The AMA couldn't pay anyone to do a better job of protecting their interests.
Another fine example of counterproductive behavior.



At 09:46 AM 12/3/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Todd Gastaldo" <tgastaldo@...>
>To: <vzo.martino@...>; <p.s.baxter@...>
>Cc: <chiro-list@yahoogroups.com>; <chiro-list3@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 3:53 PM
>Subject: Dr. P Baxter (Towbin article): Mass child abuse caused by
>iatrogenic pelvic deformation (temporary) during birth
>
>
>> DR. PETER BAXTER, Editor, Dev Med Child Neurol: The 1969 Towbin article
>> quoted below - please post it - please make it FREE ACCESS - to help end
>> mass child abuse by MDs.
>>
>> MASS CHILD ABUSE CAUSED BY IATROGENIC PELVIC DEFORMATION (TEMPORARY)
>> DURING BIRTH
>>
>> (Bcc'd to ICNA members with emails listed below.)
>>
>> Martino et al. write:
>>
>> "A highest incidence of occipitoposterior fetal head position may depend
>> by
>> [sic]...malnutrition with pelvic deformity, pelvic immaturity in the
>> teenager..."
>> --Martino V, Iliceto N, Simeoni U. Minerva Ginecol. 2007
>> Aug;59(4):459-464.
>> PubMed abstract
>>
>> QUESTION FOR MARTINO ET AL.: What if occipit posterior fetal head
>> position is caused by IATROGENIC PELVIC DEFORMATION (temporary) during
>> birth?
>>
>> The most common medical delivery positions - semisitting and dorsal -
>> close the birth canal up to 30%...
>>
>> Last century, Russell [1969] used Borell and Fernstrom's intrapartum
>> x-rays
>> [1957] to derive the 30% figure.
>>
>> For the full cites and the simple birth-canal-closing biomechanics of
>> semisitting and dorsal delivery...
>>
>> See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1.
>> http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4 FREE ACCESS
>>
>> REGARDLESS WHETHER IATROGENIC PELVIC DEFORMATION CAUSES OCCIPUT
>> POSTERIOR...
>>
>> IT'S MASS CHILD ABUSE
>>
>> Regardless whether iatrogenic pelvic deformation contributes to persistent
>> occipital position of the fetal head it is criminally negligent (mass
>> child abuse) for obstetricians to ignore simple biomechanics and the
>> medical literature and close birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. (For the
>> simple biomechanics and references, see Gastaldo 1992, just cited.)
>>
>> Please sign Hospital Child Abuse: DAs and AGs should end it
>> immediately...
>>
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/hospital-child-abuse-das-and-ags-should-end-it-\
immediately
>>
>> SOMETIMES IT'S FATAL CHILD ABUSE...
>>
>> Sometimes the mass child abuse crime escalates to criminally negligent
>> homicide - sometimes babies die....
>>
>> Two forms of AGGRAVATED child abuse...
>>
>> 1. OXYTOCIN CHILD ABUSE...
>>
>> As the fetus courses the pelvic outlet - it is obvious OXYTOCIN CHILD
>> ABUSE for
>> physicians and nurses to KEEP birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%
>> (keep women semisitting or dorsal) and whip the uterus with oxytocin.
>>
>> 2. FORCEPS/VACUUM CHILD ABUSE...
>>
>> An estimated 1 in 10 births is a birth-canal-closed (semisitting or
>> dorsal) forceps/vacuum fetal neck wrenching child abuse procedure.
>>
>> It's obvious birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION child abuse - yet
>> doctors of chiropractic are silent - one even censors - to help
>> obstetricians cover-up the obvious crime. See discussion of Censor Kevin
>> Thos. McGann, DC, below.
>>
>> LASTING NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS
>>
>> In 1969, Professor Abraham Towbin, M.D., reported on the results of a
>> study he conducted at Harvard Medical School's department of
>> neuropathology on spinal cord and brainstem injuries in newborn infants.
>> Professor Towbin conducted autopsies on more than 2,000 newborn infants
>> who had died shortly after birth. In his report 'Latent Spinal Cord and
>> Brainstem Injuries in Newborn Infants,' Professor Towbin summarized his
>> findings as follows:
>>
>> "Spinal cord and brainstem injuries occur often during the process of
>> birth, but frequently escape diagnosis. Respiratory depression in the
>> neonate is a cardinal sign of such injury. In infants who survive there
>> may be lasting neurological defects reflecting the primary injury; in
>> some, secondary hypoxic damage to the cerebrum may ultimately be
>> manifested as cerebral palsy."
>> --Peter N. Fysh, DC apparently quoting from Towbin A. Latent Spinal Cord
>> and Brainstem Injuries in Newborn Infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1969
>> Feb;11(1):54-68.
>> Kids Need Chiropractic Too, Dynamic Chiropractic. February 28, 1992,
>> Volume 10, Issue 05.
>> http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/10/05/22.html
>>
>> NOTE: The just-quoted article by Peter N. Fysh, DC appeared after I spoke
>> to him in person about the birth-canal-closing - yet he failed to mention
>> it.
>>
>> 10 years later Joan Fallon, DC told me not to mention Dr. Fysh. For my
>> reply to Dr. Fallon, see
>> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/5ba91304fadfdc19.
>>
>> For other bizarre "chiropractic" behavior...
>>
>> See Babies being attacked; chiropractic roof on fire; Carol Phillips, DC
>> won't go look...
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/1579b31032da464f
>>
>> See also Dr. McGann's bizarre censorship behavior below.
>>
>> INDIRECT VIDEO ADMISSION OF THE MASS CHILD ABUSE
>>
>> The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist's/ACOG's Shoulder
>> Dystocia training video is an indirect VIDEO ADMISSION that MDs know they
>> are routinely closing birth canals up to 30%.
>>
>> The ACOG video purports to show MDs how to allow the birth canal to open
>> maximally in the small number of cases when babies' shoulders get stuck -
>> which is the indirect admission that MDs know they are routinely closing
>> birth canals up to 30%.
>>
>> The kicker: The version of McRoberts demonstrated on the ACOG training
>> video actually keeps the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30%.
>>
>> See TWO McRoberts maneuvers - one keeps the birth canal closed up to
>> 30%...
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2
>>
>> BIZARRELY, UCLA POLICE DID NOT ACCEPT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE REPORTS
>>
>> Gary S. Goldman, PhD, editor-in-chief of the peer-reviewed medical
>> journal Medical Veritas, corroborated with
>> physicians info about the birth "atrocities" (his word) and reported
>> suspected child abuse - only to have UCLA police deem his
>> suspected child abuse reports deemed "not acceptable."
>>
>> Two years later, UCLA Compliance Officer William Cormier
>> offered the blather that it was "appropriate" for UCLA police to have
>> ignored Dr. Goldman's suspected child abuse reports...
>>
>> Dr. Goldman suddenly decided that his suspected child abuse reporting had
>> been
>> "ludicrous." He indicated publicly that reporting is a "DEAD-END."
>>
>> When I pointed out that Dr. Goldman had just promoted the
>> child-abuse-perpetuating crime of failure to report child abuse, he
>> quickly
>> deleted his signature and "DEAD-END" comment from my petition. (Dr.
>> Goldman
>> was signatory number two - there is still evidence that he signed - but
>> his
>> name and "DEAD-END" crime promotion comment are gone.)
>>
>> Dr. Goldman also suddenly decided not to publish my Open Letter to British
>> Gray's Editor-in-Chief Susan Standring, PhD or contact the law enforcement
>> cc addressees for verification of
>> receipt and comment on the Four OB Lies....
>>
>> See UTERINE RUPTURE! Attn: British Gray's (Dr. Standring):
>> Misuse-of-oxytocin child abuse
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4897 <--Dr. McGann
>> has censored access
>>
>> Alternate URL: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list3/message/3
>>
>> British Gray's Editor-in-Chief Susan Standring, PhD has been silent. I
>> will
>> cc her via: susan.standring@...
>>
>> AN INTERESTING DOCTOR OF CHIROPRACTIC CENSOR
>>
>> Previous Yahoo chiro-listowner, Kevin Thos. McGann, DC CENSORED his
>> "uncensored and open" chiro-list after I protested his sentiment that
>> reporting suspected child abuse is "ludicrous."
>>
>> See http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list3/message/15
>>
>> It is NOT "ludicrous" to report suspected child abuse - it's the LAW.
>>
>> "Ludicrous" is MDs COMMITTING obvious birth-canal-closing/SPINAL
>> MANIPULATION child abuse - complete with obvious cover-up lies - with DCs
>> saying nothing as law enforcement looks the other way.
>>
>> MDs KNOW law enforcement is looking the other way.
>>
>> Steve Harris, MD arrogantly boasts:
>>
>> "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime.
>> These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you."
>> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/
>> 28866f3384801ae9
>>
>> (I had pointed out to Dr. Harris that MDs are fraudulently promoting
>> vaccinations by PLANNING to endanger vaccinated children during disease
>> outbreaks. For my latest post on this subject, see:
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list3/message/39)
>>
>> Dr. McGann's silence/censorship is most bizarre given the recent
>> MD-pediatrician call for collaboration - "particularly" with
>> chiropractors -
>> to investigate and report harms of spinal manipulation of children:
>>
>> "'Patient safety demands a greater collaboration between the medical
>> community and other health care professionals, particularly
>> chiropractors, such that we can investigate and report harms related to
>> spinal manipulation together.'
>> --Sunita Vohra, MD FRCPC MSc et al.^^^ Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;
>> 119(1):e275-83. Epub 2006 Dec 18. PubMed abstract
>>
>> WHY DID DR. McGANN SUDDENLY CENSOR HIS "UNCENSORED" LIST
>>
>> DID "CHIROPRACTIC" ATTORNEY MIKE SCHROEDER MEET DR. McGANN IN AMSTERDAM?
>>
>> All possibilities must be considered until the mysterious censorship is
>> explained. Censorship helps perpetuate the mass child abuse.
>>
>> According to the Los Angeles Times, "chiropractic" Attorney Mike Schroeder
>> visited Amsterdam "on business" on Oct. 30, 2007 - or rather - he was
>> there when an Oct. 30, 2007 story was being written...
>> http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-carona30oct30,0,327619.story
>>
>> That same month, I mentioned "Chiropractic" Attorney Schroeder in an Oct.
>> 4, 2007 post...
>>
>> See Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing: Do Egyptian obstetricians do it?
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4
>>
>> Specifically, I mentioned (in that Oct. 4, 2007 post) that an earlier post
>> about Atty Schroeder had been CENSORED...
>>
>> Dr. McGann lives in or near Amsterdam.
>>
>> Until the first mysterious censorship - and Dr. McGann's recent MASSIVE
>> censorship (reporting child abuse to police is "ludicrous" says Dr.
>> McGann) - are explained otherwise - I can't help discussing Atty
>> Schroeder's first SLAPP censorship (see below) and the possibility that
>> Atty Schroeder went to Amsterdam to meet Dr. McGann to stimulate further
>> censorship...
>>
>> Here is a relevant excerpt from the Oct. 4, 2007...
>>
>>>>>>BEGIN excerpt of Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing: Do Egyptian
>>>>>>obstetricians do it?
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4
>>
>> ABOUT DR. GASTALDO...FOLLOW THE MONEY...
>>
>> I have been laboring without pay for over 20 years. I have been spending
>> my
>> money and others' money to do this work. I would like to pay people back
>> generously - with plenty left for myself.
>>
>> "Self-serving."
>>
>> Dr. Goldman plagiarised my synthesis and censored the Four OB Lies -
>> censoring because he felt I was being "self-serving," he said.
>>
>> See Birth in America: Suspected Child Abuse
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3299 <--censored
>> by Dr. McGann
>>
>> Alternative URL:
>> http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.med/2005-03/0526.html
>>
>> All I did was truthfully state what I had done. And I spent my valuable
>> time doing so **at Dr. Goldman's request**!
>>
>> Dr. Goldman CENSORED me for my trouble - failed to publicize the Four OB
>> Lies...
>>
>> See Gary Goldman's 'Medical Veritas': Truth or whitewash?
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3295 <--censored
>> by Dr. McGann
>>
>> Alternative URL:
>> http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.med/2005-03/0493.html
>>
>> I AM being self-serving! Since around 1984, I have been working to
>> PREVENT
>> the most bizarre "healthcare" child abuse offered by MDs and thereby SAVE
>> America billions.
>>
>> My idea - cleverly resisted by Dr. Goldman and silently resisted by so
>> many
>> others (including law enforcement) - is to simply have LAW ENFORCEMENT
>> finally end the MD crimes. If my idea saves those billions - hopefully I
>> can CLAIM some of those billions via QUI TAM. (Hopefully, California Atty
>> Genl Jerry Brown and Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers will help me out in both
>> regards. As usual, I will cc Hardy via hardy.myers@....)
>>
>> At the very least, I would like a whistle-blower's QUI TAM portion of the
>> billions MD-pediatricians and MD-obstetricians "earned" after they LIED -
>> after I exposed their phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology back in
>> 1987.
>>
>> Sorry to repeat myself but... Again regarding my exposure of the phony
>> "babies can't feel pain" neurology, American MDs did some bizarre things
>> after I petitioned Congress for an exemption from the child abuse statutes
>> for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the
>> penis.
>>
>> American medicine's infant penis ripping and slicing ritual is TOTAL
>> foreskin amputation - sometimes fatal - still no medical reason - OBVIOUS
>> child abuse - see the California Penal Code quoted above.
>>
>> And see again: HIV: Keeping MDs out of prison: Dr. Poland, AAP and infant
>> circumcision
>> revisited [visit website]
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/43c7261a4aafff5a
>>
>> AMAZING COINCIDENCE...
>>
>> Some might Google my name and see that I lost a defamation lawsuit to Atty
>> Mike Schroeder - and (ad hominem) argue that I must be wrong on this or
>> that
>> other issue. (Donna Young is the latest person to have done this.)
>>
>> As the California Supreme Court wrote in Barrett v. Rosenthal:
>>
>> "[E]ven when a defamation claim is 'clearly nonmeritorious,' the threat of
>> liability 'ultimately chills the free exercise of expression.' (Baker v.
>> Los
>> Angeles Herald Examiner (1986) 42 Cal.3d 254, 268; see also Time, Inc. v.
>> Hill
>> (1967) 385 U.S. 374, 389.)"
>>
>> Fortunately, I now know that legislatures have passed SLAPP laws making
>> it easy to defeat SLAPP suits.
>>
>> The California Supreme Court recently called SLAPP suits "the Heckler's
>> Veto" in Barrett v. Rosenthal.
>>
>> I learned $25,000 too late that I had been SLAPPed by Attorney Mike
>> Schroeder...
>>
>> My first reaction was to ask Atty Schroeder what it would take to make
>> his lawsuit go away.
>>
>> He wanted a retraction and $1,000.
>>
>> He sent me obvious lies to sign.
>>
>> I refused to sign Atty Schroeder's lies.
>>
>> I tried to get the trial moved to Oregon but failed. A $25,000 default
>> judgement resulted - which I paid. The merits of the case were never
>> argued.
>>
>> Instead of being intellectually honest in their argumentation...
>>
>> Some people still promote Atty Schroeder's SLAPP/"heckling" of me
>> discussed
>> in a Dynamic Chiropractic "hit" piece on the web titled "The Cost of
>> Voicing
>> Opinions on the Internet."
>>
>> See http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/951223d0dbd6c84c
>>
>> FOR THE DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC "HIT" PIECE itself, go to:
>> http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/18/04/05.html
>>
>> Dynamic Chiropractic once boasted:
>>
>> "When we at 'DC' write a news story, we give conflicting parties the
>> opportunity to express their points of view. This is called balanced
>> reporting. Not all publications however honor this practice of ethical
>> journalism."
>> http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/11/09/10.html
>>
>> I was never interviewed for the just mentioned Dynamic Chiropractic "hit"
>> piece. (The editor/publisher is Don Petersen, Jr., son of Sr. - the man
>> who
>> published my first article on routine infant penis ripping and slicing.)
>>
>> Mr. Petersen's "hit piece" contains a rather obvious leap of logic, as in,
>> "As an
>> attorney, Mr. Schroeder knew Dr. Gastaldo's false comments were
>> actionable."
>>
>> False comments are indeed actionable; but my comments were not proven to
>> be
>> false - and - here's the kicker - false comments about public figures
>> (Schroeder was attorney for the chiro board) are NOT actionable if they
>> are not made with "actual malice."
>>
>> We all have a First Amendment right to petition for redress of
>> grievances -
>> so even false comments are protected speech if they are not made with
>> "actual malice."
>>
>> The Dynamic Chiropractic "hit" piece was rather obvious "yellow
>> journalism":
>>
>> Atty Schroeder may still be functioning as an attorney for Dynamic
>> Chiropractic editor/publisher Donald Petersen, Jr. who STILL has not
>> published the facts.
>>
>> Assuming Atty Schroeder manipulated Dynamic Chiropractic, it would not be
>> the first time he's manipulated the press...
>>
>> I will cc Atty Schroeder via Don Petersen, Jr. via don@...
>>
>> SCHROEDER'S "SECRET PACT WITH AN AMBITIOUS LOS ANGELES TIMES REPORTER..."
>>
>> R. Scott Moxley wrote in 2003:
>>
>> "Confident that the news would never get back to Orange County,
>> [Schroeder]
>> bragged to a 1997 Northern California GOP audience...[that]...he had
>> engineered a secret pact with an
>> ambitious Los Angeles Times reporter to lend credibility to Dornan's
>> fanciful and ultimately dismissed accusation that Loretta Sanchez stole
>> the
>> 1996 election...I mention Mike's inadvertent confession because I now
>> wonder
>> if sordid press manipulation and a lack of appreciation for journalistic
>> independence come naturally..."
>> --Gag Order
>> The war inside the DA's media department
>> By R. Scott Moxley
>> Thursday, May 29, 2003 - 12:00 am
>> http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/gag-order/20909/
>>
>> WHO WAS/IS SCHROEDER'S "AMBITIOUS LOS ANGELES TIMES REPORTER"?
>>
>> I ask because LA Times reporter Christine Hanley contacted me, asking for
>> evidence for my
>> claim that Schroeder asked me to sign obvious lies to make his lawsuit go
>> away.
>>
>> Orange County Register reporter R. Scott Moxley wrote on Dec. 13, 2006:
>>
>> "Except for the pending results of FBI probes into allegations of
>> high-level
>> corruption at the [Schroeder-influenced] Carona-led sheriff's department,
>> no
>> story is anticipated more by insiders than an upcoming Los Angeles Times
>> [Hanley - TDG]
>> profile of the Schroeders..."
>>
>> Reporter Moxley called Schroeder "the most trusted strategist for Orange
>> County's most powerful law enforcement officials, District Attorney Tony
>> Rackauckas and Sheriff Mike Carona. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher is on
>> speed
>> dial. City councilmen, mayors, senior bureaucrats, members of state and
>> federal legislatures-even judges, federal prosecutors, ambassadors, famous
>> businessmen and reporters-call Schroeder for advice..."
>>
>> Quote is from The Reporter vs. the Republican Power Couple: Will an
>> upcoming
>> LA Times profile unravel or bolster Mike Schroeder's empire?
>> By R. SCOTT MOXLEY
>> Wednesday, December 13, 2006 - 9:30 am
>>
http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/the-reporter-vs-the-republican-power-couple/26\
358/
>>
>> WHY DID OC WEEKLY REPORTER MOXLEY FORGET TO MENTION THAT SCHROEDER HAD
>> PREVIOUSLY "PLAY[ED] THE LA TIMES LIKE A PIANO," AS IN,
>>
>>
http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/schroeder-plays-the-times-like-a-piano/24861/
>> Schroeder Plays the Times Like a Piano
>> Dornan attorney says Times reporters worked for him
>> By R. Scott Moxley
>> Friday, December 12, 1997 - 12:00 am
>>
http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/schroeder-plays-the-times-like-a-piano/24861/
>>
>> MIKE SCHROEDER'S PREDICTION
>>
>> BACK TO MOXLEY'S 2006 ARTICLE...
>>
>> "[N]o story is anticipated more by insiders than an upcoming Los Angeles
>> Times profile of the Schroeders, who live in a modest, hillside Newport
>> Beach house overlooking Irvine. Multiple sources at the paper confirm that
>> the story has been written and is awaiting management's decision on a
>> publication date.
>>
>> "Three points are obvious from my own research: veteran Times reporter
>> Christine Hanley has conducted a wide-ranging, in-depth investigation for
>> more than a year; the Schroeders, who loathe Hanley, lobbied for another
>> Times reporter, Christopher Goffard, to write the story; and though the
>> Schroeders lost that battle, it's unclear what shocking revelations-if
>> any-will be forthcoming.
>> <snip>
>>
>> "[Mike Schroeder's] reaction is symbolized by a shoulder shrug.
>>
>> "'For anyone to care about Hanley's story, it's got to have some breaking
>> news about me,' he said. 'It won't. It will be an extended whine. She's
>> probably getting her bad information from George [Jaramillo]. And besides,
>> nobody reads the Times anyway.'"
>>
>> "Mike Schroeder is a prolific quote machine. Silent for a moment, he
>> added,
>> 'If Hanley and the Times want to write a story that essentially says I'm
>> this big, powerful guy, be my guest. I'm not crazy. I'd take that story
>> every day.'"
>>
http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/the-reporter-vs-the-republican-power-couple/26\
358/
>>
>> WHAT IF LA TIMES REPORTER HANLEY WAS **WORKING** FOR SCHROEDER?
>>
>> (WHAT IF **MOXLEY** WAS WORKING FOR SCHROEDER TOO? WHY DIDN'T MOXLEY
>> MENTION SCHROEDER PREVIOUSLY PLAYING THE LA TIMES "LIKE A PIANO"?)
>>
>> What if Hanley's real job was to find out what EVIDENCE Schroeder's
>> enemies
>> have
>> for their claims?
>>
>> What if Hanley's job (in regard to me, a minor player - or am I?), was to
>> find out whether
>> I still had evidence for my claim that Schroeder asked me to sign a pack
>> of
>> lies to make his lawsuit go away?
>>
>> When she asked for them, I dutifully digitized the documents and sent them
>> to her via a PDF
>> file I think it was.
>>
>> I never heard anything further from her.
>>
>> Ultimately, someone else wrote the article about Schroeder - and as
>> Schroeder
>> predicted - it wasn't all that critical of him.
>>
>> One observer ("Jubal") blogged:
>>
>> "[O]ne wonders, 'why the fuss'? A long piece saying Mike Schroeder is a
>> tough, effective, powerful Orange County political player. Stop the
>> presses!"
>> http://www.ocblog.net/ocblog/2007/01/the_la_times_pr.html
>>
>> Given the previously reported "information sharing pact" with the LA Times
>> (see above), it is possible that all the "fuss" was about Schroeder AGAIN
>> using an LA
>> Times reporter - this time to find out who had evidence to support
>> allegations against him.
>>
>> MANY people might have unwittingly given Schroeder documents proving their
>> allegations against him - via secret "information sharing" - via an LA
>> Times
>> reporter.
>>
>> [Schroeder would have found out who he could easily beat in court -
>> because
>> they did not produce documents for the LA Times - and who he could not
>> easily beat in court - because they DID produce documentation for their
>> claims against him.]
>>
>>
>> THE AMAZING COINCIDENCE
>>
>> About the time Atty Schroeder SLAPPed me, he tried to buffalo an appeals
>> court
>> on the meaning of California's anti-SLAPP statute...
>>
>> Wrote Judge Gilbert Nares et al. (Court of Appeal of the State of
>> California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One):
>>
>> "Although Schroeder argues that the statute is designed to suppress
>> protected activity--his right to sue the government--we conclude the
>> statute
>> is primarily designed to promote and encourage protected conduct--the
>> right
>> of defendants to exercise their First Amendment rights without fear of
>> unmeritorious SLAPP lawsuits."
>> --Nares et al. in MICHAEL J. SCHROEDER, Plaintiff and Appellant vs. CITY
>> COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRVINE et al., Defendants and Respondents.
>> No. D038976, In the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Fourth
>> Appellate District, Division One, (Super. Ct. No. 00CC02785)
>> http://www.cfac.org/CaseLaw/Cases/Schroeder_v_City_Council.html
>>
>> FURTHER AMAZING COINCIDENCE: Judge Gilbert Nares was the judge who,
>> during
>> my first divorce, taught me that the child protection statutes have teeth.
>> He asked why we were getting divorced. "He's argumentative," said her
>> attorney. Judge Nares asked for an example of an argument. She didn't
>> have
>> any examples. I had an example. Judge Nares lectured her in open court.
>> I had NO idea the ramifications of my sharing the details of a huge
>> argument
>> with my soon-to-be ex-wife. It was the biggest mistake of my life.
>>
>> So... Judge Nares - the judge who schooled my first wife and me regarding
>> the child protection statutes - later was one of the judges who schooled
>> Atty Schroeder regarding SLAPP suits around the time Atty Schroeder
>> SLAPPed
>> me.
>>
>> I thought it a truly amazing coincidence.
>>
>> Atty Schroeder SLAPPed me because I said he "bilked" the Calif. Chiro.
>> Board
>> out of hundreds of thousands in DC licensing fees when he defended the
>> Board
>> against 10 MD-obstetricians (and others) who sued the Board - ostensibly
>> protesting the Board's adoption of Atty Schroeder's Rule 302 - but I think
>> intending to judicially RUBBERSTAMP Atty Schroeder's Rule 302.
>>
>> Atty Schroeder's Rule 302 said that California DCs - who by Board
>> regulation
>> used to have to attend a birth to graduate/get licensed - could no longer
>> even sever umbilical cords. (BTW, Calif. Atty. Genl Jerry Brown who was
>> then
>> Governor spoke at the last function where I saw California's last
>> chiropractic obstetrician - Laura Flores, DC, PhD.)
>>
>> Atty Schroeder's Rule 302 was just a regulation. The mass baby
>> strangulation by MD-obstetricians is a massive crime. It is not beyond
>> the
>> pale to suggest that the 10 MD-obstetricians - and Atty Schroeder -
>> conspired to cause a COURT to make it so DCs could not testify as experts
>> regarding the mass baby strangulation being committed by MD-obstetricians.
>>
>> I say this because when I contacted the Board years ago, a man calling
>> himself Mike Schroeder, attorney for the Board, told me it was not within
>> the California scope of chiropractic practice for me to inform women that
>> MDs are senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%.
>>
>> And when I contacted then-Governor Pete Wilson's office about the obvious
>> crime, I was assured by Gov. Wilson's office that such things were outside
>> my scope of practice.
>>
>> I think the Mike Schroeder, Atty for the Board ("outside your scope of
>> practice") might have been the same Atty Schroeder who later SLAPPed me.
>> I
>> think then-Gov. Pete Wilson's office was using Schroeder's Rule 302
>> against
>> me - against babies.
>>
>> Atty Schroeder calls himself a "chiropractic" attorney.
>>
>> ATTY SCHROEDER SILENCE - BABIES BE DAMNED
>>
>> CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE - BABIES BE DAMNED
>>
>> IS CHIROPRACTIC UNDER ATTACK?
>>
>> I recently wrote to David N. Taylor, DC, DABCN of Greenfield, Mass. (I
>> will
>> cc him via dntaylordc@... )
>>
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4758 <--censored
>> by Dr. McGann
>>
>> Alternative URL:
>>
>> BE ADVISED #1: National College of Chiropractic (now NUHS) President James
>> Winterstein is remaining silent about the massive obstetric
>> birth-canal-closing/spinal manipulation crime.
>>
>> See AMI OB/GYNs: Are they 'true CAM providers'?
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/816475211e7e2368
>>
>> Now is NOT the time to be silent. The MD birth-canal-closing/spinal
>> manipulation crime is massive.
>>
>> MD-pediatricians
>> recently stated that concern for
>> patient safety "demands" a greater collaboration "particularly" with
>> doctors
>> of chiropractic "such that we can
>> investigate and report harms related to spinal manipulation together."
>> --Sunita Vohra, MD FRCPC MSc et al. Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):e275-83.
>> Epub 2006 Dec 18. PubMed abstract
>>
>> So far, pediatrician Sunita Vohra, MD et al. and editors at Pediatrics
>> have
>> not jumped at the chance to stop the massive birth-canal-closing/spinal
>> manipulation crime of MD-obstetricians...
>>
>> YOU PRAISED CHIROPRACTIC'S SCIENCE COMMUNITY
>>
>> "Today, our profession owes a lot to...select
>> few...[research-oriented -TDG]...individuals who were able to lead the way
>> into the AHCPR, interdisciplinary research meetings and symposiums,
>> provide
>> data for implementation of chiropractic care into the Department of
>> Defense
>> and Department of Veteran Affairs, and open many other doors to increase
>> access to chiropractic care."
>> http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/25/21/08.html
>>
>> BE ADVISED #2: Our profession's vaunted science community is ignoring an
>> anti-scientific federal CAM rule.
>>
>> As I indicated in the abovementioned email copied to National/NUHS Pres.
>> Winterstein...
>>
>>>>>>>BEGIN excerpt of AMI OB/GYNs: Are they 'true CAM providers'?
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/816475211e7e2368
>>
>> THE FEDERAL CAM SCAM: NIH/NCCAM's definition of CAM is badly
>> subluxated.
>>
>> (NCCAM is NIH's National Center for Complementary and Alternative
>> Medicine.)
>>
>> NCCAM's stated "legal mandate" includes identifying and investigating
>> "complementary and alternative" medical treatment (CAM)...
>> http://nccam.nih.gov/about/plans/2005/index.htm
>>
>> BUT...by NCCAM definition, identifying and investigating
>> "complementary
>> and alternative" medical treatment (CAM) can't involve identifying
>> and
>> investigating CAM performed by MDs when CAM performed by MDs is "an
>> integral part of conventional medicine."
>>
>> (Complementary and alternative medical treatment (CAM) is
>> defined in the NCCAM Strategic Plan (2005-2009) as "medical practices
>> that are 'unproven by science and not presently considered an
>> integral part of conventional medicine (also referred to as
>> biomedicine, or
>> mainstream or allopathic medicine)..."
>> http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-07-003.html)
>>
>> As indicated above, attempted cover-up of ongoing criminal behavior of
>> MDs may be the reason for the badly subluxated NIH/NCCAM definition of
>> CAM.
>>
>> AMI itself might have been subluxated for the same reason - with AMI-
>> affiiliated DCs remaining silent, hoping to gain political plums from
>> politically powerful organized medicine
>>
>> AMI is promoting the fraudulent notion that CAM is mostly only part of
>> "alternative" medicine. AMI makes reference to "The Best Medicine of
>> Both Worlds," as in,
>>
>> "We integrate the most current evidence-based protocols from both
>> conventional medicine and alternative medicine to achieve 'The Best
>> Medicine of Both Worlds' (sm)."
>> http://www.amibestmed.com/ (Click on "Home")
>>
>> To be sure, there is a CAM world and there is a conventional medicine
>> world - but they are substantially the same worlds - inhabited/
>> dominated by MDs including criminal CAM practitioners called OB/GYNs.
>>
>>>>>>>END excerpt of AMI OB/GYNs: Are they 'true CAM providers'?
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/816475211e7e2368
>>
>>
>> MAYBE DCs ARE REMAINING SILENT BECAUSE OF ONGOING X-RAY/VERTEBRAL
>> SUBLUXATION FRAUD BY DCs?
>>
>>>>>>>END excerpt of missing Message #4762
>>
>>>>>>END excerpt of Judge Nares: Birth-canal-closing: Do Egyptian
>>>>>>obstetricians do it?
>> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/4
>>
>> Regardless who is responsible for the mysterious censorship...
>>
>> BIRTH EMERGENCY: Law enforcement is looking the other way and MDs know it
>> (see Dr. Harris's arrogant boast above)...
>>
>> READERS: Please sign Hospital Child Abuse:
>> DAs and AGs should end it
>> immediately...
>>
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/hospital-child-abuse-das-and-ags-should-end-it-\
immediately
>>
>> Thanks for reading.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Todd
>>
>> Dr. Gastaldo
>> Hillsboro, Oregon
>> USA
>> todd@...
>>
>> Copied to: Martino et al. at the Dipartimento di Ostetricia e
>> Ginecologia,
>> Ospedale Privato Accreditato Santa Maria, Bari, Italy, via
>> vzo.martino@...
>>
>> Copied also to: RAY MAKARTOFF, DC
>>
>> I'm copying Dr. Makartoff because he reminded me of the Towbin article
>> mentioned above.
>>
>> He wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Ray Makortoff
>> To: todd@...
>> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 10:32 PM
>> Subject: Towbin article
>>
>> Good day Dr. Gastaldo,
>>
>> My name is Dr. Ray Makortoff. I am a Chiropractor in Castlegar, B.C. I
>> have been searching the net for the article by Professor Abraham Towbin
>> on, "Latent Spinal Cord and Brainstem Injuries in Newborn Infants" however
>> have not found one that I can download. If you have the article can you
>> please e-mail it to me. I would like to have it on file as I use his
>> abstract/summary in my public presentations.
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>>
>> Ray.
>>
>>>>>>END Dr. Makortoff's email to Dr. Gastaldo
>>
>> Ray,
>>
>> I, too, looked for the full Towbin article but couldn't find it online -
>> for free or for purchase.
>>
>> Hopefully, Dr. Baxter will post it and make it FREE ACCESS - to help end
>> the mass child abuse by his fellow physicians.
>>
>> If you didn't read anything about my work to end the mass
>> birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION child abuse being committed by MDs
>> before contacting me...
>>
>> Well, now you have my latest post about it.
>>
>> Hopefully doctors of chiropractic will not continue to ignore this golden
>> opportunity to ask law enforcement to finally save tiny limbs and tiny
>> lives and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever
>> be able to adjust by hand.
>>
>> Please sign Hospital Child Abuse: DAs and AGs should end it
>> immediately...
>>
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/hospital-child-abuse-das-and-ags-should-end-it-\
immediately
>>
>> Please encourage others to sign - regardless whether they are DCs.
>>
>> Good luck in your public presentations.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Todd
>>
>> Dr. Gastaldo
>> Hillsboro, Oregon
>> USA
>> todd@...
>>
>> Bcc'd to Dr. Baxter's fellow INTERNATIONAL CHILD NEUROLOGY
>> ASSOCIATION/ICNA Committee Members....
>>
>> Please join me in urging Dr. Baxter to post the 1969 Towbin article and
>> offer free access - to help end the mass birth-canal-closing/SPINAL
>> MANIPULATION child abuse by MDs...
>>
>>
guillermo.agosta@...,harroyo@...,hchugani@...\
.edu,orvar.eeg-olofsson@
>>
kbh.uu.se,mmg@...,mack.kenneth@...,roberto@...,hnehealth.\
nsw.gov.au,wilmshur@...,vcnwong@...,yfukuyam@...\
,jean.aicardi@...,sashwal@...,theon@...,banlar@...\
.tr,hugoarroyo@...,ggg17@...,child@...,lieven.lag\
ae@...,milivoj.velickovic@...,mickleary@...,\
william.logan@...,pascas@...,ipcastroviejo@...,shield@crypt\
ic.rch.unimelb.edu.au,olofsson@...,segawa@...,ms.vanderknaap@vumc\
.nl,curatolo@...,rapin@...,mosawa@...,natalio@fejerm\
an.com,peterp@...,paris.fr,michael.shevell@...,moser@kennedykr\
ieger.org,raili.riikonen@...,srosem@...,suzukiy@...,ingrid.tein\
@sickkids.ca,miladi.mg@...,curatolo@...,gmiller@...,icnc@p\
ublic3.bta.net.cn,kalra@...,c.newton@...,cnewton@...\
imcom.net,philippe.evrard@r!
> db.ap-hop-paris.fr
>>
>> This post will be archived for global access in the chiro-list archive.
>> Search for it at: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>