BABIES SUBLUXATED BY OBGYNs. (ACA members quoted below.)

PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBGYNs are
closing birth canals up to 30%. See Gastaldo 1992, FREE ACCESS below.

It's easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%.

See WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE at the very
end of this post.

ACA's Nebraska Delegate ERIC A. BENSON, DC writes:

"Subluxations...may occur in infancy from a difficult birth..."
http://www.drericbenson.com/
Click on "Chiropractic Methods" then on "Read the facts about chiropractic"
(Accessed Nov. 9, 2008)

ACA member Michael C. Martin, DC, DABCO offers a percentage:

"85-95% of all subluxations I see in adults and children, can be traced
to a difficult delivery..."
http://www.martinchiropracticoffice.com/new.html

DR. BENSON,

I've already written to Dr. Martin - he is silent - hasn't added a
birth-canal-closing warning to his web page. I will cc him via
info@....

Regardless the percentage of subluxations caused by difficult birth, it is
unethical to fail to take simple action to help PREVENT that which one
charges to treat...

REMEMBER...

"It is established obstetric teaching that a narrow pelvic outlet
predisposes to a difficult vaginal delivery..."
--Ass-Ärztin Dr. Andrea Froschauer-Frudinger et al. via
andrea.frudinger@... [Froschauer-Frudinger et al. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol
2002;109(11):1207-12]

By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBGYNs are senselessly narrowing
birth canals/pelvic outlets up to 30% (most births).

For the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and clinical and
radiographic cites from the medical literature - see Gastaldo TD. Letter.
BIRTH. 1992;19(4):230-1.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4, FREE ACCESS.

WORSE: When babies get stuck, OBGYNs are senselessly KEEPING birth canals
closed the "extra" up to 30% (keeping women semisitting/dorsal) - as they
pull with vacuums/forceps (1 in 10 births) - sometimes pulling so hard they
rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.

STILL WORSE: OBGYN experts have been lying to cover-up. For the Four OB
Lies - they are whoppers...

See "Dents in babies' skulls"
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e

OBGYNs indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely closing
birth canals up to 30%. (ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia training video purports
to show how to allow the birth canal to open maximally in the small number
of cases when babies' shoulders get stuck - which is the indirect admission
that OBYNs know they are routinely closing birth canals up to 30%.

Sadly, the version of McRoberts purported in the ACOG video to allow the
birth canal to open maximally actually keeps it closed the "extra" up to
30%. This is OB Lie #4.

DR. BENSON: ASSUMING YOU SUSPECT CHILD ABUSE...

FOUR ACTIONS

1. EDUCATE POLICE - REPORT and urge ACA members to report. Urge ACA
members to KEEP reporting even though law enforcement is currently
looking the other way. See the arrogant boast of Steve Harris, MD quoted
below in regard to MORE MEDICAL CRIME...

2. EDUCATE **WOMEN** - include the birth-canal-closing biomechanics
in your website blurb about subluxations caused by difficult birth. (Note:
Women should not have to ASK for the "extra" room in the birth canal for
their babies. Most women don't KNOW to ask. Therefore the crime must be
reported. Eventually law enforcement will stop looking the other way. See
#1 above.)

3. EDUCATE ACA MEMBERS ABOUT ACA DELETING ITS BIRTH TRAUMA POLICY. Urge ACA
to
put BACK the birth trauma policy and issue a press release protesting the
birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation and other OBGYN crimes.

4. EDUCATE ACA MEMBERS ABOUT THE OBVIOUS FCER FRAUD: "Leaders"
at ACA and FCER are ignoring the birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation
of OBGYNs most likely: 1) to curry favor with organized medicine
and 2) to avoid further scrutiny of spinal manipulation by DCs. This is
discussed below.

Please note: UNPRECEDENTED ACA/ICA COOPERATION came after ACA deleted
it's birth trauma policy - after ICPA deleted Dr. Jeanne Ohm's
citation of my work...

See ICPA/OHM'S DELETIONS (ALSO: DR. HEWITT and DR. WATSON: DO YOU SUSPECT
MASS CHILD ABUSE BY OBGYNs?)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2466

The ACA Pediatrics Council described the unprecedented ACA/ICA cooperation
as follows:

"June 2008: The ACA Pediatrics Council and the ICA Pediatrics Council
issued a joint press release last week explaining our mutual recognition of
the
DICCP [Diplomate, International College of Chiropractic Pediatrics]...The
ACA's House of Delegates voted to approve the recognition
of the International College of Chiropractic Pediatrics (ICCP) as the
governing body that grants post-doctoral certification in the specialty of
chiropractic pediatrics. This is in response to a by-laws amendment passed
by our council. This is the first time in history that the same organization
has been recognized by both the ICA and the ACA for post-graduate
certification of diplomates."
http://www.acapedscouncil.org/ACAPC-News.html

I have indicated to ACA Pediatrics Council Pres. Elise Hewitt, DC that ACA
and ICA should issue a
joint press release protesting the birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation
and other OBGYN crimes.

Dr. Hewitt (and Dr. Amy Watson) have remained silent - babies be damned.

DR. BENSON (and anyone else reading): If you do NOT suspect the
birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation is
child abuse,
please tell me why - preferably publicly.

If you DO suspect child abuse take the four actions above.

EMERGENCY. Please act immediately. Do it for the tiniest chiropractic
patients.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA
todd@...

PS MORE MEDICAL CRIME

As indicated above, law enforcement is looking the other way and MDs know
it...

>
> Steve Harris, MD arrogantly boasts:
>
> "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime.
> These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
> 28866f3384801ae9
>
>
> Dr. Harris's arrogant boast came in reply to my having
> pointed out another massive MD crime: fraudulent vaccination promotion...
>
> MDs are promoting PLANNED endangerment of VACCINATED children.
>
> When parents ask about vaccine exemptions for their children, they are
> told
> the bald lie that only their vaccine-exempt children need to be sent
> home/protected during disease outbreaks.
>
> Since many vaccinated children are not immunized by their vaccinations,
> ALL
> children need to be sent home/protected during disease outbreaks.
>
> All 50 state vaccination laws need to be changed immediately.
>
> See TIME magazine on chiropractors vs. vaccination
> http://groups.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/5d9a066386e4ef2f
>
> BTW, I am in FAVOR of vaccination - I am just not in favor of MDs
> **fraudulently promoting vaccination** as they fail to promote
> breastfeeding
> as free daily immunizations that reportedly make MD-needle-vaccinations
> work
> better...

STILL **MORE** MD CRIME...

MASS IMMUNOLOGIC CHILD ABUSE
>
> FRAUDULENT BREASTFEEDING PROMOTION BY MDs AND CDC...
>
> MDs and CDC are failing to explicitly state that breastfeedings are
> IMMUNIZATIONS
>
> MDs and CDC should immediately start informing the public that
> breastfeeding
> women scan for pathogens and manufacture IMMUNIZATIONS which they inject
> with their breasts - daily.
>
> CDC's vaunted National Immunization [sic] Program doesn't even call
> breastfeedings immunizations or mention that breastfeeding women immunize
> far more babies than MDs and reportedly make MD-needle-vaccinations work
> better.
>

THE FOLLOWING IS EXCERPTED FROM AN EMAIL TO AMERICAN INDIANS...

[BREASTFEEDING/OBESITY/DIABETES ADDENDUM Oct. 19, 2008: The U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services Office on Women's Health's "Easy
Guide to Breastfeeding for American Indian and Alaskan Native Families" also
fails to explicitly state that breastfeedings are IMMUNIZATIONS. The
closest the brochure comes is, "Microwaving breast milk will kill the
antibodies."
http://www.4woman.gov/pub/BF.AIAN.pdf...This brochure for American Indian
and Alaskan Native women should be changed to explicitly state that
breastfeedings are IMMUNIZATIONS that reportedly make vaccinations work
better...BREASTFEEDING AND DIABETES...I liked this sentence in the brochure:
"The people of GilaRiver Indian Community in Arizona, working together with
the scientistsfrom the National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that
breastfeedinglowers the risk of an infant becoming overweight and possibly
developingdiabetes in later life." Obviously, a brochure intended for
American Indians and Alaska natives that apes the gross error of omission of
US Government agencies by fraudulently promoting breastfeeding - by failing
to even mention that breastfeedings are IMMUNIZATIONS - well - obviously
this agency policy has " has "TRIBAL IMPLICATIONS" and (as noted above):
"[F]ederal agencies [Medicare/Medicaid] are required by Executive Order
to consult with
Indian tribes on "policies that have TRIBAL IMPLICATIONS." [See Executive
Order 13175, 65 Fed. Reg. 67,249 (Nov. 9,
2000), emphasis added.]
http://www.nihb.org/docs/gao_cms_ihs_d08724.pdf

>>>>BEGIN SECOND ADDENDUM Oct. 19, 2008

BRAVO!

I just found this...

Alicia Dermer, M.D., I.B.C.L.C. and Anne Montgomery, M.D. say:

"HUMAN MILK IS BABY'S FIRST IMMUNIZATION"...

But they FAIL to mention something extremely important: Vaccination is NOT
immunization; vaccination is ATTEMPTED immunization..

They write:

"Human milk is baby's first immunization. It provides antibodies
[IMMUNIZATIONS - please use this power word Alicia and Anne - TDG] which
protect baby from many common respiratory and intestinal diseases, and also
contains living immune cells. First milk, colostrum, is packed with
components which increase immunity and protect the newborn's intestines.
Artificially fed babies have higher rates of middle ear infections,
pneumonia, and cases of gastroenteritis (stomach flu). Breastfeeding as an
infant also provides protection from developing immune system cancers such
as lymphoma, bowel diseases such as Crohn's disease and celiac sprue, and
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, all of which are related to immune system
function. AND BREASTFED BABIES GENERALLY MOUNT A MORE EFFECTIVE RESPONSE TO
CHILDHOOD [VACCINATIONS]. In all these cases, benefits begin immediately,
and increase with increasing duration of breastfeeding."
http://www.geocities.com/lonnit.geo/GREATBF.HTML (emphasis added)

Drs. Dermer and Montgomery also fail to mention that - while breastfeeding
their babies - breastfeeding mothers scan for pathogens and manufacture
specific IMMUNIZATIONS - i.e. - breastfeeding is FREE DAILY IMMUNIZATION and
(quoting the two MDs): "BREASTFED BABIES GENERALLY MOUNT A MORE EFFECTIVE
RESPONSE TO CHILDHOOD [VACCINATIONS]."

MDs have hijacked the power word "immunization" to market their
vaccinations...

The hijacking must be reversed...

I'll cc the two "Human milk is baby's first immunization" MDs via
dermer@..., annemont@...

>>>>BEGIN excerpt of Attn GAO: Why are AAP and CDC failing to promote free
>>>>daily immunizations
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2378

BREASTMILK:

THAT STUFF'S GOT **IMMUNIZATIONS**!!

See MATERNAL ANTIBODIES FOR PASSIVE INFANT IMMUNIZATION
NIH GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 40, November 18, 1994
RFA: AI-95-004
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AI-95-004.html

BREASTMILK CONTAINS **SPECIAL** IMMUNIZATIONS...

Quoting Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC from Scientific American...

"Researchers do not yet know how the mother's immune system knows to
make
antibodies
(IMMUNIZATIONS) against only pathogenic and not normal bacteria..."

FULLER EXCERPT

"The mother (IMMUNIZER) synthesizes antibodies (IMMUNIZATIONS) when she
ingests, inhales or otherwise comes in contact with a disease-causing
agent.
Each antibody (IMMUNIZATION) she makes is specific to that agent; that
is,
it binds to a single protein, or antigen, on the agent and will not
waste
time attacking irrelevant substances...[i.e.] the antibodies
(IMMUNIZATIONS) delivered to the infant ignore useful bacteria normally
found in the gut. This flora serves to crowd out the growth of harmful
organisms, thus providing another measure of resistance. Researchers do
not
yet know how the mother's immune system knows to make antibodies
(IMMUNIZATIONS) against only pathogenic and not normal bacteria, but
whatever the process may be, it favors the establishment of 'good
bacteria'
in a baby's gut...[B]reast milk is truly a fascinating fluid that
supplies
infants with far more than nutrition. It (supplies IMMUNIZATIONS daily
and
thereby) protects them against infection until they can protect
themselves.
--Jack Newman, MD
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
http://www.kellymom.com/newman/how_breastmilk_protects_newborns.html

MDs and CDC ought to be handing-out this Scientific American article by
Jack Newman, MD and explaining it to every pregnant woman - without
leaving
out the power word "immunization" (like Jack did)...

I'll cc Jack via newman@...

Jack, MDs and CDC are failing to tell the world that breastfeeding women
are
IMMUNIZERS who administer the vast majority of immunizations.

AN IMMUNIZATION (BREASTFEEDING) BONUS:

Breastfeeding immunizations reportedly make MD-needle-vaccinations work
better.

Quoting Hanson and Telemo [1999]:

"The improved defense against infection in the breast-fed infant is
not just a matter of passive, temporary protection. There is also a
definite ACTIVE impact on the breast-fed infant's immune system that
makes
it function more efficiently in defense against infections and in
response
to vaccines for years to come." [Hanson and Telemo in Ogra et al.
Mucosal Im
munology 1999:1501, emphasis added]

Sorry to repeat myself, but the MD/CDC mass immunologic child abuse
crime is
massive: MDs are mysteriously failing to tell the world that
breastfeeding women are IMMUNIZERS who scan for pathogens and
manufacture
specific
IMMUNIZATIONS which they "inject" with their breasts DAILY.

What pregnant woman - explicitly informed that she can IMMUNIZE her baby
daily and (reportedly) make
MD-needle-vaccinations work better - is going to fail to at least
ATTEMPT to
breastfeed?

MDs and CDC are missing a golden opportunity to make both the
immunization rate (breastfeeding rate) and vaccination rate skyrocket...

The MD/CDC mass immunologic child abuse crime is massive.

>>>END excerpt of Dr. Gastaldo's post: Medicine's Vaccination
Subluxation
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2222

[NOTE: Like most DCs, I am IN FAVOR of vaccinations - as long as MDs and
CDC are not forcing them. Unfortunately, MDs and CDC **are** forcing
vaccinations - fraudulently - using PLANNED endangerment of VACCINATED
children during disease outbreaks.]

>>>>END excerpt of Attn GAO: Why are AAP and CDC failing to promote free
>>>>daily immunizations
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2378

>>>>END SECOND ADDENDUM Oct. 19, 2008

FCER = Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research...

I RECENTLY WROTE TO FCER TRUSTEE CHARLIE DUBOIS OF WISCONSIN...

MR. DUBOIS: Hopefully, OBGYNs will stop the crimes without being forced -
but there is a
problem with that scenario - immediately ending the crimes is tantamount to
admitting they are crimes - which is why I am in favor of pardons in advance
for OBGYNs. As medical students, OBGYNs are TRAINED to commit obvious
felonies. See the bizarre ACOG Shoulder Dystocia training video discussion
below.

I wrote to MS. SCHWERDTFEGER - Mr. DuBois' assistant...

...Prevent Child Abuse Wisconsin says:

"No child deserves to be abused or neglected. As a person who cares about
children, you have a moral (and maybe a legal) responsibility to report
suspected abuse or neglect."
http://www.preventchildabusewi.org/recrep.htm

MS. SCHWERDTFEGER: Assuming you agree that children are being abused en
masse by organized
medicine...

Suggested ACTIONS regarding the mass child abuse I mentioned - and other
mass
child abuse I did not mention...

1. REPORT to police - and if you have any pregnant friends or relatives
please tell them that by
using
semisitting and dorsal lithotomy delivery positions, OBGYNs are routinely
closing birth canals up to 30% (most births) - and that it is easy for women
to
allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. PREGNANT WOMEN:
See WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE at the very end of this post
and **talk to your OBGYN**. Jeanne, if you do inform pregnant friends or
relatives and they have questions, tell them to feel free to email me at
todd@....

2. REPORT to police - and please also tell pregnant friends or relatives
that OBGYNs are
temporarily asphyxiating babies, permanently robbing them of up to 50% of
blood volume. It's American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior
toward males and females and it is suspected to cause AUTISM. Like the
senseless birth-canal-closing - it
too is easy to prevent: PREGNANT WOMEN: Don't let your OBGYN clamp the
cord until baby is pink, breathing and not in need of resuscitation - and
**talk to your OBGYN**.

3. Please urge **Mr. DuBois** to report to police and publicly inform his
employees
and whomever insures them that OBGYNs are routinely abusing children - and
urge him to urge FCER to stop the sordid "scientific"
charade and start EDUCATING pregnant women - as in the EDUCATION part of
FCER's mission. My full post regarding FCER FRAUD is reproduced below.

FCER TRUSTEE DUBOIS

Charlie,

As noted above, your company STANDARD PROCESS, Inc. promotes optimal
nutrition for children but does not mention that MDs and CDC are lying by
omission thereby in effect denying massive numbers of babies not only
optimal nutrition but massive numbers of free daily immunizations.

You are failing to mention/report the mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse. See
above.

Hopefully, you just did not know about the mass immunologic child abuse by
MDs and CDC...

I note that you sell a brochure to health professionals that says:

"Could your child be healthier?...At our office, we believe that given the
proper nutrition, your body has amazing capabilities of keeping itself
healthy."
http://www.standardprocess.com/display/displayFile.aspx?docid=2804&filename=/Pub\
lic/Lit/Brochures/childrensnutritionL1350.pdf

Why not change this brochure to state that "proper nutrition" for babies
(breastfeeding) has IMMUNIZATIONS which (reportedly) make
MD-needle-vaccinations work better?

Your brochure continues:

"We also believe that nutrition should be individualized to meet each
patient's needs..."

BREASTFEEDING is "individualized to meet each patient's needs"!
Breastfeeding mothers scan for pathogens and manufacture SPECIAL
antibodies - special IMMUNIZATIONS - in response to whatever pathogens they
come into contact with in baby's environment. See above.

Your brochure concludes:

"For these reasons and many more, we proudly recommend Standard Process
whole food supplements."

Obviously, BREASTFEEDING WOMEN should be consuming proper nutrition to
support production of their IMMUNIZATIONS - and this should be stated in
your brochure.

Or perhaps a separate brochure for pregnant women should be created.

If you are truly interested in preventing child abuse and AUTISM (see the
FCER quote below), please look closely at the mass temporary asphyxiation of
babies mentioned above and discussed below - and REPORT.

OBGYNs really are temporarily asphyxiating babies and amputating up to 50%
of their blood volume - routinely - and retired OBGYN George Malcolm Morley
says AUTISM is being caused. (Of course, the obvious mass baby
asphyxiation/mass baby blood robbery crime should end immediately even if it
isn't causing autism.)

It is time for chiropractic leaders at FCER to end their sordid "scientific"
charade.

The chiropractic profession is competing with a massive criminal
enterprise which includes mass birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION child
abuse - with FCER remaining silent.

By using semisitting and dorsal lithotomy delivery (most births), OBGYNs
close the birth canal up to 30%.

For the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and clinical and
radiographic cites from the medical literature - see Gastaldo TD. Letter.
BIRTH. 1992;19(4):230-1.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4, FREE ACCESS.

OBGYNs are senselessly KEEPING birth canals closed up to 30% (women kept
semisitting/dorsal) as they pull with vacuums/forceps (1 in 10
births) - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny
spinal cords.

OBGYNs indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are routinely closing
birth canals up to 30%. The American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists/ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia training video purports to
demonstrate how to allow the birth canal to open maximally in the small
number of cases when babies' shoulders get stuck - which is the indirect
admission that OBGYNs know they are routinely CLOSING birth canals the
"extra" up to 30%.

IT BEARS REPEATING THAT: The birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation crime
is not just being
committed in the occasional shoulder dystocia emergency - the crime is being
committed in **1 in 10 births** (forceps/vacuum births).

Some babies are DYING and obstetricians are LYING. See the Four OB Lies at
the URL below.

I noted above that you "fund...and print...Child Abuse Prevention education
booklets used by the local police department."
http://www.standardprocess.com/display/helpinghands.spi

Please REPORT the obvious birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation child
abuse to police - and please KEEP reporting until the massive OBGYN crimes
end.

Please encourage FCER to encourage DOCTORS OF CHIROPRACTIC to report and
keep reporting until the crime ends.

The Foundation for Chiropractic Progress (F4CP) says,

"Standard Process has...committed over $250,000 to the Foundation's goal of
educating the public regarding the benefits of chiropractic care."
http://www.foundation4cp.com/

Mysteriously, the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress (F4CP) is FAILING to
educate the public - failing to use NON-SPINAL
chiropractic care to educate the public about the massive
birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION crime of OBGYNs - not to mention
their mass baby asphyxiation/mass baby blood robbery crime.

I've been emailing Foundation for Chiropractic Progress (F4CP) members -
have they ever forwarded my emails to you?

How about FCER people? Have they forwarded?

I was sort of relieved to receive Ms. Schwerdtfeger's note (reproduced
below) indicating that she could not find the email that I sent to you via
info@.... (It too is reproduced below.)

Failure to receive my emails MIGHT account for the silence of F4CP and
FCER - babies
be damned.

One can only hope - and ask for acknowledgement of receipt. (Will you
please acknowledge receipt of this email? Jeanne, will you? Please just
forward it back to me.)

If you are helping to buy health insurance for Standard Process, Inc.
employees, you are helping to PAY for the mass child abuse crimes of OBGYNs.

Please inform your employees about the crimes - and how easy they are to
prevent.

Please also inform whomever insures them.

And (sorry to repeat myself) please inform police.

A special BIRTH "Child Abuse Prevention" education booklet is in order, as
in,

"...funding and printing Child Abuse Prevention education booklets used by
the local police department."
http://www.standardprocess.com/display/helpinghands.spi

But first, please REPORT.

Until law enforcement (and FCER and F4CP) stop looking the other way, your
educational efforts may be the only way that some people will be able to
prevent the sometimes-fatal mass child abuse from being inflicted onto their
babies.

MEDICARE/MEDICAID

In 1996, American Association of Medical Colleges/AAMC President Jordan J.
Cohen, M.D.suggested in an editorial that "many faculty
practices" have been submitting "false claims" to Medicare and are "certain"
to be assessed "major monetary penalties" for having submitted "false
claims."

Dr. Cohen wrote further, "...[T]he real jeopardy...is not the money.
It is the irreparable damage to academic medicine's integrity...I wonder
how well academic medicine could withstand the specter of widespread
allegations of false claims."
[Cohen JJ. Billing Medicare becomes more than a matter of money.
Academic Medicine. (Jul)1996;71(7):756]

Dr. Cohen ignored my response to him - or perhaps he never received it.

See http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2499

THE US GOV'T IS BEING DEFRAUDED...

Medicare PAYS hospitals for the birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation
crime TRAINING ($100,000 per year per obstetric resident).

And Medicaid pays for the birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation crime
itself.

FALSE CLAIMS ATTORNEY SHELLEY SLADE SAYS...

....that the False Claims Act prohibits billing Medicaid and
Medicare for care that is so deficient that it is "affirmatively harmful to
patients," as in,

"Deficient Care...a service provided in such a deficient fashion that the
government payer did not get the benefit of its bargain...billing Medicare
or Medicaid for care that is of such low quality and so deficient that it is
affirmatively harmful to patients..."
http://www.false-claims-act-health-care-fraud-whistleblower-attorney.com/about-o\
ur-firm/our-services/health-care-fraud.php

As I told Atty Slade...

EMERGENCY: STANDARD OBGYN CARE IS "AFFIRMATIVELY HARMFUL" -
SOMETIMES
FATAL...

Oddly, Atty Slade ran the other way - babies be damned...

See Atty Slade: Birth canal closing is 'affirmatively harmful' - please help
babies...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2303

Charlie, as indicated above, if you are paying TAXES you are helping to pay
for birth-canal-closing/baby-asphyxation TRAINING of medical students by
obstetric residents. (Medicare pays hospitals BILLIONS per year - $100,000
per year per recently graduated medical student/resident - to train medical
students. Obstetric residents train medical students to senselessly close
birth canals and senselessly asphyxiate babies.)

AN INCREDIBLE QUOTE...

Henry J. Aaron, PhD wrote in Waste, We Know You Are Out There. NEJM.
(Oct30)2008;359(18):1865-1867:

"Medicare, operates under authorizing legislation that states: 'Nothing in
this title shall be constituted to authorize any Federal Officer or employee
to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine'..."

I RECENTLY WROTE TO DR. AARON...

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2523

THE PRACTICE OF CRIME IS NOT THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE***

***Some of American medicine's most frequent surgical behaviors are obvious
crimes.

[I appended for Dr. Aaron a substantial excerpt of my email to FCER; see
below.]

HENRY J. AARON, PhD FORGOT TO MENTION THE PRACTICE OF CRIME BY MDs...

Henry J. Aaron, PhD wrote in Waste, We Know You Are Out There. NEJM.
(Oct30)2008;359(18):1865-1867:

"Everyone would agree that a costly intervention that is always useless or
that harms patients is wasteful."
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/18/1865?query=TOC

DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Everyone (except perhaps MDs and those who protect
them) would agree that a costly intervention that is always useless or that
harms patients constitutes CRIME - not "the practice of medicine." When MDs
are caught LYING to cover-up obvious crime (see below) - even MDs and those
who protect them might agree that crime is being committed.

DR. AARON ALSO WROTE:

"Medicare, operates under authorizing legislation that states: 'Nothing in
this title shall be constituted to authorize any Federal Officer or employee
to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine'..."

DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: Crime is not the practice of medicine. Federal
Officers and employees CAN control the practice of CRIME by MDs.

DR. AARON WROTE:

"It is scandalous that Congress fails to dedicate, say, 1% of Medicare and
Medicaid spending to support research, conducted by an apolitical body, on
the effectiveness and relative costs of medical procedures and to require
private payers to make a similar contribution. The results from such
research would be years in coming, but the size of the task heightens the
need to begin it now."

DR. GASTALDO REMARKS: It is scandalous that Federal Officers and
employees - and Congress - fail to control/STOP the practice of
Medicaid/Medicare reimbursed crime by MDs. It is scandalous that Dr. Aaron
fails to speak out about the rampant practice of crime by MDs. Stopping the
practice of crime by MDs would yield INSTANT savings.

>>>>END my preface to Dr. Aaron - which ended with a substantial excerpt of
>>>>my FCER FRAUD email, reproduced below.
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2523


HERE IS MS. SCHWERDTFEGER'S EMAIL TO ME...

----- Original Message -----
From: Schwerdtfeger, Jeanne
To: tgastaldo@...
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 2:16 PM
Subject: message to Mr DuBois


Hello Dr Gastaldo,

I was unable to locate your message to Mr DuBois. If you would like to
resend it to me I would be sure to get it to him.

Kind regards,
Jeanne Schwerdtfeger
Executive Secretary
Standard Process Inc
262-495-6457

This e-mail message includes information which should be considered private,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately delete it and notify
the sender or other relevant parties within Standard Process Inc. You are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. Thank you for your cooperation.

>>>>END Ms. Schwerdtfeger's email

MS. SCHWERDTFEGER: I am publicizing your email because mass child abuse is
being committed by MDs and ignored by DCs. Hopefully Mr. DuBois was just
being kept in the dark until now by both FCER and F4CP. Or maybe FCER and
F4CP weren't receiving my emails. Hopefully, FCER Trustee DuBois will
expose the OBGYN crimes and the FCER fraud...

HERE IS THE EMAIL THAT APPARENTLY GOT LOST ("I was unable to locate your
message to Mr DuBois.")

>>>>BEGIN FCER spinal manipulation/stroke FRAUD: Attn FCER trustee Charles
>>>>Dubois...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2508

FCER SPINAL MANIPULATION/STROKE **FRAUD**

FCER (cited below) says: "Current research finds no difference between
chiropractic care and medical care and the risk of stroke..."

IT'S A FRAUD. FCER, ACA and researchers are IGNORING most medical spinal
manipulation. See below.

AUTISM prefatory note: Attention: FCER Trustee Charles DUBOIS (Standard
Process, Inc. via info@...): FCER Trustee Dubois: If you
are truly interested in preventing child abuse and AUTISM (see FCER quote
about you below) - please see my discussion of ACA spokesman (and former
nurse) Dr. Robert HAYDEN and retired OBGYN George Malcolm MORLEY. Dr.
Morley is trying to prevent autism by ending mass baby asphyxiation/mass
permanent amputation of up to 50% of baby blood volume. It's obvious mass
child abuse by OBGYNs. It's performed in most c-section births and most
"cord blood banking" births, according to Dr. Morley - see below.

DCs should be REPORTING all mass child abuse by OBGYNs: "Many [all?] state
laws obligate the doctor of chiropractic to report [suspected] child
abuse..."
http://www.icabestpractices.org/pdf/ICABPGCh02_8427_s.pdf (bracketed words
are mine)

Which brings me back to birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION mass child
abuse by OBGYNs...

"Outward [the obstetrician is] icily calm, but inward [he] is extremely
harrassed...attempting to disguise how hard he is really pulling on the
fetal head."
--Kinch RA. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1962; 5:1031-43 quoted in Pauerstein CJ
(ed). Clinical Obstetrics. NY: John Wiley & Sons 1987:871.

By using semisitting/dorsal lithotomy delivery (most births), OBGYNs are
routinely closing birth canals up to 30%. For radiographic and clinical
cites, see Gastaldo 1992, FREE ACCESS below.

WORSE: OBGYNs are routinely KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to
30% (keeping women semisitting/dorsal) as they pull with vacuums/forceps (1
in 10 births) - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny
spinal cords. More on this below....

FCER (and ACA) ARE IGNORING THIS **SOMETIMES-FATAL** ROUTINE MEDICAL SPINAL
MANIPULATION BY OBGYNs...

Which brings me back to the stimulus for this post...

On Oct. 23, 2008, I received an email from FCER/Foundation for Chiropractic
Education and Research.

(FCER was founded by NCA, the precursor organization to ACA/American
Chiropractic Association).

Again quoting that FCER EMAIL (cited below^^^):

"Current research finds no difference between chiropractic care and medical
care and the risk of stroke..."

AGAIN: IT'S A FRAUD. FCER, ACA and researchers are IGNORING most medical
spinal manipulation...

Specifically, FCER, ACA and researchers are ignoring **sometimes-fatal**
BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING spinal
manipulation by OBSTETRICIANS, the most prolific medical spinal
manipulators.

See Dr. Merrifield [FCER]: Pediatricians seek help 'particularly' from
chiropractors
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1869

See also: Emergency chiropractic for babies. Attention Robert A.
Hayden, DC, PhD -
ACA 'spokesman to television, radio and the printed media.'
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2485

And see: EDZARD ERNST, MD. J R Soc Med 2007;100:330-338.
http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/100/7/330

(I have emailed Dr. Ernst, FCER, and ACA members multiple times - to no
avail. I'll cc FCER again - via ROBIN R. MERRIFIELD, World Federation of
Chiropractic/WFC/FCER/ICCR Coordinator***, at FCERedit@...; also via
FCER Director of Education at rmerrifield@... - and I'll cc Dr. Ernst
via Edzard.Ernst@.... I'll also cc ACA members via their delegates
and alternate delegates. Note: It is possible that ACA delegates are not
passing this info on to ACA members. NOTE: I'VE TELEPHONED FCER's ROBIN R.
MERRIFIELD - asking her to acknowledge receipt of my emails - to no avail.)

***WFC/FCER/ICCR/International Conference on Chiropractic Research
Coordinator Merrifield will hopefully distribute this email to all those
attending WFC & FCER's ICCR -- Montreal 2009.

"Mark those dates now - April 30 to May 02, 2009 - and prepare to join over
1,000 DC's from over 40 countries in Montreal, Quebec, Canada."
www.wfc.org/congress2009

I'll cc this to WFC Congress Administrator Linda Sicoli, 416-484-9978 phone,
416-484-9665 fax via lsicoli@...

With enough DCs protesting, it may be possible for the chiropractic
profession to finally end the mass child abuse crimes of OBGYNs - well
before Montreal 2009.

^^^THE FCER EMAIL THAT STIMULATED THIS POST was an FCER Product release/Oct.
23, 2008 email: "Cervical Artery
Dissection - Changing the Conversation...The Facts Are Clearly Stated And
Ready For You To Use in This 8-Panel Pamphlet...Order your supply
today...call 800-622-6309."

DCs should PREVENT obstetricians from causing "mechanical disorders of the
musculoskeletal system:

>>>
>>> PREVENTION QUOTE FROM THE WORLD FEDERATION OF CHIROPRACTIC/WFC
>>>
>>> "A health profession concerned with the diagnosis, treatment and
>>> PREVENTION
>>> OF MECHANICAL DISORDERS OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM, and the effects
>>> of
>>> these disorders on the functions of the nervous system and general
>>> health.
>>> There is an emphasis on manual treatments including spinal adjustment
>>> and
>>> other joint and soft-tissue manipulation."
>>> --WFC Dictionary Definition, World Federation of Chiropractic, 2001,
>>> emphasis added
>>>
>>
http://www.wfc.org/website/WFC/website.nsf/WebPage/DefinitionOfChiropractic?Open\
\
\
>> Document
>>>
>>> PREVENTION QUOTE FROM THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
>>>
>>> "[Chiropractic]...A health care profession concerned with the diagnosis,
>>> treatment and
>>> PREVENTION OF DISORDERS OF THE NEUROMUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM and the
>>> effects
>>> of these disorders on general health. There is a an emphasis on manual
>>> techniques, including joint adjustment and/or manipulation with a
>>> particular
>>> focus on subluxations."
>>> --The WHO definition, World Health Organization, Guidelines on
>>> Chiropractic,
>>> 2005, emphasis added
>>>
>>
http://www.wfc.org/website/WFC/website.nsf/WebPage/DefinitionOfChiropractic?Open\
\
\
>> Document
>>>
>>> The WHO definition just quoted mentions "a particular focus on
>>> subluxations."
>>>
>>> There should be a particular focus on adjusting NON-SPINAL
>>> subluxations -
>>> to
>>> PREVENT subluxations.
>>>
>>>>>>>END excerpt of Validating NON-SPINAL chiropractic: Stopping the OBGYN
>>> spinal manipulation crime
>>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1659
>>>
>>
>> OBGYNs are behaving as CLASSIC nerve (brain)-pinching and
>> nerve-stretching
>> subluxations.
>>
>> See Haneline/Nansel: OBGYNs are nerve-pinching/nerve-stretching
>> subluxations
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1390
>>

EDUCATION...

Dr. DD Palmer, founder of chiropractic NAMED chiropractic (in part)
EDUCATION - "the mental act of accumulating knowledge." [1910:19]

"Chiropractic came as an educator...When a member of society has fallen,
send for an educator," he said. [1910:465,876,116]

"It now remains for Chiropractors to rectify the mistakes of the medical
profession," he said on p. 867.

Of course, the chiropractic profession (including DD himself) did make
mistakes - and the chiropractic profession STILL makes mistakes.

It's just that the medical profession's mistakes were (and still are) so
much worse...

Significantly, FCER - the Foundation for Chiropractic EDUCATION and Research
is ignoring an important part of its own stated Mission - EDUCATION:

FCER Mission: "To promote the health and well being of humanity by
encouraging and supporting research and EDUCATION relative to the field of
chiropractic care..." (EDUCATION emphasis added)
http://www.fcer.org/html/about_facts.htm

THE BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING OBSTETRICIAN SPINAL MANIPULATION CRIME IS GRUESOME -
SOMETIMES FATAL...

The massive birth crime is "relative to the field of chiropractic care" -
because the field of chiropractic care includes PREVENTION. See WFC and WHO
quotes above.

Obstetricians are senselessly using semisitting/dorsal delivery thereby
senselessly closing birth canals up to 30% (most births).

For the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics and clinical and
radiographic cites from the medical literature - see Gastaldo TD. Letter.
BIRTH. 1992;19(4):230-1.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4, FREE ACCESS.

WORSE, when babies get stuck (1 in 10 births) obstetricians are senselessly
KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% (senselessly keeping women
semisitting/dorsal) - as they pull with forceps/vacuums - sometimes pulling
so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.

Some babies DIE - some babies are paralyzed - most only suffer gruesome
spinal manipulation.

OBGYN experts indirectly ADMIT ON VIDEO that they KNOW they are
routinely closing birth canals up to 30%. The American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists/ACOG's Shoulder Dystocia training video
purports to demonstrate how to allow the birth canal to open maximally in
the small number of cases when babies' shoulders get stuck - which is the
indirect admission that OBGYNs know they are routinely closing birth canals
up to 30%.

OBGYN experts have been LYING to cover-up.

OB Lie #4 is perhaps the most vicious: The version of McRoberts maneuver
purported (on the just mentioned ACOG video) to allow the birth canal to
open maximally when babies' shoulders get stuck - actually keeps it closed
the "extra" up to 30%.

For all Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...

See [New Jersey's] 'Benevolent' FBI/DHHS OIG Agent Bruno Varano (ret.):
[BRUNO:] You're ignoring mass child abuse by OBGYNs.
=0 A http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2440

ATTENTION FEDS: QUI TAM ACTION

I have been working unreimbursed for years.

I mentioned a QUI TAM action in New Jersey's 'Benevolent' FBI/DHHS OIG
Agent, URL above..

Retired NJ federal law enforcement officer Bruno Varano initially indicated
I should telephone him about how to CORRECTLY get
QUI-TAM-reimbursed for my work - but when I called him - he hung up on
me...

Children are DYING and obstetricians are LYING - and a federal law
enforcement officer hung up on me told me in
effect "no more email about the mass child abuse." Something is very
screwy.

OBGYNs are likely causing BABY STROKES...

See Baby stroke risk = elderly stroke risk (Lee et al. UCSF) [2005]
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/4c1033ab4a8aab2e

IT'S SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY

...as that term is defined in the December 2004 "WHO guidelines on basic
training and safety in chiropractic":

"Spinal manipulative therapy...[i]ncludes ALL procedures where the hands or
mechanical devices are used to mobilize, adjust, manipulate, APPLY TRACTION,
massage, stimulate or otherwise influence the spine and paraspinal tissues
with the aim of influencing the patient's health." (p. 4, emphases added)
http://www.chiroeco.com/50/bonus/WHOguidelines.pdf

FCER's EMAIL (cited above) ALSO SAID:

"Due to injury or genetics, susceptible people have weaknesses
in their cervical arteries which may ultimately lead to stroke..."

DUE TO INJURY?

WHAT **CAUSES** CERVICAL ARTERY INJURY?

WHAT CAUSES CERVICAL ARTERY "WEAKNESSES"?

FCER begs the question - suggests that spinal manipulation does NOT cause
cervical artery injury because (says FCER) cervical artery injury is caused
by previous cervical artery injury...

Begging the question is not science.

REMEMBER: With birth canals senselessly KEPT closed up to 30%, when babies
get stuck, obstetricians pull with forceps/vacuums and sometimes they pull
so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies DIE -
again - with birth canals senselessly KEPT closed up to 30%...

HYPOTHESIS

What if OBSTETRICIANS (via their bizarre birth-canal-closing/spinal
manipulation in 1 in 10 births; see above) are causing "weaknesses" in
cervical arteries early in life - "weaknesses" that in some babies
ultimately manifest as stroke?

Again: See Baby stroke risk = elderly stroke risk (Lee et al. UCSF) [2005]
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/4c1033ab4a8aab2e

What if, in addition to causing strokes early in life, there are
obstetrician-INITIATED strokes/"weaknesses" LATER in life (again, baby
stroke risk = elderly stroke risk; see above) - by further injury to
obstetrician-caused "weaknesses" - via gentle spine stresses - including
RELATIVELY GENTLE^^^ spinal-manipulation by CHIROPRACTORS...

^^^REMEMBER: Obstetricians are NOT gentle. With birth canals senselessly
kept closed up to 30%, when babies get stuck, obstetricians pull with
forceps/vacuusm - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of
tiny spinal cords. Some babies DIE - I say again - with birth canals
senselessly KEPT closed up to 30%...

REGARDLESS whether obstetrician-initiated cervial artery "weaknesses" are
causing strokes later in life...

The controversy boils down to risk vs. benefit of spinal manipulative
therapy - and there is NO benefit - only risk - risk of DEATH - and risk of
lesser sensory and motor deficits later in life, to paraphrase one child
neurology text.

"OBSTETRIC" CHIROPRACTORS (MD-OBSTETRICIANS)

Quoting FCER: "The only way in which risks to the patient attributed to the
["OBSTETRIC" CHIROPRACTOR - TDG] may be reduced (other than abandoning
treatment altogether) is if research is allowed to flourish and guide the
physician in identifying components that may be producing problems."
(emphasis added)
http://www.fcer.org/html/about_facts.htm

Some babies are DYING and "obstetric" chiropractors (MD-obstetricians) are
LYING instead of allowing research to flourish.

Compounding the problem is that chiropractors cannot use federal money to
research/expose the obstetric birth-canal-closing spinal manipulation
crime...

THE FEDERAL CAM SCAM - IS IT "THE TRAP"?

(See "THE TRAP" by the late TCC President WILLIAM D. HARPER, Jr., MS, DC,
below.)

NIH's NCCAM - by definition - can't research/expose mass
birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation by some of the most prolific CAM
practitioners - OBGYNs...

>> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/14cdbd307637816b
>>
>> NCCAM's stated "legal mandate" includes identifying and investigating
>> "complementary and alternative" medical treatment (CAM)...
>> http://nccam.nih.gov/about/plans/2005/index.htm
>>
>> Yet by NCCAM definition, identifying and investigating "complementary
>> and alternative" medical treatment (CAM) can't involve identifying and
>> investigating CAM that is "an integral part of conventional medicine."
>>
>> That is, complementary and alternative medical treatment (CAM) is
>> defined in the NCCAM Strategic Plan (2005-2009) as "medical practices
>> that are 'unproven by science and not presently considered an integral
>> part of conventional medicine (also referred to as biomedicine, or
>> mainstream or allopathic medicine)..."
>> http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-07-003.html
>> The "scientific" game is fixed - babies be damned.

[Addendum Oct. 20, 2008: IF SOMETHING IS "CAM" - UNPROVEN - IT'S
CAM/UNPROVEN REGARDLESS WHO IS DOING IT...CHIROS ARE **EMBRACING** THE CAM
FRAUD WHICH IS REALLY ONLY A "NICER" VERSION OF ORGANIZED MEDICINE'S "YOU'RE
QUACKS - WE'RE NOT" LIE...]
>>
>>>>>>END excerpt of my Open Letter to NIH's NCCAM...
>> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/14cdbd307637816b

"THE TRAP" by the late TCC President WILLIAM D. HARPER, Jr., MS, DC...

From the FCER website...

"1969 (July): Lifeline (publication of TCC) includes:
-'The trap' (p. 1), apparently written by TCC President William D. Harper,
Jr., M.S., D.C.:
"There is much evidence today to substantiate the idea that any federal
subsidy of our colleges that would contribute to faculty
and administrative support would eventually lead to subservience and loss of
identity as a professional entity.
It is all very well to dream of federal subsidization but when the cost is
considered, one wonders if it is worth the price.
Whenever someone furnishes money for your subsistence there are strings
attached, and these strings may lead to the absorption, dilution, and
eventual elimination of Chiropractic as a separate and distinct branch of
the healing arts...."
--
http://www.fcer.org/History/CRF-FCERsec.pdf (p. 86-87)

Doctors of chiropractic are raking in tax dollars now - but the price is -
at the very least - not being able to research/expose mass
birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation child abuse by OBGYNs. See above.

DR. WILLIAM D. HARPER AND "THE HIGHEST OBLIGATION"

The Highest Obligation was written by the 1966 ACA Commission for the
Principles of
Chiropractic (Janse and Harper et al.)...

I mentioned "The Highest Obligation" in Dynamic Chiropractic years ago...

"It was D.D. Palmer who wrote that the cause of all disease -- including
vertebral subluxation -- is mechanical, chemical and psychic irritation of
the nervous system from the external environment; and this fundamental
hypothesis of chiropractic may be found in the 27th and 28th [and 29th]
editions of Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. It is in Dorland's
because years after D.D. said it, it was enshrined in an essay called 'The
Highest Obligation' by Drs. W.D. Harper, Joseph Janse, Helmut Bittner,
Clarence Weiant and Earl Homewood. After which, Dr. W.D. Harper reprinted it
in his text Anything Can Cause Anything 'just in case it gets lost in the
fast political shuffle of chiropractic.'"
http://www.chiroweb.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=38267

When ACA Delegate Keith Overland indicated he did not know who I am....

I replied that I was the one who got the essence of "The Highest Obligation"
published as the definition of chiropractic in three editions of Dorland's
Illustrated
Medical Dictionary...

I did not quote the actual Dorland's definition:

"[C]hiropractic...a science of applied neurophysiologic diagnosis...based on
the theory that...irritation of the nervous system by [environmental
(mechanical, chemical, or psychic) noxious irritants]...is the cause of
disease...Diagnosis is the identification of these noxious irritants and
treatment is their removal by the most conservative method."

Regarding the MASSIVE birth-canal-closing subluxation above, please note
that one definition of natural childbirth reads quite similarly:

"Natural childbirth means no physical, chemical or psychological condition
likely to disturb...the natural phenomenon or parturition." [Grantley
Dick-Read, M.D. quoted in Noble E. Childbirth with insight Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin, 1983:38]

I noted also for ACA Delegate Keith Overland that I persuaded Dorland's to
include DCs in the definition of "doctor."

I noted in that post (reproduced in my post to ACA alternate delegate Robert
Hayden, DC, PhD)...

ACA later screwed me - saddled chiropractic with a
"neuromusculoskeletal" definition complete with the anti-chiropractic
inference (again) that disease is caused by "abnormal nerve function"...

See Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of
chiropractic) [2004]
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2134

REPORTING THE MASS CHILD ABUSE BY OBGYNs...

Obstetricians and chiropractors must start REPORTING the obvious
birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation MASS CHILD ABUSE crime of
obstetricians.

MD-pediatricians want doctors of chiropractic to JOIN them in reporting
harms related to spinal manipulation in children...

A 2006 article in the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that concern for
patient safety "DEMANDS" a greater collaboration "PARTICULARLY" with doctors
of chiropractic "such that we can
investigate and REPORT harms related to spinal manipulation together."
(Emphases added.)
--Sunita Vohra, MD FRCPC MSc et al. PEDIATRICS. 2007 Jan;119(1):e275-83.
Epub 2006 Dec 18. PubMed abstract

Yet both MD-pediatricians and DC-pediatricians remain silent...

I'll cc PEDIATRICS Editor Jerold Lucey, MD via
jpuskarz@..., rperelman@..., jerold.lucey@...

Sadly, DC-pediatricians have not only been silent...

DC-pediatricians (ICPA/Drs. Ohm and Alcantara) have CENSORED my
birth-canal-closing info after citing it...

It's PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE, as in,

"[Withholding] information by restricting scholarly exchange...[is a form
of]...psychological violence."
--Ralph Crawshaw, MD. Academic sanction: targeting South African
science.JAMA 1989;262(11):1499-1503

ACA pediatricians Elise Hewitt, DC and Amy Watson, DC are remaining
silent...

See ICPA/Ohm's deletions (also: Dr. Hewitt and Dr. Watson: Do you suspect
mass child abuse by OBGYNs)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2466

After I called attention to ACA's birth trauma public policy, it too
mysteriously disappeared...

Recently, I wrote of the disappeared ACA birth trauma policy: Emergency!
It's GONE.

ACA alternate delegate ROBERT A. HAYDEN, DC, PhD, an ACA spokesman, did not
understand the emergency ("This is an emergency?" he asked)...

So I spelled it out for him...

"Robert...The emergency FOR BABIES is the birth-canal-closing/spinal
manipulation mass
child abuse by OBGYNs - and the other obvious OBGYN crimes discussed in the
post to which you replied, reproduced below....The emergency for the
chiropractic profession is the mysterious deletion of
ACA birth trauma policy - more on this latter emergency below...."

See Emergency chiropractic for babies. Attention Robert A. Hayden, DC, PhD -
ACA 'spokesman to television, radio and the printed media.'
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2485

ACA's DR. HAYDEN AND CARDIOVASCULAR AND CORONARY "CARE" CHILD ABUSE...

ACA alternate delegate Dr. Hayden, just mentioned, specialized in
"cardiovascular and coronary care," as in, "Prior to receiving his doctor of
chiropractic degree, Dr. Hayden was a critical care nurse specializing in
cardiovascular and coronary care..."
http://www.acatoday.org/content_css.cfm?CID=2163

Mention of cardiovascular and coronary care reminds me: In addition to
routinely closing birth canals up to 30%, OBGYNs are temporarily
asphyxiating babies en masse as they permanently rob them of up to 50% of
their blood volume.

It's obvious mass cardiovascular and coronary "care" CHILD ABUSE - MASS
FORCED BRADYCARDIA - MASS FORCED FETAL DISTRESS...

[A GRUESOME EXPERIMENT]

To demonstrate to themselves that robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood
volume is a BAD IDEA, retired OBGYN George Malcolm Morley blithely
recommends that obstetricians commit "lesser" child abuse - temporary baby
asphyxiation - causing obvious fetal distress - 60 bpm bradycardia -
[WITHOUT PROCEEDING TO AMPUTATION OF UP TO 50% OF BABY BLOOD VOLUME]

"[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The
[fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color
will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue
(vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be
able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on
a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds. Common sense will soon
release the finger and thumb."
http://web.archive.org/web/20040929080014/www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm

See Dents in babies' skulls (and SJ Doc)...
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/08abfc7ff242150e

NOTE: Normal fetal heart rate is 100 to 160...

Senselessly bringing the heart rate down to 60 is obvious child
abuse/senseless fetal distress...

"[E]xtreme bradycardia [heart rate under 80 bpm] is always an expression of
fetal distress and is a consequence of reduced gas exchange at the
placenta."
--From CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS IN PREGNANT PATIENTS.
By Maria Helena L. Souza, CCP (BR)* & Decio O. Elias, MD**
* Perfusionist / ** Pediatric Cardiac Surgeon
http://perfline.com/textbook/local/pregnancy.html

[NOTE: Dr. Morley's gruesome temporary baby asphyxiation experiment above
is step one in the mass baby blood robbery that is American medicine's most
frequent surgical behavior toward both males and females.]

AUTISM AND FCER TRUSTEE CHARLES DUBOIS...

"[T]he newest member of the Board of Trustees, FCER...CHARLES DUBOIS,
President of Standard Process, Inc...also serves on the board of the
Foundation for Chiropractic Progress...[and] on the board of...the CHILD
ABUSE Education Foundation of Wisconsin [and] Jonah's Journey (an AUTISM
awareness foundation)..." (emphases added)
http://www.fcer.org/html/News/boardchgs08.htm

FCER TRUSTEE DUBOIS: Retired OBGYN George Malcolm Morley says the mass baby
asphyxiation/mass baby blood robbery may be causing AUTISM.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050923102537/bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/324/7\
334/393#30254

See also: Dr. Morley's website: www.cordclamp.com.

Of course, the mass baby asphyxiation/mass baby blood robbery must end
REGARDLESS whether it is causing autism.

ACA's DR. HAYDEN AND **NURSES**...

"[Dr. Hayden] devoted 18 years to the nursing profession, serving as
executive director of the Mississippi Nurses' Association, and as a
registered lobbyist and continuing education consultant."
http://www.acatoday.org/content_css.cfm?CID=2163

Dr. Hayden could speak to nurses about stopping mass child abuse by OBGYNs.

WARNING: Many nurses are MD handmaidens...

One prominent nurse - Yale CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney - ignored my pleas
years ago and PROMOTED
routine closure of the birth canal by CNMwives, as in,

"The usual positions in a hospital delivery room are lithotomy or dorsal.
Midwives believe that in neither of these positions does the woman have to
be flat on her back; rather, they encourage a semisitting, or 'back up' and
'legs down,' modification of these positions."
[Varney H. Varney's Midwifery. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. 4th ed.
2004:839]

Also on p. 839, CNMwife Varney promotes KEEPING the birth canal closed when
the shoulder get stuck:

"In the event of...shoulder dystocia...the woman should be
in a lithotomy position..."

See my post, "I ain't no Semmelweis but"...
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.med/2004-06/0348.html

UNEXPLAINED BRAIN BLEEDS IN 26% OF VAGINAL BIRTHS

See MRI: Brain bleeds in 26% of vaginal births (Looney et al. 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/6746b6292cae7566

The influential **EDZARD ERNST, MD** should start reporting the mass child
abuse by OBGYNs - including and especially birth-canal-closing/spinal
manipulation - both to police in suspected child abuse reports - and to his
audience in his articles critical of spinal manipulation.

After all, Dr. Ernst writes: "In the interest of patient safety we should
reconsider our policy towards the routine use of spinal manipulation."
[Ernst E. J R Soc Med 2007;100:330-338.]
http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/100/7/330

As noted above...

FCER SAYS IT IS "CHANGING THE CONVERSATION"

WHY might FCER be "changing the conversation"?

Many DCs are not yet aware that Sandra Nette of Alberta, Canada is bringing
a class action to end upper
cervical spinal manipulation in Alberta, Canada.

One main chiropractic newspaper - Dynamic Chiropractic - has been silent
about the fact that Sandra Nette of Alberta, Canada is bringing a class
action to end upper
cervical spinal manipulation in Alberta, Canada.

Ms. Nette became nearly totally paralyzed following spinal manipulation.
http://albertachiroclassaction.ca

See also: Birth trauma and Alberta Health (and FMC attorneys): Bad news!
Mass child abuse by OBGYNs
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1919

I don't know how successful Ms. Nette's FMC class action will be; but
according to the medical literature, spinal manipulation by chiropractors
likely DOES (rarely) cause cervical artery injury and stroke:

1. "Weak to moderately strong evidence exists to support causation between
[cervical manipulative therapy] and [vertebral artery dissection] and
associated stroke." [Miley et al. Neurologist. 2008 Jan;14(1):66-73.]

2. "In prior studies which identified vertebral artery compromise, those
with a history of [cervical spinal manipulative therapy/cSMT] were more
likely to have involvement of the V3 segment [of the vertebral artery].
Although this study does not identify a mechanism which relates vertebral
artery dissection and exposure to cSMT, these data are compatible with a
greater than additive relation between compromise of an arterial segment
thought to be mechanically vulnerable and history of a mechanical event."
[Kawchuk et al. J Neurol. 2008 Mar;255(3):371-7. Epub 2008 Jan 15.]

Spinal manipulation by chiropractors does not occur in a vacuum.

Patients present with conditions, hoping for relief of neck pain for
example.

KEY POINT: Spinal manipulation risk to patients is FAR LESS than risks
posed to patients by medical care for the same conditions treated by spinal
manipulation. ("The best evidence indicates that cervical manipulation for
neck pain is much safer than the use of NSAIDs, by as much as a factor of
several hundred times. There is no evidence that indicates NSAID use is any
more effective than cervical manipulation for neck pain." [Dabbs and
Lauretti. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Oct;18(8):530-6.]

PATIENTS ARE NOT BEING WARNED ABOUT **DEATH** FROM NSAIDS...

NSAIDS = Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs...

A few years back, some people quoted me regarding NSAIDS...

http://www.forktender.com/NSAIDS_and_Potential_Problems.pdf

According to Fries [1992], NSAIDs are thought to cause 76000
hospitalizations and 7600 deaths per year
by causing gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding. Fries JF. Assessing and
understanding patient risk.
Scand J Rheumatol 1992;Supp 92:21-24

More recently, Dr. Fries reportedly told LA Times Magazine that "The Food
and Drug Administration
believes anywhere from 10,000 to 20,000 deaths each year are the result of
severe bleeding caused by
NSAIDS. It's a big problem." Fries quoted in Marsa L. America's other drug
problem. LA Times
Magazine (Sep29)1996. Quoted from Dynamic Chiropractic [(Jan1)1997:23]

Also interesting are reports suggesting a link between use of non- steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) and reactivation of tuberculosis. (See Tomasson et al. Tuberculosis
and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
drugs. Can Med Assoc J (Feb1)1984;130:275; and see Bennan M. Adverse effects
of
NSAIDs on renal function (case report). Can Med Assoc J
(Nov1)1984;131:1012-3.)
http://www.forktender.com/NSAIDS_and_Potential_Problems.pdf

EDZARD ERNST, MD concedes that: "[N]on-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs)-cause considerable problems, for example gastrointestinal and
cardiovascular complications"...

BUT BIZARRELY, Dr. Ernst forgets to explicitly mention DEATHS from NSAID
consumption, this in an article explicitly warning about deaths from spinal
manipulation.

Dr. Ernst concedes that "spinal manipulation could be preferable to drug
therapy" - but - he says - "there are problems with this line of argument:
the
efficacy of NSAIDs is
undoubted but that of spinal manipulation is not."

How could Dr. Ernst forget to mention DEATH from NSAIDS?

NSAIDS "RELATIVELY CONTRAINDICATED"...

Two CNMs, Benetti and Marchese
[1996], came to the conclusion that CNMs should make referrals to
chiropractors "when necessary"; but unfortuately, Benetti and Marchese
[1996] gave no indication as to WHY it might be necessary for
nurse-midwives to make referrals to chiropractors. [Benetti MC, Marchese
T. Primary care for women: management of common musculoskeletal
disorders. JNM 1996;41:173-87]

CNMs branching into the management of musculoskeletal conditions should
not restrict themselves (or their patients) to NSAIDs, heat and ice.

Benetti and Marchese note that NSAIDs - non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs like aspirin and ibuprofen - are "relatively contraindicated in
patients with...pregnancy" [1996:173].

Oddly, Benetti and Marchese [1996] mention
referral to chiropractors but fail to mention spinal
manipulation.

To all pregnant women who are suffering spinal/pelvic pain, there are
practitioners of various professional stripes who specialize in adjusting
pregnant women.

"POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE"?

Says Dr. Ernst, "the adverse effects of NSAIDs are subject to
post-marketing surveillance while those of spinal manipulation are not."
[Ernst E. J R Soc Med 2007;100:330-338.]
http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/100/7/330

DR. ERNST'S "POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE" MAY BE A FRAUD...

Perhaps things are different in Dr. Ernst's native Austria - or in the
country where he presently resides - the UK...

But American MDs do not have a very good history of adverse event
surveillance...

In 1993, then-FDA commissioner David Kessler, M.D. said that in spite of the
fact that reports from health
professionals are "essential" to ensure safety of medicines, physicians "do
not think to report adverse events."

"Only about 1% of serious events are reported to the FDA, according to one
study." [Kessler DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting
medication and device adverse effects and product problems. JAMA
(Jun2)1993;269(21):2765-68]

Kessler [1993] said physician reporting of serious adverse
events "is not in the culture of US medicine" because, as of 1985, only 14%
of US medical schools had required courses in "therapeutic decision making."

In 2002, Moore and Weiss echoed Kessler, apparently citing the same FDA
report:

"It is almost certain that the overall total of death and serious injury
associated with drug adverse events is substantially higher than reported
here. According to a recent FDA report, 'About 90% of serious or fatal
adverse drug reactions are never reported. Some studies have found reporting
rates around 1%.''
--Moore TJ, Weiss SR, et al. Reported adverse drug events in infants and
children under 2 years of age. Pediatrics, November 2002:110(5), p. e53.
www.pediatrics.org/cgi/reprint/110/5/e53

VACCINATION AND MD FAILURE TO REPORT SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS...

Vaccination safety is compared to safety of medications on CDC's vaccine
"warning" sheets - yet MDs may still be failing to report many adverse
events making the statement on the warning sheets nearly worthless.

The sheets don't even state that vaccination is an OPTION - even when states
have "compulsory" vaccination laws. (MDs and CDC are fraudulently promoting
vaccination using PLANNED endangerment of VACCINATED children during disease
outbreaks. See below.)

THIS IS TRULY BIZARRE...

In 1988, pediatrician Martin Smith, MD wrote an essay after passage of the
passage of the "National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act," [Smith
M.
Pediatrics 1988;82(2):264-9]

Smith [1988] wrote that "members [of the American Academy of Pediatrics/AAP]
should be informed of the
necessity that led to the inclusion of some of the provisions in the act as
they now exist."

Specifically, Smith [1988] noted that "many [vaccine] administrators have
not heretofore practiced" reporting adverse events (!) and that "these
requirements *had to be accepted* (!) in the process of negotiations through
the years - because "Congress had *demanded* the inclusion of the reaction
reporting requirement as a condition to the legislation." (Emphasis added.)

In noting that Congress's adverse reaction reporting requirement will give
"a better epidemiologic store of information," Smith [1988] admitted a key
point: No one knows "the real facts" about vaccine reactions/vaccine
safety! [Smith M. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.
Pediatrics 1988;82(2):264-9]

In 1991, a National Academy of Sciences vaccine safety
report mandated by the Act noted that "many gaps and limitations of
knowledge
bear...directly and indirectly on the safety of
vaccines...[including]...limited capacity of existing surveillance systems
of vaccine injury..." [Howson CP, Howe CJ, Fineberg HV. Adverse effects of
pertussis and rubella vaccines. National Academy Press 1991]

I SAY AGAIN: In 1993, then-FDA commissioner David Kessler, M.D. said that
in spite of the fact that reports from health
professionals are "essential" to ensure safety of medicines, physicians "do
not think to report adverse events."

AND FURTHER FROM 1993...

"Only about 1% of serious events are reported to the FDA, according to one
study." [Kessler DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting
medication and device adverse effects and product problems. JAMA
(Jun2)1993;269(21):2765-68]

I suspect that DC silence about this obvious mass child abuse by MDs has
something to do with MDs (and law enforcement in government) still not
prosecuting ongoing Medicare radiation/subluxation billing fraud by DCs -
thereby perpetuating it...

See Medicine's Vaccination Subluxation
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2222

NOTE: Like most doctors of chiropractic, I am IN FAVOR of vaccinations - as
long as they are not forced - but vaccinations ARE being forced - informed
consent is not being obtained.

As noted in "Medicine's Vaccination Subluxation," in addition to conducting
what one MD admits is a "consent charade," MDs (and CDC) are also
fraudulently promoting vaccinations by
engaging in PLANNED endangerment of VACCINATED children during disease
outbreaks.

And there is the related matter of MDs (and CDC) lying by omission - in
effect denying massive numbers of babies massive numbers of free daily
immunizations.

It's mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse by MDs (and CDC) - and it compounds mass
physical child abuse by MDs...

WHY are DCs silent?

Why is **FCER** silent?

FCER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER DEANNA BECK...

http://www.medicalconversation.com/archive/index.php/t-95071.html

Anthony Rosner, PhD, then-director of chiropractic's premier
research foundation, the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and
Research/FCER, ignored the MD-pediatricians's call for greater
collaboration.

See http://www.fcer.org/html/News/pediatrics107.htm

Before that, FCER's Director of Administration Deanna Beck counselled Dr.
Rosner to ignore the birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation of MDs...

------ Forwarded Message
From: <DEANNAFCER@...>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:11:34 EDT
To: <tgastaldo@...>
Subject: Re: FCER/Rosner still ignores bizarre spinal manipulation by MDs -
was Re: Su...

Tony

Let it go.......... He is not a FCER or ACA member, donor, supporter. He is
not an NCMIC policyholder (according to our files anyway).

[#### WHAT?! One has to donate to FCER, ACA or NCMIC for the scientific arm
of chiropractic to take note of - and publicly protest - an obvious mass
spinal manipulation crime of MDs?!]

#### [THINK ABOUT IT!] I have offered FCER and chiropractic a way to HELP
SAVE AMERICA
BILLIONS PER YEAR - and make birth easier - and FCER/DeAnna says: "Let it
go." (!!)

He's a lone wolf. Your response was all we need to offer.

#### Yes, isn't that BIZARRE - I'm a "lone wolf" - no one will help stop
senselessly/GRUESOME spinal manipulation by MDs?!!!

####s Why, it's as if FCER (and ACA and NCMIC) have made a DEAL with
organized medicine!

DeAnna

DeAnna L. Beck, CAE
Director of Administration
Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research
380 Wright Road
Norwalk, IA 50211
800-622-6309 515-981-9888 FAX 515-981-9427
http://www.fcer.org/
Translating Research Into Practice

The DeAnna L. Beck email above was reproduced from: FCER (chiro?) insanity:
Is FCER's DeAnna Beck serious?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4323 <--DELETED from
the uncensored version of chiro-list by uncensored chiro-listowner Kevin
Thos McGann, DC himself!

This just-mentioned massive censorship of my work - including censorship of
my reply to FCER's DeAnna Beck - occurred soon after "chiropractic" attorney
Mike Schroeder visited the city of Dr. McGann's residence, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands.

See Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4

FCER recently let Dr. Rosner go and kept DeAnna Beck...

Ms Beck is FCER's "Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer"...
http://www.fcer.org/about.htm#Staff

"THE NEXT GOAL FOR OUR PROFESSION"...

GO GEORGE!

According to Former FCER Pres. George McClelland, DC (recently re-elected to
the FCER board and the Executive Committee):

"The next goal for our profession is to educate our chiropractic physicians,
other healthcare providers, consumers, and decision makers about the science
that drives our healthcare services, while we seek to develop new research
and researchers to help our profession better serve those health
consumers-our patients-all around the world."
--FCER Press Release. For Immediate Release: September 12, 2008
380 Wright Road, Norwalk, IA 50211 USA
Phone: 800-622-6309 or 515-981-9888
Fax: 515-981-9427 E-mail: FCER@...
http://www.fcer.org/html/News/boardchgs08.htm

When FCER's Reed B. Phillips, DC, PhD wrote:

"Spinal manipulation is an art that has found a niche and is here to stay.
It is not likely to be a privilege limited to the DC."
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/26/14/16.html

I answered Dr. Phillips via FCER's Robin Merrifield:

Spinal manipulation with birth canal closed up to 30% should not be ANYONE'S
privilege.

Again, that FCER SPINAL MANIPULATION/STROKE **FRAUD**

FCER says: "Current research finds no difference between chiropractic care
and medical care and the risk of stroke..."

IT'S A FRAUD. FCER, ACA and researchers are IGNORING most medical spinal
manipulation. See above.

Dr. Phillips wrote further:

"Chiropractic...is faced with a very serious challenge. The future is ours
to determine if we take action rather than be acted upon..."
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/26/14/16.html

I replied (via FCER's Robin Merrifield):

If chiropractors don't take action, BABIES will continue to be "acted
upon" - by gruesome spinal manipulators called OBGYNs.

ON A PERSONAL NOTE...

BACK IN THE EARLY 90s...

I spoke personally with Reed Phillips at a chiropractic research
conference - at least I think it was Reed Phillips...

I noted that I had recently exposed American MDs using phony "babies can't
feel pain" neurology thereby perpetuating obvious mass child abuse - mass
infant penis ripping and slicing for which there is NO MEDICAL INDICATION.

Chiropractic "scientist" Reed Phillips indignantly informed me that HIS
doctor didn't tell HIM that babies can't feel pain when he paid to have his
son's penis ripped and sliced - as if parents can legally pay an MD to
commit penis ripping and slicing with no medical indications. (This
violates medical ethics.)

Mass infant penis ripping and slicing by MDs should have ended BILLIONS of
dollars' worth of infant screams ago - immediately after I pointed out the
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology - and the fact that there are NO
MEDICAL INDICATIONS.

Ending the mass child abuse NOW - instantly saves America an estimated $400
million dollars per year and PRESERVES the surgery as a CHOICE American
males can make for themselves in adulthood.

Maybe the mass infant penis ripping and slicing must continue until American
parents no longer ask for it?

What about the senseless BIRTH-CANAL-CLOSING/spinal manipulation child
abuse - are American parents asking for THAT?

WHY is the chiropractic profession silent?

Note: Strange things happened after I called for religious exemptions from
the child abuse laws for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the
foreskin on the penis. (American MDs are TOTAL infant foreskin amputators.)

See Sen. McCain: Phoenix American Indians with AIDS?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2481

I noted for former editor DANA LAWRENCE, DC years ago that American MDs had
just used phony "antibody means current disease" immunology in an attempt to
cover-up after I exposed the phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.

Dr. Lawrence wasn't interested in publishing news of this bizarre -
obviously illegal - medical behavior in the journal he edited back then -
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics/JMPT.

"The truth will out," he assured me.

Dr. Lawrence is now working in the Chiropractic section of the American
Public Health Association/APHA.

Recently, when I informed him of the birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation
crime of OBGYNs - he told me not to contact him.

I don't think Dr. Lawrence or Dr. Phillips are really interested in seeing
truth "outed."

Maybe ALL DCs are not interested "outing" the truth?

What about NON-DCs - like FCER Trustee Charles Dubois?

Again that AUTISM prefatory note: Attention: FCER Trustee Charles DUBOIS
(Standard Process, Inc.): If you are truly interested in preventing child
abuse and AUTISM (see FCER quote about you below) - please see my discussion
of ACA spokesman (and former nurse) Dr. Robert HAYDEN and retired OBGYN
George Malcolm MORLEY. Dr. Morley is trying to prevent autism by ending
mass baby asphyxiation/mass permanent amputation of up to 50% of baby blood
volume. It's obvious mass child abuse by OBGYNs. It's performed in most
c-section births and most "cord blood banking" births, according to Dr.
Morley - see [above].

One can only ask...

Hopefully, WFC/FCER/ICCR/International Conference on Chiropractic Research
Coordinator Robin Merrifield will distribute this email to all those
attending WFC & FCER's ICCR -- Montreal 2009.

"Mark those dates now - April 30 to May 02, 2009 - and prepare to join over
1,000 DC's from over 40 countries in Montreal, Quebec, Canada."
www.wfc.org/congress2009

I'll cc this to WFC Congress Administrator Linda Sicoli, 416-484-9978 phone,
416-484-9665 fax via lsicoli@...

With enough DCs protesting, it may be possible for the chiropractic
profession to finally end the mass child abuse crimes of OBGYNs - well
before Montreal 2009.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA
todd@...

WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE...

>(NOTE: Women
> do NOT need to squat to allow their birth canals to open maximally.
See
> WHAT
> DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE, below.)
>
> Incidentally, the Great Squat Robbery was related to The Great Birth
> Robbery
> in British obstetrician Jason Gardosi's 1989 Lancet "randomised
controlled
> trial of squatting" - where nobody squatted because - said Gardosi -
most
> women can't squat well enough to do so during delivery - which is false:
> See Brazilian obstetrician Moyses Paciornik's report of thousands of
> squatting
> births in chair-dwelling women - which at my request was published in
> Birth
> with my letter describing the birth-canal-closing biomechanics of
> semisitting delivery...FREE ACCESS above.
>
> OBSTETRICS: "UNCONTROLLED EXPERIMENTATION"
>
> In 1989, British obstetrician Richard J. Lilford noted that
> obstetrics
> "amounts to uncontrolled experimentation."
>
> See Lilford RJ. State of the obstetric art. The Lancet
> (Nov18)1989:1205-1207. Reviewing Chalmers I,
> Enkin M and Keirse MJNC (eds.). Effective Care in Pregnancy and
Childbirth
> Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989 Pp 1516 (2 vols) ISBN
0-192615580.
>
> That same year, 1989, Lilford forgot to inform women that
> semi-dorsal delivery closes the birth canal up to 30%. He conducted an
> "Experiment of squatting
> birth" in which he asked women "to recline into a semi-dorsal position
> at the moment of crowning" - after informing them of the "putative
> benefits of squatting." [Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989a;
> 30:217-20.]
>
> Lilford must not have informed women that the semi-dorsal position
CLOSES
> the birth canal up to 30%...
>
> WHAT DELIVERY POSITIONS WOMEN SHOULD USE...
>
> NOTE: Women do NOT need to squat to offer their babies the "extra" up
to
> 30%.
>
> It is easy for women to offer their babies the "extra" up to 30% of
room
> in
> the birth canal: The rule is easy: Semisitting and dorsal CLOSE - most
all
> other delivery positions OPEN.
>
> Side-lying is perhaps the easiest way to allow the birth canal to open
the
> "extra" up to 30%; but many women prefer to stand, squat or kneel as
they
> push their babies out. (Kneeling facing the raised head of the bed is
> popular.)
>
> WARNING: Women should talk to their OBGYNs and make sure that if their
> baby gets stuck (1 in 10 births) they will not be moved to semisitting
or
> dorsal - because - I say again - semisitting and dorsal CLOSE the
birth
> canal the "extra" up to 30%. OBGYNs have no business wrenching babies'
> spines with forceps/vacuums with the birth canal closed the "extra" up
to
> 30%.
>

ONE LAST MATTER...

A QUESTION FOR DR. BENSON...

Regarding mass forced medication with FSA/fluoride,arsenic,lead,
*does* Nebraska - like Texas - have a "general rule" against
forced-medication? If so, it is likely - as in Texas - there is
pro-forced-medication case law - like the fraudulent ESPRONCEDA case in
Texas which quotes the 200_ Florida-Supreme-Court-rubberstamped QUILES
notion that fluoridation is not medication because cities are intending to
fluoridate FAUCETS - not bloodstreams.

See again: Was the Nebraska fluoridation vote illegal?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2614

This post will be archived for global access. Search for it at
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/