Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
NRCEV
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
New NRCEV Subscribers   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #88 of 170 |
Re: New NRCEV Subscribers

Tom,

Thanks, that is how I read it also, just wanted to be clear.



- In NRCEV@yahoogroups.com, "N4AOF" <N4AOF@...> wrote:
>
> Individual certification is completely different from Resource
Type
> definitions.
>
> A Resource Type generally defines the personnel and equipment to
perform a
> specific function. Such as a dump truck with driver. Within a
given
> resource type, there may be several classes of that resource. For
example a
> Dump Truck I would be a bigger dump truck than a Dump Truck II.
The manner
> of defining resource types was developed by the experts at FEMA
(the same
> experts who determined that there was no requirement for ANY kind
of
> communications resource because all the other resource types are
defined as
> bringing their own communications with them).
>
> Meanwhile the individual certification titles of Operator and
Specialist,
> with I and II, are parallel with common industry practice of
designating
> individual qualifications. This system was in common use long
before
> Resource Type definitions were thought of.
>
> The two systems were created independently and have only very
slight
> interaction. Yes, a higher level resource (lower roman number)
would often
> require some higher level personnel (higher roman number) -- but
that's
> life.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jzsszj" <jzs@...>
> To: <NRCEV@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 00:04
> Subject: [NRCEV] Re: New NRCEV Subscribers
>
>
> Tom, I have a question, and I must quote some things here so that
> you can see where I am asking from. My question follows this
quote.
> ****************************************
> Certification Guide for
>
> NATIONAL REGISTRY OF CERTIFIED EMCOMM VOLUNTEERS
> Individual Volunteers
>
> 04_NRCEV_Individual_Application_v2.pdf
>
> Page 19 of 32
>
>
> Type - A classification of resources in the ICS that refers to
> capability. Type I is generally considered to be more capable than
> Types II, III or IV, respectively, because of size; power;
capacity;
> or, in the case of incident management teams, experience and
> qualifications.
> **********************************
> This "type" definition seems to go counter to the categories you
> have listed for Operators and Specialists on the application. I
> assume then, that this does not apply to that section, as it is
> counter to the levels in the Emmcomm courses and in our Local ARES
> certifications. I believe the quoted "type" is referring to the
> NIMS definitions of equipment, etc., only?
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.nrcev.org
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>





Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:20 am

jzsszj
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #88 of 170 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Welcome to all the new subscribers to the NRCEV group on Yahoo. This Yahoo!Group mail list operates in parallel with the main NRCEV website. It provides an...
n4aof
Offline Send Email
Mar 21, 2007
11:54 pm

Tom, I have a question, and I must quote some things here so that you can see where I am asking from. My question follows this quote. ...
jzsszj
Offline Send Email
Mar 22, 2007
10:06 am

Individual certification is completely different from Resource Type definitions. A Resource Type generally defines the personnel and equipment to perform a ...
n4aof
Offline Send Email
Mar 22, 2007
10:36 am

Tom, Thanks, that is how I read it also, just wanted to be clear. ... Type ... perform a ... given ... example a ... The manner ... (the same ... of ... ...
jzsszj
Offline Send Email
Mar 22, 2007
6:06 pm

Tom is exactly right. The Certification levels do not refere to a Type. The ARCTs are defined by Type. If you look at that matrix you will see how it applies...
Chris
ng3f
Offline Send Email
Mar 22, 2007
10:38 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help