Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
athletic_training_education
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Degree / Major Options   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2365 of 3451 |
Re: Degree / Major Options

I believe that this kind of dual-program is really the wrong signal to send. We
are essentially saying that our professional (entry-level) preparation program
is good pre-professional training for those interested in pursuing other
professions. That is very
dangerous. There is no way that any other professional health care program
would allow this to occur within their profession. Try to imagine a PT, PA, or
OT program allowing someone to take all of their didactic training, but avoid
the clinical training. It just would
not happen.

Plus, how would these non-AT students, who are not completing the clinical
training, be able to contribute in a meaningful way to course dialogue? The
discussions that occur in courses should engage students to draw upon their
concurrent clinical experiences?
Otherwise the clinical and didactic components are completely disjointed. How
do you reinforce clinical concepts presented in the classroom to students with
no experiental training?

Furthermore, we should not be teaching the knowledge and skills of athletic
training to people with no intentions of entering our profession. I assume
these non-AT students complete lab courses? So, we are saying that anyone can
learn our knowledge and skills
regardless of intent to enter our profession. This is highly troublesome and
contributes to the misperceptions about the quality of our education. Imagine
the students that pursue other health professions degrees and say, 'I know
everything an athletic trainer knows, I just never did the clinical education to
sit for the exam'.

I understand institutional autonomy, but I believe that this scenario is bad for
our profession. I would hope that accreditation standards and guidelines for
our health professions programs would expressly prohibit this kind of thing from
happening.


Eric L. Sauers, PhD, ATC
Chair, NATA Post-Professional Education Committee

Associate Professor & Director, Sports Health Care Program
Chair, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences
Arizona School of Health Sciences
A. T. Still University
5850 E. Still Circle
Mesa, AZ 85206
Office: (480) 219-6031
Fax: (480) 219-6100
E-mail: esauers@...
Internet: www.ashs.edu






Thu Nov 3, 2005 6:23 pm

sauers_eric
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #2365 of 3451 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I'm curious to see if other programs offer options or tracks within their Athletic Training major / degree. We have two options in our Athletic Training...
Brian Farr
bkfarr2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2005
3:58 pm

Brian, We have a similar set-up. All of our students major in Athletic Training, but some choose to complete the clinical track (to be eligible to sit for the...
VALERIE HERZOG
vwherzog
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2005
5:41 pm

Dear Colleagues, In response to the recent posting about dual majors in athletic training, we believe that there are several very important points to consider ...
Paula Sammarone Turoc...
turocyp@...
Send Email
Nov 3, 2005
5:41 pm

Colleagues, One possible solution is to identify some courses in which you would allow non-majors to enroll providing they meet course prerequisites and also...
Sharon Menegoni
mollyanna2
Offline Send Email
Nov 7, 2005
11:59 pm

This is an excellent model Sharon and it works great. We do the same thing. Pre-physical therapy students from the Biology dept. are able to take certain...
Jose' E. Rivera
jrivera@...
Send Email
Nov 14, 2005
4:07 pm

I have a question on this and was hesitant to express an opinion before because of not knowing what the JRC-AT position was on it. What would happen in this...
Jose' E. Rivera
jrivera@...
Send Email
Nov 8, 2005
12:00 am

I believe that this kind of dual-program is really the wrong signal to send. We are essentially saying that our professional (entry-level) preparation program...
sauers_eric
Offline Send Email
Nov 8, 2005
12:07 am

While this discussion has brought to light many valid points regarding the negative aspects of the dual track AT major, I'd like to share some of the positive...
Valerie Herzog
vwherzog
Offline Send Email
Nov 14, 2005
3:55 pm

I would expect that the answer to Jose's first concern is that the PROGRAM is what is accredited in its entirety, not elements of. Students are transient, and...
Paul Alvarez
alvarezatc
Offline Send Email
Nov 14, 2005
3:55 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help