Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Reiki-Uk-Society · Reiki Healing Spirit Spirituality Society's Culture Health
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Question for Reiki Teachers...   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1573 of 3558 |
I was attuned as a Reiki Master in August of 2002. In 2003 I taught a
pair of Reiki I classes. In teaching, I followed the format as
delivered by those who taught me (my lineage). Since having taught -
and having had a chance to watch the progression of my students - I
have developed a quandry. I have put a lot of time and medative
thought into this matter and can not seem to arrive at an answer that
seems harmoneous on all the right levels.

The situation I'm talking about is that in our lineage the Cho Ku Rei
symbol has been taught as part of the Reiki I class. I have seen
various books where its in Reiki I and (many) others where its in
Reiki II.

Personally, I understand why it was put in Reiki I in our lineage, as
for many of us we find it to be a "physical" healing based sybol.
Within our lineage Reiki I is self and others, physical. Reiki II is
emotional, distance, etc. Very little, except the attunement process
itself is generally taught at the Reiki III level.

I am scheduled to be teaching Reiki I again in September, so this
issue has attained some urgency. While I would like to keep within the
structure of my lineage, I am seeing definete problems. (The problem
is, most of us were not sufficiently taught the methods of utilization
of Reiki that most R1's are. The hands we can do, but beaming etc is
beyond the scope.) Even when shown how to do beaming and direct
hands-on intent, my students, after recieving the symbol, immediately
gravitated to it for dear life. There was within some, the almost fear
of turning loose of it. Now, I know that as long as their intent is
right it really is "all good" but I also see some problems with this
approach.

Perhaps as an instructor I have done something in error to cause this.

I have not taught a Reiki II class yet but am currently structuring
one. I do not really know how to go about this - expecially if I move
Cho Ku Reik into the R2.

All of your thoughts, concerns, feedback and oppinions would be
greatly appreciated. Thank you for listening...

Blessings,
Kimberly




Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:29 am

healing_touc...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1573 of 3558 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I was attuned as a Reiki Master in August of 2002. In 2003 I taught a pair of Reiki I classes. In teaching, I followed the format as delivered by those who...
healing_touch_reiki
healing_touc...
Offline Send Email
Jul 30, 2004
12:30 am

Hi Kimberley, I do not know how it will help, but here's my view. My lineage teaches the symbols are passed on at Reiki 2, with Reiki 1 just being the physical...
pbreheny@...
iaidodan
Offline Send Email
Jul 30, 2004
9:20 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help