Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
cannabisaction · Global Cannabis. Million Marijuana March
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Almonds FUMIGATED! Boycott Blue Diamond nuts. Buy imported almonds.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1413 of 1507 |

2 articles below detail recent USDA pollution of domestic raw almonds with a toxic, cancer-causing fumigant. The USDA wants to prevent the repetition of a couple, small industrial-farming-caused salmonella incidents concerning almonds. By substituting deaths from fumigant-induced cancers. Brilliant solution to a non-problem. Since the so-called problem is due to cross-contamination of poorly-cleaned equipment from factory-farming pollution. The USDA doesn't fumigate or steam-sterilize raw, organic, lettuce mixes! So why almonds? The reason is domestic, shared-monopoly lobbying from Blue Diamond, the major almond producer, and others, in order to further prop up their shared monopoly. By destroying smaller almond producers through this burdensome rule that requires the use of some very expensive fumigation, or steam-sterilization, equipment. You WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BUY  RAW DOMESTIC ALMONDS!

Please forward this boycott info widely. Almonds FUMIGATED! Boycott Blue Diamond nuts. Buy imported almonds.


====start====

www.foodconsumer.org

Food & Health : Laws & Politics
ALERT: USDA Says Foods Labeled as 'Raw' Can Be Pasteurized
Under pressure from industrial agriculture lobbyists, the USDA has quietly approved a new regulation that will effectively end distribution of raw almonds, while putting many family farmers out of business. The regulation is scheduled to go into effect in just a few short days on September 1st, unless thousands of consumers take action now.
Sep 2, 2007 - 6:52:58 PM


Foodconsumer.org


All News 
 
 Misc. News
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Letter to Editor
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 G.eneral H.ealth
 D.rug N.ews
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search






Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed
foodconsumer.org news feed
Submit news[release]
General health News
foodconsumer.org is ranked among top 100 that are often featured in google news service
Please donate


Food & Health : Laws & Politics Last Updated: Sep 2, 2007 - 7:06:42 PM


ALERT: USDA Says Foods Labeled as 'Raw' Can Be Pasteurized
By Organic Consumers and The Cornucopia Institute
Sep 2, 2007 - 6:52:58 PM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   

Editor's note:  We prefer almonds like many other nuts not being processed in any way for any purpose and then being claimed to be raw or natural.  Using a chemical to kill microorganisms is not a pasteurization process.  When you call it pasteurization, you change the original definition of pasteurization, which potentially misleads consumers.  Some consumers will avoid ALL almonds if such a process is allowed to be used.  That is the message the industry needs to hear.  After all, almonds are not an indispensable vitamin.

Sunday September 2, 2007 (Organicconsumers.com) -- Under pressure from industrial agriculture lobbyists, the USDA has quietly approved a new regulation that will effectively end distribution of raw almonds, while putting many family farmers out of business. The regulation is scheduled to go into effect in just a few short days on September 1st, unless thousands of consumers take action now.

The rule requires pasteurization of almonds, including organic, yet allows those same almonds to continue to be labeled as "raw". Nutritionists point out that raw, organic almonds are far superior, in terms of nutrition, than pasteurized almonds.

One of the FDA-recommended pasteurization methods requires the use of propylene oxide, which is classified as a "possible human carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and is banned in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union.

Organic and family-scale almond farmers are protesting the proposed rule, saying it will effectively put them out of business, since the minimum price for the pasteurization equipment is $500,000.

The agency claims pasteurization is necessary, since there have been two food contamination incidents with raw almonds since 2001.

But both of these incidents, in fact, were the result of blatant mismanagement on large industrial-scale almond farms.

Take action now or read on?  The following is written by The Cornucopia Institute.
 

The Cornucopia Institute, April 17, 2007
Straight to the Source


In response to two outbreaks of Salmonella in 2001 and 2004 traced to raw almonds grown in California, the Almond Board of California and the USDA have quietly developed a new regulation mandating that all almonds undergo a sterilization process that includes chemical and/or high-temperature treatments.

The plan is angering many small-scale farmers, retailers, and consumers. This new rule is controversial for many reasons.  It could force family farms out of business, ignores the underlying systemic problems with conventional agriculture that cause food contamination, and is upsetting to consumers seeking organic and raw foods.

Truth in Advertising, or Greenwashing Questionable Technology?

While the USDA generously describes the new almond treatments as pasteurization, the most common treatment method expected to be used fumigates almonds with propylene oxide.  In lab experiments, the chemical leads to gene mutation, DNA strand breaks, and neoplastic cell transformation.  The U.S. EPA has classified propylene oxide as a probable human carcinogen.  Its use in treating food for human consumption is banned in the European Union, Canada, Mexico, and most other countries. 

Organic Almonds Might Be Safer but Will Not Be "Raw"

The only exemptions to these new regulations will be organic "raw" almonds, which will not be fumigated, but will undergo the steam-heat treatment, and small-scale growers who can sell truly raw almonds but only direct to the public from farm stands. Almonds that have heat treatment will deceptively still be labeled as "raw," despite having undergone surface sterilization treatments.

Family Farmers Could Be Squeezed Out of Business

The costs of the chemical and heat treatments, in addition to the costs of transporting and recording the new procedures, will be especially onerous on small-scale and organic farmers.  The equipment to pasteurize almonds is very expensive.  A propylene oxide chamber costs $500,000 to $1,250,000, and a roasting line can cost as much as $1,500,000 to $2,500,000.  Smaller, family-operated handlers that buy almonds from small, family-owned almond growers and cater to the organic and natural foods markets, are concerned that they will not be able to afford such expensive equipment and will be forced out of the almond business.

Pasteurization?

Unlike milk, eggs, and meats, for which real pasteurization or cooking offers an important protection from food-borne illness, no scientific evidence exists to show that almonds are an inherently risky food.  In fact, Salmonella contamination of almonds can only occur when livestock manure or fecal matter is inadvertently transferred to the nuts through contaminated water, soil, or transportation and handling equipment.  Almonds may also be infected by poor employee sanitation either on the farm or in processing facilities. 

While two outbreaks may bring bad publicity and economic losses to the almond industry, it does not prove that almonds are inherently unsafe.  Is it justified to impose these onerous regulations on an entire industry, impacting all consumers, because of two relatively small outbreaks, one of which has been traced to Paramount Farms, a giant, industrial-scale farming operation raising 70,000 of acres of nut crops, that is by no means representative of the industry as a whole?

Rule Status

The rule is set to go into effect on September 1.  The Cornucopia Institute has formally asked the USDA to re-open the regulatory proceeding to allow for additional public input and review.  Only 18 public comments-all from the almond industry-were received on the draft rule when it was open for public comment in early 2007.  Unlike consumers, retailers, or other organizations concerned with food safety, all almond handlers received a personal letter or fax from the USDA alerting them to the sterilization proposal and inviting their comments. It's time other stakeholders-consumers and retailers-have an opportunity to have their voices heard in this matter.

We urge all concerned consumers, retailers, and farmers to contact the USDA and demand that the new rule mandating "pasteurization" of almonds be re-opened for public comment and review.  Cornucopia has a comprehensive fact sheet on the almond issue on its web page, and a sample letter for interested individuals to send to the USDA can be found at http://cornucopia.org/index.php/almonds/

Your support of The Cornucopia Institute underwrites our work on food and farm policy issues concerning sustainable and organic agriculture.  You can donate online using our secure credit card server.  Your personal and financial information will not be shared with anyone.

Share this article on =>

spurl digg yahoo bookmarks simpy fark del.icio.us blink nowpublic magnolia reddit tailrank Send link via yahoo messenger rawsugar furl newsvine


© 2004-2007 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page



Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org
Disclaimer | Advertising | Jobs | Privacy | About US | Newsletter | Contact Us
© Copyright 2004 - 2007 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved
Link Partners: hicenter.com | shopseek.com | copyregister.net | infoplus.com | career info | Internet services | Flavor Consulting | Please donate



====end====

-------------------------------------------

====start====

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/23/BUE8RN9HJ.DTL

Article:Organic almond supporters roast pasteurization plan:/c/a/2007/08/23/BUE8RN9HJ.DTL
Article:Organic almond supporters roast pasteurization plan:/c/a/2007/08/23/BUE8RN9HJ.DTL
(what's this?)

(close) (what's this?)

To all Safari Browser users,

Our implementation of comments on SFGate causes the back button to break on all versions of Safari. To resolve this issue we have provided you with an alternative "Safari Back" button to help you navigate through our site. We will continue to work toward resolution of the issue and regard this as a "temporary" fix.

Another option is to consider use of the Firefox browser which does not experience this issue. You can download Firefox at getfirefox.com.

Apologies for any inconvenience.

The SFGate Team.

[close]

San Francisco Chronicle

Organic almond supporters roast pasteurization plan

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Business & Finance
--Get Quote:


Symbol Lookup
--Main Business & Finance Page: Stock quotes, portfolio, funds and more...
--Small Business Center: A new resource for small businesses. Get expert advice, forms and more.
--SFGate Technology: It's a high-tech world - - we just plug you into it...

A new food regulation that mandates the pasteurization of California almonds leaves a bad taste in the mouth of Jesse Schwartz, a purveyor of raw organic almond butter and other natural foods in Berkeley.

For 25 years, as president of Living Tree Community Foods, he has done business with small Central Valley farmers, and now, effective Sept. 1, he'll have to buy raw nuts for processing from Italy, Spain and Turkey - almonds of lesser quality, he will tell you.

"Almonds are a part of the heritage of the American people, and it makes me very sad that they're about to dump a fumigant on our American heritage," Schwartz said, referring to a method of pasteurization that involves chemicals.

After two outbreaks of salmonella bacteria poisoning that were traced to almonds - in 2001 and 2004 - the Almond Board of California, the industry's trade association, proposed to the Department of Agriculture that mandatory sterilization be imposed in the name of consumer safety. The government agreed, the rule was written and was scheduled to take effect next month.

On Aug. 1, the Almond Board's directors, fearing there was insufficient sterilization equipment and too few operators in place to treat the nuts and deliver an uninterrupted supply, petitioned for a postponement of the rule to March 1.

This week, the government denied the request, confident the deadline can be met.

The rule that was more than three years in the making - one that burnishes the almond industry's reputation for safety or sullies the noble nut, depending upon your view - will apply to about 500 million pounds of almonds sold in the United States annually.

All the nation's almonds, 1.3 billion pounds this year, are produced in the Central Valley. More than half are exported, and those are exempt from the pasteurization rule. Growers at farmers' markets and those selling from roadside stands are also exempt and can sell raw, unpasteurized almonds to consumers. But the share of the crop sold in the U.S. market - to retailers and food processors, for example - is covered.

In most cases, almond handlers - middlemen who buy nuts from growers and sell to customers - will have responsibility for the pasteurization, and some of the work will be done by food processors or third-party companies.

Some of those almonds will be sterilized by oil roasting and blanching. Organic growers will submit their crops to steam heating, a method approved by organic overseers, although many organic growers are still queazy about the rule.

The most common method of sterilizing almonds is propylene oxide fumigation, using a chemical compound that is classified by the Environmental Protection Agency as a probable human carcinogen and that was briefly used as a racing fuel that added oxygen molecules to gasoline.

The National Hot Rod Association put a stop to that in 1993 because of propylene oxide's association with cancer, according to a spokesman.

"The only people who can use that stuff are dressed in space suits with rubber hands and masks," said Schwartz, the raw foods advocate who says the pasteurization rule is an overreaction to the two outbreaks and that "nature provides almonds to us in sterile form" protected by husk and shell.

However, propylene oxide has been used for food sterilization - particularly in nuts, spices and cocoa power - since 1958 and is authorized by the Food and Drug Administration and Environmental Protection Agency.

In the 2001 salmonella incident, several dozen people were sickened in Canada. In 2004, several dozen people were sickened in the United States and eight other countries. In both cases it is believed the almonds came into contact with bacteria at processing plants.

"We said that is unacceptable, that both consumers and our industry are at risk," said Richard Waycott, the chief executive officer of the Almond Board of California, in Modesto. "We said, 'Let's figure out what we can do.' "

California almonds handled by Blue Diamond Growers in Sacramento, the largest nut processing and marketing company in the world, representing 3,000 growers, have been pasteurized for four years. The sterilization was a response to the outbreaks. "This is to assure consumers that our products are safe to eat," said Susan Brauner, director of public affairs for the company.

She said the majority of almonds are consumed either as an ingredient in other products and therefore roasted or heated to a temperature that effectively achieves pasteurization. Uncooked almonds are less than 10 percent of the total market, she said.

It's a passionate sector, nonetheless. Advocates in the raw foods and organic movement have prompted more than 15,000 people to sign petitions seeking a halt to enforcement of the pasteurization rule.

"This rule is the brainchild of a subset of the industrial agricultural community" and generated only 18 public comments before critics turned their attention to it, said Mark Kastel, executive director of the organic watchdog group Cornucopia Institute, which is fighting the government's ruling.

"It's more of a ploy by the big outfits, the big handlers, to drive the small guy out of business, because it's easier for them to do the treatment on a large scale," said Hendrik Feenstra, an almond handler in Orland (Glenn County).

Glenn Anderson, an organic almond grower in Hilmar (Merced County) for the past 18 years, said, "It feels like somebody has really done a number on us here. My customers tell me they want to buy the same product they have bought from me for the last 18 years, and I would like to have the right to do that, if that's what the consumer wants. Seems like the American way to me."

Anderson and other organic growers also object to the rule because they believe sustainable farming methods they use, including mulching rather than controlling weeds with chemicals, naturally prevent bacteria.

There will be a cost for the treatment, estimated at 3 to 5 cents per pound, and growers may absorb those costs, said Dave Phippen, a co-owner of Travaille and Phippen, growers, packers and shippers of almonds in Manteca (San Joaquin County).

"That's the way it should be, to advance a very healthy product," said Phippen, a former chairman of the almond board.

He said that objections from raw foods and organic advocates were considered in the rule-making process and that is why the heating process was added to the other methods of sterilization.

"The flip side of that is if there is another outbreak, usually the press does not distinguish between organic and nonorganic - they just made someone sick," said Phippen. "So the consensus was that all almonds would have to go through the kill step because with an outbreak we would have a blemish on the California almond name whether organic or not."

Waycott, the Almond Board's chief executive, said that "a prerequisite was that there would be no degradation of the product" in the pasteurization process. He said nutrition specialists have tested almonds pre- and post-pasteurization and have not found differences in "sensory attributes."

That's a tough sell for Schwartz of Berkeley.

"Before long, it seems," he writes on his Web site, "all the food sold in the Untied States will be genetically modified, irradiated, pasteurized, homogenized, hydrolyzed and packaged for a two-year shelf life and it will all be labeled as 'All Natural.' "

Online resources

Anderson's Web site

www.andersonalmonds.com

Schwartz's Web site

www.livingtreecommunity.com

Cornucopia Institute

www.cornucopia.org

E-mail George Raine at graine@....

This article appeared on page C - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Comments

(8)
Share your thoughts on this story.

Bay Recruiter Top Jobs

GOVERNMENT

Executive Officer. Port of Long Beach

Port of Long Beach

GOVERNMENT

Housing & Property Manager - Monterey

City of Monterey

GOVERNMENT

Waste Management Sacramento County

County of Sacramento

HEALTHCARE

IMPAQ Rehabilitation

INDUSTRIAL

Creative Lead Industrial

LAW ENFORCEMENT

S.F. Public Safety & Law Enforcement

San Francsico Public Safety

MANAGEMENT

Be a Leader Who Can Make a Differe

L3 Communications SSG - Tinsley

SALES

Great Opportunity!

Who's Calling

SALES

Cruise Ship Art Auctioneer

Sales

Be a Media Star @ the Chronicle

San Francisco Chronicle

SECURITY

OFFICERS (ARMED ) San Francisco

SPEECH

THERAPISTS (Pacifica & Daly

ARCHITECT

Nationally recognized

CUSTODIAN

SUPERVISOR Grace Cathedral

CUSTOMER

Service For EVA & Korean Airlines

Yahoo! HotJobs
Be the first to share your thoughts on this story.
Share your thoughts on this story.
- be the first to share your thoughts on this question.
- Sorry, comments are closed for this story.
Organic almond supporters roast pasteurization plan
BU


====end====

--
regards,
eco man,
MMM (Global Million Marijuana March):
http://cannabis.wikia.com/wiki/Global_Marijuana_March_2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Marijuana_March
http://gallery.marihemp.com/years
http://www.myspace.com/ecommm
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/mmmworld
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/cannabisaction

CHEAP SOLAR POWER IS HERE NOW,
when the subsidy and health costs of fossil fuel pollution are accounted for.
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/cannabisaction/message/1351
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/02/19/ccview19.xml
Chart of cumulative installed photovoltaic solar power in the IEA PVPS countries 1992 to 2005. In megawatts:
http://www.iea-pvps.org/isr/images/2005_graph01.gif
Why are the sheeple (sheep-like people) following oil companies into Iraq and possibly Iran?
Solar power in detail:
http://www.iea-pvps.org/isr/index.htm
Wiki: http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Solar

Sat Sep 8, 2007 3:34 pm

tents444
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1413 of 1507 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

2 articles below detail recent USDA pollution of domestic raw almonds with a toxic, cancer-causing fumigant. The USDA wants to prevent the repetition of a...
Eco Man
tents444
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2007
3:40 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help