Issue: Or why the only way you can "deal" with a person like Lisa -- is to put a strong minus lens on her. Lisa will start "arguing" about 'strain' and...
LudlamJR.txt Subject: Dr. Ludlam's letter to Dr. Jacob Raphaelson Enjoy, Otis ======= OPTOMETRIC CENTER OF NEW YORK 351 WEST 48TH STREET NEW YORK. NEW YORK...
... If you are going to misrepresent people's views, you should be careful not to post their actual words at the same time; it makes your misrepresention too...
Dear Judy, I have made myself VERY CLEAR about the proven dynamic behavior of the fundamental eye. I consistently use the correct measurement terms,...
The response of the fundamental eye (dynamic) to a "delta" in its average value of accommodation. http://www.geocities.com/otisbrown17268/youngtc.jpg ...
Update with a correction: A PREDICTIVE MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR THE EYE'S FOCAL STATUS Remarks prepared for the 18 th Annual Rocky Mountain Bioengineering...
Subject: Leading second-opinion optometrists. It is clear that true prevention will require considerable insight and fortitude in BOTH the child, and...
... ????????????????? What are you talking about ????????????????? You claimed that Lisa and I think that a PREVENTIVE plus is a big joke. I pointed out that...
Subject: What science says about the effect of a minus lens on the refractive STATE of the eye. Re: Since scientific truth is rejected, let us just call...
Yes, indeed, science shows that a "plus" changes the status of accommodation (entire eye -- change of power.) Second-opinion best, Otis ============ Subject:...
Dear Reader, Doctors who "help" or recommend the use of the plus for prevention, sometimes get "reprimands" from boards of optometry. For this reason, I will...
PlusAdvi.txt Dear Plus-lens user, Subject: Remarks about prevention -- to a person who did it "right" from the start. Thanks for your latest question on...
Dear Prevention minded expert, Subject: The "spark" of curiosity that led me to Raphaelson and Dr. Francis Young. Otis> I am very thankful for Dr. Bates...
... The conclusion of the study is that reading through plus lenses does not necessarily reduce accommodation. This would explain why so many "masked" studies...
Dear Alex, I agree with you on a number of levels. Above all both analytical and factual. In fact even Judy agrees with my analysis -- considering that the...
... I think you are correct about the ability of the eye to adapt to a lens. I'm not sure we agree on the implications of this experiment. ... I would be...
Dear Alex, Subject: EXACT definition here. Let me further clarify. The retina will change the eye's total power by +3 diopters if you look from "infinity" (or...
... In the study you posted, when a +2 lens was used, the eye did change power as if the +2 had not been used. Do you want us to disagree with the results of a...
Subject: Un-necessary Cyl. Sorry, but there is no good reason to "prescribe" -1/2 diopter astigmatism -- if the child has 20/20. Best, Otis ============= Dear...
Dear Judy, Thanks for your majority-opinion on the subject of the eye "not responding" to a plus. But as Alex pointed out, the statements are ambiguous at...
Indian/American About 33 minutes. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=MdFwr0juqfM It takes 33 minutes to describe the human eye's resolution of 1 minute of arc? ...
... This is true, given sufficient illumination and detail ("spacial frequency") of target. Under certain circumstances the accommodative response is reduced...
... In what way were the written conclusions of the study you posted ambiguous? And are you suggesting that the second opinion is to restate published...
Dear Judy, Since you choose to believe that a lens has no effect on the total power of they eye -- "accommodation" -- then indeed we do have a dispute of your...
... wrote: (snip a comment bearing no relation to this thread) You didn't answer my questions: "In what way were the written conclusions of the study you...
Dear Judy, Let me ask YOU the following questions. 1. Does the natural eye have the ability to sense micro-blur at the surface of the retina. Yes or no. If...
Dear Judy, To help you resolve the question of the eye's total-power change (from 60 to 63 diopters) when you place a -3 diopter on front of it -- here is a...