Jeremy and colleagues,
Great topic…makes me want to rant on-and-on in a long
post J
We have never approached the “pre-season”
clinicals as optional and therefore we do not need to “recruit”
students to come-in for them. To do so makes it seem as if the students
are coming because your athletics department needs some extra hands… i.e.
students are coming as a labor force rather than for an educational experience.
This really isn’t the case, but it appears that way to the students
if you conceptualize these vital experiences as optional and recruit for them.
We need to realize and convey to our students is that this
is an EDUCATIONAL experience and treat it as such. Our colleagues in
other health care professions are not hung-up on following the regular year academic
calendar with clinicals for their students, so why are we? The students
of the other programs in our school (PT, OT, Rad Tech, Med Tech, respiratory
therapy, perfusion and dietetics) do REQUIRED clinical internships over the
summers and the students often have to pay for travel to a remote site and
secure housing there to do it. They also sometimes get paid for them too…
there’s a lesson there for CAATE to consider. IT’S TIME WE
THINK LIKE HEALTH CARE EDUCATORS and leave behind the conceptual limitations of
our physical education / kinesiology roots. We need to think of clinicals
as education and not work. It’s not about labor for two-a-days nor
is it a matter of giving students time-off to earn money; it’s about
educational requirements for a program of study at a university. Period. These
educational requirements are just as vital and non-negotiable as taking your
required coursework. You can’t skip out on the two-a-days
experience any more than you can skip out on taking anatomy. The truth is that
an AT student is NOT prepared to practice without having had this experience…
preferably several times so they know how to run it when they become an ATC. It’s
time we quit producing knowledgeable but unprepared students who don’t
understand the demands of the profession they are entering or how to best
accomplish these demands. We need to prepare them to practice, not just
to understand how to care for injuries and illnesses. It’s time we
realize that the accreditation standards are a MINIMUM set of program
requirements and NOT a blueprint for running a program. This is what
institutional autonomy is all about… creating program requirements for
the good of the student that make them better prepared (as opposed to just trying
to get out of meeting the minimum requirements). When and if we ever get there,
we’ll be able to quit using a process driven accreditation and move to an
outcome based one like many other health care professions... but that’s a
topic for a different rant J
Our approach at
For our upper classmen, it is a required part of their
autumn quarter clinical rotation and they were informed of the specific assignment
in the spring and planned for it. For them, the clinical begins before the
classroom part of the autumn quarter education, but it is still a required part
of their autumn quarter assignment (you come in when your ACI comes in with the
team they oversee). We struggled with how to better incorporate this
phase of clinicals into our educational program for our incoming sophomores (1st
year in the program) because we don’t make their autumn quarter
assignments until after we gain a better feel for their strengths and
weaknesses based on their two-a-days performance. We addressed this for these
new students by creating a separate course about athletic training in the
pre-season (ATH TRNG 350 – Managing Risks, Emergencies & Patient Care
in the Pre-Season). It runs on a specially approved alternative-term
calendar that runs from the day the students come in until the beginning of the
autumn term (it doesn’t match up with either our regular summer term or
our fall term). It includes classroom, lab, and clinical components throughout
the entire two-a-days period.
Our approach may not work for everyone, but it fits with our
program philosophy and mission that education is equally about the classroom
and the clinical and you can’t skimp on either.
Am I on the money or am I off my rocker? What do
others think?
- Mark

Mark A. Merrick, PhD, ATC
Associate Professor & Director
The
Division of Athletic Training
614-247-6231