Re: Photos ... Polaroid or Digital?
Thanks ... guess I needed to hear someone say that ... I was
starting to doubt the results I was getting. I have the new nikon
10 mexapixel and was printing them with highest quality on 8 1/2 x
11 and found that a well taken polaroid blows it away in results. I
still find that a spot of blood as a "witness" works the best. I
was also imprinting onto small vials of filtered water (1/6 vodka to
kill bacteria) and find that a cleared quartz crystal really does
the job. Love this machine!
Thanks for the input!
Robert
-- In
biophoton@yahoogroups.com, "tymetoplay2001"
<tymetoplay2001@y...> wrote:
>
> My experience (practitioner of 30 yrs), has shown me that the
poloroid
> photos work much better than digital...have found digitals give
false
> readings when doing testing and are flat energetically.
>
> Jeff did some transmissions via his machine and mine that produced
no
> results for me,a few years ago...digital photo he produced was the
> witness...not saying it was because of the digital...just sharing
> outcome using digital...
>
> I recommend poloroids over digitals...
>
> Byron
>
>
>
>
> --- In
biophoton@yahoogroups.com, "QB" <quantumbalancing@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > Dr. Jeff Sutherland believes that digital photographs can be
very
> > effective when used with the ABPA. He reported this on his
website
> > (
http://www.frequencyresearch.org/) as shown below:
> >
> > The Advanced Biophoton Analyzer (ABPA) is a device that can be
used
> > for many purposes. One of them is to broadcast frequencies on a
very
> > low frequency carrier wave that can penetrate the earth and is
> > independent of distance. Years of work on refining the
> > hardware/software setup of this device enables excellent effects
at
> > a distance. The frequency effect on a living organism at a
remote
> > location is comparable to being in the room with an EMEM plasma
> > device or directly connected to electrodes. Contact Dale Fawcett
at
> > (360) 598-6585 to discuss details of how this is possible.
> >
> > The ABPA has some advantages over direct contact with frequency
> > devices as it is able to monitor the energy system of the target
and
> > only transmit information that will balance that energy system
and
> > bring it into a higher energy state. It is a self-correcting
device
> > that works with and enhances the effect of frequency generators
> > attached to it.
> >
> > I am often asked about using the Advanced Biophoton Analyzer
(ABPA)
> > with frequency devices and how to connect an F160 or FSCAN. The
> > photo above shows an F160 connected to the ABPA wire which runs
> > under the ABPA input well.
> >
> > The wire that comes with the ABPA has the best impedance match
to
> > the device and provides about five times the power output of
using
> > common phono jack cable that is terminated correctly with a 50
ohm
> > resistor. Because the APBA cable has a mini-phono jack at the
end of
> > it you will need a female mini-phono jack to male phono jack
> > converter from Radio Shack that will allow the ABPA cable to
plug
> > into an FSCAN2. Use the power port on the FSCAN2 with the
voltage
> > turned all the way up to 16 volts. This provides the maximum
> > magnetic field around the cable. Placing the cable under the
input
> > well of the ABPA allows the magnetic field around the cable to
> > extend up into the input well where it is scanned and
transmitted.
> >
> > The F160 has a female BNC connector so you must get an
additional
> > part from Radio Shack. You need a female phono jack to male BNC
> > connector converter. Turn the voltage all the way up on the F160
as
> > well. This will work for FSCANs with BNC connectors.
> >
> > There are eight switches on the ABPA. For frequency work they
should
> > be set as follows:
> >
> > Inherited IDF - Off
> > Chemical Sensitivities - Off
> > Dampening Field - Off
> > Antidote/Clone - Auto
> > Balance/Neutralize - Auto
> > On/Off - On
> > Send/Off - Send
> > Plant/Animal - Auto
> >
> > A final tip that will magnify the output of the ABPA is to take
a
> > high resolution photo of the target and print it out on 8.5x11"
> > paper on a high quality printer (1200 dpi or better). Fold the
paper
> > into quarters and put it in the photo well of the ABPA.
> >
> > The improvement in performance with these strategies is quite
> > significant. Hooking up the cable properly with increase
> > effectiveness by 5 times. Using a high resolution digital photo
> > instead of a Polaroid photo will give another 5 fold
improvement.
> > Taking the picture with the camera on a tripod will double the
> > effective resolution and multiply output by 2. Finally, printing
the
> > photo in an 8.5x11" format gives a fourfold gain. You now have a
> > device that works 5x5x2x4=200 times better than previously!
> >
> > The only challenge remaining is finding the right frequencies
for
> > your purposes. As Dr. Royal Rife once said, if you have the
wrong
> > frequency or set of frequencies you will get no effect. For help
in
> > finding the right frequencies for your needs, contact the
Frequency
> > Research Foundation.
> >
>