Dear Judy, I belive in an intelligent "fighting chance" at true prevention. YOu have made your position (that prevnetion is impossible) very clear to all,...
Dear Judy, Subject: The Natural eye -- having refractrive STATES. Judy, I have defined the natural eye to you MANY TIMES. But you want "ME" to pay YOU $240.00...
... I have provided it to you many times already. ... You said "natural", whatever that means. Since when did you care that eyes be "normal" (whatever that...
Dear Judy, I know that you with to think that you are "perfect" and always "right" as a doctor. You also think of "me" and everyone else as a "patient" that...
... Two similar studies (which I have pointed out to you before) have been conducted more recently. Children and adults with exotropia were prescribed...
Judy, Subject: THe CONFIRMING test of the human eye (that it is dynamic) that can never be conducted. Re: The "Catch-22" of science. Re: This would indeed...
Dear Judy, You yet again missed the point. I care about the science and FACTS, and the SUMMARY of the fundamental eye's behavior. This science (of the dynamic...
... Funny, when I read Wildsoet's text about the "blue tint diagram", she doesn't mention natural eyes, refractive state, control systems or -3D lenses Here...
Subject: Look aat science and facts yourself -- then protect your distant vision for life. Re: Because these majority-opinion ODs are blind to science and...
Dear Judy, Subject: Christine's opinion -- whatever it might be. I think you missed the point here -- and I need to clear it up. I would be glad to discuss...
Dear Jan, The scientific mind does not so much provide the right answers, as to ask the right questions. Claude Levi-Strauss Men, it has been well said, think...
I deeply respect the long-term PREVENTIVE work by second-opinion professionals. They work on TRUE prevention (with the plus). Here are some remakrs to Jan, who...
Below is Jan's response, (i.e., INSISTANCE) that a natural eye with a refractive STATE of +1/2 diotper, will not change its refractive STATE by -1 diotpers (to...
... Emmetropia is defined as zero refractive error, so the definition is zero. Please do not confuse "emmetropia" and "normal". An eye that is not normal (ie...
... You might want to read something more recent than 1957. Is Richard Carter a medical professional? Did he quote medical professionals in the article? And...
Subject: Can you get the natural eye to change for a postive refractive STATE to a negative STATE from the forced wearing of a minus lens. Re: The answer MUST...
PrescribeTO.txt Here Dr. Raphaelson questions the "quick fix" for all refractive STATEs policy. Let us just call his "objection" to the minus lens -- and...
... Judy, it would help if you would read to the end of Otis's post before responding. I know your time is precious at $250 /hr but if you're going to bother...
... Who says only 2% of eyes are normal. Or is this one of those special definitions that only you use. Why are you saying only 2% of eyes are normal? How do...
ToParent.txt Otis> Let me add that, for a more complete effect, a +2.5 diotper should be used for all reading. A +1.0 would have only a slight effect. By...
Perfect.txt Dear Judy, How can only 2 percent of eyes be normal? Of all natural eyes are only 2 percent normal? I would be interested in your commentary on...
Layman Ram> How serious is the issue of a girl using spectacle -4.5 on both the side. She is using for quite long time. Can it be cured. What can be issue...
... No. Zero refractive error is exactly zero. Normal refractive error is a range which follows a two tailed distribution graph skewed to the minus with a...
Dear Judy, You stated that "un-corrected" errors can lead to "many problems" -- and the implication is that all "errors" must be "corrected". Could you explain...
Dear Judy, Correct me -- based on what you were taught: A normal refractive STATE is exactly zero. Right? And refractive STATE that is not exactly zero is an...
... I don't know what you mean by "perfect". If you mean an eye with zero refractive error, then the accepted definition of zero is, well, zero. Be aware that...
... I don't recall ever using the word fraud with reference to Bates, Colgate or anyone else. Yet again, you attribute words to me that I have not used....
Here all eyes are either "postive" (hyperopic) or they are "negative", (myopic). There are no eyes with a refractive STATE of exactly zero, or "perfect". The...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
