Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
cancerregistrargroup · Cancer Registrar Group - Come talk about registry issues.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Error rates   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1362 of 1572 |
Re: Error rates

We do several things.
1. When abstracting, each abstractor is expected to run global edit
checks on the case before proceeding to the next case.
2. If the abstractor is either a non-CTR or is a CTR inexperienced
with our caseload, their cases are all visually reviewed by a CTR
who IS experienced with our caseload (many times, this catches
things global edits wouldn't, such as text fields not proving what
was coded or otherwise not meeting text field standards defined in
our abstracting procedure).
3. Our cases are submitted to our regional SEER registry (who in
turn will submit them to the state). There are two reports they
provide back to us which are useful (when we actually have time to
process them, that is). The first is a new cases listing. It shows
how they chose to code their data items - we usually focus on a few
fields rather than trying to verify each and every item, taking into
account that there are still a few little rule differences for SEER
and hospital registries. The second report is a correction report.
Whenever they change a data field on one of our cases, that will
appear in this report.
4. There are several fields I have found over the years are easy to
make mistakes in, and may not be checked with global edits. So I
have made a report to list those fields for groups of cases so I can
review them en mass. This is a fast and easy way to spot common
errors and patterns of errors (sometimes it may even be something
that autocodes but has an imperfect algorhithm - say an unusual
leukemia not getting grouped correctly for SSS grouping or
something).
We haven't set explicit rates, but do submit data to NCDB (and oh
how I wish their genedits program were more user friendly!). Also
the SEER registry in our area HAS set minimum error rates, so that
also is a help to us.

--- In cancerregistrargroup@yahoogroups.com, "corolla_046"
<decoeb@t...> wrote:
> I would like information about the types of quality checks done on
> registry data within your departments and if you have an
established
> error rate that must not be exceeded?




Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:13 pm

thaydenhome
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1362 of 1572 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I would like information about the types of quality checks done on registry data within your departments and if you have an established error rate that must...
corolla_046
Offline Send Email
Aug 25, 2004
4:44 pm

We do several things. 1. When abstracting, each abstractor is expected to run global edit checks on the case before proceeding to the next case. 2. If the...
thaydenhome
Offline Send Email
Aug 26, 2004
3:14 pm

When our network of hospitals had the 5 registrars reporting to the same manager, we performed peer review quarterly on abstracts selected randomly that would...
c_carter_ctr
Offline
Sep 3, 2004
3:44 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help