Dear Friends, Subject: Intellectual analysis -- and a desire to help. While we all have our "differences" about the issue of prevention -- because it depends...
hello guys, I recently stumbled upon "EYE POWER" a device that costs $800, but is suppose to fix myopia to 20/20. Sounds too good to be true, anyone hear of it...
Dear Pawel, Part of my interest was to VERIFY claims of this nature. When they say "cure" -- I must say I doubt it. I believe in clearing your Snellen at the ...
Dr. Liberman is a professional expert. He is BOTH and optometrist and a Ph.D. I never use the word "cure", "therapy", and ANY MEDICAL TERM. Here is part of the...
Subject: A negative refractive STATE of the eye is "life threatening"? "There is a problem here with asking people to self-diagnose," says Dr. Robertson. "My...
Subject: It would be far better if you read your own Snellen. Re: And further, had your own low-cost trial lens kit. Here is the description by an OD. ...
Subject: Office Myopia (the lack of ability to preceive ANYTHING other than your "office function". Re: Intellectual blindness towards all science and ...
... Did you actually read the full text of the link? If so, I don't understand your comment. The review was done by a workgroup of eye researchers, public...
Dear Judy, Yes, I did read the article. I deeply regret that it is profoundly isolated from fundamental science, and does NOT ALLOW FOR ANY 'CHECK' 'BALLANCE'...
PrevEntr.txt Dear Friends, Subject: Don has the courage to challenge the majority-opinion system. RE: Engineering review of "The International Myopia ...
Subject: A proposed study -- that makes NO optical or scientific sense. ===================== Randomised Clinical Trial of Myopia Prevention Using +3D Lenses...
... I don't understand this comment. The article was a review of all published studies on myopia prevention. How is that "isolated from science". And if it...
Dear Judy, Subject: Ignoring ALL SCIENCE AND DATA. Re: Science does not "cut off" prior to 1987 "A Medline search using PubMed was conducted to identify...
Judy, It is absolutly BLIND both in science and engineering to DENY objective facts and a contrary opinion and wise judgment. Why not publish these reference...
... yes ... Of course not. What a silly comment. Many things in both clinical practice and science are not fully understood and there may well be two valid...
Here is the "standard" idea that you do NOTHING FOR PREVENTION. There are 200+ references. http://www.aoa.org/documents/CPG-15.pdf The second-opinion, about...
Dear Judy, Subject: When highly qualifed professionals (even in your "field" DISAGREE with you about natural eye's behavior -- that IS BY DEFINITION, THE...
Dear Judy, While you may love the effect of a minus lens on the person, the second-opinion is that it is a seriously flawed idea and concept. Since you don't...
... Your original post (and my comment in reply) was the question of why "plus prevention" was not mentioned in a 2006 review of myopia treatment. As I pointed...
Dear Judy, Subject: Writing letters suggesting CHANGE. Re: Dealing with a totally CLOSED MIND. Don Rehm has written such letters. They all wind up in the...
Dear Judy, Subject: Plus prevention -- is what the individual must learn to do for himself. Judy> As I pointed out, reference was made to undercorrection, ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
