DOFDiopt.txt The Depth-of-Field of the natural eye is judged to be 0.3 diopters. Here is the analysis and numbers: Poster # 135 COMPARISON OF DEPTH OF FOCUS...
This is from a paper published by Dr. William Ludlam. 37. Schwartz, I., and Sandberg, N., "The Effect of Time in Submarine Service on Vision, " Report No....
Dear Judy, Thanks for your "not science" input. But, in fact the word "emmetropization" is an artifact of a truly BAD concept of the natural eye's behavior. I...
RefState.txt Science: The SCIENCE of Refractive STATE change with applied lens. Subject: More majority-opionion statements by Judy about refractive STATES and...
Craig> You seem to be saying that because no other treatments are available, then understanding minus lenses and any possible side effects is not necessary --...
Subject: NATRUAL eye prevention. Re: Keepting the refractive STATE of the natural eye SLIGHTLY POSTIVE to avoid a negative STATE. Judy effectively argues that...
It is very easy to do what is in this video. It is very difficult to do a "deeper" scientific analysis and choose to work on a PREVENTIVE method. Here is one...
But you never say anyting at all. Other than you are "perfect" and the minus is "perfectly safe". And for proof? You say, "Trust me". Judy, too many "trust...
The effect of a minus on the human eye: a thought experiment Dear Jean, Subject: The effect of a minus on the natural eye is proven. Re: But there is a massive...
Dear Frans, You can explain these issues to a college student. You can not explain them to a child. I think this is why Bates had difficulteis with his 1913...
Yes Otis, Prevention is most important. But curing by helping patients to search for the cause also is done by Bates practice. There is still certain hope left...
Dear Scientific reader. Subject: Judy is PARTIALLY correct. Most people, perhaps DON'T want prevention -- if it required EFFORT and INSIGHT. Bates said that...
Dear Judy, Subject: Always enjoy hearing your false beliefs -- that a negative STATE can NOT BE PREVENTED. I have said that PREVENTING a negative STATE for the...
Dear Judy, Are you again going to tell them that: 1. A minus lens is "perfectly safe"? 2. That "environment" has NO EFFECT on the refractive STATE of the...
Dear Wise, second-opinion friend, Subject: How does Judy answer Jean? Jean> Judy, I have some questions for you: Jean> If minus glasses are proved to be the...
Dear Judy, If you are truly sincere -- why not fully identify yourself? Alex does. Don Rehm does. Frank Young did. Dr. Kaisu does. Why not be honest -- and...
Dear Judy, cc Frans Subject: The tragic "sttitude" that destroyed your vision. Since you are going to lose the Engineering/Scientific discussion, I see that...
Dear Judy, Why do you continue to tell people your endless lie?? Is your "career" that important that you must protect it by telling Frans distortions and lies...
Dear Frans, Subject: Judy's preferred ignorance. Yes, there is the field of Engineering/Science that Judy does not KNOW, and NEVER wants to LEARN anyhthing new...
Dear Frans, Subject: Judy's over-prescription habit. I think Judy will confirm this. For the most part, she does not check the child's naked eye visual acuity....
Dear Frans, Subject: How do you conduct a BETTER study? I have asked the people posting on i-see to review an provide commentary on: 1. Was Bates successful? ...
Dear Frans, Subject: The problem with Judy -- she will not admit to her mistake. When a person attempts to "cover up" a "poor" method of practice, then we all...
Dear Frans, Subject: Sassisailor's success -- to 20/40. In fact I "worked" with sassisailor, and she worked with a "Focometer". Since you plan to go through...
Having problems with message search?
