
> > lencat@...
> > Cc: jerb40@... ; nwwlc@... ; drkugler@... ;
> > info@... ; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com ; chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com
> > ;
> > etienne.deharven@... ; robert.leppo@... ;
> > peter.duesberg@... ; charles.geshekter@... ;
> > roberto.giraldo@... ; claus.koehnlein@... ;
> > frank.lusardi@... ; christine.maggiore@... ;
> > bryan.owen@... ; david.rasnick@... ;
> > gordon.stewart@... ; hiv-aids@... ; wintera@... ;
> > webmaster@... ; redalerts@... ;
> > aidsmythexposed@... ; info@... ; ihooper@... ;
> > arehab@... ; arubin@...
> > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 3:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: Are baby screams just 'diatribes'?: Attn: Brian Carter of
> > AIDSMythExposed.com
> >
> >
> > Mr. Gastaldo,
> >
> > #### Correction: It's Dr. Gastaldo when proper titular etiquette is used.
> > You may not think I rate the title "Dr" - if so - so be it - but it was
> > while earning my doctorate in chiropractic that I learned the simple
> > neurology necessary to expose American medicine's phony "babies can't feel
> > pain" neurology and the simple biomechanics necessary to expose American
> > medicine's grisly birth-canal-closing habit.
> >
> > While I share your desire to make birth better for moms and babies,
> >
> > #### No. Your desire isn't anything like mine. My desire includes doing
> > the minimum under the law - reporting suspected child abuse - to protect
> > children. (If you don't suspect child abuse, then your desire is quite
> > unlike mine.)
> >
> > I absolutely disagree with your caustic and inflammatory tone and
> > language.
> >
> > #### I substitute graphic description for euphemism. For example, instead
> > of "routine infant circumcision" I say "mass infant penis ripping and
> > slicing." This description - however accurate - offends some people -
> > understandably - as obvious crime SHOULD offend people.
> >
> > #### I also call the OBGYN crimes what they are - crimes. We live in a
> > medico-"legal" "just us" system. An attorney who protects MD criminals no
> > longer surprises me.
> >
> > Rather, I feel it hurts the cause
> >
> > #### There are VARIOUS causes - various CRIMES. Sorry to be "caustic and
> > inflammatory" but they are OBVIOUS crimes.
> >
> > and do not wish to be associated with your efforts.
> >
> > #### If you see error in my work, please point it out. If I agree, I will
> > issue an apology. I see no error on my part.
> >
> > I am deeply concerned about the use of my name in the text below.
> >
> > #### I am deeply concerned that your train of thought takes a dirt road.
> > As
> > noted above, Attorney Kim Collins called herself a REFORMED attorney when
> > she wrote the article I quoted. I **quoted** her calling herself a
> > "reformed" attorney. Now she is saying she did not write that article as
> > an
> > attorney. If she did not want to be identified as having written that
> > article as an attorney, she should not have noted in her article that she
> > is
> > an attorney - "reformed" or otherwise.
> >
> > I stand behind the piece I wrote on Christine Maggiore,
> >
> > #### I never said you DIDN'T stand behind your piece!
> >
> > whom I now consider a long distance friend.
> >
> > #### How sad that she lost a daughter.
> >
> > However I wrote it as a doula, mother and writer, not as an attorney.
> >
> > #### FALSE. You identified yourself as an attorney. You wrote or caused to
> > be written at the bottom of the article: "Kim Collins, also known as
> > DoulaMomma, lives with her husband and three sons in South Orange. A
> > 'reformed' attorney, she now teaches childbirth classes, counsels on birth
> > options, creates belly casts, and works as a birth doula. Reach her at
> > doulamomma1@...."
> > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> >
> > #### If "reformed" attorney means you are admitted but no longer practice
> > law, then SAY so. If you don't want to be identified as an attorney, DON'T
> > MENTION that you are an attorney.
> >
> > Although I am admitted, I no longer practice law. To imply otherwise is
> > disingenuous and misleading.
> >
> > #### YOU implied otherwise by not explaining that "reformed" means
> > "admitted
> > but no longer practicing law." By your own definition, YOU were
> > disingenuous and misleading.
> >
> > Please correct this immediately by sending a retraction/correction to
> > everyone to whom this was sent and anywhere this was posted online or in
> > print.
> >
> > #### I have corrected you and this is being cc'd to the people who
> > received
> > the post to which you objected as well as being posted to the two
> > chiro-lists.
> >
> > Further, you improperly attribute the quote about OBs being domestic
> > terrorists to me and again refer to me as "ATTORNEY COLLINS". I did not
> > say
> > this.
> >
> > #### I **addressed** you, as in,
> >
> > >
> > > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism.
> > > It's
> > > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > > just
> > > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL.
> >
> > #### **I** said OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism. My
> > apologies if anyone thought I was quoting you.
> >
> > Please cease and desist from using my name in regards to this concept
> >
> > #### WHAT?! You wrote in your article: "Immediately, I saw many parallels
> > between her experience of being diagnosed HIV+ and childbirth in America;
> > the lack of truly informed consent; the pervasive feeling that it's not
> > okay
> > to ask too many questions or to say 'No, thanks' to tests or
> > protocols-tests
> > that are sometimes flawed or have not been shown to improve outcomes-with
> > matters only being complicated by healthcare economics."
> > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> >
> > #### Failure to obtain truly informed consent is a crime - a BATTERY - in
> > many jurisdictions. What is it in your jurisdiction?
> >
> > #### I SAY AGAIN...
> >
> > >
> > > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism.
> > > It's
> > > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > > just
> > > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL.
> >
> > and correct this error immediately by the means requested above.
> >
> > #### I don't see any error. People who - like you - thought I was quoting
> > you now know that I was **addressing** you - assuming they are reading
> > this.
> >
> > If there is someone else to whom I should direct my concerns, please
> > advise.
> >
> > #### Again, if you SUSPECT child abuse - REPORT - to law enforcment.
> >
> > > "In New Jersey, any person having reasonable cause to believe that a
> > child
> > > has been subjected to abuse or acts of abuse should immediately report
> > > this
> > > information to the State Central Registry (SCR). If the child is in
> > > immediate danger, call 911 as well as 1-877 NJ ABUSE. A concerned caller
> > > does not need proof to report an allegation of child abuse and can make
> > > the
> > > report anonymously...Any person who knowingly fails to report suspected
> > > abuse or neglect according to the law or to comply with the provisions
> > > of
> > > the law is a disorderly person and subject to a fine of up to $1000 or
> > > up
> > > to
> > > six months imprisonment, or both."
> > > http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/abuse/how/
> >
> > I am copying my attorney, Leonard J. Catanzaro, Esq., on this email, as
> > well
> > as my publisher at The MotherHood, Lisa Duggan, who can be reached
> > directly
> > at TheMotherHood@...
> >
> > #### I too will copy your attorney - hopefully he is LEONARD J. CATANZARO
> > Attorney at Law
> > 434 Broadway
> > Suite 900
> > New York, New York 10013
> > CONTACT US
> > Leonard J. Catanzaro, Esq.
> > Associate:
> > Steven R. Perkel, Esq.
> > Paralegals:
> > Stacey Ann Francis
> > Alicia Bucknol
> > nyc (212) 226-1234
> > nassau (516) 561-6661
> > fax (212) 226-1392
> > Via lcatanzarolaw@...
> > http://www.quicklien.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kimberley Collins, CD(DONA)
> >
> > #### You are welcome Kim.
> >
> > Kim Collins, DoulaMomma
> > Childbirth Services For Mommas & Their Families
> > 917.992.4424 doulamomma@...
> > http://www.doulamomma.com
> >
> > Read my blog at http://doulamomma.blogspot.com/
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > In a message dated 12/6/2008 9:56:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> > > tgastaldo@... writes:
> > > CAIR: OBGYNs AS TERRORISTS:
> > >
> > > CHRISTINE MAGGIORE'S HIV+ BRUSH WITH OBSTETRICS
> > >
> > > (Attn CAIR: Jason Erb and Ibrahim and Ahmed and Amina: Please see my
> > > Open
> > > Letter below - esp. the postscript.)
> > >
> > > "When [Christine Maggiore] was pregnant...she went to several OBs and
> > > was
> > > either turned away or told she had to take AZT and have a cesarean
> > > birth."
> > > --By ATTORNEY KIM COLLINS. From the preface to an interview of Christine
> > > Maggiore by "reformed" attorney Kim Collins who "now teaches childbirth
> > > classes, counsels on birth options, creates belly casts, and works as a
> > > birth doula. Reach her at doulamomma1@...."
> > > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> > >
> > > ATTORNEY COLLINS: OBGYNs are "practicing" rampant domestic terrorism.
> > > It's
> > > "nice" "scientific" domestic terrorism to be sure - but it's terrorism
> > > just
> > > the same - SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL. (Attorney Sara Ainsworth via
> > > nwwlc@..., please help stop domestic terrorism by OBGYNs. Modern
> > > medicine is - in effect - a WORLD RELIGION - see the quotes below. One
> > > American MD arrogantly boasts - in effect - that crime is not crime when
> > > MDs
> > > commit it. See the quote from Steve Harris, MD, reproduced below.)
> > >
> > > OBGYNS "PRACTICE" TRULY BIZARRE DOMESTIC TERRORISM
> > >
> > > The grisly spectacle of obstetricians prescribing the DNA chain
> > > terminator
> > > AZT BEFORE birth is as bizarre as the grisly spectacle of obstetricians
> > > senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% DURING birth - by using
> > > semisitting or dorsal delivery. (The obstetric practice of routinely
> > > asphyxiating babies/permanently amputating up to 50% of their blood
> > > volume
> > > is also grisly - easily ended. See below.)
> > >
> > > BIZARRE BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING/SPINAL MANIPULATION
> > >
> > > In MOST births, obstetricians use birth-canal-closing semisitting or
> > > dorsal
> > > delivery positions - both of which close the birth canal up to 30%. (For
> > > the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and radiographic and
> > > clinical
> > > cites from the medical literature, see Gastaldo 1992, FREE ACCESS
> > > below.)
> > >
> > > WORSE: When babies get stuck, obstetricians KEEP birth canals closed the
> > > "extra" up to 30% - keep women semisitting or dorsal - as they pull with
> > > forceps/vacuums (1 in 10 births) - sometimes pulling so hard they rip
> > > spinal
> > > nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
> > >
> > > Some babies are DYING - and obstetric experts are LYING. See the Four OB
> > > Lies in "Dents in babies' skulls" URL below. (THE KICKER: Obstetricians
> > > indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely closing
> > > birth
> > > canals up to 30%. See below.)
> > >
> > > Nurses are in on the grisly gag - at least nurse leaders are...Yale
> > > CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney Burst ignored my pleas and promoted
> > > birth-canal-closing/semisitting in her Midwifery text.
> > >
> > > SPEAKING OF CHILDREN DYING...
> > >
> > > How sad that Christine Maggiore's three-year-old daughter ELIZA JANE
> > > dodged
> > > the AZT/DNA-chain-terminator bullet before birth but later died after
> > > that
> > > amoxicillin incident...
> > > http://www.justiceforej.com/MotherHood.html
> > >
> > > INTERESTING COINCIDENCE: One of Christine Maggiore's pediatricians -
> > > Paul
> > > Fleiss, MD - protested in The Lancet [1995] another bizarre obstetric
> > > behavior - mass infant penis ripping and slicing - American medicine's
> > > most
> > > frequent surgical behavior toward males, as in,
> > >
> > > "[C]onsistent with torture...[w]ith or without anaesthesia...Despite the
> > > obviously irrational cruelty of circumcision, the profit incentive in
> > > American medical practice is unlikely to allow science or human rights
> > > principles to interrupt the highly lucrative American circumcision
> > > industry.
> > > It is now time for European medical associations to condemn the North
> > > American medical community for participating in and profiting from what
> > > is
> > > by any standard a senseless and barbaric sexual mutilation of innocent
> > > children."
> > > --Fleiss PM. Letter. Lancet 1995;345:927.
> > > http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/fleiss/
> > >
> > > DR. FLEISS ("consistent with torture") obviously suspects mass child
> > > abuse.
> > > I wonder if he ever filed a suspected child abuse report. Maybe
> > > Christine
> > > Maggiore will ask him...
> > >
> > > I wonder if *Christine Maggiore* suspects the mass infant penis ripping
> > > and
> > > slicing is child abuse...
> > >
> > > REMEMBER: The no-medical-indication mass infant penis ripping and
> > > slicing
> > > should have ended BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago -
> > > back
> > > in
> > > 1987 when I pointed out the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.
> > > See
> > > below. Ending the screams now - finally - instantly saves America an
> > > estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE
> > > American males can make for themselves in adulthood.
> > >
> > > I wonder if Christine Maggiore suspects the BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING is mass
> > > child abuse...
> > >
> > > I will cc silent Christine Maggiore and her fellow Rethinking AIDS
> > > mucky-mucks via etienne.deharven@...;
> > > robert.leppo@...; peter.duesberg@...;
> > > charles.geshekter@...;
> > > roberto.giraldo@...;
> > > claus.koehnlein@...; frank.lusardi@...;
> > > christine.maggiore@...; bryan.owen@...;
> > > david.rasnick@...; gordon.stewart@....
> > >
> > > I wonder if JASON ERB suspects mass child abuse...
> > >
> > > Jason "responded" to my post, reproduced below.
> > >
> > > I now reply...
> > >
> > > JASON ERB HELPS PERPETUATE MASS CHILD ABUSE.
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below.
> > >
> > > Jason Erb
> > > via jerb40@...
> > >
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > I say again: Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing
> > > keeping American MDs out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass
> > > infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > Thank you for offering your disagreement.
> > >
> > > My comments are interspersed below ####.
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Jason Erb
> > > To: Todd Gastaldo
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:36 AM
> > > Subject: Re: An 'HIV/AIDS risk-lowering' 'chop chop'?
> > >
> > >
> > > Todd,
> > >
> > > you said "Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing
> > > keeping
> > > American MDs out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime..."
> > >
> > > I disagree. The circumcision of newborn baby boys in the U.S. was widely
> > > practiced decades before Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis came on to the
> > > scene
> > > in
> > > 1984.
> > >
> > > #### Jason, IT DOESN'T MATTER how long obvious child abuse is practiced.
> > > Child abuse is a CRIME which is to be reported IMMEDIATELY - even if it
> > > is
> > > so much as SUSPECTED. Your euphemism. "Circumcision of newborn baby
> > > boys"
> > > helps conceal the fact that the crime is - literally - mass ripping and
> > > slicing of infant penises - "widely practiced for decades" with PHONY
> > > "BABIES CAN'T FEEL PAIN" NEUROLOGY AND NO MEDICAL INDICATIONS.
> > >
> > > #### In late 1987 - BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago - I
> > > pointed out American medicine's uncritical PERPETUATION of the phony
> > > "babies
> > > can't feel pain" neurology.
> > >
> > > #### In March 1988, suddenly, by voice vote of the California Medical
> > > Association House of Delegates - the no-medical-indications mass infant
> > > penis ripping and slicing became "an effective public health measure"
> > > "confirmed" in Africa to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS. By passing
> > > CMA
> > > Res. 305-88, the CMA House of Delegates in effect voted against the
> > > CMA's
> > > own Sceintific Board which had just REJECTED the Robert C.
> > > Gallo-HIV/AIDS-hypothesis-based hoax. To my knowledge, CMA Res. 305-88
> > > is
> > > still in force.
> > >
> > > ### Also in late 1987, I petitioned Congress for a religious exemption
> > > from
> > > the child abuse laws for "mini-circ" - the ancient Jewish ritual that
> > > leaves
> > > most of the foreskin on the penis. (American MDs are TOTAL foreskin
> > > amputators.)
> > >
> > > ### In the January 1988 issue of PEDIATRICS, American MDs came out
> > > against
> > > ALL religious exemptions from the child abuse laws. (An exemption from
> > > the
> > > child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish "mini-circ" would have made it
> > > obvious to all that American medicine's TOTAL amputation is child
> > > abuse.)
> > >
> > > ### In February 1988 issue of PEDIATRICS, American MDs came out in favor
> > > of
> > > anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse.
> > >
> > > ### American MDs were scrambling. Prison is not a pleasant thought for
> > > anyone. (BTW, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
> > > students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies. See the ACOG
> > > Shoulder Dystocia training video discussed below.)
> > >
> > > ### The 1988-9 American-MD-scramble was so convincing that American MDs
> > > had
> > > to be informed that American MD-pediatricians are (officially)
> > > ANTI-circumcision, as in,
> > >
> > > MEDICAL TRIBUNE 30:16 (8 June 1989)
> > > FORGET THOSE HEADLINES ABOUT CIRCUMCISION
> > > AAP IS AGAINST ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION
> > > http://www.cirp.org/CIRP/news/1989.06.08%3aMedicalTribune
> > >
> > > ### Jason Erb continues...
> > >
> > > Also, the hypothesis isn't just Gallo's anymore but has become an
> > > entrenched
> > > worldwide socio-political-financial construct.
> > >
> > > #### One would EXPECT American MDs to tie into "an entrenched worldwide
> > > socio-political-financial construct" in their attempt to stay out of
> > > prison
> > > for their ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime. There
> > > aren't
> > > enough MDs to serve all the prison time. Remaining silent about the
> > > CMA's
> > > obvious HIV/AIDS hoax only helps keep the construct entrenched.
> > >
> > > #### As I indicated to Duesberg in 1990-1 and as I am STILL indicating
> > > to
> > > Duesberg (et al.) (as they sit in stony silence - babies be damned):
> > > American MDs USED - American MDs STILL USE the "entrenched worldwide
> > > socio-political-construct" ultimately based on Gallo's phony "antibody
> > > means
> > > current disease/HIV/AIDS" immunology - to perpetuate the mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime - yet there are STILL no medical indications -
> > > only a history of phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and
> > > American-taxpayer-funded "scientific" testing and promotion of African
> > > penis
> > > slicing in an attempt to PROVE the obvious hoax (CMA Res. 305-88) -
> > > which
> > > (I
> > > say again) is ultimately based on Robert C. Gallo's phony "antibody
> > > means
> > > current disease/HIV/AIDS" immunology.
> > >
> > > The 2600+ members of Rethinking AIDS (of which you yourself are a member
> > > as
> > > well as Peter Duesberg who you challenge) are among those who have
> > > publicly
> > > expressed their doubts about the HIV/AIDS hypothesis.
> > >
> > > "PETER DUESBERG WHO[M] YOU CHALLENGE..."
> > >
> > > #### I **thank** Peter Duesberg for pointing out Robert C. Gallo's lame
> > > HIV/AIDS hypothesis! I only challenge him to finally start publicly
> > > discussing the FACT that Gallo's lame HIV/AIDS hypothesis was invoked
> > > over
> > > the objection of the CMA Scientific Board - as part of American
> > > medicine's
> > > lame attempt to cover-up phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and an
> > > ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > So let's talk about how we can work together to subject the HIV/AIDS
> > > hypothesis to intense public, medical, and scientific scrutiny.
> > >
> > > #### I **am** talking about "how we can work together to subject the
> > > HIV/AIDS hypothesis to intense public, medical, and scientific
> > > scrutiny."
> > >
> > > If your belief proves to be true,
> > >
> > > #### I am not stating mere "belief": It is a FACT that Robert C. Gallo's
> > > lame HIV/AIDS hypothesis was invoked over the objection of the CMA
> > > Scientific Board as part of American medicine's lame attempt to cover-up
> > > phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and the ongoing mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime. See above.
> > >
> > > then you will have achieved your goal regarding the practice of
> > > circumcision
> > > as a consequence of us working together on the HIV/AIDS front.
> > >
> > > #### My "goal regarding the practice of circumcision" includes helping
> > > Rethinking AIDS answer a key question...
> > >
> > > #### As I noted in my post...
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS ASKS: ARE AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > Acclaimed AIDS expert James Chin, MD, MPH reportedly believes that
> > > AFRICAN
> > > PROMISCUITY is the reason Sub-Saharan Africa is the only uncircumcised
> > > place
> > > on Earth that suffers a heterosexual AIDS epidemic.
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > **ARE** AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > TWO GOOD QUESTIONS came from RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter
> > > Duesberg, PhD et al., emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. "Do scientific studies support the conclusion that Africans are an
> > > especially promiscuous people?
> > >
> > > 2. "And if the majority of males throughout the world are uncircumcised,
> > > why
> > > does naturally
> > > occurring male anatomy lead to AIDS only in Africa?"
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > THE SHORT ANSWER: IT DOESN'T MATTER whether Africans are especially
> > > promiscuous. Naturally occurring male anatomy leads to AIDS only in
> > > Africa
> > > because back in 1987 American MDs correctly feared that RIPPING and
> > > SLICING
> > > that very same naturally occurring male anatomy on infants leads to
> > > PRISON
> > > in America...
> > >
> > > Two questions for RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.,
> > > emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. In [1990-1], why did Rethinking AIDS member Peter Duesberg, PhD
> > > ignore
> > > the
> > > fact that American MDs had been caught perpetuating phony
> > > "babies can't feel pain" neurology as they committed obvious mass child
> > > abuse - ripping and slicing infant penises en masse for no medical
> > > indication?
> > >
> > > 2. Why did Duesberg ignore the fact that, in a lame attempt to COVER-UP
> > > their obvious mass child abuse crime, American MDs had just ignored
> > > their own Scientific Board to fraudulently declare their NO MEDICAL
> > > INDICATION mass infant penis
> > > ripping and slicing "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS (California Medical
> > > Association
> > > Res. 305-99)?
> > >
> > > Rethinking AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.) are STILL ignoring
> > > the
> > > bizarre CMA behavior - babies be damned...
> > >
> > > >>>>END excerpt of my original post - which Jason blithely ignored.
> > >
> > > REGARDING MY "RIPPING AND SLICING" PHRASEOLOGY...
> > >
> > > FIRST, INFANT PENISES ARE RIPPED...
> > >
> > > "[The first step in all circumcisions]...freeing adhesions [ripping
> > > foreskin from glans], is
> > > tantamount to cruel and unusual punishment and is unfounded
> > > physiologically and
> > > medically." [Kaplan GW: Circumcision: An overview. Current Problems
> > > in Pediatrics, 1977;7(5):8.]
> > >
> > > THEN INFANT PENISES ARE SLICED...
> > >
> > > "One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced
> > > off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald
> > > Goldman, PhD, author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)
> > >
> > > "The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
> > > about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin."
> > > http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD,
> > > author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)
> > >
> > > "[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an
> > > acknowledged
> > > hazard to health." [Katz M. Circumcision. AJDC 1980;134:1098]
> > >
> > > Attention California DAs who might be reading...
> > >
> > > IN CALIFORNIA: Prosecution of child abuse "does not require any
> > > intent to
> > > violate law, or to injure another, or to acquire any
> > > advantage." [People v.
> > > Pointer (App. 1 Dist. 1984) 199 Cal. Rptr. 357 cited/quoted under
> > > California
> > > Penal Code Section 273a]
> > >
> > > "After years of strapping babies down for this brutal procedure and
> > > listening to their screams, we couldn't take it any
> > > longer." [Sperlich
> > > BK,
> > > Conant M. Am J Nurs (Jun)1994:16.]
> > >
> > > "[C]onstitutional rights...including freedom of religion, are
> > > inadequate to
> > > prevent the states from using their authority to treat circumcision
> > > as
> > > child
> > > abuse...The most obvious way to proceed with enforcement...is through
> > > criminal prosecution under existing state laws." [Brigman WE:
> > > Circumcision
> > > as child abuse: the legal and Constitutional issues. Journal of
> > > Family
> > > Law,
> > > 1984;23(3):337-57]
> > >
> > > PARENTS CANNOT LEGALLY MARTYR THEIR CHILDREN
> > >
> > > According to the US Supreme Court writing in Prince v. Massachusetts,
> > > 321 U.S. 158
> > > (1944): "parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it
> > > does
> > > not follow they are free ... to make martyrs of their children before
> > > they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can
> > > make that choice for themselves."
> > >
> > > Most American males are still imprisoned to have their penises ripped
> > > and sliced...
> > >
> > > "In less than 30 seconds a nurse can immobilize the struggling
> > > infant securely in the correct position with Circumstraint.
> > > Soft, wide Velcro straps encircle the infant's elbows and knees,
> > > depriving him of leverage. He's held securely without danger of
> > > escape...[The Circumstraint elevates the hips]...perfectly
> > > presenting the genitalia." [From an ad for the Olympic
> > > Circumstraint, manufactured in Washington state, emphasis added.]
> > >
> > > THIS OBVIOUSLY ILLEGAL TAKING OF INFANT PRISONERS (AND SLICING OFF
> > > INFANT PENIS PARTS) IS OBVIOUSLY AGAINST MEDICAL ETHICS...
> > >
> > > Here is a relevant quote from the American Academy of Pediatrics/AAP:
> > >
> > > "[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient exist
> > > independent of parental desires...A[n infant's screaming writhing and
> > > bleeding obviously constitutes the - TDG] patient's reluctance or
> > > refusal to assent [and - TDG] should...carry considerable weight when
> > > the proposed intervention is not essential to his or her welfare and/
> > > or
> > > can be deferred without substantial risk... [T]hose who care for
> > > children need to provide for measures to solicit assent and to attend
> > > to possible abuses of 'raw' power over children when ethical
> > > conflicts
> > > occur."
> > > AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
> > > Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric
> > > Practice(RE9510)
> > > Pediatrics Volume 95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317
> > > http://www.aap.org/policy/00662.html
> > >
> > > THE LONDON CASE: "JUDICIAL ABSURDITY"
> > >
> > > In 1989, Attorney Richard W. Morris called it "judicial absurdity"
> > > when California courts in effect declared that parents may consent to
> > > have MDs take their infants prisoner for the penis ripping and
> > > slicing
> > > - and the California Supreme Court silently went along with the
> > > grisly
> > > gag.
> > > http://www.nocirc.org/symposia/first/morris.html
> > >
> > > GOOD NEWS: At least one subsequent California court reportedly
> > > ignored this London precedent.
> > >
> > > "Infants, legally mentally incompetent, ARE...protected from
> > > nonrequired medical treatments under the Probate Code" (emphasis
> > > added), according to the following article...
> > >
> > > >>>>BEGIN excerpt of http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/
> > >
> > >
> > > In an unpublished 1987 decision of the Court of Appeal, 1st District
> > > No. A03040, London v. Glassner et al., petition for review denied,
> > > parental consent to "any ... medical treatment" is found to be
> > > without
> > > apparent limitation, regardless of purpose. Civil Code 25.8 cited as
> > > authority for this decision provides: Either parent if both parents
> > > have legal custody, or the parent or person having legal custody or
> > > the legal guardian of a minor may authorize in writing any adult
> > > person into whose care the minor has been entrusted to consent to ANY
> > > X-ray examination, anesthetic, MEDICAL OR SURGICAL diagnosis or
> > > TREATMENT and hospital care to be rendered to the minor under the
> > > general or special supervision and UPON THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN AND
> > > SURGEON licensed under the provisions of the Medical Practice Act or
> > > to consent to an X-ray examination, anesthetic, dental, or surgical
> > > diagnosis or treatment and hospital care to be rendered to the minor
> > > by a dentist licensed under the provision s of the Dental Practice
> > > Act
> > > or to consent to an X-ray examination, anesthetic, dental or surgical
> > > diagnosis or treatment and hospital care to be rendered to the minor
> > > by a dentist licensed under the provisions of the Dental Practice
> > > Act." (emphasis added.) This court then held "(a) circumcision is a
> > > medical, surgical treatment," rejecting plaintiff's public policy
> > > argument that children should be protected from suffering
> > > unjustifiable pain or risk - based on the premise that parents cannot
> > > consent to surgical procedures which have no medical purpose." While
> > > this section does not specifically grant any direct authority for
> > > parental consent, the trial court found the legislative history was
> > > to
> > > extend the common law authority of parents.
> > >
> > > The London decision is unsupported and contradicted by the California
> > > Supreme Court's decision in Conservatorship of Valerie N. v. Valerie
> > > N. (1985) 219 Cal. Rptr. 387). The case deals with the rights of
> > > parents of a mentally incompetent adult to consent to sterilization,
> > > a
> > > recognized medical treatment. The court found that the parents as
> > > "conservators were not entitled to have conservatee, who was unable
> > > to
> > > consent to sterilization, sterilized inasmuch as there was neither
> > > evidence of necessity ... nor sufficient evidence that less intrusive
> > > means ... were not presently available to conservatee." This court
> > > further holds "... as to those medical procedures permitted after
> > > court authorization the Legislature has required a judicial
> > > determination that the condition of the conservatee 'require the
> > > recommended course of medical treatment'" as provided in Cal. Probate
> > > Code Section 2357. subh. (h)(1). Infants, legally mentally
> > > incompetent, are therefore protected from nonrequired medical
> > > treatments under the Probate Code.
> > >
> > > [One of - TDG] the most important Supreme Court cases reflecting
> > > state
> > > and judicial intervention [is] Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158
> > > (1944)...The essence of the Prince decision is captured in the
> > > statement that "parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But
> > > it does not follow they are free ... to make martyrs of their
> > > children
> > > before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when
> > > they can make that choice for themselves." Prince, supra, 170. Under
> > > Yoder, supra 234, parental authority and discretion may be challenged
> > > "if it appears that parental decisions will jeopardize the health and
> > > safety of the child..." This demonstrates that the child's right to
> > > safety overcomes parental constitutional rights.
> > >
> > > >>>>END excerpt of http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/
> > >
> > >
> > > When the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in a religious
> > > freedom case - Oregon
> > > Employment v. Smith (1990) - the American Jewish Congress co-
> > > sponsored
> > > the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, fearing that states would
> > > invoke the Smith decision and use child protection statutes to end
> > > ritual
> > > circumcision. [Greenhouse L. NY Times 5/11/90:A10].
> > >
> > > But the American Jewish Congress needn't have bothered. The ritual
> > > mutilation of infants was illegal (but tolerated)
> > > before the Smith decision - and (most significantly) it is STILL
> > > illegal (but tolerated).
> > >
> > > Significantly, Jewish authorities (vigorously contested by other
> > > Jewish authorities) offer Jewish parents an ideological basis not to
> > > circumcise:
> > >
> > > 1) "[Circumcision] is not a sacrament which inducts the infant into
> > > Judaism: his birth does that" [Rabbi MN Kertner. What is a Jew? New
> > > York: Macmillan, 1973,1993] (Note: Adult Jews who wish to remain
> > > uncircumcised are accepted under Israel's Law of Return - and are
> > > allowed to remain uncircumcised. This suggests that "religious"
> > > circumcision is a CHOICE which may legitimately be postponed until
> > > adulthood and beyond. It makes sense for adults to be able to choose
> > > which religion to embrace, and to choose whether or not to surgically
> > > alter their bodies for religious reasons.)
> > >
> > > 2) As indicated above, modern rabbis are advocating the amputation of
> > > FAR MORE infant
> > > foreskin than God originally/allegedly intended. Quoting
> > > Wallerstein:
> > > "Originally, the surgery involved only cutting the tip
> > > of the foreskin. This was changed in the Hellenic Period to prevent
> > > [Jews from] elongat[ing] the foreskin stump in order to appear
> > > uncircumcised." [Wallerstein E. Humanistic
> > > Judaism 1983;11(4):46. (Wallerstein, a Jew, had previously won the
> > > American Medical Writers Award for his 1980 book, "Circumcision: An
> > > American Health Fallacy.)
> > >
> > > 3) "The infliction of unnecessary pain is precisely what Judaism is
> > > designed to fight against, so it makes little sense for us to be the
> > > perpetrators on our children." [Rabbi Michael Lerner. Jewish Renewal
> > > NY: G.P. Putnam's Sons 1994:387])
> > >
> > > 4) Some religions do not allow members to be circumcised.
> > > Therefore,
> > > a baby who is circumcised is denied the choice of some religions. A
> > > baby who is left intact, however, has true religious freedom, as he
> > > can
> > > choose to be circumcised or intact when he is old enough to choose.
> > >
> > > Again, that statement from Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158
> > > (1944): "parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it
> > > does
> > > not follow they are free ... to make martyrs of their children before
> > > they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can
> > > make that choice for themselves." Prince, supra, 170.
> > >
> > > The mass infant mutilation should have ended BILLIONS of dollars'
> > > worth of infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I pointed out
> > > American
> > > medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.
> > >
> > > Ending the mass infant mutilation now instantly saves America an
> > > estimated $400 million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE
> > > American males can make for themselves in adulthood.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason, you are helping Rethinking AIDS leaders ignore the bizarre 1988
> > > CMA
> > > "confirmed"-in-Africa hoax discussed in my original post.
> > >
> > > Please help PUBLICIZE the bizarre CMA "confirmed"-in-Africa hoax. Urge
> > > Rethinking AIDS leaders to do the same - finally.
> > >
> > > The obvious child-abuse-perpetuating "confirmed"-in-Africa CMA hoax must
> > > be
> > > noted as a potential source of bias everytime the
> > > American-taxpayer-supported "scientific" African penis-slicing promotion
> > > is
> > > discussed.
> > >
> > > I say again: Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing
> > > keeping American MDs out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass
> > > infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > TWO QUESTIONS...
> > >
> > > 1. You totally ignored the fact that the mass infant penis ripping and
> > > slicing is ongoing CRIME.
> > >
> > > WHY?
> > >
> > > 2. You totally ignored the OTHER obvious mass medical crimes discussed
> > > in
> > > my
> > > post.
> > >
> > > WHY?
> > >
> > > May I know how you happened to see my post?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > PS THE UNITED STATES IS "DENYING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM TO [TINY US]
> > > CITIZENS..."
> > >
> > > Jason, are you "Jason Erb Former National Governmental Affairs Director
> > > of
> > > CAIR...the Council on American-Islamic Relations..."?
> > > http://ldsfocuschrist.blogspot.com/2008_04_01_archive.html
> > >
> > > This just-mentioned Jason Erb, formerly of CAIR, was quoted saying in
> > > regard
> > > to denial of religious freedom: "Abuses here [in the US] certainly
> > > aren't
> > > as grave as in many countries" - this in response to the 2002 release of
> > > a
> > > US State Department report accusing governments of "denying religious
> > > freedom to their citizens":
> > >
> > > "The US State Department on Monday accused several Asian states, in
> > > particular those with totalitarian governments or predominantly Muslim
> > > populations, of denying religious freedom to their citizens...The fourth
> > > annual report report classifies abusive governments...In releasing the
> > > report, John Hanford III, US ambassador for international religious
> > > freedom,
> > > stressed that religious freedom was a potent weapon with which to 'fight
> > > the
> > > war on terrorism'...The [September 11, 2001] attacks by al-Qaeda
> > > highlighted
> > > the reality that people can and do exploit religion for terrible
> > > purposes,
> > > in some cases manipulating and destroying other human beings as mere
> > > instruments in the process," says the report's introduction. "Where
> > > governments protect religious freedom, and citizens value it as a social
> > > good, religious persecution and religion-based violence find no
> > > warrant,"
> > > it
> > > added, noting that such protections were essential to avoid a potential
> > > "clash of civilizations". 'It would be very interesting to see what the
> > > authors of this report would say if they were to look at the United
> > > States,'
> > > said Jason Erb, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic
> > > Relations
> > > (CAIR)....Some of the abuses included...police surveillance or
> > > unofficial
> > > harassment of minorities...fingerprinting visitors from Muslim
> > > countries;
> > > interviews of Muslim immigrants where they have often been asked
> > > questions
> > > about their religious practices...'Abuses here certainly aren't as grave
> > > as
> > > in many countries cited in the report, but there are certainly parallels
> > > that are interesting to note,' Erb added."
> > > --Jim Lobe. US report blasts religious intolerance. Asia Times, Oct. 9,
> > > 2002
> > > http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/DJ09Ae02.html
> > >
> > > MODERN MEDICINE - A WORLD RELIGION...
> > >
> > > >>>>BEGIN excerpt of Two days before 9/11: MDs kill - PTs silently suck
> > > >>>>up...
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1413
> > >
> > > >Karen Spencer, PT responded to Henry with an excellent question:
> > > >
> > > >"Why is it that so many health care workers always assume
> > > >that an MD has to be correct?..."
> > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pther/message/25682
> > > >
> > > >That's an easy one. MDs and the Pharmcos run the medical machine -
> > > >and...
> > > >
> > > >"[T]he intellectual foundation of medical care...is...whatever a
> > > >physician decides is by definition correct." [Eddy DM. The
> > > >challenge. (Jan12)1990 JAMA]
> > > >
> > > >Also...
> > > >
> > > >"There is one quotation that captures the essence of what
> > > >membership in both the AMA and our state medical associations is
> > > >all about...'Joining the AMA is like joining a church...'
> > > >[Hopkins D reviewing Campion FD: The AMA and U.S. Health Policy
> > > >Since 1940, 1984, Review Press: Chicago, IL. In Western J Med,
> > > >1985;142(2):273]
> > > >
> > > >In fact...
> > > >
> > > >The medical profession is such a tyrannical religion that a
> > > >federal court and a federal appeals court had to order its
> > > >largest diocese (the AMA) to let individual MDs and individual
> > > >hospitals make "individual decisions." [Wilk CA. Medicine,
> > > >monopolies, and malice. Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996]
> > > >
> > > >Incredibly, the AMA appealed!!
> > > >
> > >
> > > >>>>END excerpt of Two days before 9/11: MDs kill - PTs silently suck
> > > >>>>up...
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1413
> > >
> > > BTW JASON: THANKS! When I Googled your name, I found Latter Day Saint
> > > (Mormon) Steve St.Clair addressing "Islamic supercession" and flaws in
> > > the
> > > notion that Christianity, Judaism and Islam are "...three equivalent
> > > legs
> > > propping up a single monotheistic stool."
> > > http://ldsfocuschrist.blogspot.com/2008_04_01_archive.html
> > >
> > > Lately, I have been thinking of similar matters...
> > >
> > > Dr. DD Palmer, founder of chiropractic, posited a healing spirit which
> > > he
> > > called Innate and which he said he would rename the three monotheistic
> > > Gods....
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > MORMONS AND MOSLEMS AND INFANT CIRCUMCISION
> > >
> > > My recollection (someone correct me if I am wrong) is that Mormons do
> > > not
> > > believe in infant circumcision because infants aren't old enough to
> > > understand what is happening.
> > >
> > > My further recollection (again, someone correct me if I am wrong) is
> > > that
> > > Moslems used (some still do?) wait until age 13...
> > >
> > > Waiting five more years - until age 18 - would make for legal
> > > circumcisions - as long as no one is being forced....
> > >
> > > COPIED TO:
> > >
> > > Council on American-Islamic Relations/CAIR
> > > 453 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.
> > > Washington, DC 20003
> > > Tel: 202.488.8787
> > > Fax: 202.488.0833
> > > Via info@...
> > >
> > > Also copied to CAIR via:
> > >
> > > CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, Tel: 202-744-7726, via
> > > ihooper@...
> > > CAIR Media Relations Director Ahmed Rehab, Tel: 202-870-0166, via
> > > arehab@...
> > > CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin, Tel: 202-488-8787 or
> > > 202-341-4171, via arubin@...
> > >
> > >
> > > READERS: HERE IS THE POST TO WHICH JASON ERB "RESPONDED"....
> > >
> > > From: Todd Gastaldo <tgastaldo@...>
> > > To: RedAlerts@...; Carter19604@...;
> > > AIDSMythExposed@...
> > > Cc: drkugler@...; info@...; chiro-list@yahoogroups.com;
> > > chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com; etienne.deharven@...;
> > > robert.leppo@...; peter.duesberg@...;
> > > charles.geshekter@...;
> > > roberto.giraldo@...;
> > > claus.koehnlein@...; frank.lusardi@...;
> > > christine.maggiore@...; bryan.owen@...;
> > > david.rasnick@...; gordon.stewart@...;
> > > hiv-aids@...; wintera@...; webmaster@...
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 6:26:27 AM
> > > Subject: An 'HIV/AIDS risk-lowering' 'chop chop'?
> > >
> > > AN "HIV/AIDS RISK-LOWERING" "CHOP CHOP"?
> > >
> > > "THE CHOP CHOP"...euphemizing obvious medical crime...
> > >
> > > On Oct. 13, 2008, BRIAN CARTER (Assistant Manager of AIDSMythExposed)
> > > made
> > > light of the ongoing medical crime of mass infant penis ripping and
> > > slicing - calling it "the chop chop."
> > > http://groups.msn.com/AIDSMythExposed/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=36003&LastModified=4675693942803128318
> > >
> > > Mr. Carter was calling attention to a WebMD article about circumcision
> > > ostensibly preventing HIV/AIDS transmission during sex between gay
> > > men...
> > >
> > > Mr. Carter made NO MENTION of the fact that the same WebMD article
> > > promoted
> > > notion that the mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime prevents
> > > HIV/AIDS transmission during HETERO- sexual intercourse later in life:
> > >
> > > "It's now clear that circumcision reduces heterosexual men's risk of
> > > getting
> > > HIV from sexual intercourse."
> > > --Daniel J. DeNoon, WebMD Health News...Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD
> > > http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/news/20081007/can-circumcision-cut-hiv-in-gay-men
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below
> > >
> > > Brian Carter
> > > Assistant Manager
> > > AIDSMythExposed.com
> > > Via Carter19604@...
> > >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > BE ADVISED: THE "CHOP CHOP" IS MASS INFANT PENIS RIPPING AND SLICING -
> > > AN
> > > OBVIOUS CRIME - THERE IS NO MEDICAL INDICATION.
> > >
> > > Babies are screaming, writhing and bleeding through the mass infant
> > > penis
> > > ripping and slicing. Rarely, babies die or lose their penises.
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS leaders are still remaining silent about American
> > > medicine's
> > > ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime - originally
> > > perpetuated
> > > with phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology - now being lamely
> > > covered-up/perpetuated with phony "antibody means current
> > > disease/HIV/AIDS"
> > > immunology...
> > >
> > > Meanwhile a RETHINKING AIDS announcement blithely exclaims:
> > > "...REMINISCE
> > > WITH HOLIDAY CHEER!"^^^
> > >
> > > "Do you feel like a sane person in an insane world? Do you want to meet
> > > others who question openly and think freely?...RETHINKING AIDS invites
> > > all
> > > area AIDS Rethinkers to an informal meet-up for drinks and hors
> > > d'oeuvres,
> > > hosted by Brian Carter, Assistant Manager, AIDSMythExposed.com."
> > > ^^^RETHINKING AIDS Red Alert, Dec. 3, 2008, reproduced below.
> > >
> > > Brian, I feel like a sane person in a RETHINKING AIDS insane world.
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS leaders are still remaining silent about American
> > > medicine's
> > > ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime - originally
> > > perpetuated
> > > with phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology - now being lamely
> > > covered-up/perpetuated with phony "antibody means current
> > > disease/HIV/AIDS"
> > > immunology...
> > >
> > > I recently wrote to Hans Kugler, MD about DUESBERG ignoring the mass
> > > (sometimes fatal) child abuse years ago - when I discovered American MDs
> > > using the HIV/AIDS hypothesis to cover-up phony "babies can't feel pain"
> > > neurology...
> > >
> > > Bear in mind: There are NO medical indications for the mass infant penis
> > > ripping and slicing crime - none.
> > >
> > > >>>> BEGIN Bizarre HIV/AIDS factoid
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2663 (slightly
> > > edited)
> > >
> > > Robert C. Gallo's HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing keeping American
> > > MDs
> > > out of prison for American medicine's ongoing mass infant penis ripping
> > > and
> > > slicing crime...
> > >
> > > Strange things happened after I discovered American MDs still using
> > > phony
> > > "babies can't feel pain" neurology to slice infant penises: Perhaps the
> > > STRANGEST thing is ongoing: American taxpayer-funded promotion of
> > > AFRICAN
> > > penis slicing.
> > >
> > > See below.
> > >
> > > ALSO: MASS ADULT VAGINA SLICING: American medicine is also committing a
> > > mass
> > > VAGINA slicing crime which is hospitalizing women in droves. See the
> > > postscript.
> > >
> > > Hans Kugler, PhD writes:
> > >
> > > "More and more scientific studies...don't support the [HIV/AIDS]
> > > hypothesis..."
> > > http://www.antiagingforme.com/html/sci_updates.html
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access; see below
> > >
> > > Hans Kugler, PhD
> > > International Academy of Alternative & Anti-Aging Medicine
> > > Via drkugler@...
> > >
> > > Hans,
> > >
> > > Strange things happened in early 1988 after I exposed American
> > > medicine's
> > > phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and called for a religious
> > > exemption from the child abuse statutes for the ancient ritual that
> > > leaves
> > > most of the foreskin on the penis:
> > >
> > > In the space of three months in early 1988...
> > >
> > > 1. American MDs suddenly came out
> > > against ALL religious exemptions (Pediatrics Jan. 1988) - most likely
> > > because a religious exemption for the ancient ritual that leaves most of
> > > the
> > > foreskin on the penis would have immediately exposed American medicine's
> > > TOTAL foreskin amputation ritual as child abuse.)
> > >
> > > 2. American MDs came out in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child
> > > abuse (Pediatrics
> > > Feb 1988); and,
> > >
> > > 3. The California Medical Association House of Delegates
> > > abruptly ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote (CMA Res.
> > > 305-88) abruptly declared the no-medical-indication total foreskin
> > > amputation ritual "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa
> > > to prevent transmission of HIV.
> > >
> > > THE CMA LIED: Infant circumcision prevents HIV transmission (CMA Res.
> > > 305-88) was an obvious hoax which American MDs are STILL trying to
> > > legitimize as
> > > demonstrated by the recent US taxpayer funded NIH "scientific" slicing
> > > of
> > > African truck driver penises...
> > >
> > > See again: HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland,
> > > AAP and infant circumcision revisited
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
> > >
> > > American taxpayers are paying BILLIONS - via the President's Emergency
> > > Plan
> > > For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) - in part to publicize the
> > > US-taxpayer-financed obvious African truck driver penis slicing hoax.
> > >
> > > $15 BILLION...
> > >
> > > "In anticipation of the potential role of safe male circumcision, the
> > > U.S.
> > > President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has been a member of
> > > an
> > > international working group...PEPFAR...will support implementation of
> > > safe
> > > medical male circumcision for HIV/AIDS prevention based on requests from
> > > host governments...The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief is a
> > > $15
> > > billion, five-year initiative..."
> > > --Statement from Ambassador Mark Dybul, U.S. Global AIDS
> > > Coordinator...Released on December 13, 2006
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/press/77790.htm
> > >
> > > $30 BILLION MORE...
> > >
> > > "The World Health Organization (WHO) today warmly welcomed the United
> > > States' proposal to commit a further $30 billion to the President's
> > > Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and extend the Plan for another five
> > > years..."
> > > --WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan, quoted in WHO's online "Media
> > > Centre."
> > > http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2007/s10/en/index.html
> > >
> > > United States' President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief/PEPFAR is
> > > "Promoting male circumcision as part of a comprehensive strategy to
> > > reduce
> > > HIV transmission."
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/pepfar/press/88332.htm
> > >
> > > $26 MILLION EXPLICITLY FOR "MALE CIRCUMCISION ACTIVITIES" IN AFRICA...
> > >
> > > "In fiscal year 2007, PEPFAR allocated approximately $16 million to
> > > support
> > > male circumcision activities with that figure increased to nearly $26
> > > million in fiscal year 2008...
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/press/107985.htm
> > >
> > > "EDUCATION AND CONSENT OF THE CLIENT"
> > >
> > > PEPFAR says male circumcision is "an elective surgical procedure using
> > > local
> > > anesthesia following education and consent of the client..."
> > > http://www.pepfar.gov/press/107985.htm
> > >
> > > Education of African clients should always include the fact that the
> > > HIV/AIDS hypothesis is the only thing keeping American MDs out of prison
> > > for
> > > their ongoing mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > American medicine's mass infant penis ripping and slicing crime should
> > > have
> > > ended in America BILLIONS of dollars' worth of infant screams ago - back
> > > in
> > > 1987 when I first exposed American medicine's phony "babies can't feel
> > > pain"
> > > neurology hoax.
> > >
> > > Stopping the infant screams now instantly saves America an estimated
> > > $400
> > > million per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE American males
> > > can
> > > make for themselves in adulthood.
> > >
> > > On NOVEMBER 17, 2008, Robert C. Gallo, perpetrator and perpetuator of
> > > the
> > > HIV/AIDS hoax reportedly called for a DOMESTIC version of the
> > > President's
> > > Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief - "Fighting AIDS at Home: A PEPFAR plan
> > > for
> > > America's inner cities"...
> > >
> > > ...but Gallo's article made no mention of the African
> > > PEPFAR circumcision-prevents-AIDS hoax.
> > > --Gallo RC. Washington Times, Nov. 17, 2008. Article reproduced by the
> > > National AIDS Treament Advocacy Project/NATAP
> > > http://www.natap.org/2008/newsUpdates/111708_01.htm
> > >
> > > I'll copy NATAP via info@....
> > >
> > > ATTENTION NATAP: Obviously, education of African-AMERICAN circumcision
> > > clients should always include the fact that the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is
> > > the
> > > only thing keeping American MDs out of prison for their ongoing mass
> > > infant
> > > penis ripping and slicing crime.
> > >
> > > One last matter...
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS AND PETER DUESBERG, PhD...
> > >
> > > Hans, I came across your article quoted above when I visited the
> > > Rethinking
> > > AIDS web site...
> > >
> > > RETHINKING AIDS ASKS: ARE AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > Acclaimed AIDS expert James Chin, MD, MPH reportedly believes that
> > > AFRICAN
> > > PROMISCUITY is the reason Sub-Saharan Africa is the only uncircumcised
> > > place
> > > on Earth that suffers a heterosexual AIDS epidemic.
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > **ARE** AFRICANS "UNIQUELY PROMISCUOUS"?
> > >
> > > TWO GOOD QUESTIONS came from RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter
> > > Duesberg, PhD et al., emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. "Do scientific studies support the conclusion that Africans are an
> > > especially promiscuous people?
> > >
> > > 2. "And if the majority of males throughout the world are uncircumcised,
> > > why
> > > does naturally
> > > occurring male anatomy lead to AIDS only in Africa?"
> > > http://www.rethinkingaids.com/
> > >
> > > THE SHORT ANSWER: IT DOESN'T MATTER whether Africans are especially
> > > promiscuous. Naturally occurring male anatomy leads to AIDS only in
> > > Africa
> > > because back in 1987 American MDs correctly feared that RIPPING and
> > > SLICING
> > > that very same naturally occurring male anatomy on infants leads to
> > > PRISON
> > > in America...
> > >
> > > Two questions for RETHINKING AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.,
> > > emails listed below):
> > >
> > > 1. In [1990-1], why did Rethinking AIDS member Peter Duesberg, PhD
> > > ignore
> > > the
> > > fact that American MDs had been caught perpetuating phony
> > > "babies can't feel pain" neurology as they committed obvious mass child
> > > abuse - ripping and slicing infant penises en masse for no medical
> > > indication?
> > >
> > > 2. Why did Duesberg ignore the fact that, in a lame attempt to COVER-UP
> > > their obvious mass child abuse crime, American MDs had just ignored
> > > their own Scientific Board to fraudulently declare their NO MEDICAL
> > > INDICATION mass infant penis
> > > ripping and slicing "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS (California Medical
> > > Association
> > > Res. 305-99)?
> > >
> > > Rethinking AIDS leaders (Peter Duesberg, PhD et al.) are STILL ignoring
> > > the
> > > bizarre CMA behavior - babies be damned...
> > >
> > > I'll copy them all (again) via etienne.deharven@...
> > > <etienne.deharven@...>; robert.leppo@...
> > > <robert.leppo@...>; peter.duesberg@...
> > > <peter.duesberg@...>;
> > > charles.geshekter@...
> > > <charles.geshekter@...>;
> > > roberto.giraldo@...
> > > <roberto.giraldo@...>; claus.koehnlein@...
> > > <claus.koehnlein@...>; frank.lusardi@...
> > > <frank.lusardi@...>;
> > > christine.maggiore@...
> > > <christine.maggiore@...>; bryan.owen@...
> > > <bryan.owen@...>; david.rasnick@...
> > > <david.rasnick@...>; gordon.stewart@...
> > > <gordon.stewart@...>
> > >
> > > Thanks for reading everyone.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > Copied to: WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan
> > > Via hiv-aids@...
> > > Also via Anne Winter
> > > Advocacy and Communications Coordinator
> > > Tel.: +41 22 791 5876
> > > Mobile: +41 79 440 6011
> > > E-mail: wintera@...
> > >
> > > PS As indicated above, American MDs are also committing a massive VAGINA
> > > slicing crime which can be stopped by applying the federal Female
> > > Genital
> > > Mutilation/FGM statute that was passed in part because of concerns about
> > > female genital mutilation in Africa.
> > >
> > > My Open Letter to the Texas Board of Nursing...
> > >
> > > NURSE/VAGINA WARNING: TRULY BIZARRE "OBGYN SPECIALTY CONTENT"
> > >
> > > "[T]he [FNP/Family Nurse Practitioner] educational program provided some
> > > content related to OB/GYN. It did not, however, include OB/GYN specialty
> > > content to the same depth that the WHNP's program did..."
> > > --Texas Board of Nursing scope of practice scenario
> > > http://www.bon.state.tx.us/practice/apn-scopeofpractice.html
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER
> > >
> > > Texas Board of Nursing
> > > Katherine Thomas, MN, RN
> > > Executive Director
> > > 333 Guadalupe #3-460
> > > Austin, Texas 78701
> > > Office: (512) 305-7400
> > > Fax: (512) 305-7401
> > > Via webmaster@...
> > >
> > > Katherine,
> > >
> > > By using semisitting/dorsal delivery, OBGYNs are senselessly closing
> > > birth
> > > canals up to 30% - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing
> > > everything possible to open birth canals - even as they senselessly
> > > CLOSE
> > > birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. See below.
> > >
> > > Please warn all Texas licensed nurses that DELIBERATE **VAGINA**
> > > INJURIES (SENSELESS BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSED EPISIOTOMIES)
> > > are causing trauma to the perineum - sending child-bearing women BACK to
> > > hospitals in droves:
> > >
> > > "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma
> > > to
> > > perineum due to childbirth."
> > > http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm
> > >
> > > The birth-canal-closed/mass vagina slicing is OBVIOUS mass sexual
> > > assault.
> > > See below.
> > >
> > > NOTE: The federal Female Genital Mutilation statute can be used to end
> > > the
> > > massive birth-canal-closed vagina slicing crime - the FGM statute
> > > applies
> > > to
> > > women 18 and under. See below.
> > >
> > > OBGYNs don't charge for their birth-canal-closed episiotomy sexual
> > > assaults - but Shiono et al. at NIH demonstrated that episiotomized
> > > women suffer 50 times more severe perineal tears (tears clear to the
> > > anus)
> > > than women who are not episiotomized - and (as indicated above)
> > > hospitals
> > > make LOTS of money treating "trauma to the perineum due to childbirth."
> > >
> > > I SAY AGAIN: "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all
> > > women
> > > is trauma to
> > > perineum due to childbirth."
> > > http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm
> > >
> > > PREGNANT WOMEN: You can help PROTECT YOUR VAGINAS: It's easy to allow
> > > your
> > > birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up
> > > to 30%.
> > >
> > > See WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE at the very end of this
> > > post.
> > >
> > > THE BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING...
> > >
> > > As I've noted repeatedly for CDC's Injury Prevention Director Ileana
> > > Arias,
> > > PhD (DIANNE CLAPP - have you forwarded to Dr. Arias yet?)...
> > >
> > > "It is established obstetric teaching that a narrow pelvic outlet
> > > predisposes to a difficult vaginal delivery..."
> > > --Ass-?rztin Dr. Andrea Froschauer-Frudinger et al. via
> > > andrea.frudinger@... [Froschauer-Frudinger et al. Br J Obstet
> > > Gynaecol 2002;109(11):1207-12]
> > >
> > > By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBGYNs are senselessly
> > > narrowing
> > > birth canals/pelvic outlets up to 30% (most births).
> > >
> > > For the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and clinical and
> > > radiographic cites from the medical literature - see Gastaldo TD.
> > > Letter.
> > > BIRTH. 1992;19(4):230-1.
> > > http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4, FREE ACCESS.
> > >
> > > WORSE: When babies get stuck, OBGYNs are senselessly KEEPING birth
> > > canals
> > > closed the "extra" up to 30% (keeping women semisitting/dorsal) - as
> > > they
> > > pull with vacuums/forceps (1 in 10 births) - sometimes pulling so hard
> > > they
> > > rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
> > >
> > > STILL WORSE: OBGYN experts have been lying to cover-up.
> > >
> > > For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...
> > >
> > > See "Dents in babies' skulls"
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e
> > >
> > > OBGYNs indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely
> > > closing
> > > birth canals up to 30%. (ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia training video
> > > purports
> > > to show how to allow the birth canal to open maximally in the small
> > > number
> > > of cases when babies' shoulders get stuck - which is the indirect
> > > admission
> > > that OBYNs know they are routinely closing birth canals up to 30%.)
> > >
> > > AGAIN: PREGNANT WOMEN: You can HELP PROTECT YOUR VAGINAS: It's easy to
> > > allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up
> > > to 30%.
> > >
> > > See WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE at the very end of this
> > > post.
> > >
> > > THE MASS VAGINA SLICING: IT'S MASS SEXUAL ASSAULT...
> > >
> > > "EPISIOPROCTOTOMIES" - slicing vaginas clear to the rectum - to widen
> > > birth
> > > canals - with birth canals KEPT closed up to 30%...
> > >
> > > When babies are stuck and forceps are applied - OBGYNs often offer
> > > "generous" episiotomies - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are
> > > doing
> > > everything possible to open the birth canal - even as they keep the
> > > birth
> > > canal closed the "extra" up to 30%.
> > >
> > > The most generous episiotomy is "episioproctotomy" - slicing the woman
> > > clear
> > > to her rectum - surgically/fraudulently inferring that everything
> > > possible
> > > is being done to open her birth canal - even as her birth canal is kept
> > > closed up to 30%...
> > >
> > > BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSED VAGINA SLICING IS MASS SEXUAL ASSAULT...
> > >
> > > No woman wants her birth canal closed, her vagina sliced...
> > >
> > > According to the National Center for Victims of Crime/NCVC:
> > >
> > > "Some examples of sexual assault include: A doctor...touching
> > > your sexual organs in an unprofessional, unwarranted and inappropriate
> > > manner."
> > > http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?db
> > > Name=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32369
> > >
> > > IT'S DELIBERATE VAGINA TEARING...
> > >
> > > Michael C. Klein, MD writes: "[E]pisiotomy is a deliberate second degree
> > > tear." [Birth. Letter.
> > > 2002;29(1):74]
> > >
> > > Some MDs are still claiming (fraudulently) that their episiotomies are
> > > *preventing* severe tears
> > > clear to the anus when in fact MDs are CAUSING severe tears clear to the
> > > anus.
> > >
> > > In 1990 the National Institutes of Health researched the issue and found
> > > that deliberate tears by
> > > MDs (episiotomies) cause fifty times MORE severe tears (tears clear to
> > > the
> > > anus) relative to leaving
> > > the vagina alone.[Shiono et al. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75(5):765-70. In
> > > Klein
> > > et al. Online J Curr Clin
> > > Trials (Jul1)1992, Doc. No. 10]
> > >
> > > The fraud is perpetuated by NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL...
> > >
> > > According to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital's Episiotomy video,
> > > episiotomy
> > > is
> > > performed,
> > >
> > > "...to prevent vaginal tears..."
> > > http://www.nyp.org/media/index.html (Click on "Topics" then
> > > "Episiotomy")
> > >
> > > THE FRAUD SENDS WOMEN **BACK** TO THE HOSPITAL...
> > >
> > > Again, OBGYNs don't charge for their birth-canal-closed episiotomy
> > > sexual
> > > assaults;
> > > but as noted above, Shiono et al. at NIH demonstrated that episiotomized
> > > women suffer 50 times more severe perineal tears (tears clear to the
> > > anus)
> > > than
> > > women who are not episiotomized.
> > >
> > > And severe perineal tears land women back in the hospital:
> > >
> > > "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma
> > > to
> > > perineum due to childbirth."
> > > http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm
> > >
> > > FURTHER REGARDING BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSED VAGINA SLICING...
> > >
> > > WHEN THE BIRTHING MOTHER IS UNDER 18...
> > >
> > > THE FEDERAL FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION/FGM STATUTE APPLIES...
> > >
> > > The federal FGM statute only exempts vagina slicing at birth if it is
> > > done
> > > for "medical purposes."
> > >
> > > Closing the birth canal and slicing the vagina (thereby pretending to
> > > be doing everything possible to open it) is obvious battery - or at
> > > least
> > > criminal negligence.
> > >
> > > Significantly, the federal FGM statute does NOT exempt vagina slicing
> > > based
> > > on mere
> > > "belief" on the part of MDs (or "any other
> > > person") "that the operation is required as a matter of custom or
> > > ritual"...
> > >
> > > Here is the US Code as quoted by Cornell University School of Law:
> > >
> > > 18 USCS ? 116. Female genital mutilation
> > > (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), whoever knowingly circumcises,
> > > excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or
> > > labia
> > > minora or clitoris of another person who has not attained the age of 18
> > > years shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5
> > > years,
> > > or both.
> > > (b) A surgical operation is not a violation of this section if the
> > > operation
> > > is-
> > > (1) necessary to the health of the person on whom it is performed, and
> > > is
> > > performed by a person licensed in the place of its performance as a
> > > medical
> > > practitioner; or
> > > (2) performed on a person in labor or who has just given birth and is
> > > performed for medical purposes connected with that labor or birth by a
> > > person licensed in the place it is performed as a medical practitioner,
> > > midwife, or person in training to become such a practitioner or midwife.
> > > (c) In applying subsection (b)(1), no account shall be taken of the
> > > effect
> > > on the person on whom the operation is to be performed of any belief on
> > > the
> > > part of that person, or any other person, that the operation is required
> > > as
> > > a matter of custom or ritual.
> > > http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/116.html
> > >
> > > There are BILLIONS per year to be INSTANTLY saved - just by stopping
> > > obvious
> > > medical CRIME.
> > >
> > > INSURANCE COMPANIES could do the job.
> > >
> > > Insurance companies think they are paying OBGYNs to allow birth canals
> > > to
> > > open maximally.
> > >
> > > But OBGYNs are closing birth canals up to 30% - and lying to cover-up.
> > > See
> > > the Four OB Lies, mentioned above.
> > >
> > > Insurance companies could collect PAST birth-canal-closing damages using
> > > "retro-audits."
> > >
> > > See F4CP officers and Ins. Comm. Ario: MANDATORY 'retro-audits':
> > > MASSIVE
> > > ins. fraud by OBGYNs...
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1763
> > >
> > > THE PROBLEM...
> > >
> > > Law enforcement is looking the other way - and MDs know it.
> > >
> > > Steve Harris, MD arrogantly boasts:
> > >
> > > "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime.
> > > These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
> > > 28866f3384801ae9
> > >
> > > Dr. Harris' arrogant boast came after I exposed yet another mass medical
> > > crime - fraudulent promotion of vaccination using PLANNED endangerment
> > > of
> > > VACCINATED children during disease outbreaks.
> > >
> > > For details...
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > Years ago, the mass vagina slicing got babies six weeks' worth of free
> > > daily
> > > immunizations....
> > >
> > > See Breastfeed 'til your vagina heals (THANKS Martina Nicholson, MD!)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2595
> > >
> > > For further info regarding breastfeedings being free daily
> > > immunizations...
> > >
> > > ...and MDs and CDC lying by omission to DENY free daily immunizations...
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise
> > > SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > It's mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse to go along with the mass
> > > birth-canal-closing PHYSICAL child
> > > abuse.
> > >
> > > [Dec. 6, 2008 ADDENDUM: In 1995, Circumcisionist Edgar Schoen, MD told
> > > Australian physician
> > > Terry
> > > Russell,
> > >
> > > "We are now at a point that [infant penis ripping and slicing] is
> > > analogous to
> > > immunisation." Russell T. Letter. Medical Observer (20Jan)1995,
> > > Level
> > > 2, 100 Bay Road, Waverton, NSW 2060 AUSTRALIA. Note: I replaced the
> > > euphemism circumcision with "infant penis ripping and slicing."]
> > >
> > >
> > > It is federal policy to PAY obstetricians to close birth canals up to
> > > 30%
> > > and keep birth canals
> > > closed when babies get stuck (keep women semisitting/dorsal) as they
> > > pull
> > > with vacuums/forceps (1 in 10 births) sometimes pulling so hard they rip
> > > spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
> > >
> > > WORSE: It is federal (Medicare) policy to pay to TRAIN medical
> > > students to commit the obvious sometimes-fatal mass child abuse crime:
> > > (Medicare pays hospitals $100,000 per year per obstetric resident to
> > > train medical students to keep birth canals closed when babies get
> > > stuck.
> > > Medicare pays for all medical residencies - billions per year.)
> > >
> > > OBSTETRICIANS are filing FALSE CLAIMS - everyone assumes OBGYNs are
> > > doing
> > > everything possible to open birth canals when in fact they are CLOSING
> > > birth
> > > canals routinely - up to 30% - and lying to cover-up.
> > >
> > > TWO ATTORNEYS RAN THE OTHER WAY - BABIES BE DAMNED...
> > >
> > > Two False Claims Act attorneys (Shelley Slade and Janet Goldstein) ran
> > > the
> > > other way after I wrote to them...
> > >
> > > I wrote:
> > >
> > > ROBERT L. VOGEL
> > > Direct line: (202) 537-5904
> > > Email: rvogel@...
> > >
> > > SHELLEY R. SLADE
> > > Direct line: (202) 537-5903
> > > Email: sslade@...
> > >
> > > JANET L. GOLDSTEIN
> > > Direct line: (202) 537-5906
> > > Email: jgoldstein@...
> > >
> > > Robert, Shelley and Janet,
> > >
> > > Please help me use THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT to stop mass child abuse by
> > > OBGYNs...
> > >
> > > You indicate that the False Claims Act prohibits billing Medicaid and
> > > Medicare for care that is so deficient that it is "affirmatively harmful
> > > to
> > > patients," as in,
> > >
> > > "Deficient Care...a service provided in such a deficient fashion that
> > > the
> > > government payer did not get the benefit of its bargain...billing
> > > Medicare
> > > or Medicaid for care that is of such low quality and so deficient that
> > > it
> > > is
> > > affirmatively harmful to patients..."
> > > http://www.false-claims-act-health-care-fraud-whistleblower-attorney.com/about-o\
> > > \
> > > ur-firm/our-services/health-care-fraud.php
> > >
> > > EMERGENCY:
> > >
> > > STANDARD OBGYN CARE IS "AFFIRMATIVELY HARMFUL" - SOMETIMES
> > > FATAL...
> > >
> > > I'll email this to False Claims Act attorney ROBERT L. VOGEL via
> > > rvogel@....
> > >
> > > As noted above, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs because as
> > > medical students MDs are TRAINED to "perform" obvious felonies. See
> > > again
> > > the ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training video and OB Lie #4, mentioned
> > > above.
> > >
> > > Thanks for reading everyone.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > MAYBE CDC *CAN'T* TAKE ACTION?
> > >
> > > MAYBE AMERICAN MDs **MUST** "PERFORM" MASS CHILD ABUSE OR WWIII WILL
> > > BREAK
> > > OUT?
> > >
> > > LET ME EXPLAIN...
> > >
> > > Here in America, it is possible that OBGYNs are allowed to
> > > continue their gruesome birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulative therapy
> > > (and
> > > other obvious crimes) because their most frequent surgical behavior
> > > toward
> > > males is a bizarre TOTAL infant foreskin amputation version of a
> > > protected
> > > form of "religious" child abuse - the ancient
> > > foreskin amputation Jewish ritual - reportedly commanded by a God -
> > > which
> > > leaves most of the foreskin on the penis...
> > >
> > > Strange things happened in early 1988 after I exposed American
> > > medicine's
> > > phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and called for a religious
> > > exemption from the child abuse statutes for the ancient ritual that
> > > leaves
> > > most of the foreskin on the penis:
> > >
> > > 1. American MDs suddenly came out
> > > against ALL religious exemptions (Pediatrics Jan. 1988);
> > >
> > > 2. American MDs came out in favor of anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child
> > > abuse (Pediatrics
> > > Feb 1988); and,
> > >
> > > 3. The California Medical Association House of Delegates
> > > abruptly ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote (CMA Res.
> > > 305-88) abruptly declared the no-medical-indication total foreskin
> > > amputation ritual "an effective public health measure" "confirmed" in
> > > Africa
> > > to prevent transmission of HIV.
> > >
> > > It was an obvious hoax which American MDs are STILL trying to legitimize
> > > as
> > > demonstrated by the recent US taxpayer funded NIH "scientific" slicing
> > > of
> > > African truck driver penises...
> > >
> > > See HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland,
> > > AAP and infant circumcision revisited
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
> > >
> > > American taxpayers are paying BILLIONS - in part to publicize the
> > > US-taxpayer-financed obvious African truck driver penis slicing hoax.
> > >
> > > See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
> > > health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560
> > >
> > > BTW, I still think Congress should pass a religious exemption from the
> > > child
> > > abuse statutes for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the
> > > foreskin on the penis. I don't think observant Jews will ever be able to
> > > let go of their "mini-circ" infant penis slicing ritual.
> > >
> > > Much land in the Middle East is at stake. (The Jewish God reportedly
> > > promised Jews all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates as long as
> > > they engaged in 'mini'-circ - the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most
> > > of
> > > the foreskin on the infant penis. American MDs are performing a
> > > different
> > > ritual - TOTAL infant foreskin amputation.)
> > >
> > > The recent US taxpayer financed "scientific" HIV/AIDS African truck
> > > driver
> > > penis slicing may be the ultimate cover-up - to maintain the global
> > > post-WWII status quo...
> > >
> > > AGAIN: MAYBE CDC *CAN'T* TAKE ACTION?
> > >
> > > MAYBE AMERICAN MDs **MUST** "PERFORM" MASS CHILD ABUSE OR WWIII WILL
> > > BREAK
> > > OUT?
> > >
> > > I hope not - but stranger things have happened.
> > >
> > > I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs because as medical
> > > students, MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies. See the ACOG
> > > Shoulder Dystocia training video mentioned above.
> > >
> > > Again, thanks for reading everyone.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > USA
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > A FAMILY NURSE PRACTITIONER PROGRAM FOR DOCTORS OF CHIROPRACTIC...
> > >
> > > Hey, why not?
> > >
> > > Scott Wofford, BS, MSPT, DC, Founder of Mid America Learning EXCLAIMS:
> > >
> > > "Use your chiropractic training as the foundation for a complimentary
> > > [sic]
> > > professional career! Become a Family Nurse Practitioner!"
> > > http://midamericalearning.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=b\
> > > log&id=11&Itemid=71
> > >
> > > OPEN LETTER archived for global access
> > >
> > > Scott Wofford, BS, MSPT, DC
> > > Founder
> > > Mid America Learning
> > > 342 Cedar Street
> > > Abilene, TX 79601
> > > Telephone: (325) 673-7800
> > > Fax: (325) 673-7801
> > > Via admissions@...
> > > http://www.midamericalearning.com
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > >
> > > Hopefully the Texas Board of Nursing will take immediate action to stop
> > > the
> > > massive birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation crime.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, please spread the word in your nursing program and to
> > > your
> > > fellow nursing programs.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Dr. Gastaldo
> > > Hillsboro, Oregon
> > > todd@...
> > >
> > > SCOTT: DOCTORS OF CHIROPRACTIC ARE FALLING DOWN ON THE JOB - BABIES BE
> > > DAMNED
> > >
> > > MD-pediatricians want doctors of chiropractic to join them in reporting
> > > harms related to spinal manipulation in children...
> > >
> > > A 2006 article in the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that concern
> > > for
> > > patient safety "DEMANDS" a greater collaboration "PARTICULARLY" with
> > > doctors
> > > of chiropractic "such that we can
> > > investigate and REPORT harms related to spinal manipulation together."
> > > (Emphases added.)
> > > --Sunita Vohra, MD FRCPC MSc et al. PEDIATRICS. 2007 Jan;119(1):e275-83.
> > > Epub 2006 Dec 18. PubMed abstract
> > >
> > > Yet both MD-pediatricians and DC-pediatricians remain silent...
> > >
> > > I'll cc PEDIATRICS Editor Jerold Lucey, MD via
> > > jpuskarz@..., rperelman@..., jerold.lucey@...
> > >
> > > Sadly, DC-pediatricians have not only been silent...
> > >
> > > DC-pediatricians (ICPA/Drs. Ohm and Alcantara) have CENSORED my
> > > birth-canal-closing info after citing it...
> > >
> > > It's PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE, as in,
> > >
> > > "[Withholding] information by restricting scholarly exchange...[is a
> > > form
> > > of]...psychological violence."
> > > --Ralph Crawshaw, MD. Academic sanction: targeting South African
> > > science.JAMA 1989;262(11):1499-1503
> > >
> > > ACA pediatricians Elise Hewitt, DC and Amy Watson, DC are remaining
> > > silent...
> > >
> > > See ICPA/Ohm's deletions (also: Dr. Hewitt and Dr. Watson: Do you
> > > suspect
> > > mass child abuse by OBGYNs)
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2466
> > >
> > > After I called attention to ACA's birth trauma public policy, it too
> > > mysteriously disappeared...
> > >
> > > Recently, I wrote of the disappeared ACA birth trauma policy: Emergency!
> > > It's GONE.
> > >
> > > ACA alternate delegate ROBERT A. HAYDEN, DC, PhD, an ACA spokesman, did
> > > not
> > > understand the emergency ("This is an emergency?" he asked)...
> > >
> > > So I spelled it out for him...
> > >
> > > "Robert...The emergency FOR BABIES is the birth-canal-closing/spinal
> > > manipulation mass
> > > child abuse by OBGYNs - and the other obvious OBGYN crimes discussed in
> > > the
> > > post to which you replied, reproduced below....The emergency for the
> > >
> > > chiropractic profession is the mysterious deletion of
> > > ACA birth trauma policy - more on this latter emergency below...."
> > >
> > > See Emergency chiropractic for babies. Attention Robert A. Hayden, DC,
> > > PhD -
> > > ACA 'spokesman to television, radio and the printed media.'
> > > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2485
> > >
> > > ACA's DR. HAYDEN AND CARDIOVASCULAR AND CORONARY "CARE" CHILD ABUSE...
> > >
> > > ACA alternate delegate Dr. Hayden, just mentioned, specialized in
> > > "cardiovascular and coronary care," as in, "Prior to receiving his
> > > doctor
> > > of
> > > chiropractic degree, Dr. Hayden was a critical care nurse specializing
> > > in
> > > cardiovascular and coronary care..."
> > > http://www.acatoday.org/content_css.cfm?CID=2163
> > >
> > > Mention of cardiovascular and coronary care reminds me: In addition to
> > > routinely closing birth canals up to 30%, OBGYNs are temporarily
> > > asphyxiating babies en masse as they permanently rob them of up to 50%
> > > of
> > > their blood volume.
> > >
> > > It's obvious mass cardiovascular and coronary "care" CHILD ABUSE - MASS
> > > FORCED BRADYCARDIA - MASS FORCED FETAL DISTRESS...
> > >
> > > [A GRUESOME EXPERIMENT]
> > >
> > > To demonstrate to themselves that robbing babies of up to 50% of their
> > > blood
> > > volume is a BAD IDEA, retired OBGYN George Malcolm Morley blithely
> > > recommends that obstetricians commit "lesser" child abuse - temporary
> > > baby
> > > asphyxiation - causing obvious fetal distress - 60 bpm bradycardia -
> > > [WITHOUT PROCEEDING TO AMPUTATION OF UP TO 50% OF BABY BLOOD VOLUME]
> > >
> > > "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and
> > > thumb...The
> > > [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the
> > > color
> > > will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue
> > > (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will
> > > be
> > > able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR
> > > deceleration
> > > on
> > > a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds. Common sense will
> > > soon
> > > release the finger and thumb."
> > > http://web.archive.org/web/20040929080014/www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm
> > >
> > > See Dents in babies' skulls (and SJ Doc)...
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e
> > >
> > > NOTE: Normal fetal heart rate is 100 to 160...
> > >
> > > Senselessly bringing the heart rate down to 60 is obvious child
> > > abuse/senseless fetal distress...
> > >
> > > "[E]xtreme bradycardia [heart rate under 80 bpm] is always an expression
> > > of
> > > fetal distress and is a consequence of reduced gas exchange at the
> > > placenta."
> > > --From CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS IN PREGNANT PATIENTS.
> > > By Maria Helena L. Souza, CCP (BR)* & Decio O. Elias, MD**
> > > * Perfusionist / ** Pediatric Cardiac Surgeon
> > > http://perfline.com/textbook/local/pregnancy.html
> > >
> > > [NOTE: Dr. Morley's gruesome temporary baby asphyxiation experiment
> > > above
> > > is step one in the mass baby blood robbery that is American medicine's
> > > most
> > > frequent surgical behavior toward both males and females.]
> > >
> > >
> > > WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE...
> > >
> > > > (NOTE: Women
> > > > do NOT need to squat to allow their birth canals to open maximally.
> > > See
> > > > WHAT
> > > > DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE, below.)
> > > >
> > > > Incidentally, the Great Squat Robbery was related to The Great Birth
> > > > Robbery
> > > > in British obstetrician Jason Gardosi's 1989 Lancet "randomised
> > > controlled
> > > > trial of squatting" - where nobody squatted because - said Gardosi -
> > > most
> > > > women can't squat well enough to do so during delivery - which is
> > > > false:
> > > > See Brazilian obstetrician Moyses Paciornik's report of thousands of
> > > > squatting
> > > > births in chair-dwelling women - which at my request was published in
> > > > Birth
> > > > with my letter describing the birth-canal-closing biomechanics of
> > > > semisitting delivery...FREE ACCESS above.
> > > >
> > > > OBSTETRICS: "UNCONTROLLED EXPERIMENTATION"
> > > >
> > > > In 1989, British obstetrician Richard J. Lilford noted that
> > > > obstetrics
> > > > "amounts to uncontrolled experimentation."
> > > >
> > > > See Lilford RJ. State of the obstetric art. The Lancet
> > > > (Nov18)1989:1205-1207. Reviewing Chalmers I,
> > > > Enkin M and Keirse MJNC (eds.). Effective Care in Pregnancy and
> > > Childbirth
> > > > Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989 Pp 1516 (2 vols) ISBN
> > > 0-192615580.
> > > >
> > > > That same year, 1989, Lilford forgot to inform women that
> > > > semi-dor