a message from Michael Heleus on frequencies and astrology from this forum
Hope you might like what you find at Hotson's
quantum astrology forum at
http://www.zeitlin.net/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&forum=Hotson_Physic\
s&history=0
interesting enough to post some of it on Biosonic.
love,
Michael


> > Dear Gerry,
> > More thoughts on the Song of the Earth and
> the
> > Music of the Spheres. About F sharp: The ancient
> > Chinese called it "Hu", the tone of the Earth. The
> > King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid sings to this
> > frequency even when no sounds are being produced.
> > Native American flute makers tune their
> instruments to
> > this note to serenade the Earth Mother.
> > However I found that when I computed this
> tone, I
> > used my approximation of the earth's diameter of
> 8000
> > miles. The sea-level diameter is somewhat less, so
> > that the earth's resonant frequency comes out
> somewhat
> > higher, around 376 hz, which is higher than the
> A4=440
> > f sharp, which is 370 hz. (Actually, of course,
> the
> > first harmonic resonant frequency is 23.5 hz,
> > F#0.)However it still makes a good harmonic fourth
> > with the Sound of the Universe, 272 hz.
> > The fact that the earth has a 'sound'
> hearable by
> > sensitives all over the world means that other
> planets
> > also must have a 'sound' that they broadcast
> through
> > the BEC. As I mentioned in my paper, these
> 'sounds'
> > have a pronounced effect on the electron densities
> in
> > the Earth's ionosphere, the effects peaking when
> the
> > planets are nearest. (Harnishmacher and Rawer,
> > 1981).(This might be especially interesting to
> Ted).
> > Jupiter, of course, thunders out a major third
> chord,
> > 272 hz and 5/4ths higher, 340 hz. (This would be
> > closest to C#4 and F4). 272 hz is the 'sound' of
> its
> > diametric harmonic, and 340 hz. is sounded by the
> > three Galilean satellites.
> > Saturn 'sings' almost the same note as the
> > Galilean satellites, 335 hz, again a major third
> (5/4
> > ratio) above the 'Sound of the Universe'. Uranus
> sings
> > almost the same note, an octave lower (172.6 hz),
> a
> > major fifth (3/2 ratio) below the Sound of the
> > Universe. Mars sings almost the same note, 177.7
> hz.
> > The moon's fundamental is 86.2 hz, almost exactly
> F2.
> > Venus sings a note a little higher than ours,
> a
> > fundamental of 24.77 hz, a little above G. If you
> are
> > interested, I can figure Mercury, Neptune and
> Pluto as
> > well, though I suspect their 'songs' are too weak
> to
> > be 'heard' on earth.
> > Back to the connection with Astrology: Our
> > bioplasma bodies are both ear and voice: they both
> > pick up signals from the universe, and send out
> > signals to it. At birth this sensitive system
> > resonates to the 'sounds' of its surroundings,
> > including the harmonics of the planets as they
> 'sound'
> > at that moment. It is 'struck' by these major
> chords,
> > and would tend to resonate (positive feedback)
> > whenever the 'sounds' are the same or similar.
> > Now, as to how it 'speaks', I am a little
> more
> > vague. but that it does has been established over
> and
> > over..

> Let me
> > know what you think about all this.
> > All my best, Don



Dear Gerry,
My ladder of octaves in part 2 established over
and over that the wave function of a body is the
result of the underlying BEC, and it is therefore
based on the body's light-diameter, the fundamental
frequency being the time light takes to cross the
body, as the BEC always vibrates at exactly C. Thus
the frequencies I mention are all based on a
fundamental of the light-diameter of the body, or
octaves thereof.
The earth's fundamental, therefore, has a
wavelength of the earth's diameter, 12756.28 m, for a
wavelength of 0.4255 light-seconds, or 23.50 hz. This
is near F sharp sub zero, which is 23.12 hz, or f
sharp sub 4 of 276 hz.
The fact that light won't cross an opaque body
doesn't have anything to do with the fundamental,
which is waving in the BEC, nor with an 'ion cloud'.
This was firmly established with the sun, whose wave
function and harmonics, establishing where the planets
condensed, was based on octaves of its diameter, and
with the gas giant planets, whose wave function,
determining the stable positions of the satellites,
was also based on their equatorial diameters. The wave
function of earth, since we have less plasma, is
perhaps weaker, but the fact that sensitives all over
the earth and at all periods of history can hear the
same note indicates that our wave function, like all
the others, is based on our light-diameter.
Hope this clears this up. All my best, Don.

And another:
While the earth overall is nearly electrically
neutral, it does have a magnetic field, which requires
an electrical field. Moreover the atmosphere is
ionized to a greater or lesser extent, which is why we
have lightning. Crystals as in rock are ionized to a
degree depending on the exact configuration of the
crystal. And the oceans have huge quantities of
dissolved salts, which are ionized. All this is
spinning at about 1000 mph, which is surely enough to
keep an underlying BEC in a turmoil and organizing
this disturbance into a single waveform, which would
have its lowest energy configuration as the largest
wavelength, the diameter of a spherical object. ok?
Don

And another:
Dear Gerry,
A few quick notes. I realized that the resonant
harmonic of the gas giant planets was based on the
cloud tops at their equator, which determined the
stable nodes at which their satellites could form.
With the Earth, the corresponding place would be the
ionosphere, the almost completely ionized top of the
atmosphere. Using this instead of the sea-level
diameter gave even better values for F#, ones that
make an almost perfect 4th (4/3) with Jupiter's
harmonic, the "Sound of the Universe".
Also, I didn't mention the reason I gave Das Lied
von der Erde as the 'subject'. In writing his "Song of
the Earth, Mahler based its songs on Chinese poetry,
for which he chose the Pentatonic scale of the five
black notes on the piano, F#, G#, A#, B#, and C#. Thus
his "Song of the Earth" is, fittingly, written
essentially in the key of F#, the Earth's own resonant
frequency. (He was perhaps familiar with ancient
Chinese music, largely based on F# as "Hu", the
Earth's sacred tone.) I also find that Pythagorean,
Ancient Egyptian, and Arabian music also are all based
on F#.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]