Steve,
You are a wise consumer. It is not unethical for a patient to make a choice to assist the scientific process. I just think it is unethical for a physician to withhold a needed therapy.
Also, it is probably a good idea for you to optimize your blood's buffering capacity.
jboy
-----Original Message-----
From: dudescholar3@...
To: chelationtherapy@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [chelationtherapy] study taking place at National Institutes of Health?
coygators@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> Goooooo oobagah Tom!!!
>
> CoEnzyme Q 10 up to 800 mgs. daily until your cardiologist tells you
> your ejection fraction is improving, then reduce the amount of it toward
> the more usual 100 to 200 mg. daily.
I take the equivalent of 1100 mg/day and intend to continue indefinitely - my
ejection fraction is normal by-the-way.
> I say stay away from the clinics that are involved with the NIH
> chelation study. It is troubling.
>
> As you indicated, what about the idiots who may be getting "placebo?"
> It is unethical to play roulette with a patient you know that has a
> problem and play some game of withholding treatment from him or not.
> You go to a doctor to be helped.
I don't think it is troubling to work with clinics that are involved in the NIH
study. The place I used in Utah is the only clinic in Utah that offers
chelation and I was asked if I wanted to be in the study. My reply was "Not a
chance!", I want to get the real deal. EDTA comes with a burning pain - I think
it's related to how acidic your blood is - and I can certainly tell nowadays if
I was getting the real deal or a placebo but I didn't want to play that game.
I've had 40+ session of EDTA to date (and 25 of PlaqueX) and try for a monthly
maintenance IV session of EDTA. Because my kidney function was very good, I got
a higher dosage of EDTA than average.
--
Steve - dudescholar3@basicmail.net
"If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march
on." --Stopford Brooke
>
>
> Goooooo oobagah Tom!!!
>
> CoEnzyme Q 10 up to 800 mgs. daily until your cardiologist tells you
> your ejection fraction is improving, then reduce the amount of it toward
> the more usual 100 to 200 mg. daily.
I take the equivalent of 1100 mg/day and intend to continue indefinitely - my
ejection fraction is normal by-the-way.
> I say stay away from the clinics that are involved with the NIH
> chelation study. It is troubling.
>
> As you indicated, what about the idiots who may be getting "placebo?"
> It is unethical to play roulette with a patient you know that has a
> problem and play some game of withholding treatment from him or not.
> You go to a doctor to be helped.
I don't think it is troubling to work with clinics that are involved in the NIH
study. The place I used in Utah is the only clinic in Utah that offers
chelation and I was asked if I wanted to be in the study. My reply was "Not a
chance!", I want to get the real deal. EDTA comes with a burning pain - I think
it's related to how acidic your blood is - and I can certainly tell nowadays if
I was getting the real deal or a placebo but I didn't want to play that game.
I've had 40+ session of EDTA to date (and 25 of PlaqueX) and try for a monthly
maintenance IV session of EDTA. Because my kidney function was very good, I got
a higher dosage of EDTA than average.
--
Steve - dudescholar3@
"If a thousand old beliefs were ruined on our march to truth we must still march
on." --Stopford Brooke