Hi Steve!

I don't know the answer to this question.... Hoping someone with laser
manufacturing wisdom will give some insight to this question.

Health, Hope, Joy & Healing :
May you Prosper, even as your Soul Prospers 3John 2

Jennifer Ruby

Email advice is not a substitute for medical treatment.

http://www.rubysemporium.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SymphonicHealth
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Therapeutic-Laser_Therapy
http://www.lazrpulsr.com
______________________________________________
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
----- Original Message -----
From: "esl5552001" <SCL555@...>
To: <Therapeutic-Laser_Therapy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:56 PM
Subject: [Therapeutic-Laser_Therapy] Line vs Dot and power output question..


| I have noticed that some lasers on the market (635nm healing lasers)
| use a dot and some lasers use a line. I have heard it said that if you
| are using a 5mw line then you are losing a significant amount of power.
| For instance the Erchonia is said to only produce .6mw output of power
| at the aperture. Wouldn't it make sense to just use 15-20mw diode (or
| whatever it takes) until you arrive at the desired 5mw output at the
| aperture for a line generated laser? Then you could cover more area in
| less time with greater effect using a true 5mw. Just trying to arrive
| at the bottom line of all this laser tech(pun intended).
|