My name is Otis Brown, and I am interested in the prevention of nearsighedness. Prevention is not easy -- but with work it is possible to clear your vision if...
Dear Friends, Subject: Reset of the original MyopiaFree Group. This NewsGroup has been revised. Please re-join this group to follow the analysis and...
Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: Vision clearing to pass the DMV -- including Astigmatism and Ghosting (Diplopia) In my opinion, prevention is...
To: John M. (Pilot), Subject: A proposed DISCUSSION of prevention (20/40 to 20/70) for students wishing to PROTECT there vision in a four year college. Re:...
Dear Don, Subject: Ghosting -- differnt that Astigmatism Re: Fincham -- 43 percent of eye's with excellent have "ghosting". I do not think there has been any...
Dear Friends, Subject: Some commentary on prevention-with-plus for your interest. Re: If I "prescribed" a "preventive plus", and the person developed 1/4...
Dear Don, Subject: Consistent over-prescription by minus two diopters. Re: People currently working with the plus for prevention Re: Statements by ODs on...
Military Visual Requirements Spherical Equivalent Conversion Remarks: The minus lens "works" instantly. If you prefer it -- then use it. If you are 28 years...
Dear Keith, Subject: Keeping your vision clear during the college years. Re: Scientific certification -- and arguments against it. I am pleased you "did it...
Chalm3.txt Dear Friends, This was written about 100 years ago. Chalmer Prentice, M.D. may have not got everything right (no one ever does) but he got this...
Dear Keith, Subject: Using precise words to describe the dynamic behavior of the eye. Judy does not understand the concept. Tragically, most of the "public"...
Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: Francis Young's study demonstrates that a steady DIFFERENCE (of -1/2 diopter per year) in refractive state develops...
Dear Prevention minded freinds, Subject: The office "fib" clearly stated. Is it true? Here is the review. ___________________________ Dear Keith, Some people...
Dear Keith, Subject: The "second opinion" on prevention. Re: Some "conversations" with the "majority opinion" ODs on sci.med.vision Re: The incredible...
Dear Keith, Subject: Scientific proof to support your effective use of the plus for prevention. It takes great personal resolve to use the plus to keep your...
N. River Part 1 Mr. N. River (name changed) claims that the "preventive" plus will "hurt your eyes". For that reason he contacted my nephew to inform his that...
NRiver2.txt Mr. N. River (named changed) claims that the "preventive" plus will "hurt your eyes". For that reason he contacted my nephew to inform his that...
Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: Objective scientific proof depends on the nature of the question you learn to ask. Re: Long ago I learned to...
Dear Second-opinion friends, Subject: Direct scientific proof -- of the eye's fundamental behavior. Re: I get tired of ODs insisting that a minus lens has NO...
Autobi2.txt Dear Prevention-minded friends, Subject: My background and interests. Re: Personal credibility -- and your judgment. You have a right to know who...
Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: A conversation with a minus-lens theory and practice optometrist. Re: The difference between pure-science and ...
Care2.txt Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: Warnings against the preventive second-opinion from the ODs on Google -- sci.med.vision for your enjoyment....
Dear Keith, Subject: Medical insistance that "environment" has NO EFFECT on the refractive state of the fundamental eye. If you wonder why no one will help...
Dear Jon, Subject: Myopic ODs who "beat up" on me. Re: The professionalism of Steve Leung and Jacob Raphaelson. Re: Learning to think for yourself -- and...
Retin7.txt Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: The complete presentation of the OD majority opinion. "I know that most men...can seldom accept even the ...
Retin8a.txt Dear Jon, Subject: A statetemnt of intense bias against prevention with the plus. Men live by their routines; and when these are called into ...
Dear Keith, Subject: This OD simply does not "get it". If you have had 20/20 previously, and the develop a negative refractive status of -3/4 diopters, after ...
Dear Keith, Subject: The incredible arrogance of some ODs. Re: Please remember, not all "docs" are like this -- thank goodness. I fear for the people who come...
Dear Prevention minded friends. Subject: Summary and commentary on historic prevention with the plus -- at the threshold. Ret> I have serious doubt that a kids...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
