Thank you Marysol for this facinating info. What I found also fascinating
was that when Ted Denmark recalculated "F#=362.6 for the Earth tone and have
calculated all the just intonations for the other tones in this octave,
finding everything as you have indicated. Here is the chromatic octave
between C=256 & C=512", the values for the C major scale are identical to
the Pythagorian tunings.
Paul


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marysol Gonzalez Sterling" <biosonica@...>
To: "biosonic forum" <biosonic@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 5:58 AM
Subject: [biosonic] frequencies and astrology


> a message from Michael Heleus on frequencies and astrology from this forum
> Hope you might like what you find at Hotson's
> quantum astrology forum at
>
http://www.zeitlin.net/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&forum=Hotson_Physic\
s&history=0
> interesting enough to post some of it on Biosonic.
> love,
> Michael
>
>
> > > Dear Gerry,
> > > More thoughts on the Song of the Earth and
> > the
> > > Music of the Spheres. About F sharp: The
ancient
> > > Chinese called it "Hu", the tone of the Earth.
The
> > > King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid sings to
this
> > > frequency even when no sounds are being
produced.
> > > Native American flute makers tune their
> > instruments to
> > > this note to serenade the Earth Mother.
> > > However I found that when I computed this
> > tone, I
> > > used my approximation of the earth's diameter
of
> > 8000
> > > miles. The sea-level diameter is somewhat
less, so
> > > that the earth's resonant frequency comes out
> > somewhat
> > > higher, around 376 hz, which is higher than
the
> > A4=440
> > > f sharp, which is 370 hz. (Actually, of
course,
> > the
> > > first harmonic resonant frequency is 23.5 hz,
> > > F#0.)However it still makes a good harmonic
fourth
> > > with the Sound of the Universe, 272 hz.
> > > The fact that the earth has a 'sound'
> > hearable by
> > > sensitives all over the world means that other
> > planets
> > > also must have a 'sound' that they broadcast
> > through
> > > the BEC. As I mentioned in my paper, these
> > 'sounds'
> > > have a pronounced effect on the electron
densities
> > in
> > > the Earth's ionosphere, the effects peaking
when
> > the
> > > planets are nearest. (Harnishmacher and Rawer,
> > > 1981).(This might be especially interesting to
> > Ted).
> > > Jupiter, of course, thunders out a major third
> > chord,
> > > 272 hz and 5/4ths higher, 340 hz. (This would
be
> > > closest to C#4 and F4). 272 hz is the 'sound'
of
> > its
> > > diametric harmonic, and 340 hz. is sounded by
the
> > > three Galilean satellites.
> > > Saturn 'sings' almost the same note as the
> > > Galilean satellites, 335 hz, again a major
third
> > (5/4
> > > ratio) above the 'Sound of the Universe'.
Uranus
> > sings
> > > almost the same note, an octave lower (172.6
hz),
> > a
> > > major fifth (3/2 ratio) below the Sound of the
> > > Universe. Mars sings almost the same note,
177.7
> > hz.
> > > The moon's fundamental is 86.2 hz, almost
exactly
> > F2.
> > > Venus sings a note a little higher than ours,
> > a
> > > fundamental of 24.77 hz, a little above G. If
you
> > are
> > > interested, I can figure Mercury, Neptune and
> > Pluto as
> > > well, though I suspect their 'songs' are too
weak
> > to
> > > be 'heard' on earth.
> > > Back to the connection with Astrology: Our
> > > bioplasma bodies are both ear and voice: they
both
> > > pick up signals from the universe, and send
out
> > > signals to it. At birth this sensitive system
> > > resonates to the 'sounds' of its surroundings,
> > > including the harmonics of the planets as they
> > 'sound'
> > > at that moment. It is 'struck' by these major
> > chords,
> > > and would tend to resonate (positive feedback)
> > > whenever the 'sounds' are the same or similar.
> > > Now, as to how it 'speaks', I am a little
> > more
> > > vague. but that it does has been established
over
> > and
> > > over..
>
> > Let me
> > > know what you think about all this.
> > > All my best, Don
>
>
>
> Dear Gerry,
> My ladder of octaves in part 2 established over
> and over that the wave function of a body is the
> result of the underlying BEC, and it is therefore
> based on the body's light-diameter, the
fundamental
> frequency being the time light takes to cross the
> body, as the BEC always vibrates at exactly C.
Thus
> the frequencies I mention are all based on a
> fundamental of the light-diameter of the body, or
> octaves thereof.
> The earth's fundamental, therefore, has a
> wavelength of the earth's diameter, 12756.28 m,
for a
> wavelength of 0.4255 light-seconds, or 23.50 hz.
This
> is near F sharp sub zero, which is 23.12 hz, or f
> sharp sub 4 of 276 hz.
> The fact that light won't cross an opaque body
> doesn't have anything to do with the fundamental,
> which is waving in the BEC, nor with an 'ion
cloud'.
> This was firmly established with the sun, whose
wave
> function and harmonics, establishing where the
planets
> condensed, was based on octaves of its diameter,
and
> with the gas giant planets, whose wave function,
> determining the stable positions of the
satellites,
> was also based on their equatorial diameters. The
wave
> function of earth, since we have less plasma, is
> perhaps weaker, but the fact that sensitives all
over
> the earth and at all periods of history can hear
the
> same note indicates that our wave function, like
all
> the others, is based on our light-diameter.
> Hope this clears this up. All my best, Don.
>
> And another:
> While the earth overall is nearly electrically
> neutral, it does have a magnetic field, which
requires
> an electrical field. Moreover the atmosphere is
> ionized to a greater or lesser extent, which is
why we
> have lightning. Crystals as in rock are ionized to
a
> degree depending on the exact configuration of the
> crystal. And the oceans have huge quantities of
> dissolved salts, which are ionized. All this is
> spinning at about 1000 mph, which is surely enough
to
> keep an underlying BEC in a turmoil and organizing
> this disturbance into a single waveform, which
would
> have its lowest energy configuration as the
largest
> wavelength, the diameter of a spherical object.
ok?
> Don
>
> And another:
> Dear Gerry,
> A few quick notes. I realized that the resonant
> harmonic of the gas giant planets was based on the
> cloud tops at their equator, which determined the
> stable nodes at which their satellites could form.
> With the Earth, the corresponding place would be
the
> ionosphere, the almost completely ionized top of
the
> atmosphere. Using this instead of the sea-level
> diameter gave even better values for F#, ones that
> make an almost perfect 4th (4/3) with Jupiter's
> harmonic, the "Sound of the Universe".
> Also, I didn't mention the reason I gave Das Lied
> von der Erde as the 'subject'. In writing his
"Song of
> the Earth, Mahler based its songs on Chinese
poetry,
> for which he chose the Pentatonic scale of the
five
> black notes on the piano, F#, G#, A#, B#, and C#.
Thus
> his "Song of the Earth" is, fittingly, written
> essentially in the key of F#, the Earth's own
resonant
> frequency. (He was perhaps familiar with ancient
> Chinese music, largely based on F# as "Hu", the
> Earth's sacred tone.) I also find that
Pythagorean,
> Ancient Egyptian, and Arabian music also are all
based
> on F#.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> To Post a message, send it to: biosonic@yahoogroups.com
>
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
biosonic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biosonic/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> biosonic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>