... As I have repeatedly told you, I have never said that emmetropia means normal, nor have I ever said that eye with hyperopic refractive error may not have...
You do not have to do extensive resarch now to find out that the fundamental eye is proven to be dynamic. i.e., its refractive STATE will FOLLOW a -3 diopter...
I would gladly PAY for information on true-prevention. Just present scientific fact and trut to me -- and I will make my own choice (for prevention) in this...
A long time ago, pilots and mechanics wore no "muffs" when working around piston and jet planes. It was thought that noise has NO LONG TERM EFFECT ON THE...
... Amazing! I always thought that putting a lens on simulated... get this: putting a lens on! But what I still can't understand is, why "simulate" the...
Dear Second-opinion friends, I present the natural eye as a dynamic system -- as a scientific concept. Thus the natural eye (tracking the accommodation system)...
Dear Judy, Thanks for your convoluted explanation of the artifical word "emmetropization". Where a refractive STATE of exactly zero is normal -- and all other...
... emmetropization... ... The "natural and normal eye" will not have a +3 or -3 lens in front of it. Without this lens, it will tend to adjust its growth to ...
Here are some remarks by Don Rehm -- about the need to check your Snellen and refractive STATE by your own checking. Enjoy, Otis ===================== Don Rehm...
There are a group of professionals, engineers, scientists, pilots, optometrists, ophthamologists who support the concept of prevention at the threshold. Here...
... Summary: Emmetropization fails in some animals, especially if the congenital refractive error is large. If large refractive error is present in only one...
For your enjoyment. Otis ================== Developmental visual system anomalies and the limits of emmetropization. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Harwerth RS. ...
Dear Judy, Thanks -- then we agree. I have argued that the person himself -- with SCIENTIFIC TRAINING -- study the science, the facts, the blue-tint model, the...
... Although a decade old, so newer data is not included, it is a good summary of the field up to 1998. I am surprised that you provided the link as it...
Dear Judy, Since you, by your own statement, have NO INTEREST in helping ANYONE avoid entry into myopia -- then why do you object when the person himself...
Dear Judy, Subject: I do not use bogus words to describe the refractive STATES of the natural eye. But I will answer questions about the natural eye's proven...
Dear Judy, You will be happy to know that I do not PRESCRIBE anything. But if I wish to find out if a population of fundamental eyes are DYNAMIC, then with ...
... Perhaps you could provide the implication. The study you referred to involved having hyperopic animals wear minus lenses. You may be take some comfort in...
... Contrary to the subject line of this post, I made no remarks about preventing myopia and my comments that Otis cut and pasted from another forum were not...
Dear Judy, As I have SUGGESTED -- the person HIMSELF look at these experiments. You can read INTO the data anything you wish. But, in my engineering judgment,...
Dear Reader, Majority-opinion Judy is right. If she suggest that you can GET OUT OF -10 DIOTPERS -- I would agree that it is impossible. Further, because of...
... Donders/Helmholtz did not suggest the box camera as a model for the human eye. Quite the contrary. . ... Emmetropia is refractive error of zero. The word...
Remarks: This person has a measured refractive STATE of -6 diotpers. Yet her visual acuity is 20/50 -- as she measures it. She is an engineer -- working on...
Dear Second-opinion friend, I often here the remark, yes, you are an Engineer, but what to the ODs think? You will find them contradictory also -- including ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
