BREASTFEED 'TIL YOUR VAGINA HEALS (**THANKS** Martina Nicholson, MD

REPOST: Originally posted Jun 26 2001, 8:50 pm

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/898e94658a3d4294?hl=en

Calif. Assemblyman Keeley: One of your constituents, Martina Nicholson, MD,
mentioned you in Donna Zelzer's OBCNEWS, the June 26, 2001 issue.

I'm writing in part because Dr. Nicholson wrote about human milk:

"Brave doctors and scientists have proved conclusively that human milk is
the best food for babies."

Arrrrrggghhhh! Breastmilk is NOT mere food! Breastfeedings are free daily
IMMUNIZATIONS!

[ADDENDUM Nov. 7, 2008: See breastfeeding/immunization info in The God
Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560]

Dr. Nicholson perpetuates mass immunologic child abuse by
failing to mention this fact. What woman - properly informed - is going to
deny her baby free daily immunizations? Do NOT wait for the California
Medical Association's permission before stopping the CMA from committing
further mass immunologic child abuse and other major crimes.

Governor Davis gover...@..., I say again: Please pardon *all*
MDs in advance. I discuss their other major crimes below.

OPEN LETTER (posted to the following usenet newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative; misc.kids.pregnancy; sci.med)

Martina Nicholson, MD
Member
Board of Governors
Santa Cruz County Medical Society
(Part of the "Federation of Medicine" which includes AMA)
1661 Soquel Dr
Santa Cruz, CA 95065-1709
831-476-7676
mart...@...
http://www.santacruzcountymedical.org/index2.htm
(Click on "Governance")

Dear Martina,

Breastfeedings *are* free daily immunizations!!!

As I noted on your telephone answering device: Women scan their
environments for pathogens and manufacture IMMUNIZATIONS which they "inject"
with their breasts DAILY.

For details...

See Adjusting CindyRN's breastfeeding site/Jack Newman's DYNAMITE
corrected...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1178 <--DELETED; see below.

Martina, ASK yourself: What woman - properly informed - would allow her
baby to go without free daily immunizations?!

Indeed, what SOCIETY - properly informed - would allow babies to go without
free daily immunizations?!

Speaking of societies, why does the **Santa Cruz Medical Society** allow
babies to go without free daily immunizations?

How about the OTHER "Federation of Medicine" societies, as in,

"The Santa Cruz County Medical Society...[and]...the California Medical
Association [CMA]...along with the American Medical Association [AMA], make
up what is refered [sic] to as the 'Federation of Medicine.'"
http://www.santacruzcountymedical.org/index2.htm
(Click on "Governance")

Martina, as I noted on your telephone answering device, you and your fellow
"Federation" MDs are lying by omission - committing mass IMMUNOLOGIC child
abuse!

Report yourselves to Santa Cruz County Child Protective Services! (MDs are
mandated reporters - even and especially when they are the child abusers.)

Martina, by copy of this e-mail to Governor Gray Davis
gover...@..., I will recommend that you and your fellow
"Federation" MDs be pardoned in advance.

As alluded to above, I've already asked Governor Davis to pardon *all* MDs
in advance.

No response yet...

See Ufberg, Calif. Chiro Bd perpetuate DC radiation fraud
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1220 <--DELETED; see below.

Martina: If you already KNEW that breastfeedings were free daily
immunizations - and you *should* have known this - then WHY did you leave
this key detail out of your OBCNEWS article? It is GROSS NEGLIGENCE to
discuss breastfeeding and fail to disclose that breastfeedings are free
daily immunizations.

There are more obvious medical crimes...

Martina, my heart skipped a beat when I saw what you wrote about mass vagina
slashing (euphemism "routine episiotomy")...

Quoting your OBCNEWS article:

"[The medical recommendation that women should only breast-feed for 6 weeks
based on]...how long it takes for the episiotomy to heal...The needs of the
breast-feeding infant...were not taken into account."

I had no idea! Mass immunologic child abuse by MDs was perpetuated in part
because MDs were also engaging in mass ADULT abuse - mass vagina slashing!

Martina, mention of vagina slashing is a *perfect* segueway to discussion of
my PRIORITY:

Stopping MDs from routinely closing birth canals up to 30%...

MD-obstetricians routinely slash vaginas, fraudulently claiming they are
doing everything to open the birth canal - even as they CLOSE it up to
30%...

MD-obstetricians indirectly ADMIT they routinely close birth canals! The
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/ACOG Shoulder
Dystocia Drill video instructs MDs to open the pelvic outlet in the small
minority of births where the shoulders get severely stuck - which means MDs
are CLOSING the pelvic outlet in MOST births - up to 30% it turns out.

The kicker is that the MD method for opening the birth canal - McRoberts
maneuver - actually keeps it closed!

MDs ALSO admit (albeit indirectly) that far less than 30% closure of the
birth canal can KILL.

For details, see Bonehead Shoulder Dystocia Attorney James L. O'Leary, II...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1154 ) <--DELETED; see
below.

Martina, you are a member of ACOG - or rather - Martina Nicholson, MD is
listed at ACOG's web site. www.acog.org...

WHY are MDs routinely jamming sacral tips up to 4 cm into pelvic outlets?!

Some babies are being born with actual DENTS ('ping pong' depression
fractures)
in their skulls!

Most of these "ping pong" skull fractures likely "pop" back out and only
appear as "bumps"...

Noemi Lee, PT saw a "bump" on her baby's head right after delivery...None of
the doctors knew where it came from...

Here is a web page with some of Noemi's thoughts regarding her
second birth experience - as well as her generous thoughts about me...
http://www.noemi.freeserve.co.uk/Open_Thoughts/thought7.html

According to John Ogden, MD,

"The developing skull, especially in an infant, may be deformed
substantially WITHOUT (italics in original) sustaining an OBVIOUS fracture
when...compressed (p. 78)...[Elasticity of the skull]...allows significant
temporary indentation of the skull toward the brain, with restoration of the
contour after 'release' of the deforming force (p. 79)....
[Ogden J. Skeletal Injury in the Child. Third Edition, NY: Springer 2000,
obvious emphasis added]

Dr. Ogden offers some good news...

"Despite considerable depression of the bone, there may be little brain
injury (p. 79)."

Dr. Ogden offers some bad news...

"[D]espite the seeming absence of specific osseous injury, severe injury to
the brain may occur...(p. 79)"
[Ogden J. Skeletal Injury in the Child. Third Edition, NY: Springer 2000]

Martina, as if routinely squashing fetal skulls/pinching fetal brains
weren't bad enough - MDs are **gruesomely** manipulating most babies spines
by grasping and pulling on fetal heads as they stick out vaginas.

MDs say they only pull "gently" in most births; but obviously one should
NEVER pull on a fetal head with the fetal shoulders stuck in a pelvic outlet
senselessly closed up to 30% - yet MDs do it all the time.

In 10 to 15% of births, MDs reach INSIDE vaginas with forceps and vacuum
extractors and drag babies though pelvic outlets senselessly closed up to
30% - sometimes pulling/manipulating so hard that they rip spinal nerves out
of tiny spinal cords!

Incredibly, when the shoulders get REALLY stuck, MDs use the abovementioned
McRoberts maneuver which (I say again) KEEPS the birth canal closed up to
30%!

Returning to the subject of mass vagina slashing (euphemism "routine
episiotomy")...

Routine vagina slashing is no small, insignificant matter. Relative to
letting the vagina tear (if it's going to tear; sometimes it doesn't) -
INTENTIONALLY slicing the vagina - episiotomy - is associated with 20 times
more vaginal rips clear to the anal sphincter [Shiono et al. 199_] - and an
estimated 50% of anal sphincter rips result in some form of anal
incontinence. [Jander C, Lyrenas
S. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001 Mar;80(3):229-34].

In other words, some women are wearing diapers for the rest of their lives
because MDs caused senseless rips of their vaginas clear to their anal
sphincters...

See Episiotomy is 'nice' violence against women performed by 'nice' MDs (I'm
speaking of ROUTINE episiotomy, of course.)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1150 <--DELETED; see below.

And see Obstetric Crime Photos
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1174 <--DELETED; see below.

Martina, your profession's crimes are obvious and massive.

As I indicated above, I've already asked Governor Davis to pardon all MDs in
advance - to help motivate MDs to end the crimes sooner.

No response yet...

See Ufberg, Calif. Chiro Bd perpetuate DC radiation fraud
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1220 <--DELETED; see below.

While it is understandable that MDs would want to wait for pardons in
advance before stopping their grisly massive crimes against mothers and
babies - it isn't fair to mothers and babies.

Martina, please use your influence as a Governor in the "Federation of
Medicine."

Please help mothers and babies NOW.

IMMEDIATELY report yourself and your fellow MDs to Child Protective
Services.

It's the law.

Sincerely,

Your friend,

Dr. Gastaldo

PS Martina, here's your article from the June 26 issue of Donna Zelzer's
OBCNEWS...

()()()()()()()()()()
Breastfeeding Time-Off Extension
From: "Dr.. Martina Nicholson" <mart...@...>

A Discussion about the reasons for requesting the extension
of disability time-off for breastfeeding mothers

The problem of incorporating breastfeeding into the working
mother's life has evolved over the last 50 years. Many
women, including my mother, fought the whole medical
establishment to successfully nurse when I was an infant in
the early 1950's. Neighbor children came to watch,
astonished that babies could be fed at mother's breast.
Brave doctors and scientists have proved conclusively that
human milk is the best food for babies. Slowly, the
misplaced modesty of the Victorian era was rolled back by
women determined to give their children the best start in
life.

Both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American
College of Obsterics and Gynecology recommend that infants
be exclusively breastfed till 24 weeks. In the past, many
mothers were not working, or had jobs which allowed flexible
entry and retreat from the workplace. Now, in contrast,
seniority, insurance and tax structure, and the fact that
80% of women work outside the home affect this situation.
Most importantly, especially in California, is the fact that
for many, perhaps most, families, there is a financial
necessity for two incomes in order to pay for the basic
costs of having a home.

To meet this challenge, in recent years we are renting out
large numbers of excellent electric "milking machines"--
breast pumps which will more efficiently get the milk out of
the breast during small breaks in the working day, so that
the mother can take this milk home to leave with her
infant's caregiver for the next day's feeding. Currently,
when babies take this breast milk in bottles, we are
satisfied that we have "met their needs". We are also
satisfied that we have kept this woman in the workplace.

Many feminists are reluctant to "turn back the clock" to a
time when mothers actually stay home and breastfeed their
babies on demand. Some women see it as a loss of political
and economic freedom and opportunity to support the
mother-infant dyad in it's most basic structure in the first
6 months of life-- a position implicitly taken in the AAP
and ACOG position papers.

I think the basic question is; are we really ready to
support legislation which would make it possible to do the
physiologically sound thing? And is our mandate to care for
public health something that impels us to look at the
current situation and say it is not "normal" or "normative"
and demands a paradigm shift in our thinking??

In support of the 24 week rule, I would like to point out
that several other things occur when a baby nurses at the
breast. The mouth and jaw develop in a stronger way, paving
the way for speech development and also for orthodontic
health. The baby has less air absorption than from
bottles-- although the new vacuum-bag bottles help address
this. The baby is nurtured by a beloved person, mirroring
the infant's emotions and personhood. Psychiatrically, this
may be an indispensable way to form basic trust.
Also, there are long-term health benefits to the nursing
mother. It is thought that there is development of the
breast buds into the fully- branched form of the lactating
breast-- which is later less-susceptible than are the breast
buds to the triggers which produce breast cancer.

I understand the concern of people who don't want
breastfeeding post-partum women to be thought of as
"disabled"-- who consider it a healthy state. But my belief
is that we need to re-think and re-structure the whole
thing. Breastfeeding women are the most exhausted people I
know, with the possible exception of chemotherapy patients.
When someone came up with the 6 week "rule," it was in
regard to how long it takes for the episiotomy to heal, and
for the lochial bleeding to cease. The needs of the
breast-feeding infant, or the mother-infant dyad were not
taken into account.

My pregnant patients first "hit the wall" at around seven
months, when they physically feel they won't be able to do
it all. Then the weeks of post-partum fly by, and they come
in at 6 weeks begging for more time off-- they realize they
can't keep their milk supply without frequent nursing, and
it feels horrible to leave the baby with a caregiver and a
bottle.

For 10 years I said to them that I didn't invent the
system, and I can't extend their disability. Then one day I
thought long and hard about it, and I wrote a petition and
started getting signatures. For four years, I have been
taking signatures to my local Assemblyman Fred Keeley by the
handfuls. He asked me to try to get the CMA to stand with
me.

Obviously, even with CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
promoting this, we will not be able to prevail without
widespread pediatric, obstetric and societal support. I
believe this is worth trying to do, so I will keep trying to
get it through in California. Then we can try to change it
nationally, because every state has the same stupid rule.
In Europe, women get a year off -- paid leave with
insurance coverage. We should be able to afford 6 months.
Both AAP and ACOG suggest breastfeeding on demand
exclusively for 24 weeks. That to me is a 24 hour a day
job. Only 20 % or less of nursing mothers are exclusively
breastfeeding at 6 months. There is a simple way to
increase those numbers-- let the mothers stay with the
babies. That will also stabilize the milk supply so that
moms can successfully pump in the workplace and give
supplemental breast milk through the whole first year. It
has been shown that breast milk-fed infants have less
allergies, less upper respiratory diseases, and better
immune resistance to infections. There are less babies who
are hospitalized when they are breastfed. It may also be
true that there are less psychotic people who were
breastfed versus bottle-fed. It has been shown to be less
expensive by about $450.00 per patient, to care for
breast-fed babies in the first year of life.

My patients can't afford to take time off without pay.
Also, they can't afford to lose their insurance benefits,
and job seniority. Maybe some middle class families could
use the family leave act (although it is only allowed up to
12 weeks), but many patients need continuing income,( even
though it's less than they could earn by working), and one
obvious source is from the disability insurance they have
paid into by working.

80% of women work. The average number of children per
family is 2, so we are asking for a maximum of 1 year off in
a woman's whole working life. Employers do NOT pay for
disability-- it is paid into by all workers in the state.

Many women who are well-educated, valuable employees will
negotiate for better deals from employers, and many will go
back to work sooner. However, we will have created a new
"norm" for the ones who need it most-- the ones who have no
margin of financial safety-net, no help at home, no
understanding boss, no place to pump, and no way to buffer
themselves from the continuous exhaustion of trying to work
and breastfeed in the baby's first months of life.

Our society can ill-afford to ignore the needs of infants
and children any more. We need good legislation which
supports healthy families. I believe this measure will be
cost-effective, medically sound, and well-accepted by the
general population. Everyone has seen women in their own
families struggle with this miserable pittance of time-off.
Let us help provide the remedy.

To subscribe to the obcnews write to
mailto:listp...@... and put _only_ the words
subscribe obcnews your-name
in the _body_ of the message. Replace your-name with your
actual name.

If you have any problems or questions, write to Donna
Zelzer at mailto:bi...@...

>>>><<<<END Martina's article in OBCNEWS<<<<


Martina, I'm copying this to Assemblyman Fred Keeley at Kee...@...

Let's hope Mr. Keeley will not wait for the California Medical Association's
permission before publicly telling MDs to stop the mass immunologic child
abuse...and the mass vagina slashing...and the mass gruesome spinal
manipulation of most babies by MDs (see above)...

Donna Zelzer bi...@..., you have my permission to send out this
post as a Special Issue of OBCNEWS.

Better yet, just send the title and URL...

Breastfeed 'til your vagina heals (THANKS Martina Nicholson, MD!)
--By Todd D. Gastaldo, DC
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1225

Donna, please tell OBCNEWS readers that if Yahoo is down, they can find my
Open Letter to Dr. Nicholson by searching at http://groups.google.com.

Thanks, Donna.

And Donna...

I saw Leilah's most recent article in OBCNEWS...

Remember when Leilah "raped" Phil Watters, MD with her language?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=leilah+raping&hl=en&safe=off&rnum=1...
elm=HGKQ4.333%24Z6.143%40sea-read.news.verio.net

Before publishing Leilah's most recent article, why didn't you suggest that
she mention that MDs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30% as they
study vaginal breech births and claim that cesareans are always *better*
than vaginal breech births?

As long as fetuses are GETTING raped, in part because of Leilah's act of
omission, maybe we should all feel a little raped...

>>>>END Breastfeed 'til your vagina heals
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/898e94658a3d4294?hl=en

"CHIROPRACTIC" ATTORNEY SCHROEDER...

Regarding the DELETED posts/URLs above, MASSIVE censorship of my work
occurred soon after "chiropractic" attorney
Mike Schroeder visited the city of Dr. McGann's residence, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands.

See Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4

ATTY SCHROEDER AND CCGPP...

Another powerful chiropractic player is CCGPP, the Council on Chiropractic
Guidelines and Practice Parameters.

CCGPP is the DCs and PhDs and others who are helping us define chiropractic
for the
insurance industry.

CCGPP includes prevention as part of CCGPP's definition of
chiropractic.

CCGPP indicates that FCER includes prevention, as in,

"CCGPP invites you to subscribe to [FCER's] DCConsult website
for...[i]nformation on patient health care diagnosis, treatment and
PREVENTION..."
http://www.ccgpp.org/consult.htm

Again, FCER has not been responding.

CCGPP has not been responding either...

SORRY TO BE NEGATIVE BUT...

CCGPP may be being controlled...

One CCGPP member - "chiropractic" Atty Michael Schroeder - wrote Rule 302 -
a California chiropractic regulation forbidding California DCs from severing
umbilical cords. (California DCs used to deliver babies; indeed, California
DCs used have to attend a birth to get licensed.)

Thanks to CCGPP's "chiropractic" Atty Michael
Schroeder, Calif. doctors of chiropractic can't sever umbilical cords
anymore - even as Calif. medicos/OBGYNs routinely sever umbilical cords
immediately after birth thereby temporarily asphyxiating babies/permanently
amputating up to 50% of their blood volume.

For info about the mass temporary baby asphyxiation crime (and other obvious
crimes of medicine)...

See The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise SPIRITUAL
health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560

California's OBGYNs are engaging in the massive
birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION child abuse crime.

Not a peep out of chiropractors - indeed chiropractors have placed Atty
Schroeder on the CCGPP council that is helping us define chiropractic
practice!

AGAIN: SORRY TO BE "NEGATIVE" BUT...

I suspect that CCGPP's "chiropractic" Atty Michael Schroeder is a "mole" for
organized medicine. I suspect his Rule 302 was written to make sure that
Calif. DCs could not testify as experts/will not BE ABLE to testify as
experts - when temporary
baby asphyxiation/permanent baby blood robbery cases finally start hitting
the courts. (Years ago, a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney
for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners, told me it was outside
my scope of practice to inform pregnant women that OBGYNs are closing birth
canals. Back then, someone in then-Gov. Pete Wilson's office assured me of
the same thing. I suspect Schroeder's Rule 302 was being used to "good"
effect - to protect OBGYNs - babies be damned. Again, I suspect that
CCGPP's "chiropractic" Atty Michael Schroeder is a "mole" for organized
medicine.)

See 'Chiropractic' Atty Schroeder: Babies in danger: A CCGPP lie perpetuates
mass child abuse by MDs...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/274

>>>>END excerpt of The God Subluxation (also: a US Govt mission is to raise
>>>>SPIRITUAL
health of American Indians - "to the highest level"...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2560