--- In biophoton@yahoogroups.com, Gail Evans <sewtulsa1@...> wrote:
>
> I use the F165/ABPA for lyme treatments on a regular basis. Very practical,
since you
don't have to sit in front of a machine or hold on to hand cylinders, since the
programs I
use run for a long time.
>
> I have also recently used it to clear up a rescue dog's mange and various skin
problems.
I used a combination program from TrueRife.com and selected parasite/pathogen
frequencies from the CAFL. The dog was in real bad shape, and showed a huge
improvement in 2-3 days.
>
> ge
>
Hi Gail,
I'm using the ABPA A2 to send Jeff Sutherland's Lyme frequencies from my
FScan. I was
making good progress with just the FScan, but the electrode pads were beginning
to make
my skin rash, and I felt 'tethered' to my Lyme disease. Now, wireless and much
happier,
I'm torn between using frequencies to kill the pathogens, and simply using the
ABPA A2 to
balance my body and build my immune system to be inhospitable to the pathogens.
I don't want the 'bugs' to get the upper hand, even short-term. After a year of
FScan work,
I don't want to lose ground to them, and I know they continue to emerge and
proliferate.

Alan Back speaks of the safety codes in the A2 which can't do harm, and I'm
wondering if
you or anyone out there knows what happens to MOR frequencies, when driven or
broadcast by APBA A2. Can they still kill the pathogens? Does sending, with
Auto-Auto,
bypass the codes so the frequencies can still shatter the 'bugs'?

L&L,
Lena
> ---------------------------------
> Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
> always stay connected to friends.
>