this is Elaine Thompson response, I hope some others have something to say too,
now that they had sometime with the NS and can compare..........


----- Original Message -----
From: <elaine.thompson@...>
To: "Marysol Gonzalez Sterling" <biosonica@...>
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Sorry to shake you up, but deBroglie makes more sense


> Dear People who are discussing the Mass to frequency calculations versus the
> molecular weight to freq.
>
> As a practitioner of about 14 years now with thousands of clients under my
belt,
> I can say with Absolute conviction that the mass to freq calculation does NOT
> work/have an effect on the human body.Obviously All sound has an effect but
not
> in the way we are discussing here)
> The mol wt calculation does without question.
>
>
> I have found some correlations between natural chemicals and manufactured
> chemicals...such as Tannin (found in red wine and teas, but also manufactured
> for industry and here you will find that artificially produced tannin has a
freq
> that is the mol weight of natural tannin divided by the mass to freq
calculation.
> So I think there is a place for the mass to freq, but only with man made
> chemicals.....I have not proved this with medications however, as they seem to
> respond to mol wt calc. I have done much work on hard Drug and medical
> addictions and know that the mol wt works on the human body and the mass to
> freq has no effect whatsoever with addictive drugs and other medcations
> Thank you
> Elaine J Thompson





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]