----- Original Message -----

From: dyoung@...

To: Todd Gastaldo

Cc: PearblossomInc@...

Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 8:06 AM

Subject: Re: I say again, I need you to confirm at the Premier's office, hewas awsare of the dangers of doctors imposeing early cord clamping.read aspatience is a virtue, not deleting for timeconvenience. Re: If u werespeaking only of the past, what of the currenttimes?it is a legal issue forWhat is left out, means no true consent wasgiven...Re:Forced standards ofcare are not lega

Todd, I give both you and Gary, as Professional persons, to do an Inquiry, under Access to Information, that I reported a death of William Gerald Argo, October 8, 2000, as a susepcted early clamping death, death by shutting down his system and organs, by too little blood allowed to flow into his expanding lungs.  Mother is Tammie Argo, of Dawson Creek.  Doctor who aided in the care, was Dr. Karen Glendinning, now of Calgary, Alberta,  The BC Ambulance sent a medic, or medics, but their name or names are unknown, or of their duty to make a factual care report when the cord was tied, hand-squeezed, or clamp, and if they used special tools to do that, too.  How did they revive the baby, with special infant oxygen masks, or message.  Was the baby wrapped instantly at birth, or clamped first...thus if not wrapped hypothermia would have caused, too, little blood flow infusion through the cord, if yet attached for a while. 

The mother told me personally, she did not touch the baby's umbilical cord.  So who of the emergency responders did.  What manual did they use, that there was a cover-up and not allowed at least to any person's request, which I made, a Summary of the death, and what or why was it called a natural death.  Eacly clamping causeing suffocation and shutting down the baby's internal organs, is anything but natural, but their is was a suspected cover-up.  Where was the cover-up of false care taught the medics, as first responders.  It was at the Premier's office, and to the Ombudsman office, as well, who refused an investigation on this issue, of medical concerns, while he may have done so, had that office not been controlled in a homicide supsected and cover-up.

Where else but the Premiers office, can you inquire under Access to Information, did Donna Young, a birth researcher, and reader of harms of active management, report false training leading to the death of this child, suspected of no enough blood for the needs of premature child.  It is at the Burnaby Chief Coroner's office, as they were the ones to refuse a summary of this child's death, reported to them in the month of November 2000, that a review was requested, how did the child die, for prevention of other babies being early clamped by medical experts in BC, Canada?  Chief coroner is a Mr. Smith, an X-RCMP member who knows all about the homicide laws and the need to investigagte all unexpected deaths.  \He cannot say a premature child has to have an expected death.  NOT so, if not early cord clamped, so he is cover-up his advisors opinion, a Dr. Sidney Pilley, of the Coroner's office, used as a medical advisor, who stopped all investigation on the suspected negligence death of early clamping for this infant.

So Todd and Gary, as professional persons, I am in need of big brothers, helping out here.  So if you are genuinely concerned to stop the putting in harm's way, investigate the officials, that refuse to protect babies and their mothers, too, on birth issues.  We start at the top of the list, The Hon. Premier Gordon Campbell,and his Ministries of the Justice Department, and also his Advisors to the Ministry of Health and their Act, that appoints and allows the College of Physicians and Surgeons, to train and certify competence in all medical persons, that come to another's aid in childbirth, and the after birth care of the infant, involving revival on the untied umbilical cord, and not cutting it, without specific consent, of risk facftors of viruses getting in a cut cord, too. 

This is sexual discrimination to the childbearing women, and it is discrimination by age, and mental and physcial disadvantages to the minor, the newborn citizen.  The criminal codes in Canada identify a person, as a citizen, on or off the umbilical cord, and is protected while being born, labor begun, the child is being born, supported during and after his/her birth on the untied cord, for full blood infusion, into their expanding lungs.  This is a known duty of protection, long ago known to prevent deaths or causing a newborn child to be weaker.  Known in the past, since publication from 1801, to the present time, so there is not good exuse of the governments agents to deny them the truth, for prevention or to the allowance all babies are born equal, regardless of being a premature birth...  That means all babies get full blood infusion from their own blood bag, the palcenta, and through their own means, the umbilical cord.  That is what it means to really be born equal, of equal security of person, does it not.  So do your duty, make the Inquiries under Access to Information, had I reported a medical suspected death, November 2000, or not?  And to the appropriate persons, and again, and again locally, to the local Federal RCMP, using the August 2001 letter by an expert, Dr. George \Malcolm Morley, for which his letter was given, criminal investigation of any child put in harm's way, and this child likely died of early cord tying and cutting.

You may contact the local RCMP detachment, too, for Access to Information, did they not investigate this need of a criminal investigation of putting a child in harm's way of unnecessary cord clamping, that the baby likely suffocated, not dying just because he was born smaller, and prematurely, but over 4-months of gestation.  This can be confirmed too, in your inquiry, the size and weight and gestation of the child, who died.  This is respect as he was a human being, equal to investigation if not given adequate security of person, as to Canada's Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as a duty of investigation by our present and past Criminal Codes of Canada.

Donna Young Quoting Todd Gastaldo <tgastaldo@...>:

> #### I SAY AGAIN...
>
>>
>> Your Canadian case is important.
>>
>> Let us focus on it.
>>
>> Have you reported yet to proper BC authorities?
>>
>> You emailed the ministry and telephoned both 911 and 310.1234?
>>
>> Did you get the name/identifier of each person with whom you spoke as I
>> advised?
>>
>> If not, report again and get the name/identifier of each person with
>> whom you speak.
>>
>> I will follow-up if you get telephone numbers (with area code) that I
>> can call from the US.
>>
>> I will memorialize the details of my telephone follow-up - I will give
>> names/identifiers - cc'ing the Ministry and archiving my post in
>> Chiro-list 3.
>>
>> I urge you to publicly state that Gary S. Goldman, PhD corroborated our
>> info with physicians and reported suspected child abuse birth
>> "atrocities" (his word).
>>
>> Being a PhD-editor-in-chief of a MEDICAL jourrnal who corroborated our
>> info with MEDICAL physicians, he is a far more credible reporter of
>> these MEDICAL standard-of-practice child abuse crimes.
>>
>> Todd
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: dyoung@...
>> To: Todd Gastaldo
>> Cc: PearblossomInc@...
>> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:07 AM
>> Subject: Yes, r u both doing a requested follow up, of the facts
>> shared. Read the letter, how long ago I had reported child endangering
>> by falseprotocols.
>>
>>
>> Dear Todd,
>> See if they will state, "Yes," Donna Young advised us of no consent of
>> being put in harm's way
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: dyoung@...
>   To: pearblossominc@...
>   Cc: tgastaldo@...
>   Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 6:54 AM
>   Subject: again, read as patience is a virtue, not deleting for 
> timeconvenience. Re: If u were speaking only of the past, what of 
> the currenttimes?it is a legal issue for What is left out, means no 
> true consent wasgiven...Re:Forced standards of care are not legal 
> when there are knownsafer options. raises the question, What must I 
> do to follow you, theChrist.
>
>
>   Gary,  and to Todd, too....You both should testify to your 
> personal birth stories, as observers, and your wife, too, if she 
> wants to help others protect their baby from being put in harm's 
> way, those of the future, of all races, of all marital status 
> groups, of all faiths, no discrimination that all children are to 
> have the right to be born equal, regardless of their sex, or their 
> blood type.
>
>   And all doctors on your board, can testify, too, and write a 
> personal true birth story, one of ignorance, too.  They have a duty, 
> implied, being part of Medical Truths, to  give

---

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.14/1172 - Release Date: 12/5/2007 8:41 AM