The effect of a minus on the human eye: a thought experiment Dear Jean, Subject: The effect of a minus on the natural eye is proven. Re: But there is a massive...
Dear Judy, Subject: Always enjoy hearing your false beliefs -- that a negative STATE can NOT BE PREVENTED. I have said that PREVENTING a negative STATE for the...
... Again you put quote marks around words I didn't say. Please either provide an actual link to my actual words or stop (mis)quoting me. What the matter with...
Dear Judy, Are you again going to tell them that: 1. A minus lens is "perfectly safe"? 2. That "environment" has NO EFFECT on the refractive STATE of the...
... What are you smoking this week? First you attribute Alex's words to me, then you attribute your words to me. Here are my actual words, not yours: ...
Dear Wise, second-opinion friend, Subject: How does Judy answer Jean? Jean> Judy, I have some questions for you: Jean> If minus glasses are proved to be the...
Dear Judy, If you are truly sincere -- why not fully identify yourself? Alex does. Don Rehm does. Frank Young did. Dr. Kaisu does. Why not be honest -- and...
Dear Judy, cc Frans Subject: The tragic "sttitude" that destroyed your vision. Since you are going to lose the Engineering/Scientific discussion, I see that...
Dear Frans, Subject: Judy's preferred ignorance. Yes, there is the field of Engineering/Science that Judy does not KNOW, and NEVER wants to LEARN anyhthing new...
Dear Judy, Why do you continue to tell people your endless lie?? Is your "career" that important that you must protect it by telling Frans distortions and lies...
... You are wrong. If a patient (adult or child) presents without glasses the unaided acuity is checked. ... What year did Diebold write? The hypothesis that...
Otis I think you are right doing . I can only appreciate and listen. It is very difficult to reverse a civilization. So I started with myself and the...
Dear Frans, Subject: Judy's over-prescription habit. I think Judy will confirm this. For the most part, she does not check the child's naked eye visual acuity....
Dear Frans, Subject: The problem with Judy -- she will not admit to her mistake. When a person attempts to "cover up" a "poor" method of practice, then we all...
Dear Frans, Subject: Sassisailor's success -- to 20/40. In fact I "worked" with sassisailor, and she worked with a "Focometer". Since you plan to go through...
Dear Frans, Subject: Second-opinion PREVENTION -- and NO PREVENTION effort. Here is the commentary: "The findings of Harvey and Lister and Pasteur and Charcot...
Dear Frans, Subject: How do you conduct a BETTER study? I have asked the people posting on i-see to review an provide commentary on: 1. Was Bates successful? ...
Dear Frans, Subject: Scientific and PERSONAL CHOICE of an OD and his family. Re: "Servicing" the public with a minus -- versus scientific PREVENTION. Re: Why...
Dear Judy, I regret that you don't understand the word "metaphor" -- i.e., the analogy between PREVENTION, versus a "quick-fix" in your office. Here is the...
Dear Judy, I have concluded that the only way a person will avoid stair-case myopia -- is to avoid you can your gross over-prescription policy, or "best visual...
Dear Judy, You have done nothing but "prend" to help people on i-see with their goal of "avoiding" nearsightedness. In fact your goal is not that at all. Your...
... Incredible. What gall. You make a glaring error -- copy and paste someone else's comments from a two year old post from another forum, attribute them to...
... Yes, there was much interest twenty-five to thirty years ago in the use of plus lenses at near to prevent myopia. A number of studies with better design...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
