Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
child_neglect_abuse · Parents:child neglect/ abuse or divorce
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Are they bi-polar or just toddlers?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1791 of 1974 |
Message----- Original Message -----
From: Parents Against TeenScreen
To: Parents Against TeenScreen
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 10:01 AM
Subject: Are they bi-polar or just toddlers?


Letters to the editor: letters@... (The shorter and more to the
point the better - they request 200 words or fewer. )



News - Press (Fort Myers, Florida)
Are they bi-polar or just toddlers?
January 31, 2008
John Rosemond

Dr. Dimitri Papolos of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and
his wife, Janice, are the recognized authorities on early-onset bipolar
disorder. They are the authors of "The Bipolar Child" (Broadway, $27.95), which
their Web site (www.bipolarchild.com) calls "the acknowledged bible" concerning
the disorder. The book is already in its third edition and has sales of more
than 200,000. The Papoloses have a devoted following of parents whose children
present the symptom picture in question.

The Papoloses believe EOBD is a serious psychiatric illness caused
by as-yet-unknown biological abnormalities and routinely recommend a treatment
plan that features powerful psychotropic drugs. They claim that the disorder is
much more prevalent than previously thought. For example, they assert that 80
percent of children with EOBD are found to meet full criteria for
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is to say most kids who
are diagnosed with ADHD also have, or really have, EOBD.

Especially intriguing is the Papolos' proposed list of "very common"
symptoms for EODB including separation anxiety, tantrums (especially in response
to the word "no"), defiance, hyperactivity, inattentiveness, unpredictable mood
swings, and distractibility. Those "symptoms" will be familiar to anyone who has
lived with a toddler.

Seemingly, the Papoloses would have us believe that behaviors
normally associated with toddlerhood are actually manifestations of a disease
that should be treated with drugs that have pronounced negative side effects
(e.g., nausea, diarrhea, severe drowsiness, significant weight gain) as soon in
the child's life as possible. Are the "terrible 2s" a disease?

Should most toddlers be on drugs? I have to admit to having no small
amount of difficulty with the reasoning involved here. One thing is certain: The
Papoloses are a boon to both the mental health and pharmaceutical industries.
I'm not so certain they are a boon to children.

In their book and in the May 2007 issue of their newsletter,
available through their Web site, the Papoloses recommend against using the word
"no" with a bipolar child "because it will trigger a meltdown." When they were
toddlers, my children often suffered wild seizures at the sound of "no."

Interestingly, however, these seizures were eventually cured with
regular doses of that very word in combination with consequences the Papoloses
would probably consider draconian. My wife and I were unaware that we should
have been giving them drugs.

In the same issue of their newsletter, the Papoloses say that
parents of bipolar children should "suffer the physical abuse" of their
children. Over the past few years, I've consulted with quite a few parents of
children ages 2 and older who were prone to hitting and kicking their parents
when their parents did not give them their way. In nearly every case (I actually
know of no exceptions), these kids were cured of their criminal tendencies in
short order by parents who did not suffer this abuse, parents who administered
not drugs but quite old-fashioned discipline.

An unknown author (sometimes identified as Jordan W. Smoller,
University of Pennsylvania) has posted on the Internet a satire titled "The
Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood" in which he proposes, with tongue in
cheek, that childhood itself is a disorder with congenital onset. "Smoller's"
symptoms include knowledge deficits, dwarfism, emotional lability, and legume
anorexia, to which I would add separation anxiety, tantrums, defiance,
hyperactivity, and every other thing associated with the so-called "terrible
2s."

The satire is truly funny, even hilarious. The question becomes: Is
it also prophetic?


Note: The satire can be found here:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/emma_holister/2004/09/19/the_etiology_and_treatm\
ent_of.htm



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
487 signatures needed to make 25,000
http://www.petitiononline.com/TScreen/petition.html Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfU9puZQKBY


If you would rather not receive the latest news via this e-mail line,
please send a message to
parents_against_teenscreen@... with "UNSUBSCRIBE ME" in the
subject line.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Fri Feb 1, 2008 10:34 pm

connecticutd...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1791 of 1974 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Message----- Original Message ----- From: Parents Against TeenScreen To: Parents Against TeenScreen Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 10:01 AM Subject: Are they...
Connecticut DCF Watch
connecticutd...
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
4:25 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help