Dear Judy, I have concluded that the only way a person will avoid stair-case myopia -- is to avoid you can your gross over-prescription policy, or "best visual...
Dear Judy, You have done nothing but "prend" to help people on i-see with their goal of "avoiding" nearsightedness. In fact your goal is not that at all. Your...
... Incredible. What gall. You make a glaring error -- copy and paste someone else's comments from a two year old post from another forum, attribute them to...
... Yes, there was much interest twenty-five to thirty years ago in the use of plus lenses at near to prevent myopia. A number of studies with better design...
... I don't recall ever discussing deafness ... People selling ear plugs can provide clinical evidence that they are effective in preventing deafness. Just two...
Dear Judy, For the reader. Judy has stated the "correction". I personally have read almost all the publications by Dr. George Hung, Dr. John Semmlow, and many...
... Judy ... Otis ... Judy Exactly. You now admit that a true prevention study has not been done and therefore whether a prevention method is effective is...
Dear Frans, I am certain that Judy is very pleasant, and believes she is TOTALLY RIGHT -- that the only solution to "deafness" is to supply a "hearing aid". ...
... When are you going to remove this thead? Here is a link to the original post on i-see, every quote you attribute to me was actually written by Alex ...
Subject: Does the over-prescription of a strong minus -- has a serious "secondary" effect. Judy maintains that: 1. It does not!! 2. But even if it does, she...
Re: vision researchers saying that prolonged close work causes myopia ... Judy> > Can you provide published statements by vision researchers saying that...
Dear Frans, Subject: The "medical mind" at work. I report scientific facts accuratly. Because I do that (in terms of objectively measured refractive STATE),...
Otis, I think OD,s are just medical and not scientific at all. They are only doing a certain general making. It is up to you to take your own prevention...
Dear Judy, Subject: TWO parts to a Engineering/Scientific question. Dr. Raphaelson (the world's FIRST second-opinion PREVENTION optometrist), brought into...
Dear Judy, Why do you continue with your "farce" that you are INTERESTED IN PREVENTION. You are NOT!!! I suggest a deeper understanding of SCIENCE is essential...
... I wish you would stop attributing statements to me that I have not made. Either post a direct link to my actual words or think of some other topic. Judy...
... a cut and paste of remarks he attributes to me. Do you have a link to the original post? I think you have attributed Alex's remarks to me. Please delete...
Dear Frans, There are majority-opinion ODs who have no interest in science and statistics. They are very "happy" being myopic and have no interest in the...
Dear Frans, Subject: Like Johann Kepler -- the only reason is it used. Here are Judy's remarks. Se is about -4 diopters myopic, and got into it the same way we...
Dear Frans, Subject: Respect for the ODs who support plus-prevention and have "fought the good fight" -- i.e., Maurice Brumer Re: Post #5 I enjoy listening to...
Subject: Science supporting Bates/Prentice PREVENTION -- at the threshold. Re: Post #3 Subject: The majority-opinion versus Dr. Bates. It is one thing to...
Subject: Dr. Bates wisdom -- for the 21 century Re: Post 2 By Dr. George Hung, K. Ciuffreda Title: "Incremental retina-defocus theory of myopia development --...
Subject: Learing the "new science" of true-prevention. Re: Post 1 Pepole believe what they WANT to believe, or what they are TAUGHT to believe. If they are...
Vision scientists George Hung (Rutgers Dept. of Biomedical Engineering) and Kenneth Ciuffreda (SUNY College of Optometry) are claiming that the "temporary"...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
