Good morning Forum



Mass-to-Frequency vs Molecular Weight: I started my research using Mol Wt
as the conversion factor between mass and frequency and had excellent
results with this system. I then added the mass-to-frequency conversion
based on the CRC Handbook of Chemistry & Physics as an attempt to align
voice energy assessments to the scientific proven conversion factor.



Mass to frequency conversion is scientifically-based as shown in the CRC
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. The conversion factors are listed in the
"Energy Conversion Factors" chart on pages 1-5.



The formula for this conversion is as follows:



· 2.25234242x10e+23 multiplied by the molecular weight of any known
substance (element).

· For example: oxygen (O-16) has a molecular weight of 15.99491.
When multiplied by the conversion formula equals 3.602601e+24

· This is then reduced in octaves (divide by 2) to 23.84001648

· The conversion formula is converted to a conversion factor by
dividing the 23.84001648 by 15.99491, which gives us 1.490475187

· This conversion factor is valid for all elemental conversions to
frequency. I call this mass-to-frequency conversion and display it in the
Transmutation Periodic Tables as ‘mass-to-freq:’





I have worked with hundreds of patients and I have had excellent results
using both systems. My focus is on nutrition and understanding the inner
workings of the body to fine tune body function. Many people use synthetic
nutrients as their guide to body function and this does not work. Every
function in the body requires the bioactive nutrient as well as their
synergists for function.



The elements in the body are not just one element as the example for calcium
is shows below:



20 Calcium-40 (mass-to-freq: 59.5632488 Hz.)



Ca.40 – 39.96259 (96.96%) Ca.42 – 41.95862 (0.64%) Ca.43 –
42.95877 (0.15%)

Ca.44 – 43.95548 (2.06%) Ca.46 – 45.95369 (0.0033%) Ca.48 –
47.95253 (<0.019%)

Ca.41 – radioactive – 1.03x10e9y Ca.45 – radioactive - 163.8d
Ca.47 – radioactive - 4.536d (MD – Ca.47) plus 15 other radioisotopes


“Transmutation Periodic Tablesä” by Carl A. Parker - Nutritional Sounds
Ó1998






As you can see, calcium has six stable isotopes and eighteen radioactive
isotopes. Based on the theory of 4th and 5th harmonic flow patterns, the
stable isotopes (5th harmonic flow) would be building blocks for our bodies
and the radioactive are in a state of decay, leaving our bodies in a 4th
harmonic flow. Let’s explain something about the chemical layout of the
elements as shown in the example above for calcium: 20 Calcium-40



· The 20 is the number of protons in the calcium isotope. It
identifies calcium. All the calcium isotopes have twenty protons. The
calcium isotopes vary in the number of neutrons. The 40 is the total number
of protons and neutrons, therefore, calcium-40 has 20 protons and 20
neutrons. Calcium-47 has 20 protons and 27 neutrons. To balance the
energy, calcium also has 20 electrons in it’s orbit, therefore creating an
electrically neutral atom.



It should also be noted that the transmutation of elements takes place
before chemistry, it takes place in the nucleus of the atom. It does not
take a particle separator as used in nuclear physics. These transmutations
take place within our bodies using very low electrical-magnetic energy. The
proton (yang) is positively charged and has a yin motion (clockwise
rotation), the electron (yin) is negatively charged and has a yang motion
(counter-clockwise rotation), and the neutron is neither.



In the database (Nutritional Awareness Scientific and/or Nutritional Sounds
v3.01 – www.nutritionalsounds.com) I have used the isotope of highest energy
in the formulation of mol wt and MTF (Mass-to-Freq) to frequency as
displayed. Note calcium below is based on 20Ca40.



Ca - (Element) AT - 39.96259



Mass to Frequency: 59.56324912

BWM: 29.78162456





Another factor practitioners need to consider in trying to understand the
relationship between voice energy charts and frequency displays is the
possibility of transmutation of elements that is taking place on a
continuous basis within the body:



To better understand the flow pattern of transmutations, the following is
from “The Philosopher’s Stone” by Michio Kushi with Edward Esko:



· “In Elemental Transmutations, the inward energy from the universe
(Sun - planets - galaxies - etc) is our building energy force. This is a
very powerful creative force of the heavens. The 5th harmonic yang energy
is a force that is gathering, condensing, and materializing life on earth, a
centripetal force – counterclockwise in rotation. The outward spiraling
energy is the 4th harmonic yin energy; it is the force going out into the
universe, decomposing, non-matter, heavy to light, a centrifugal force –
clockwise in rotation. Similar to burning wood, as the life form changes
from solid to gas to invisible, back to the beginning.”



Therefore, the flow pattern of the elements is from light to heavy, creating
life, as we know it. When we deprive ourselves of the necessary elements to
create life, our body must reverse the creative action and start a reversal
(4th harmonic – decay – death) action by pulling potassium from calcium
(Ca40 – H1 = K39). The ideal way to handle this problem is to take silicon
and magnesium, as these two elements make all the isotopes of calcium in a
5th harmonic growth pattern. The examples below show only one isotope of
calcium, Ca40.



· Si28 + C12 = Ca40

· Mg24 + O16 = Ca40

· K39 + H1 = Ca40



Modern science has stated that elements can not transmute; yet they admit
that the radioactive elements do transmute? This is shown in the Neptunium
Series of decay, which shows the decay pattern of Curium-245 to the stable
isotope of Bismuth-209, and the Thorium Series, which has Thorium-232 to
Lead-208, and the Uranium Series, which has Uranium-238 to Lead-206. Why is
it that radioactive isotopes can transmute and stable isotopes cannot?
Makes no sense, as most every isotope has both stable and unstable
(radioactive) isotopes, as shown by the example of calcium below:





The reason for all this information is to hopefully expand our research and
understanding of inner relationships ‘know’ and ‘unknown’ taking place every
second. BOTH systems give results and for me the best results have occurred
using the Mass-To-Frequency system. I have created my own ‘Transmutation
Periodic Tables to assist me in my research as well as hundreds of pages of
research material in my attempt to expand my awareness. The database gives
you thousands of these associations and synergist functions to help in
research and understanding.



· Example: As most of you are aware calcium metabolism involves
vitamin D, vitamin F, magnesium, boron, silicon, potassium and on and on.
If a person has a broken bone you cannot heal it with calcium, but you can
heal it with silicon (horsetail herb). Bone breaks under the microscope
show Silicon ions as the mending agents – not calcium.



· Another area that I have had extreme success with sound includes
using the actual ‘corrective’ frequency (not reduced to BWM) and given to
the patient using the Rife Machine.





I hope this of some help to understanding the work that has gone into these
working databases being used by many practitioners worldwide. Feedback is
highly requested and changes will always occur as understanding comes into
view.



Carl Parker

Creator of the Nutritional Awareness Scientific program & Nutritional Sounds
Database v3.01

www.nutritionalsounds.com





From: biosonic@yahoogroups.com [mailto:biosonic@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marysol Gonzalez Sterling
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 2:04 AM
To: biosonic@yahoogroups.com; TRUTHsound@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [biosonic] Re; Molecular Weight versus Mass to Frequency discussion



I include two messages about this subject from Michael Heleus, now a member
of the Truthsound forum and biosonic can continue to tell us about this
discussion... Please, all others that now much about it continue...
thanks, MS

> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Michael Heleus
>> To: Marysol Gonzalez Sterling
>> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: Fw: message for biosonic list I can't directly post from
>> yahoo as reply to forum--please post
>>
>>
>> Marysol,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the charts--they will require magnification, explanation, and
>> study before I can say more about them.
>>
>>
>> I've discussed the molecular weight to sound issue on the forum more than
>> once. Please run a search on the forum messages for deBroglie to find
these
>> occasions. As I see it, using a molecular weight in grams per Avogadro
Number
>> of molecules gives a number that the human mind can associate in the
>> unconscious part with that number as hertz well enough radionically to
get a
>> slight result in the physiology. It is an arbitrary association with no
>> logical connection between weight and frequency. They could be seen by
the
>> mind as parallel since it could associate ascending frequency with
ascending
>> weight--the parallel motion allows a slight translation
senses/mind/general
>> physiology, the numbers' relations are arbitrary nonsense. I offered that
the
>> deBroglie mass equivalent frequency was the only logical conversion
available
>> from physics I could find, and that had wildly varying and unhandy
frequency
>> ranges for sound therapy. I explained this on the forum to Jonathan
Goldman
>> in particular. There was external interference with the forum and the
>> messages about deBroglie were pretty well removed--try a search now to
see if
>> I am currently correct, since sometimes the removed stuff is restored or
>> unblocked.
>>
>>
>> Michael

>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Michael Heleus
>> To: Marysol Gonzalez Sterling
>> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 3:41 AM
>> Subject: Sorry to shake you up, but deBroglie makes more sense
>>
>>
>> YES, and yes because here mass is equivalent of weight and mass to
frequency
>> has real physics behind it, unlike the ad hoc apples=pears sort of
arbitrary
>> juxtaposition of weight/mass to frequency. It's as confusing and
innaccurate
>> as saying your car moves at 60 grams an hour! Sorry to sound so critical,
but
>> I think a more natural and sensible mass to frequency converserion by
>> deBroglie law beats an arbitrary assignment completely and would be
vastly
>> more effective in sonic treatments. Heaven help me to find the info on
the
>> net anymore, either in forum records or net calculators for
deBroglie--the
>> good stuff just keeps vanishing off the net faster than people put it up
>> anymore.--M
>>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]