Hmmm,
Yes, there are some crucial differences out there, especially with the math and
the pitch of scale when it comes to delivery. Which programs are you comparing?
Let us know and perhaps I can give you some input.
Elaine Thompson
www.elaine-thompson-soundtherapy.com


>
> Jeff,
> My two yen's worth on biosonic, The lady in Spain (sorry forget her
> name) who created Biosonic was a student of Sharrys. (from what I
> understand) Her stuff seems to be pretty good and a lot based on Sharrys
> research. Starts out the same with taking vocal prints but a little
> different (same but different) then Sharrys work and expands out in
> different areas using, color, tuninh forks and other ideas. I am sure it has
> a good effect. Sharrys research seems to focus in one direction and gets
> deeper and deeper. Always something new, something better. You should
> research both and decide what is best for you and your practitioners. If you
> got the money and time, (and brain power) I would do both, use best of both
> worlds.
> Toby
>
>
>
>
> I am interested in sleuthing out the most effective software for my
> practitioners. Can anyone speak to why Biosonic may be any more effective
> than the other software out there? Is there a difference in how calculations
> are made or the method of constructing the delivery energy?Jef
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Explore the seven wonders of the world
> http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE


0

----------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.ukonline.net