From: NESNIPPRIVACY@
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007
10:11 AM
To: nesnipprivacy@
Subject: [NESNIPPRIVACY] FW:
Health Care Law e-Alert: Court Approves Using HIPAA Regulations As Evidence
FYI – see article below.
Vice President Quality Initiatives
Nebraska Hospital Association
3255 Salt Creek Circle; Suite 100
Lincoln, NE 68504-4761
Phone: 402-742-8152
FAX: 402-742-8158
mseeland@nhanet.
____________
Privacy Notice: This message contains information that is confidential, may
be privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
named as the recipient. If you are not the named recipient or entity, please
notify the sender and do not print a hard copy of the message or save it. Email
correspondence is not saved by the Nebraska Hospital Association.
From: Laura Redoutey
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007
8:46 AM
To: Kevin Conway;
Subject: FW: Health Care Law
e-Alert: Court Approves Using HIPAA Regulations As Evidence
Share this with whomever should receive it.
From: Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007
8:43 AM
To: undisclosed-
Subject: Health Care Law e-Alert:
Court Approves Using HIPAA Regulations As Evidence
Health Care
Law e-Alert
from Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
Court
Approves Using HIPAA Regulations as Evidence
of Standard of
Care in Negligence Case
February
2007
The
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Regulations
may be used to demonstrate the standard of care in common law claims involving
the privacy of medical information, according to a December 2006 decision of
the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
Heather
Acosta was a patient and employee of Psychiatric Associates of Eastern
Carolina, which was owned by Dr. David R. Faber and managed by Robin Byrum.
Acosta alleged that Dr. Faber allowed Byrum to use his access number to access
Acosta's medical records at various times. Byrum subsequently used Acosta's
medical records to reveal private and embarrassing information about Acosta to
third parties, allegedly causing Acosta to suffer severe emotional distress,
humiliation and anguish for which Acosta sued Dr. Faber and Byrum.
In her
complaint, Acosta argued negligent infliction of emotional distress against Dr.
Faber and stated generally that Dr. Faber had a duty, based in part on HIPAA
requirements, to maintain the privacy of her medical records. Dr. Faber filed a
motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The trial court dismissed
Acosta's claim against Dr. Faber for several reasons, including that HIPAA
does not grant a private cause of action.
On
appeal, Acosta argued that she had not tried to state a cause of action under
HIPAA, but that she had referenced HIPAA as evidence of the appropriate
standard of care, which is a necessary element for her negligence claim. The
appellate court agreed. The court stated, "[s]ince plaintiff made no HIPAA
claim, HIPAA is inapplicable beyond providing evidence of the duty of care owed
by Dr. Faber with regards to the privacy of plaintiff's medical records."
This decision is not binding outside of
************
STINSON
MORRISON HECKER LLP
HEALTH CARE GROUP CONTACTS
Kirk Doan
816.691.2739
Carl Bowman
402.930.1730
Wayne Henry
402.930.1742
Patricia Zieg
402.930.1714
Stinson
Morrison Hecker LLP's Health Care Law e-Alert is a periodic e-mail service
designed to provide current information on developments affecting the health
care industry. It is intended to provide general information only, and does not
constitute a legal opinion or legal advice. Please consult an attorney about
specific concerns in this area. The choice of a lawyer is important and should
not be based solely on advertisements. This disclosure is required by rule of
the Missouri Supreme Court.
For more
information on the firm's Health Care Law practice, please visit our web site
at http://www.stinsonm