Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
PLAYNET_parentslearningadvocacyyouth · PLAYNET: Parents-Learning-Advocacy-Youth
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
ISTEP merely an indicator of weak existing special education progra   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #197 of 560 |

The first article was printed in the Linton Daily Citizen on Thursday reporting on the first meeting of the Community Council in Linton.  I was unfortunately unable to attend the meeting, but will be present at Saron Church in  Linton on Dec. 6th at noon for the next meeting.  I encourage all of you to attend as well, to help articulate the needs of our children and loved ones with learning differences.

The second article was a letter to the editor which I submitted yesterday. 


Since that time I have also found still more important facts related to this issue including the fact that L-S Elementary had 453 students who completed ISTEP testing for the 2004 rating period; (72 were special ed and 379 were not special ed), 107 of the total students tested did not pass.  49 of those failing students were special education students and 58 of those failing students were not special ed.  However, the statement in the paper said that, "a majority of the students did pass, but because of one group of special needs students who failed, the entire school failed ".  Obviously the percentage of special education students who failed ISTEP was greater than the percentage of those not categrized as special ed., but in actual numbers more students who are "not special ed" failed the ISTEP.  68% of special education students tested failed ISTEP and just over 15% of "not special ed" students failed ISTEP. 


While identifying a deficit in the existing special education programs in order to make significant and positive changes for the well being of these students is a critical need, I hope that these students have not been selectively singled out to be the scapegoat for the school failing to meet their adequate yearly progress for ISTEP last year.  We need to be looking at the schools accross the State of Indiana and find model schools who have special education programs that are enabling students to achieve success, and creating new innovative programs of our own based on the needs of our students. Parents and families of special needs students have been struggling to be heard.  We go into meeting after meeting knowing that change is needed.  We knew there was a problem in special education prior to the ISTEP score results.  Please get on board with positive solutions that will improve and enrich the public school experience for all. 

*************************************************************************************************************

Linton Daily Citizen Thursday, October 27, 2005 Vol. 100, No. 211

L-S Elementary School asks community to help close gap

by Timberly Ferree, Staff Writer

‘We’re being held accountable for something we can’t do.  We’re in a transition and we’re not alone.  We’re being set up for failure and special ed is the downfall.’ ~ Ron Bush

  <>
          The Linton-Stockton Elementary School’s community council met this week to discuss new ways to raise student achievement and close existing learning gaps.

          During the meeting, assistant Principal Nathan Moore explained that the community council is a communication link t hat brings teachers, administrators, parents, businesses and community organizations to the table for decision making. 

          One of the problems that the Linton-Stockton Elementary School is currently facing is closing the widening gap in passing ISTEP scores and failing ISTEP scores.

          Last year was the first year that the elementary didn’t meet its adequate yearly progress, Moore explained.

          A majority of the students did pass, but because of one group of special needs students who failed, the entire school failed, Moore explained.

          The problem is that in the existing system, only one percent of special needs students can take the ISTAR (Indiana Standards Tool for Alternate Reporting) instead of the ISTEP.

          That one percent is a small percentage of special needs students.

          The L-S Elementary has 453 students and 74 of them are special needs students, Moore said.

          At one time, the elementary had less than 30 special needs students taking the ISTEP but now the school has more than 30 and this  is creating a problem, Moore said. 

          Last year was also the first year to include fourth and fifth graders to those taking the ISTEP and this increased the number of special needs students.

          This problem is not just a local problem, Moore stressed.

          Standards for passing increase every three  years and in the 2005-2006 school year the standards have risen to 65.7 percent in English and 65.3 percent in math. 

          More and more schools will not pass because of the increase in categories, Superintendent Ron Bush explained.

          “We’re being held accountable for something we can’t do,” he added.

          “We’re in a transition and we’re not alone.  We’re being set up for failure and special ed is the downfall.” 

          But the school is trying hard to find ways to help the situation, he said.  Some students need to be challenged more while others need more in-class help, Moore said. 

          The public assumes that when the school does not meet its adequate yearly progress that he school is falling apart, Moore said. 

          To try to help the problem, a new early literacy assessment has just been introduced to this year’s kindergarteners and first graders.

          This assessment can help find t hose students who may have a special needs issue.

          There has been pressure to relax the federal guidelines because schools are failing like crazy, Bush said. 

          The public needs to know that the Linton-Stockton School Corporation, along with many other schools have a problem with special education, he added.

          “This is the law and we have to abide by it,” Bush said.

          “Not everybody is gonna pass the same bar at the same time,” Moore said.

          Special needs students are getting better, he added.  But the majority of the special needs students are mainstreamed.

          “We have a full inclusion program,” Moore explained.

          The focus on the community council is to brainstorm together to achieve a better adequate yearly progress for special education students.

          The next community council meeting will be Dec. 6 at noon at the Saron Church in Linton.  The public is invited and encouraged to attend. 

<> ********************************************************************************************************

ISTEP merely an indicator of weak existing special education programs

Including special needs students in ISTEP testing is not the problem.  Their scores on ISTEP are merely an indicator of their current program’s level of effectiveness.  If students with special needs are not included on standardized testing, then there is a lower incentive for schools to afford these students with true educational benefit.  Accountability for the progress of every student must exist, and current federal guidelines are trying to ensure that schools take seriously the call that no child be left behind. 

 

“The Education of all children regardless of background or disability...must always be a national priority.  One of the most important goals of my Administration is to support states and local communities in creating and maintaining a system of public education where no child is left behind.  Unfortunately, among those at greatest risk of being left behind are children with disabilities.” – President George W. Bush  Executive Order 13227

 

I found it distressing to read the quote by Superintendent Ron Bush in the Thursday October 27th article “L-S Elementary School asks community to help close gap”, which read, “We’re being held accountable for something we can’t do.  We’re in transition and were not alone.  We’re being set up for failure and special ed is the downfall.”

 

If our school administration has already determined that effectively teaching kids with  special needs/learning differences to make adequate educational annual progress is something they “can’t do”, then we have already lost the battle.  We as adults are often heard telling kids, “Don’t say ‘I can’t’, say, ‘I’ll try’”. 

 

Everyone involved must be willing to try doing things in a different way if we expect new results.  I have heard it said that one definition of  insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.  A humorous way of looking at this is, “If we always do what we’ve always done, we’ll always get what we’ve always got.” 

 

“When it comes to the education of our children, failure is not an option.” ~ President George W. Bush

 

Parents and family members of our local schools have been desperately trying to reach out to the school administration and special education Co-op to make connections and inroads on these issues.  Until now, when the school has found itself under the scrutiny of the federal government’s education reform legislation, we have been vastly overlooked and our children’s needs were thought to be secondary to that of neurotypical children; those that can learn in conventional ways. 

 

It is our hope that the Community Council represents a true desire to find more effective ways to educate our children, and not merely a way to explain to the public that the school is really doing a wonderful job and the actual problem lies with children who “can’t learn” no matter what the school might try.  Our children, even those identified with severe disabilities, truly can learn with methods and techniques that fit their individual learning styles, and with specific modifications and adaptations to the curriculum.  

 

Indeed one of the easiest ways to benefit the child and the school is to utilize permitted accommodations.  “Generally, an accommodation is acceptable on ISTEP, including the Graduation Qualifying Examination, if a student with disabilities uses the accommodation in testing situations that occur throughout the student’s educational program; however, the test may  not be modified.  Students are not to receive shortened tests, are not allowed to choose from a reduced number of possible answers, are not to have reading comprehension portions read to them, and will not receive simplified instructions.” ~ Accommodation Sheet Developed by the Indiana Education Project, Ball State University.  However, there are ample accommodations correlated to ISTEP that are either permitted and not documented on ISTEP, or permitted and documented on ISTEP. 

 

These testing accommodations, when used on a regular basis for classroom instruction and testing, will allow the student a better opportunity to access and progress in the general education curriculum and actually learn more.  The school would benefit because in addition to actually learning more, the students will also perform more satisfactorily on the ISTEP test, thus raising school performance data. 

 

Parents and families of students with learning differences have a strong desire to share our ideas and knowledge of the diverse learning styles of our children and how to effectively teach them.  Many parents of children with learning differences from ADHD to Autism, to Down Syndrome, have become educated in a broad range of intervention strategies and teaching techniques, which by necessity we learned in order to help our children strive to reach their potential. 

 

However, we are often told to leave the education to the educators and that it is not our business to interject.  It has even been practice to dismiss parents from being involved in some school activities, telling parents for example, that the teachers will plan and run the class parties and our help is not needed. 

 

Parents need to be involved with educating our children far beyond class parties and homework into the actual design and implementation of innovative programs and services that will meet the diverse educational needs of the ever changing community of learners in classrooms today. 

 

Another section of the article, “We have a full inclusion program,” is not entirely accurate either; as we have many students who spend very little to no time in general education classrooms and some who are actually segregated from typically developing peers even for lunch periods. 

 

Inclusion is not something we do in a specific classroom, only for some students, or “try it to see if it works”.  Inclusion is a way of creating a learning environment where all students are equally valued and work side by side to the maximum extent possible even if working at different levels and in different ways.  When children are educated together now, they will respect and live comfortably together as adults valuing the unique giftedness of each person.  Every individual regardless of their differences is a whole person.  

 

Finally, planning to identify students with  special needs issues earlier, such as the new early  literacy assessment for kindergarteners and first graders mentioned in the article, will only be a solution, if once identified, the approach to teaching is adapted to meet the varied needs of  these students.  For example, while phonics is generally beneficial for students, some learners may need a sight word based approach or a combination of approaches.  

 

Just one helpful tool for students with delayed reading skills might be the development of a lending library of books with an accompanying cassette tape recorded by a volunteer, who reads the story followed by reading comprehension questions and answers.  I would volunteer my time and donate tape players, books and cassettes for such a project.  I believe that the community when asked to do something specific like this would get on board, as well. 

 

The community is filled with creative and generous people who will take up the call to  ensure no child is left behind.  Let’s make the Community Council a truly valuable opportunity to improve special education programs at Linton-Stockton Elementary, not  to pass blame for failure of the school’s ISTEP gains onto the perceived inability of these students to learn.

 

 There are many more ideas families of children with learning differences look forward to sharing on December 6th at noon when the Community Council again meets at Saron Church in Linton. 

 

~ Ronda Metzger

    Parent of a student with Autism at L-S Elementary

   

 



Tue Nov 1, 2005 2:24 pm

rmetzger5
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #197 of 560 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

The first article was printed in the Linton Daily Citizen on Thursday reporting on the first meeting of the Community Council in Linton. I was unfortunately...
The Metzgers
rmetzger5
Offline Send Email
Nov 1, 2005
2:27 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help