if cyclists ride two or more abreast and it's not a substandard width lane if riding single file (e.g. a motorist and a bicyclist can safely share the lane) then I certainly agree with you. Cyclists shouldn't unnecessarily impede traffic.
But if a lane is substandard width then by not using your right to control the lane you may not hurt your image, but you may get your body hurt. Have you ever been passed very closely by high-speed traffic? It's not very pleasant and it's best to avoid this situation.
I can give you a specific example why, depending on the situation, riding three abreast is sometimes better for both bicyclist and motorist:
I used to do the Coffee Republic out of Folsom sometimes. It starts out over Santa Juanita Ave (which runs into Barton later).
Santa Juanita has very narrow lanes and if I
ride by myself I control the lane since anything else is too dangerous. Usually the Folsom ride goes double file.
One time I went on the ride people urged to go single file. That doubled the distance that motorists needed to pass all the cyclists. It invited for car drivers to go by but guess what happened when there was oncoming traffic? The motorist had to squeeze back into the lane, which was not really wide enough to share. It made it uncomfortable for the car driver, for the bicyclists and even for the oncoming traffic.
In that case, triple file would have further reduced the distance needed to pass. Motorists then have to make the same decision they will have to take when they pass other vehicles. Is it safe to pass? Fortunately, it's much quicker to pass such a relatively short 'peloton'.
But just like you wouldn't pass a slow moving tractor-trailer before a blind turn, you shouldn't pass a cyclist either.
bjorn
PS: David is teaching the LAB's road I class tonight at 5pm at Rayley's Event Center (1915 Douglas Blv). I think there are still open spots and these and many other advanced bicycling techniques will be discussed (more info at: http://www.bikingroseville.org/interest.htm but note that the class will be held at Rayley's, not at West Yost Associates)
PPS: On the Folsom ride I was yelled at for not riding 'in the ditch' and instead controlling the lane. Yelled at by cyclists who a couple of minutes later ran a four-way stop, with a car waiting.... Now there's more than an image problem here...
--- On Sat, 9/5/09, Brian McCarrel <just_ryd@...> wrote:
From: Brian McCarrel <just_ryd@...> Subject: Re: [bikingroseville] Re: Do cyclists have an image problem? To:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 7:44 AM
What I refer to is cyclists riding side-by-side, or sometimes three and four abreast when traffic is present and they should be single file. The attitude that we can take the entire lane even though we don't need to is one of the things that hurts us. Its called courtesy. Some of us need to show it more often. Yes, we have the RIGHT to take the lane, but should we do it if it hurts that precious image?
- On Thu, 9/3/09, Bob Shanteau <RMShant@gmail. com> wrote:
From: Bob Shanteau <RMShant@gmail. com> Subject: Re: [bikingroseville] Re: Do cyclists have an image problem? To: bikingroseville@ yahoogroups. com Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 8:32 PM
just_ryd wrote: > I dislike the hell-raising, beer-drinking, loud, smelly biker just as much as the obnoxious cyclist that doesn't give room to traffic or hogs the lane. There's enough pavement out there for ALL of us.
I'm curious what you mean by "the obnoxious cyclist that doesn't give room to traffic or hogs the lane." Don't you agree that a cyclist has the right to control a lane that is too narrow to share side-by-side with a vehicle?
Bob Shanteau Transportation Engineering Liaison California Association of Bicycling Organizations
What I refer to is cyclists riding side-by-side, or sometimes three and four abreast when traffic is present and they should be single file. The attitude that we can take the entire lane even though we don't need to is one of the things that hurts us. Its called courtesy. Some of us need to show it more often. Yes, we have the RIGHT to take the lane, but should we do it if it hurts that precious image?
- On Thu, 9/3/09, Bob Shanteau <RMShant@...> wrote:
From: Bob Shanteau <RMShant@...> Subject: Re: [bikingroseville] Re: Do cyclists have an image problem? To: bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 8:32 PM
just_ryd wrote: > I dislike the hell-raising, beer-drinking, loud, smelly biker just as much as the obnoxious cyclist that doesn't give room to traffic or hogs the lane. There's enough pavement out there for ALL of us.
I'm curious what you mean by "the obnoxious cyclist that doesn't give room to traffic or hogs the lane." Don't you agree that a cyclist has the right to control a lane that is too narrow to share side-by-side with a vehicle?
Bob Shanteau Transportation Engineering Liaison California Association of Bicycling Organizations
Exactly my point. But a lot less people would suggest that we take motorcycles
off the road. We are in some of the same positions with regards to public
opinion, but generally people see motorcycles as cool and spandex as weird.
Moreover, the loud and smelly parts where referring to the bike, and the beer
belly is just a statistic, and no offence with the jerk comment, I'm a jerk too.
And riding a bicycle does not negate this.
--- In bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com, "just_ryd" <just_ryd@...> wrote:
Awww c'mon now! Let's not throw down the stereotypes. I ride road bikes,
mountain bikes, sport bikes, and a Harley. The same type of misunderstanding
about cyclists happens with Harleys. People assume us to be "loud, smelly, jerks
with beer bellies". Just like anything else, one bad example ruins it for those
of us that respect the law and society...
just_ryd wrote:
> I dislike the hell-raising, beer-drinking, loud, smelly biker just as much as
the obnoxious cyclist that doesn't give room to traffic or hogs the lane.
There's enough pavement out there for ALL of us.
I'm curious what you mean by "the obnoxious cyclist that doesn't give
room to traffic or hogs the lane." Don't you agree that a cyclist has
the right to control a lane that is too narrow to share side-by-side
with a vehicle?
Bob Shanteau
Transportation Engineering Liaison
California Association of Bicycling Organizations
--- In bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com, "kan7an" <gcmack@...> wrote:
>
> I found out that Roseville will be hosting a "Hog Rally" in October, which got
me thinking. It is strange that the bad cyclists are accused of many of the bad
behaviors of bad motorcyclist, but we are told to get off of the road, and
motorcycles are seen as cool. Though I do not suggest that we become loud,
smelly, jerks with beer bellies, maybe we could take a few pointers from them on
P.R.? Maybe I should get horns for my helmet...
>
Awww c'mon now! Let's not throw down the stereotypes. I ride road bikes,
mountain bikes, sport bikes, and a Harley. The same type of misunderstanding
about cyclists happens with Harleys. People assume us to be "loud, smelly, jerks
with beer bellies". Just like anything else, one bad example ruins it for those
of us that respect the law and society. I dislike the hell-raising,
beer-drinking, loud, smelly biker just as much as the obnoxious cyclist that
doesn't give room to traffic or hogs the lane. There's enough pavement out there
for ALL of us.
Plus its really cool when I pull up to a cyclist on the Harley when they're
fixing a flat and ask if they need any help. And I would gladly give up the
motorcycles before the bicycles ...
I found out that Roseville will be hosting a "Hog Rally" in October, which got
me thinking. It is strange that the bad cyclists are accused of many of the bad
behaviors of bad motorcyclist, but we are told to get off of the road, and
motorcycles are seen as cool. Though I do not suggest that we become loud,
smelly, jerks with beer bellies, maybe we could take a few pointers from them on
P.R.? Maybe I should get horns for my helmet...
I saw this in my Whole Foods Market email newsletter. - Jade
Saturday, September 5th
Whole Foods Market Cycling Team Appearance!
11:00 - 1:00 PM FREE!
Bring
the whole family and their bikes for a fun filled event! The Health is
Wealth cycling team powered by Whole Foods Market will be making their
first appearance at our store! Participants will have the chance to
have a complimentary bike safety check and helmet fittings! This is
your chance to get a picture taken with the team with a personalized
autograph! Complementary refreshments will be provided by Whole Foods
Market! To keep up with the team visit: www.healthiswealthteam.com
I have a Downtube FS9 Folding bike
you may borrow Picture attached. The bike bag zipper is broken, but is
usable if you need. Let me know as I will have to reinstall the folding
pedals, cause I have it configured for my bike shoes currently.
Al
From:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dour, Mike Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009
4:45 PM To:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com Cc: Tony Powers Subject: [bikingroseville] Folding
Bicycles
Hi folks – There has been some discussion amongst our Transit
provider about whether or not folding bicycles are appropriate on our buses. To
aid in this discussion, we would like to borrow a folding bicycle for a test
“ride”. Does anyone out there have a folding bicycle that I can
borrow either later this week or first thing next week? Thanks! Mike Dour
Michael Dour Alternative
Transportation Analyst - Bikeways
Public Works - AlternativeTransportation City of Roseville
401 Vernon
St. Roseville, CA95678
(916) 746-1304
(916) 746-1333 fax www.roseville.ca.us/pw
Too bad I left mine in Europe. I was prepared to bring it but had it in a regular bike box. It used to be free to bring the bike across the pond with most airlines, but now they charge $200 - one-way!
I have used my folding bicycle in trains in Europe as well as in buses in San Jose. It is smaller than baby carriages or wheelchairs, so really shouldn't be a problem.
bjorn
--- On Tue, 9/1/09, Dour, Mike <mdour@...> wrote:
From: Dour, Mike <mdour@...> Subject: [bikingroseville] Folding Bicycles To: bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com Cc: "Tony Powers" <tonypowers@...> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 4:44 PM
Hi folks – There has been some
discussion amongst our Transit provider about whether or not folding bicycles
are appropriate on our buses. To aid in this discussion, we would like to
borrow a folding bicycle for a test “ride”. Does anyone out there
have a folding bicycle that I can borrow either later this week or first thing
next week? Thanks! Mike Dour
Michael Dour Alternative
Transportation Analyst - Bikeways
Public Works - Alternative Transportation
City of Roseville
401 Vernon St.
Roseville , CA 95678
(916) 746-1304
(916) 746-1333 fax www.roseville. ca.us/pw
From: Folsom
Area Bicycle Advocates [mailto:bikefolsom@...] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009
10:26 AM To: undisclosed-recipients Subject: Folsom Cyclebration
coming soon!
Folsom's annual bike festival Cyclebration is
fast approaching, September 11th-13th.
FABA has offered to help with bike parking again as well as provide
bike ambassadors. Bike ambassadors must be able to ride a metric or half
metric century and assist riders with flats, directions and other problems
during the ride. FABA provided them last year as well and riders really
enjoyed it.
Last year FABA set their single day parking record with 297 bikes
parked, we will most likely break it this year. We will need plenty of
volunteers to make this happen.
The expo will be at Negro Bar and runs from 10AM to 5PM.
Bike parking shifts:
Setup - 9AM-Noon
Swing - Noon-3PM
Close - 3PM-6PM
Ambassadors:
Ride starts at 8AM
Bike parking shifts are flexible, don't worry if you need to come
earlier or later than a given shift, any and all help is greatly needed and
appreciated.
Please let us know if you can help out on this great event.
Allow me to tag off your juxtaposition of cycling topics, Rich. In the eyes of some motorists (I've no idea what percentage), I say we have a generalized image of not being predictable roadway users. To those we try to entice into giving on-the-road cycling a try, I see reflected back the image of someone too crazy to know certain injury or death is just a bike ride away. That makes TWO image problems!
Should we care? Do we need to repair our tarnished image? If so, to what end? Is it to achieve improved respect in the eyes of our fellow roadway users? Should there be more cyclists? Both seem like worthy goals to me.
To achieve these goals, I suggest the following "lead by example" actions. I pledge to do them. Please add your
own:
1) Be a good roadway citizen. Ride predictably. Be courteous.
2) Talk about why you like cycling. Smile while you're doing. It is fun, right?
Happy pedaling,
David
From: Rich Wilson <wk633@...> To: bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:27:10 PM Subject: Re: [bikingroseville] Do cyclists have an image problem?
I've been unusually silent on this.
I think we have an image problem in so much as there the stereotype of the scofflaw cyclist. I don't know what percentage of us really are the type that anti-cyclist commentors to new stories like to rant about, but a lot of drivers say 'cyclist' with a sneer. Not that cyclists don't return the favor.
Unfortunately, 'cyclist' is far to disparate a group to address. I think we are teen-with-new- license-and- Camero through grandpa-and- his-Carolla through soccer-mom-and- her-Escalade times
100.
I'm not sure how we can effectivly change the image of 'us' when we are not 'us'. I'm sometimes spandex-guy- doing-solo- century and sometimes dad-taking-son- to-library- in-trailer, but I'm never drunk-guy-going- for-6pack or scared-new-rider- on-sidewalk- next-to-massive- bike-lane. And don't even get me going on dad-teaching- kids-to-ride- against-traffic.
----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Scott Robertson <srobertson@...> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:35:16 PM Subject: Invitation to 2nd
Loomis Bike and Trails Master Plan Workshop
A big THANK YOU to all who participated in the 1st Bikeway and Trails Master Plan Workshop. The feedback we received from the meeting and the surveys was very useful.
Our second workshop is scheduled for Wednesday, September 23rd from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM. Please see the attached flyer for more information.
See you there!
Scott
----------------------------------------------------- OMNI-MEANS, Ltd. Scott A. Robertson, Associate
I just spent some time in Washington DC and dealt with a similar
issue on the “Metro” (light rail).
During peak hours folding bikes are allowed on trains ONLY if
they are (folded) in a bag.
Outside peak hours all regular (non-powered) bikes are allowed
on trains.
Granted regular bikes need to go on the front of buses. The
folding bikes in a bag are easy on the train interiors, and are about the side
of a large suitcase. I hope you have a nice ride J
-Damien
From:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dour, Mike Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:45 PM To: bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com Cc: Tony Powers Subject: [bikingroseville] Folding Bicycles
Hi folks –
There has been some discussion amongst our Transit provider about whether or
not folding bicycles are appropriate on our buses. To aid in this discussion,
we would like to borrow a folding bicycle for a test “ride”. Does anyone out
there have a folding bicycle that I can borrow either later this week or first
thing next week? Thanks! Mike Dour
Michael Dour Alternative Transportation
Analyst - Bikeways
Public Works - Alternative Transportation
City of Roseville
401 Vernon St.
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 746-1304
(916) 746-1333 fax www.roseville.ca.us/pw
Hi folks – There has been some
discussion amongst our Transit provider about whether or not folding bicycles
are appropriate on our buses. To aid in this discussion, we would like to
borrow a folding bicycle for a test “ride”. Does anyone out there
have a folding bicycle that I can borrow either later this week or first thing
next week? Thanks! Mike Dour
Michael Dour Alternative
Transportation Analyst - Bikeways
Public Works - AlternativeTransportation City of Roseville
401 Vernon St. Roseville, CA95678
(916) 746-1304
(916) 746-1333 fax www.roseville.ca.us/pw
Hi Everyone-
With shorter days here, we re-vised rider
start times as follows:
4:00pm Men C, Women C, Juniors
4:30pm Kids up to 6 y.o.
5:00pm Men B
6:15pm Men A, Women A
Gates open at 2pm for pre-ride, or just
recreation riding on the crit course.
09/05/09 Raffle Items:
Road and Rack 4/5 Bike Rack,
One 2 shuttle pass from Yuba Expedition
Norco Beer Glasses, set of 4
REI Day Pack, and more swag stuff.
09/19/09 Raffle Items:
Raffling One night at Outside Inn,
Set of Maxxis Downhill tires.
'09 Giant Anthem Full Suspension Frame, Large
and more swag stuff.
Links to event website and photos:
http://www.lomaricaranch.com/twilightMBR.htmlhttp://www.robertnlowe.com/
For questions call or send email to Jet Lowe
lowejet@..., cell (916)207-4609
I think we have an image problem in so much as there the stereotype of the scofflaw cyclist. I don't know what percentage of us really are the type that anti-cyclist commentors to new stories like to rant about, but a lot of drivers say 'cyclist' with a sneer. Not that cyclists don't return the favor.
Unfortunately, 'cyclist' is far to disparate a group to address. I think we are teen-with-new-license-and-Camero through grandpa-and-his-Carolla through soccer-mom-and-her-Escalade times 100.
I'm not sure how we can effectivly change the image of 'us' when we are not 'us'. I'm sometimes spandex-guy-doing-solo-century and sometimes dad-taking-son-to-library-in-trailer, but I'm never
drunk-guy-going-for-6pack or scared-new-rider-on-sidewalk-next-to-massive-bike-lane. And don't even get me going on dad-teaching-kids-to-ride-against-traffic.
For the record, Bjorn, my "freak out factor" is not contained only to two wheels. It also involves cars with four wheels, trucks with multiple axels, dogs, deer, cats, birds, soccer balls, small children, and little old people trying to cross the crosswalk. lol.....
I also should have said "Good drivers AND cyclists" who anticipate what's going on, keep us ALL safe.
In a message dated 8/28/2009 12:01:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, bjhaake@... writes:
Good points made so far by everyone.
I would add to the fact that cyclists not obeying the rules there is also a lack of understanding of the vehicle code by motorists.
But I also think people are just in general complaining - motorists about bicyclists, bicyclists about motorists and other bicyclists and motorists about other motorists.
When I watch traffic I always see some car drivers drive aggressively, even using their horns, against other car drivers (I avoid riding with my dad, who goes 120mph on the Autobahn with barely 5ft to spare to the guy ahead...).
I am sure if you say in a random conversation that some motorist cut you off people will be able to agree and quickly tell a similar story.
So when somebody says he is teaching bicycle classes then it seems natural that people who had bad encounters with bicyclists will remember those. It just happens that there are a lot more motorists than bicyclists, so you hear the story more often.
I will agree with those who say we bicyclists need to be extra careful to obey the rules, to not add more fuel to the discussion (I'll keep my points about why I don't like stop signs in residential areas for some other discussion...).
I do have a couple of thoughts on maliz128 email:
> That being said, the slightest cycling infraction on the road can freak me out as a driver.
This is an interesting point. Why is it just cycling infractions that freak you out? A car driver going through a red light while you have green doesn't bother you? I witnessed an accident a few years ago where one motorist had entered the intersection and another one approached at high speed and caused an accident. The lady in the car that was being hit was pretty freaked out, actually.
> "Good drivers" tend to anticipate what's happening on the road.
I fully agree with this. And drivers extend to bicyclists, of course. If I wouldn't anticipate things as a bicyclist I'd have been toast for a few decades already.
I can't even count the number of times I had to give up my right of way (especially in Europe, where one of the most common accidents is a cyclist being hit on a bike path riding through an intersection).
I remember when a car pulled out of a parking lot, obviously not seeing me and my cousin while we simply rode along. I stopped, while my cousin was hit (albeit very slightly and no major harm done).
Interestingly enough somebody once commented on my above story where I witnessed a car accident, "Wow, it could have been you." I disagree with that as I had already anticipated the accident when I could barely see the car - the motor noise gave away the speed and the crash potential...
As a mostly driver, let me weigh in. Most "full time" cyclists I know ARE courteous -- and obey the rules of the road - despite my fears that they can hit a rock, a bump, see a snake, or have a tree fall (or spring up) into their path that will cause them to swerve into my lane, cause immense damage to my already dirty windshield, and lifetime damage to my psyche. That being said, the slightest cycling infraction on the road can freak me out as a driver.
Of course, I'm speaking in hyperbole. But I have a point.
"Good drivers" tend to anticipate what's happening on the road. If a cyclist doesn't appear to be following the rules, we know who suffers the most when its bike vs. car. No driver wants to voluntarily arrange for a cyclist to meet their maker. I think this is the reason why drivers can be touchy (wee-weed up?) if a cyclist isn't super courteous.
And for the record, I think there are many way bad drivers than cyclists.
In a message dated 8/27/2009 6:07:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdour@roseville. ca.us writes:
Hi David – Yes, Yes, Yes.
The extreme cases that Damien mentioned definitely give bicyclists a bad name. However, even “mostly compliant” bicyclists (e.g. those who roll through stop signs) are noted by non-bicyclists as examples of boorish bicyclist behavior.
When I’m talking to non-cyclists I try to remind them, as the old Depeche Mode song goes, People are People. See simple substitutions of bicyclist (motorist) below that somewhat hold true across population.
There’s a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that follower the letter of the law and stop at every stop sign (never exceed speed limit). The vast majority of bicyclists (motorists) take a calculated risk and ride through stop signs (exceed the speed limit) because they believe they can operate slightly outside the letter of the law and still not be a harm to themselves or others. There is a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that take excessive risks like riding the wrong way and running red lights (excessive speed, running red lights). It could be argued that the percentage of bicyclists that take these excessive risks is higher than that of motorists because of a variety of factors (less enforcement on bicyclists, less training for bicyclists, maneuverability of bicycles, younger age groups, etc.)
As a minority, it may be advisable for cyclists to take actions to exceed the societal norms (extra courteous and cautious) in order to make bicycling become more accepted and mainstream.
Mike Dour
From: bikingroseville@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:bikingrosev ille@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf Of Biking Roseville Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:37 PM To: BikingRoseville Group Subject: [bikingroseville] Do cyclists have an image problem?
BikingRosevillains,
I noticed the bicycle advocates in New York City , Transportation Alternatives, are running a contest to produce a video public service message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville , I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy by sharing the public roadswith others, following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a few who aren't the best ambassadors of on-road cycling, but they're a minority. Yet it seems whenever non-cyclists find out about my cycling advocacy and education efforts, they often comment on how cyclists never stop at stop signs, ride against traffic, don't look where they're going and on and on...
Is this reasonable feedback? Are we being held to a higher standard for some reason? Do we have an image problem?
Good points made so far by everyone.
I would add to the fact that cyclists not obeying the rules there is also a lack
of understanding of the vehicle code by motorists.
But I also think people are just in general complaining - motorists about
bicyclists, bicyclists about motorists and other bicyclists and motorists about
other motorists.
When I watch traffic I always see some car drivers drive aggressively, even
using their horns, against other car drivers (I avoid riding with my dad, who
goes 120mph on the Autobahn with barely 5ft to spare to the guy ahead...).
I am sure if you say in a random conversation that some motorist cut you off
people will be able to agree and quickly tell a similar story.
So when somebody says he is teaching bicycle classes then it seems natural that
people who had bad encounters with bicyclists will remember those. It just
happens that there are a lot more motorists than bicyclists, so you hear the
story more often.
I will agree with those who say we bicyclists need to be extra careful to obey
the rules, to not add more fuel to the discussion (I'll keep my points about why
I don't like stop signs in residential areas for some other discussion...).
I do have a couple of thoughts on maliz128 email:
> That being said, the slightest cycling infraction on the road can freak me out
as a driver.
This is an interesting point. Why is it just cycling infractions that freak you
out? A car driver going through a red light while you have green doesn't bother
you? I witnessed an accident a few years ago where one motorist had entered the
intersection and another one approached at high speed and caused an accident.
The lady in the car that was being hit was pretty freaked out, actually.
> "Good drivers" tend to anticipate what's happening on the road.
I fully agree with this. And drivers extend to bicyclists, of course. If I
wouldn't anticipate things as a bicyclist I'd have been toast for a few decades
already.
I can't even count the number of times I had to give up my right of way
(especially in Europe, where one of the most common accidents is a cyclist being
hit on a bike path riding through an intersection).
I remember when a car pulled out of a parking lot, obviously not seeing me and
my cousin while we simply rode along. I stopped, while my cousin was hit (albeit
very slightly and no major harm done).
Interestingly enough somebody once commented on my above story where I witnessed
a car accident, "Wow, it could have been you." I disagree with that as I had
already anticipated the accident when I could barely see the car - the motor
noise gave away the speed and the crash potential...
bjorn
--- On Thu, 8/27/09, maliz128@... <maliz128@...> wrote:
From: maliz128@... <maliz128@...>
Subject: Re: [bikingroseville] Do cyclists have an image problem?
To: bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 7:05 PM
Â
As a mostly driver, let me weigh in. Most "full time" cyclists I
know ARE courteous -- and obey the rules of the road - despite my
fears that they can hit a rock, a bump, see a snake, or have a tree fall
(or spring up) into their path that will cause them to swerve into my lane,
cause immense damage to my already dirty windshield, and lifetime damage to my
psyche. That being said, the slightest cycling infraction on the
road can freak me out as a driver.Â
Â
Of course, I'm speaking in hyperbole. But I have a
point.
Â
"Good drivers" tend to anticipate what's happening on the
road. If a cyclist doesn't appear to be following the rules, we
know who suffers the most when its bike vs. car. No
driver wants to voluntarily arrange for a cyclist to meet their
maker. I think this is the reason why drivers can be touchy (wee-weed
up?) if a cyclist isn't super courteous.
Â
And for the record, I think there are many way bad drivers than
cyclists. Â Â Â Â Â Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
In a message dated 8/27/2009 6:07:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
mdour@roseville. ca.us writes:
Â
Hi David – Yes, Yes,
Yes.
The extreme cases
that Damien mentioned definitely give bicyclists a bad name. However, even
“mostly compliant” bicyclists (e.g. those who roll through stop signs) are
noted by non-bicyclists as examples of boorish bicyclist behavior.
When I’m talking to
non-cyclists I try to remind them, as the old Depeche Mode song goes, People
are People. See simple substitutions of bicyclist (motorist) below that
somewhat hold true across population.
There’s a small
percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that follower the letter of the law and
stop at every stop sign (never exceed speed limit).
The vast
majority of bicyclists (motorists) take a calculated risk and ride through
stop signs (exceed the speed limit) because they believe they can operate
slightly outside the letter of the law and still not be a harm to themselves
or others.
There is a
small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that take excessive risks like
riding the wrong way and running red lights (excessive speed, running red
lights). It could be argued that the percentage of bicyclists that take
these excessive risks is higher than that of motorists because of a variety
of factors (less enforcement on bicyclists, less training for bicyclists,
maneuverability of bicycles, younger age groups, etc.)
As a minority, it may
be advisable for cyclists to take actions to exceed the societal norms (extra
courteous and cautious) in order to make bicycling become more accepted and
mainstream.
Mike
Dour
From:
bikingroseville@ yahoogroups. com
[mailto:bikingrosev ille@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf Of Biking Roseville
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:37
PM
To: BikingRoseville
Group
Subject:
[bikingroseville] Do cyclists have an image
problem?
Â
BikingRosevillains,
I noticed the bicycle advocates
in New York City , Transportation Alternatives, are
running a contest to produce a video public service
message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The
underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most
courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville ,
I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy by sharing the public
roadswith others, following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a
few who aren't the best ambassadors of on-road cycling, but they're a
minority. Yet it seems whenever non-cyclists find out about my cycling
advocacy and education efforts, they often comment on how cyclists never stop
at stop signs, ride against traffic, don't look where they're going and on and
on...
Is this reasonable
feedback? Are we being
held to a higher standard for some reason? Do we have an image problem?
David
From:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Biking Roseville Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 10:22 AM To: BikingRoseville Group Subject: [bikingroseville] More equal
Thanks
to Bob Shanteau, who works tirelessly with Caltrans on facility improvements for
cyclists, for sharing the good news that Caltrans has adopted a new policy on
detecting cyclists at signalized intersections. As intersections are
constructed or upgraded, they MUST detect a cyclist whether they are in a bike
lane or not. While it will take some time for this policy change to result in
actual facility changes, at least now it is California state policy that
cyclists must be detected. Today, cyclists became more equal users of our
public roadways.
Thanks to Bob Shanteau, who works tirelessly with Caltrans on facility improvements for cyclists, for sharing the good news that Caltrans has adopted a new policy on detecting cyclists at signalized intersections. As intersections are constructed or upgraded, they MUST detect a cyclist whether they are in a bike lane or not. While it will take some time for this policy change to result in actual facility changes, at least now it is California state policy
that cyclists must be detected. Today, cyclists became more equal users of our public roadways.
I would agree with Mike and maliz128. I think they have captured the essence of the issue, about cycling styles and the reason motorists get a little more uptight around us out there. I will admit to falling into Mike's "vast majority" category. I can't say exactly why, but more often than not it has to do with non-functioning signal sensors (the newly repaved Lead Hill comes to mind), or just wanting to keep a little momentum when possible and safe. That's why that little 1/4 mile "bike trail to nowhere", from the bridge on Harding to East avenue, is so great. It took two left turn traffic signals out of my commute. Now I can make two legal left turns (onto the bike trail, then onto Atlantic) with no signals, and it cuts 2 minutes off my commute.
I do see the same few gentleman on my commute who are riding their bikes on the sidewalks or bike lanes, against traffic, just about every time I am out there. But they are so mellow, probably don't own cars, are not getting in anyone's way, and they are on bikes(!) Those guys are okay with me. They are just getting around, and I don't think they are causing any problems.
Lastly, I think the most important thing I have learned from riding with David on my commutes occasionally, is to "take the lane" when there isn't enough space for bike and car. Make yourself visible well in advance of any obstacle, so that the cars see you. Overall the motorists have been mostly respectful on my commutes, when they see me and know what to expect from me.
My two cents,
Jim
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:05 PM, <maliz128@...> wrote:
As a mostly driver, let me weigh in. Most "full time" cyclists I know ARE courteous -- and obey the rules of the road - despite my fears that they can hit a rock, a bump, see a snake, or have a tree fall (or spring up) into their path that will cause them to swerve into my lane, cause immense damage to my already dirty windshield, and lifetime damage to my psyche. That being said, the slightest cycling infraction on the road can freak me out as a driver.
Of course, I'm speaking in hyperbole. But I have a point.
"Good drivers" tend to anticipate what's happening on the road. If a cyclist doesn't appear to be following the rules, we know who suffers the most when its bike vs. car. No driver wants to voluntarily arrange for a cyclist to meet their maker. I think this is the reason why drivers can be touchy (wee-weed up?) if a cyclist isn't super courteous.
And for the record, I think there are many way bad drivers than cyclists.
In a message dated 8/27/2009 6:07:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdour@... writes:
Hi David – Yes, Yes, Yes.
The extreme cases that Damien mentioned definitely give bicyclists a bad name. However, even “mostly compliant” bicyclists (e.g. those who roll through stop signs) are noted by non-bicyclists as examples of boorish bicyclist behavior.
When I’m talking to non-cyclists I try to remind them, as the old Depeche Mode song goes, People are People. See simple substitutions of bicyclist (motorist) below that somewhat hold true across population.
There’s a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that follower the letter of the law and stop at every stop sign (never exceed speed limit).
The vast majority of bicyclists (motorists) take a calculated risk and ride through stop signs (exceed the speed limit) because they believe they can operate slightly outside the letter of the law and still not be a harm to themselves or others.
There is a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that take excessive risks like riding the wrong way and running red lights (excessive speed, running red lights). It could be argued that the percentage of bicyclists that take these excessive risks is higher than that of motorists because of a variety of factors (less enforcement on bicyclists, less training for bicyclists, maneuverability of bicycles, younger age groups, etc.)
As a minority, it may be advisable for cyclists to take actions to exceed the societal norms (extra courteous and cautious) in order to make bicycling become more accepted and mainstream.
I noticed the bicycle advocates in New York City, Transportation Alternatives, are running a contest to produce a video public service message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville, I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy by sharing the public roadswith others, following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a few who aren't the best ambassadors of on-road cycling, but they're a minority. Yet it seems whenever non-cyclists find out about my cycling advocacy and education efforts, they often comment on how cyclists never stop at stop signs, ride against traffic, don't look where they're going and on and on...
Is this reasonable feedback?Are we being held to a higher standard for some reason? Do we have an image problem?
As a mostly driver, let me weigh in. Most "full time" cyclists I know ARE courteous -- and obey the rules of the road - despite my fears that they can hit a rock, a bump, see a snake, or have a tree fall (or spring up) into their path that will cause them to swerve into my lane, cause immense damage to my already dirty windshield, and lifetime damage to my psyche. That being said, the slightest cycling infraction on the road can freak me out as a driver.
Of course, I'm speaking in hyperbole. But I have a point.
"Good drivers" tend to anticipate what's happening on the road. If a cyclist doesn't appear to be following the rules, we know who suffers the most when its bike vs. car. No driver wants to voluntarily arrange for a cyclist to meet their maker. I think this is the reason why drivers can be touchy (wee-weed up?) if a cyclist isn't super courteous.
And for the record, I think there are many way bad drivers than cyclists.
In a message dated 8/27/2009 6:07:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdour@... writes:
Hi David – Yes, Yes, Yes.
The extreme cases that Damien mentioned definitely give bicyclists a bad name. However, even “mostly compliant” bicyclists (e.g. those who roll through stop signs) are noted by non-bicyclists as examples of boorish bicyclist behavior.
When I’m talking to non-cyclists I try to remind them, as the old Depeche Mode song goes, People are People. See simple substitutions of bicyclist (motorist) below that somewhat hold true across population.
There’s a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that follower the letter of the law and stop at every stop sign (never exceed speed limit).
The vast majority of bicyclists (motorists) take a calculated risk and ride through stop signs (exceed the speed limit) because they believe they can operate slightly outside the letter of the law and still not be a harm to themselves or others.
There is a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that take excessive risks like riding the wrong way and running red lights (excessive speed, running red lights). It could be argued that the percentage of bicyclists that take these excessive risks is higher than that of motorists because of a variety of factors (less enforcement on bicyclists, less training for bicyclists, maneuverability of bicycles, younger age groups, etc.)
As a minority, it may be advisable for cyclists to take actions to exceed the societal norms (extra courteous and cautious) in order to make bicycling become more accepted and mainstream.
Mike Dour
From: bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Biking Roseville Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:37 PM To: BikingRoseville Group Subject: [bikingroseville] Do cyclists have an image problem?
BikingRosevillains,
I noticed the bicycle advocates in New York City, Transportation Alternatives, are running a contest to produce a video public service message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville, I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy by sharing the public roadswith others, following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a few who aren't the best ambassadors of on-road cycling, but they're a minority. Yet it seems whenever non-cyclists find out about my cycling advocacy and education efforts, they often comment on how cyclists never stop at stop signs, ride against traffic, don't look where they're going and on and on...
Is this reasonable feedback?Are we being held to a higher standard for some reason? Do we have an image problem?
The extreme cases that Damien mentioned
definitely give bicyclists a bad name. However, even “mostly compliant”
bicyclists (e.g. those who roll through stop signs) are noted by non-bicyclists
as examples of boorish bicyclist behavior.
When I’m talking to non-cyclists I
try to remind them, as the old Depeche Mode song goes, People are People. See
simple substitutions of bicyclist (motorist) below that somewhat hold true
across population.
There’s
a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that follower the letter of
the law and stop at every stop sign (never exceed speed limit).
The
vast majority of bicyclists (motorists) take a calculated risk and ride
through stop signs (exceed the speed limit) because they believe they can
operate slightly outside the letter of the law and still not be a harm to
themselves or others.
There
is a small percentage of bicyclists (motorists) that take excessive risks
like riding the wrong way and running red lights (excessive speed, running
red lights). It could be argued that the percentage of bicyclists that
take these excessive risks is higher than that of motorists because of a
variety of factors (less enforcement on bicyclists, less training for
bicyclists, maneuverability of bicycles, younger age groups, etc.)
As a minority, it may be advisable for
cyclists to take actions to exceed the societal norms (extra courteous and
cautious) in order to make bicycling become more accepted and mainstream.
Mike Dour
From:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Biking Roseville Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009
4:37 PM To: BikingRoseville Group Subject: [bikingroseville] Do
cyclists have an image problem?
BikingRosevillains,
I noticed the bicycle advocates in New York City, Transportation Alternatives,
are running a contest to produce a video public
service message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The
underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most
courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville,
I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy by sharing the public roadswith
others, following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a few who aren't the best
ambassadors of on-road cycling, but they're a minority. Yet it seems whenever
non-cyclists find out about my cycling advocacy and education efforts, they
often comment on how cyclists never stop at stop signs, ride against traffic,
don't look where they're going and on and on...
Is this reasonable feedback?Are we being held to a higher standard for
some reason? Do we have an image problem?
If I would judge Roseville auto drivers by the incidences of red lights run,
speeding, swerving, inatentiveness, failure to stop at stop signs, and blocking
of crosswalks, I would think that Roseville has some of the worst drivers. It
is not that everyone is a bad driver, it is that the bad ones stand out. When
we say Roseville has bad drivers, most people would say that they are in fact
good drivers. However, when we say bicyclist don't follow the rules of the
road, most people do not ride in the road, so they can readily agree. Also,
anyone on a bicycle gets lumped into this category, whether they are a 12 year
old or 50+ year old asian with a bike fully loaded with all his possessions,
(saw one yesterday). This does not seem fair, because due to a lack of
enforcement, we will always have some cyclist doing outrageous things.
I have seen some bad behavior on bikes, but I would not say that the majority of
commuters are this way, but I am also not looking from the outside in. I think
that the goal of the video should be to show that there are a lot of courteous
bicyclist, and you can be one too.
Greg
p.s. I really do think Roseville has some of the worst drivers.
--- In bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com, "Keehn, Damien" <damien.keehn@...>
wrote:
>
> I think that (unfortunately) it's reasonable feedback.
I think that (unfortunately) it’s reasonable feedback. I
regularly see horrid cyclers in West Roseville soiling our image, and wrecking
havoc upon our community. Ok, seriously now… I do really see a
whole lot of terrible bicyclists. I watched some moron (adult) ride his
bike in 2 crosswalks (half way around an intersection) against all
lights/signals in front of oncoming traffic. All this in heavy traffic at
the intersection of foothills and pleasant grove. I think he even stopped halfway
across one of the crosswalks. It makes me irate.
I have approached a few folks who I deemed a menace to society
and asked them to try to obey vehicular laws. No one has punched me in the nose
yet J
-damien
From:
bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Biking Roseville Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:37 PM To: BikingRoseville Group Subject: [bikingroseville] Do cyclists have an image problem?
BikingRosevillains,
I
noticed the bicycle advocates in New York City, Transportation Alternatives,
are running a contest to produce a video public
service message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The
underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most
courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville, I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy
by sharing the public roadswith others,
following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a few who aren't the best ambassadors
of on-road cycling, but they're a minority. Yet it seems whenever non-cyclists
find out about my cycling advocacy and education efforts, they often comment on
how cyclists never stop at stop signs, ride against traffic, don't look where
they're going and on and on...
Is
this reasonable feedback? Are we being held to a higher standard for some
reason? Do we have an image problem?
--- On Thu, 8/27/09, Biking Roseville <bikingroseville@...> wrote:
From: Biking Roseville <bikingroseville@...> Subject: [bikingroseville] Bike Ed - Road Skills I class September 5 To: "BikingRoseville Group" <bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 4:36 PM
Hi Folks,
I will be teaching the Road Skills I class next Saturday, September 5, from 5-9 pm. This is the classroom-only portion of what the League of American Bicyclists now calls Traffic Skills 101. I'll teach the on-bike part in October.
While we don't get on the bikes in this month's class, it is highly interactive and hands-on. Whether you're considering your first ride on the roadways or looking for tips to make getting around by bike easier, we'll cover it in this class. More info at www.bikingroseville .org.
I encourage you to sign up. Just send me an email: bikingroseville@ yahoo.com.
I will be teaching the Road Skills I class next Saturday, September 5, from 5-9 pm. This is the classroom-only portion of what the League of American Bicyclists now calls Traffic Skills 101. I'll teach the on-bike part in October.
While we don't get on the bikes in this month's class, it is highly interactive and hands-on. Whether you're considering your first ride on the roadways or looking for tips to make getting around by bike easier, we'll cover it in this class. More info at www.bikingroseville.org.
I encourage you to sign up. Just send me an email: bikingroseville@....
I noticed the bicycle advocates in New York City, Transportation Alternatives, are running a contest to produce a video public service message to encourage cyclists to be courteous. The underlying message in my mind is that cyclists are not considered the most courteous users of NYC roadways. In my travels around Roseville, I see many cyclists demonstrating courtesy by sharing the public roadswith others, following the rules, etc. Sure, there are a few who aren't the best ambassadors of on-road cycling, but they're a minority. Yet it seems whenever non-cyclists find out about my cycling advocacy and education efforts, they often comment on how cyclists never stop at stop signs, ride against traffic, don't look where they're going and on and on...
Is this reasonable feedback? Are we being held to a higher standard for some reason? Do we have an image problem?
Exciting!:
The project is the first part of a plan
to develop 28 miles of the
Sacramento-Placerville Transportation
Corridor – former Southern Pacific
Railroad right of way – from the
Sacramento County line to Placerville.
http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2131924.html
A preview:
American River Conservancy will offer
preview hikes along the South Fork
American River Trail from 9 a.m. to 1
p.m. Sept. 5 and 26, Oct. 10 and 24, and
Nov. 7 and 21. For more information or
to sign up, call (530) 621-1224, or
e-mail julie@....
Mentioned in the article:
American River Conservancy
http://arconservancy.org/
Trails Now
http://www.trailsnow.org/
El Dorado County Transportation Commission
http://www.edctc.org/
-R