Thanks for posting this Bob. It is strange to see anything of significance
coming out of my home town of Tilton. I agree with the court decision, but I am
not sure how you interpret this to be a right to travel case for all legitimate
users. It seems that the court decided this on upon the disabilities act and
not general access. Let me know how you see this.

Greg
--- In bikingroseville@yahoogroups.com, Bob Shanteau <RMShant@...> wrote:
>
> A right to travel case is decided in favor of a disabled person,
> emphasizing that highways are for all legitimate users, including
> pedestrians (and bicyclists and operators of NEVs and mopeds and
> electric assist bicycles and ...).
>
> Bob Shanteau
>
> ***