Mr. Beebe

As usual, your post only distorts and confuses.

As the excerpt you quote below clearly indicates, when
I spoke of derivatives, I spoke of products. So your
weird little spin about animal derivatives is pure
gibberish. Read the sentence that followed, and then
have a sip of noni and calm down, OK?

We are obviously talking about products made for
animals, not products made from animals. DUH....

As for your protestations that you are not always
angry, your record and actions speak much more clearly
than your words.



--- Mike Beebe <mbeebe@...> wrote:
> At 05:15 PM 5/8/2004, you wrote:
> >Nobody said that this is the first time that Noni
> has
> >been given to animals. DUH!!! That would be
> stupid
> >-- nearly as stupid as Mr. Beebe's reaction here.
> >
> >What the note said, as you can see below, is that
> >Morinda/TNI has patented the animal derivatives of
> >Noni. What that means is, not Noni itself, but
> >products for animals specifically and made with
> Noni
> >and derivative products.
>
> Angry? No, I'm not "angry." I do, however, get
> annoyed when I see lies. We
> get enough of those from this asinine administration
> in Washington. But
> then lies from corporations are nearly de rigueur.
>
> Stupidity? How's this for stupid? "Morinda/TNI has
> patented the animal
> derivatives of Noni." This means that noni is fauna
> and not flora because
> you can only derive an animal derivative from an
> animal. Is English your
> first language?
>
> Mike Beebe
>
>
>





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover