Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MyelinSheathProtein · Vaccine Induced Demyelination in Autism
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1106 - 1135 of 1208   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#1135 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:08 am
Subject: H1N1 Explained by an Influenza Research Insider
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.healthiertalk.com/h1n1-explained-influenza-research-insider-1113



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1134 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:03 am
Subject: Dr. Tenpenny's Swine Flu Hype Center
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://drtenpenny.com/swine_flu_hype.aspx



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1133 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:51 pm
Subject: What the Inventor of the Flu Shot NOW Thinks of the Vaccine...
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/17/Obama-Administration-Launches-Deceptive-Swine-Flu-Propaganda-Blitz.aspx

Dr. Laver was a major Australian scientist involved in the invention of a flu vaccine, in addition to playing a leading scientific role in the discovery of anti-flu drugs. He went on record as saying the vaccine he helped to create was ineffective and [that] natural infection with the flu was safer. “I have never been impressed with its efficacy,” said Dr. Laver.”

Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1132 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:32 pm
Subject: Beware of Borrowed Energy
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

"For long-term health and vitality, we need to understand the difference between two types of energy: one obtained from stimulation, the other from nourishment." So writes Brendan Brazier, author of the best-selling book The Thrive Diet in his article 'Beware of Borrowed Energy'.

21st century life places great demands on us and it is all too easy to get caught in the cycle of relying on false pick-me-ups, the most common being caffeine in its many forms. This article describes the consequences of using stimulants to get us through our schedule, and Brendan has essential advice for breaking this cell-damaging cycle and restoring your real energy..

Go here to read the article in full
http://www.kiki-health.co.uk/articles_beware_of_borrowed_energy.asp



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1131 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:51 pm
Subject: TreatAutismNow...
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://treatautismnow.wordpress.com/



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1130 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:14 pm
Subject: Facebook crowdsourced investigation exposes vaccine denials of SIGA Technologies
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

http://www.naturalnews.com/027483_SIGA_Technologies_vaccines.html


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1129 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:56 pm
Subject: The Flu Vaccine Horror Story You Never Heard About
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi134.html



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1128 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:45 pm
Subject: They Want to Inject My Kids With What?
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.infowars.com/they-want-to-inject-my-kids-with-what/



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1127 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:27 pm
Subject: FluStop... Anyone?!!!
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://stop-swine-flu-now.com/index-null2.php



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1126 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:13 pm
Subject: Two die in China after H1N1 flu vaccine
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/1018187/1/.html



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1125 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:58 pm
Subject: Expert Pediatrician Exposes Vaccine Myths (AUDIO & Article)
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1124 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:20 pm
Subject: Vaccination: Federal Health Agencies Continue to Deceive Americans
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Vaccination: Federal Health Agencies Continue to Deceive Americans
 
Congressional Report on a Vaccine Mercury-Autism Link Ignored for Six Years
 
 


#1123 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:51 am
Subject: Four Perspectives on the H1N1 Virus and Vaccine
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://healthychild.org/blog/comments/four_perspectives_on_the_h1n1_virus_and_vaccine/



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1122 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:38 am
Subject: Over Eighty Percent of Suspected Swine Flu Cases were Not Flu, CBS News Reports
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

http://www.naturalnews.com/027462_swine_flu_H1N1_the.html


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1121 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:32 am
Subject: Join reader action to educate the Associated Press about natural remedies, alternative medicine
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The Associated Press continues its assault on alternative medicine, led by writer Marilynn Marchione who writes attack pieces on everything under the sun (including the sun itself) related to alternative medicine and natural therapies. The Associated Press continues to publish stories carrying this highly-opinionated (and provably false) header:

EDITOR'S NOTE: Ten years and $2.5 billion in research have found no cures from alternative medicine. Yet these mostly unproven treatments are now mainstream and used by more than a third of all Americans. This is one in an occasional Associated Press series on their use and potential risks.

As
NaturalNews previously reported, it's all part of the AP's assault on natural medicine, nutrition, medicinal herbs and naturopathic therapies (http://www.naturalnews.com/027424_m...). The AP, it seems, has decided to ally itself with pharmaceutical medicine and spend its time and money hiring writers who promote drugs and discredit anything natural. A recent story by Marchione, for example, claims that statin drugs help prevent swine flu!

It's quite clear that AP is following a specific agenda to destroy the reputation of natural medicine while boosting public perception of pharmaceuticals. And yet, in reality, it is
Big Pharma that has delivered no cures. But the sick-care industry has delivered America into financial bankruptcy and helped our nation become the most diseased population in the history of human civilization. AP feels no need to report on that inconvenient truth. Rather, it sees its job as encouraging yet more pharmaceutical use in America while destroying the credibility of far safer and more effective natural therapies that could help turn around America's health.

The Associated Press is sadly misinformed about natural medicine, and yet their stories are syndicated across thousands of
newspapers and millions of web pages each day.

We need your help in educating AP editors about natural medicine.

Take action now to educate the Associated Press

NaturalNews is asking readers to contact AP and express both your displeasure with their outright bias against natural medicine and their lack of information about the safety and effectiveness of natural, "alternative" therapies.

AP's contact information is here:

http://www.ap.org/pages/contact/con...

Their general email address is info@...

Their main phone number is (212) 621-1500.

You can also find phone numbers for their various local bureaus at the web page link provided above.

Call or email the AP today and tell them their stories by Marilynn Marchione are a disgrace to the AP's own reputation as an "objective" news source. Share with them why you'd like to see more balanced coverage of
alternative medicine.

Rules of engagement: Be polite. Do not scream or use profanity when contacting the AP. Be professional but firm. The way in which you interact with AP will shape the way they see perceive people from the alternative health community.

You may wish to share a success story of how alternative medicine has helped you overcome a
disease, or you might express how much you dislike the obvious pro-pharma bias found in Marchione's articles.

If you'd like to take this even further, call your local paper that's using AP stories and complain about the quality of the biased stories being published. Tell your local newspaper editor that AP has become a biased news organization operating with an agenda to attack and discredit alternative medicine, and that if your paper continues to run such biased AP stories, you will cancel your subscription or stop buying the paper.

You have no idea how much power you have as a news consumer willing to pick up the phone and make your voice heard. Your comments will make huge waves across the newspaper industry, and your effort can help correct the AP's misguided assault on alternative medicine, hopefully returning it to a more objective and balanced news provider.

So please join NaturalNews readers from all across the world in calling and emailing the Associated Press today to object to their biased, highly-opinionated attacks on alternative medicine.

Here's the contact page, once again:
http://www.ap.org/pages/contact/con...

Share this story everywhere

Share this story on Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and other social networks. Use the power of the internet to get this story out to as many people as possible, and encourage them to join in this effort to help educate the Associated Press about the many benefits of alternative medicine.

This is important. The AP is syndicated across thousands of news publishers. Because of their position, they have a special responsibility to be objective in their coverage of alternative medicine. Each day that they publish distorted stories attacking alternative medicine is another day that potentially millions of readers around the world are deceived into thinking natural medicine is worthless. (This is, of course, the whole purpose of the AP's agenda.)

My own letter to the Associated Press

Dear Associated Press,

As the editor of NaturalNews.com, I am appalled at the highly-opinionated, agenda-driven news stories your organization continues to publish. Written by Marilynn Marchione, these stories carry a header "editor's note" that essentially declares alternative medicine to be utterly worthless. Each of these stories then proceeds to attack alternative medicine in a blatantly biased, opinionated manner that has absolutely no journalistic credibility.

With each one of these stories you publish, your organization is losing more of its journalistic integrity. While "AP" once stood for objective, honest journalism, these attacks on alternative medicine are now earning you a reputation for agenda-driven reporting, fueled by the financial interests of the pharmaceutical companies that provide tens of millions of dollars in advertising revenue each year to the newspapers that carry your stories.

Word is already spreading across the 'net: The Associated Press has lost its street cred. The news you publish is "shaped" to appease corporate interests. Rather than seeking to report the facts, the Associated Press is now engaged in a campaign to intentionally misinform readers and destroy alternative medicine.

If this highly opinionated, biased reporting continues to be published by AP, NaturalNews and other independent media sites across the 'net will announce an "AP boycott" that seeks to encourage newspapers and websites to drop AP services altogether. We will bring together millions of readers who find tremendous value in alternative medicine and natural therapies, and we will make our voices heard with local and national newspapers that subscribe to AP services.

Due to declining revenues, many newspapers are right now reevaluating their contracts with AP. Some have already announced plans to drop your services. Should you continue to publish such biased and defamatory articles attacking alternative medicine, we will seek to rally millions of alternative medicine supporters to contact their local papers and complain about the lack of journalistic integrity in AP stories.

There's nothing wrong with publishing objective stories pointing out both the strengths and weaknesses of various alternative medicine therapies, but to publish an AP story with the pretext that alternative medicine is worthless is simply inexcusable. It's also inaccurate. In fact, it turns out that conventional (pharmaceutical) medicine is the branch of medicine that has offered no cures for degenerative disease. Alternative medicine provides many cures, including affordable, readily-available cures for
diabetes, heart disease and cancer. If you are not aware of these cures, perhaps your writers need to familiarize themselves with more of what's really happening across America: The raw foods movement, juicing, healing and rejuvenation centers, chelation therapy, herbal medicine, superfoods and energy medicine (to name just a few).

Years ago, when I followed conventional medicine, I was nearly obese, diabetes, depressed and diseased. Today, after adhering to "alternative" (natural) therapies, I remain in perfect health. I haven't been sick in years and no longer carry any health insurance because I take responsibility for my own health. My risk of cancer is near-zero, and even if I developed cancer, I know precisely how to reverse it using natural therapies.

This is the kind of information your readers deserve to know. But instead of educating your readers, you are isolating them from the very information that could save their lives. In this way, the AP is not merely violating journalist integrity, it is also violating the laws of morality and common human decency.. You have a responsibility to use your influence to help bring real
health solutions to consumers, but sadly, you have chosen to use your organization to keep the People ignorant of natural health solutions while promoting the corporate agenda of the pharmaceutical companies.

The People have the right to know the truth about the healing potential of safe, natural healing therapies, and you have a journalistic responsibility to cover these stories objectively and honestly. By continuing to publish your opinionated and distorted stories attacking alternative medicine, you only destroy your own reputation as a once-trusted news organization that has now sold out its reputation to Big Pharma.

End your assault on alternative medicine and you will restore credibility to the AP.

Regards,
- Mike Adams
Editor, NaturalNews.com


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1120 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:09 am
Subject: Do Yearly Flu Shots Increase Mortality Risk from Swine Flu?
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
A rather startling article published in the prestigious Lancet calls into question the wisdom of a yearly flu vaccine and points out that it could very easily cause more severe H1N1 swine flu.  It is one thing when the critics of Western medicine point out all the flaws in vaccine theory.  It is another matter entirely when the Lancet does so.
It is important to understand the context of this issue..  The last wobbly pillar of Western medicine is its antiquated vaccine theory.  Public health officials will swear to its ultimate truth no matter what the evidence says, as failure to get the herd to move in unison spells doom for the monopoly of the sickness industry (and their demise as the ruling elite of healthcare can’t come soon enough). 
A new article in the Lancet points out that immunization campaigns in high-risk groups may prevent them from getting a milder influenza A flu in any given season.  However, actually getting the flu also provides a type of generalized natural protection against all influenza A viruses, a type of immune training called heterosubtypic immunity.  While such protection is not 100%, it is clear that it reduces the severity of other flu types such as the H1N1 swine flu or any other pandemic strain. 
The authors argue this type of immune training “can limit virus replication and reduce morbidity and mortality of the host. This type of immunity might be relevant to human beings when a new subtype of influenza A virus is introduced into the population, such as the new influenza A H1N1 virus responsible for the present influenza pandemic and the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses that are causing an ever increasing number of human infections with high mortality rates. Preventing infection with seasonal influenza viruses by vaccination might prevent the induction of heterosubtypic immunity to pandemic strains, which might be a disadvantage to immunologically naive people-eg, infants.”
It appears that vitamin C and vitamin D adequacy would be a far more relevant public health policy than flu shots.
 


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1119 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:04 am
Subject: Conflicts of interest? Dr. Mehmet Oz owns 150,000 option shares in vaccine technology company
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/027451_Dr_Mehmet_Oz_vaccines.html

Dr. Mehmet Oz is a huge promoter of vaccines. He's been on television reinforcing fear about H1N1 swine flu and telling everyone to get vaccinated. But what he didn't tell his viewing audience is that he holds 150,000 option shares in a vaccine company that could earn him millions of dollars in profits as the stock price rises. It is in Dr. Oz's own financial interest, in other words, to hype up vaccines and get more people taking them so that his own financial investments rise in value.

Evidence describing these facts was delivered to NaturalNews by a private investigator named Joseph Culligan (
http://webofdeception.com/oprah.html#oz). That evidence includes an SEC document detailing how Dr. Oz. bought options on stocks for SIGA Technologies in 2005, 2007, 2008 and 2009. SIGA Technologies (stock symbol SIGA) is a vaccine technology company with many advanced developments whose success depends on the widespread adoption of vaccines. According to SEC documents, Dr. Mehmet Oz. currently holds 150,000 option shares on SIGA Technologies, purchased for as little as $1.35 back in 2005.

At the time of this writing, SIGA Technologies is trading at $7.10, making those options bought in 2005 worth $5.75 in profits today. If all the 150,000 options purchased by Dr. Oz. were exercised today, they would be worth roughly $180,000 in profits (they were bought at different prices, not all at $1.35). This is all revealed in what the SEC website calls an "insider transaction" document (link below).

These options won't expire until the years 2015 - 2019, and the higher the stock price of SIGA gets before then, the more profit can be realized when these options are cashed out. You can see the 2019 expiration date in this "insider transaction" form:
http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/...

If the stock price of SIGA Technologies could be pumped up even more -- say, from someone hyping up vaccines in front of a national audience -- these options could mathematically be worth millions of dollars. Just to clarify, by the way, SIGA Technologies doesn't currently manufacture a vaccine for H1N1 swine flu. It focuses on future vaccine technologies that could be applied to many different vaccines down the road.

Dr. Oz. isn't merely a holder of SIGA stock options, by the way: He's on the Board of Directors! As SIGA's own website explains, Dr. Oz has served on the board since 2001 and continues his role there today. This brings up the obvious question:

Is it right for someone talking about whether vaccines are safe on television to also be carrying stock options and serving on the board of directors of a vaccine company at the same time?

Just to make things a little more interesting, SIGA Technologies recently received a $3 million grant in taxpayer dollars from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The purpose of the grant money? To fund the study of a chemical adjunct named ST-246 to be used in future vaccines. So taxpayer money is now being used to fund a vaccine technology company whose stock price increases will financially benefit the very celebrity doctor who is hyping up vaccines to a national audience.

Something sounds fishy here...

Conflict of interest?

To my knowledge, Dr. Oz. has never disclosed to his viewing audience the fact that he owns 150,000 option shares of SIGA Technologies. And yet, with an audience of millions, Dr. Oz has continued to beat the drum of the vaccine industry, urging people to get vaccinated while implying that vaccines protect people from swine flu (even though there is absolutely no scientific evidence to back up that claim).

Here's a link to the SEC document detailing Dr. Oz's ownership of these 150,000 option shares:
http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?act...

The current value of SIGA shares can be verified here:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SIGA

Information about SIGA Technologies and their vaccine technology can be found on their website:
http://www.siga.com/index.php?ID=2

The press release announcing SIGA's receipt of $3 million from the NIH is available here:
http://www.siga.com/?ID=120

The RealAge Big Pharma front group

In addition to holding stock options in a vaccine technology company, Dr. Oz. is also a front man for the RealAge website, a sort of "health front group" for the pharmaceutical industry that uses information provided by RealAge members to solicit consumers with pro-pharma marketing message targeted by age or health condition.

Corporate sponsors of RealAge include most of the major drug companies and their most profitable pharmaceutical products such as Adderall, Ambien and Celebrex. The companies sponsoring RealAge include GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Wyeth and many others. RealAge is essentially a marketing platform for Big Pharma, disguised to look like a consumer health information service.

The New York Times calls RealAge "a window for drug makers" (
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/t...) and explains, "The test has received widespread publicity because of its affiliation with Dr. Mehmet Oz."

This NY Times article goes on to explain how the RealAge scheme operates:

People come to the site, then provide an e-mail address to take [the RealAge test]. They are asked throughout the test if they would like a free RealAge membership. If people answer yes to any of the prompts, they become RealAge members, and their test results go into a marketing database.

RealAge allows drug companies to send e-mail messages based on those test results. It acts as a clearinghouse for drug companies, including Pfizer, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, allowing them to use almost any combination of answers from the test to find people to market to, including whether someone is taking antidepressants, how sexually active they are and even if their marriage is happy.

RealAge sends the selected recipients a series of e-mail messages about a condition they might have, usually sponsored by a drug company that sells a medication for that condition.


The RealAge ads seen all over the internet do not openly disclose that taking the RealAge test gets you signed up to be solicited by Big Pharma for medication advertisements. Dr. Oz's continued promotion of this service has exposed tens of millions of health consumers to this deceptive marketing front for Big Pharma.

How much has Dr. Oz earned from his affiliation with RealAge? He isn't saying.

Front man for Big Pharma?

In my view, Dr. Mehmet Oz. is a front man for Big Pharma and the vaccine industry. He's pushing vaccines for his own personal financial gain while championing one of the largest internet Big Pharma marketing scams yet concocted.

Dr. Oz. stands to profit millions of dollars from helping creating demand for vaccines, and yet he does not disclose to his audience this huge, blatant conflict of interest. Sadly, by catapulting his career from her own show, Oprah has inadvertently unleashed a vaccine pusher onto the general public and given him influence over millions of people who may now be corralled into services like RealAge that seek to sell more drugs to unsuspecting consumers.

I respect Oprah. She's an amazing achiever. But I don't respect all the wannabe celebrity leeches who use her to launch their own careers and then exploit their newfound popularity for financial gain at the expense of the public.

Shame on Dr. Oz. for his financial conflicts of interest and his strong affiliation with the deadly pharmaceutical industry. Through his actions, Dr. Oz. has aligned himself with precisely the evil corporations that are destroying health in America today. Does the man have no shame?

He may not have any shame, but he does have 150,000 stock options that could be worth millions in the years ahead.

Additional sources:
Joseph Culligan is more than just a private investigator; he's also an author. His book When In Doubt, Check Him Out is available on Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/When-Doubt-Ch...

Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1118 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:36 am
Subject: Vitamin B12 Deficiency can Look Identical to Alzheimer's Disease
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/027456_vitamin_B12_disease_dementia.html



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1117 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:20 am
Subject: UK Doctors Take Bribes To Push Swine Flu Vaccine On Patients
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=4124271&cid=Latest_headlines_1_101109



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1116 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:27 am
Subject: A Review of Four Approved Swine Flu Vaccines’ Ingredients
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
I've said it before, but I'll say it again: I'm not anti-vaccines, but rather pro vaccine-safety. That means, I strongly believe that we should only inject substances into our bodies, and especially into the bodies of infants and the unborn, that have been rigorously studied and proven safe both short-term and long-term.
As it stands now, we've spent decades injecting materials into the bodies of young and old alike, without sufficient amounts of safety testing of the ingredients, and our society is showing the signs of this neglect.
 
Neurological dysfunction and disorders such as autism and Alzheimer's have been growing steadily and show no signs of slowing down.
Mercury, in the form of thimerosal, is included in the majority of all flu vaccines as a preservative in multi-dose vials. Thimerosal-free single-dose vials are typically reserved for infants under the age of three, and pregnant women only.
 
I recently published a long list of studies confirming the health dangers of thimerosal -- proof that those who claim "thimerosal has never been shown to cause any damage" are not telling you the truth. There's plenty of evidence to the contrary, and if you missed that article, I recommend you review it now.
But thimerosal is not the only questionable and potentially dangerous ingredient in flu vaccines.
Adjuvants Explained
In order for a vaccine to be considered effective, your immune response to the vaccine should be to produce antibodies to the live or dead viruses in the vaccine (the antigen). An adjuvant is a substance added to a vaccine to improve your immune response to the antigen. The word comes from the Latin adjuvare, which means "to help."
 
By adding adjuvants the vaccine can contain less viral antigens, which reduces production costs.
 
Unfortunately, many of these adjuvants are highly toxic.
 
There are several types of adjuvants. Some of the most commonly used ones include:
  • Aluminium hydroxide
  • Aluminium phosphate
  • Calcium phosphate
 
Other adjuvants include oil-based emulsions such as squalene, Squalene has not been licensed by the FDA for use in vaccines distributed in the U.S. yet, although squalene is an adjuvant used in vaccines distributed in Europe and other countries.
 
GlaxoSmithKline's proprietary formula ASO3™ and Novartis' MF59™ are two examples of squalene adjuvants.
 
As damaging as the neurotoxin mercury is, it's important to realize that aluminum is also a neurotoxin and aluminum-based adjuvants are estimated to be even MORE toxic than mercury.
 
GREAT NEWS -- No Squalene Allowed in US Swine Flu Vaccines!
Fortunately, Americans can draw a sigh of relief as it pertains to squalene -- one of the most controversial of the adjuvants -- at least for now.
Although vaccine manufacturers were pushing to be allowed to use squalene in many of the swine flu vaccines, and the US Department of Health and Human Services purchased spent more than $400 million of tax payers' money to stockpile the oil-based adjuvant, their efforts have been unsuccessful so far.
In order to legally allow unlicensed squalene adjuvants to be included in licensed H1N1 vaccines, the US government would have had to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
There have been small H1N1clinical trials in which experimental squalene adjuvants were included and tested, which have been reported by various media sources, fueling the questions about its use. But that is different from an FDA licensed vaccine that is made available for general public use.
To date, no EUA has been issued, so the swine flu vaccines licensed for use in the US do NOT contain squalene. However, it is still unclear whether the National Emergency declaration issued by President Obama on October 23, 2009, will cover adding novel adjuvants like squalene, or whether a separate EUA must be issued to allow the use of unlicensed adjuvants.
The best way to confirm the existence of vaccine components is to consult the vaccine product manufacturer inserts. Below, you will find links to the inserts for the four H1N1 vaccines licensed for use in the US.
You may also want to review the transcript of the July 23, 2009 meeting of the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee for more information on the discussion about whether the FDA should issue an EUA and allow unlicensed adjuvants in US vaccines.
Thankfully, so far, the FDA has declined to approve squalene adjuvants for US H1N1 vaccines, but that does not mean that the drug companies will not continue to press for approval in the future.
Beware: European Vaccines May Contain Squalene
Unfortunately, vaccine manufacturers have persuaded countries in Europe and elsewhere to add squalene to seasonal influenza and H1N1 vaccines, so if you live outside the US, you will need to do some further research to determine which vaccines may contain squalene.
A recent article in the English version of the German news source The Local, for example, warns that the German Defense Ministry has ordered a special stock of H1N1 vaccines for their troops that will contain neither mercury nor adjuvants, whereas the general public will be given vaccines containing both.
When checking for squalene, beware that the ingredient called MF59™ is an oil-in-water emulsion of squalene, Tween™80 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate), and sorbitan trioleate.
MF59 is approved for human use in Europe, but not in the U.S.
Four Swine Flu Vaccines have Gained US FDA Approval
Below I will review the list of ingredients for the four swine flu vaccines that gained U.S. FDA approval on September 15. (As of this writing, GlaxoSmithKline is the only contracted vaccine manufacturer that has not yet gotten their swine flu vaccine approved.)
Please note that there may be additional anti-virals available that are being used to treat swine flu, and/or swine flu vaccines on the market in other countries, but this article only covers the following four vaccines that have received FDA approval for use in the US:
  • MedImmune (intranasal spray)
  • Novartis
  • Sanofi-Pasteur
  • CSL
These companies, along with GlaxoSmithKline, have all been awarded contracts by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for development and production of more than 195 million doses of swine flu vaccine.
For more information, warnings and side effects of each ingredient, please follow the hyperlinks provided.
MedImmune
MedImmune, which is a subsidiary of London-based AstraZeneca, offers an intranasal spray that contains live attenuated virus. The package insert for MedImmune's intranasal vaccine can be found here.
Please note that the adverse reaction information for MedImmune's vaccine is based on studies conducted with the seasonal flu version known as FluMist.
Please review the insert for numerous warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions.
Of special note are the warnings that it should not be administrated to children and adolescents (2-17 years of age) receiving aspirin therapy or aspirin-containing therapy, because of association of Reye's syndrome.
In addition, it's important to realize that safety has not been established in individuals with underlying medical conditions predisposing them to influenza complications.
MedImmune's vaccine also should not be administered to any individual with asthma, or children under the age of 5 with recurring wheezing because of the potential for increased risk of wheezing post vaccination.

Lastly, please note that some viruses contained in this and other intranasal vaccines CAN spread from the vaccinated person to others. Hence, if a person has a compromised immune system, he or she could be placed at risk of infection from people who have been vaccinated. The ease of transmission appears to vary from strain to strain.
Dosing Instructions for MedImmune Intranasal Spray vaccine:
  • Children 0-2 years: Not approved
  • Children 2-9 years: 2 doses, 0.2 ml each, approximately one month apart
  • Children and adults between the ages of 10-49 years: 1 dose, 0.2 ml
  • Adults 50-65: Not approved, as FluMist was found to have no demonstrable effectiveness in this age group
  • Seniors 65 and over: Not approved
  • Pregnant women: Not recommended
Ingredients include:
Intranasal vaccines do not contain thimerosal (mercury).
Questionable Efficacy…
According to the insert, FluMist has demonstrated a mere 44.5 percent reduction in influenza rate when looking at all strains, compared to active controls (other flu vaccines).
Novartis
The package insert for Novartis' Influenza A(H1N1) 2009 Monovalent vaccine can be found here.
Again, the adverse reaction information for this swine flu vaccine is based on studies conducted with the seasonal flu vaccine Fluvirin, not the A(H1N1) vaccine itself..
It is worth noting that the safety data for Fluvarin (upon which the safety data for the swine flu vaccine is based), was collected from 29 clinical studies over the past 27 years that included no more than 2,768 adults.
In these studies, the subjects were observed for 30 minutes after vaccination, and were instructed to complete a diary card for the three days following immunization, to collect local and systemic reactions.
So, keep in mind that the "safety data" for this vaccine is based on studying human subjects for FOUR DAYS. Not weeks, months, or years, to see if problems occur down the line.
Please review the insert for numerous warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions.
Dosing Instructions (intra-muscular injection):
  • Children 0-4: Not recommended
  • Children 4-9: Two 0.5 ml doses one month apart
  • Children 9-17: One 0.5 ml dose
  • Adults, 18 and over: One 0.5 ml dose
Ingredients include:
  • Inactivated A/California/7/2009(H1N1)v-like virus derived from cell-cultures using dog kidneys. Physorg.com http://www.physorg.com/news175767804.html recently reported that a Swiss authority overseeing medicine and therapeutical products had found bacterial contamination in test batches of the vaccine -- a charge that Novartis has denied.
  • Single-dose vials contain 1 mcg of mercury per 0.5 ml dose
  • Multi-dose vials contain 25 mcg of mercury per 0.5 ml dose
  • Egg proteins
  • Polymyxin (antibiotic)
  • Neomycin (antibiotic found in many topical medications). Neomycin is in the FDA pregnancy category D. This means that it is known to be harmful to fetuses.
  • Beta-propiolactone (a disinfectant). According to the EPA: "No information is available on the chronic (long-term), reproductive, developmental, or carcinogenic effects of beta-propiolactone in humans. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified beta-propiolactone as a Group 2B, possible human carcinogen."
  • Nonylphenol ethoxylate (NPE) (a toxic cleaning agent)
Sanofi-Pasteur
The package insert for Sanofi-Pasteur's Influenza A(H1N1) 2009 Monovalent vaccine can be found here.
The adverse reaction information for Sanofi-Pasteur's vaccine is based on studies conducted with the seasonal flu version known as Fluzone. The safety data for infants under the age of 3 is based on adverse reactions of 19 children, reported within a mere three days of vaccination.
Please review the insert for numerous warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions.
Dosing Instructions (intra-muscular injection):
  • Children 0-5 months: Not approved
  • Children 6-35 months: two 0.25 ml doses, approximately one month apart
  • Children 36 months to 9 years: two 0.5 ml doses, approximately one month apart
  • Children 10 years and older: one 0.5 ml dose
  • Adults: one 0.5 ml dose
Ingredients include:
  • Inactivated A/California/7/2009(H1N1)v-like virus propagated in embryonated chicken eggs
  • Prefilled pediatric syringes and single-dose vials are mercury-free
  • Multi-dose vials contain 25 mcg of mercury per 0.5 ml dose
  • Formaldehyde (up to 100 mcg). Formaldehyde is classifed as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and as a known human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  • Triton-X 100 (Polyethylene glycol P-isooctylphenyl ether) is a toxic detergent
  • Sodium phosphate
  • Sodium chloride (table salt)
  • Gelatin
  • Sucrose (table sugar)
CSL Biotherapies, Inc.
The package insert for CSL's Influenza A(H1N1) 2009 Monovalent vaccine can be found here.
The adverse reaction information for CSL's vaccine is based on studies conducted with the seasonal flu version known as Afluria.
Here the safety data is based on adverse reactions reported within 21 days of vaccination. It's also worth noting that the safety assessment studies were done using mercury-containing placebos, which may significantly skew the data as the control group would most likely experience similar side effects of the thimerosal as those receiving the actual vaccine.
Additionally, tucked away on page 10 it states that:
"No controlled clinical studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Afluria have been performed."
Please review the insert for numerous warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions.
Dosing Instructions (intra-muscular injection):
  • Adults only, 18 years and older: one 0.5 ml dose
Ingredients include:
  • Inactivated A/California/7/2009(H1N1)v-like virus propagated in embryonated chicken eggs
  • Single-dose vials are mercury-free
  • Multi-dose vials contain 24.5 mcg of mercury per 0.5 ml dose
  • Polymyxin (antibiotic)
  • Neomycin (antibiotic found in many topical medications). Neomycin is in the FDA pregnancy category D. This means that it is known to be harmful to fetuses.
  • Sodium chloride (table salt)
  • Monobasic sodium phosphate
  • Dibasic sodium phosphate
  • Monobasic potassium phosphate
  • Potassium chloride
  • Calcium chloride
  • Sodium taurodeoxycholate (detergent)
  • Egg proteins (ovalbumin)
  • Beta-propiolactone (a disinfectant). According to the EPA: "No information is available on the chronic (long-term), reproductive, developmental, or carcinogenic effects of beta-propiolactone in humans. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified beta-propiolactone as a Group 2B, possible human carcinogen."
How Effective is the H1N1 Vaccine, Really?
"Specific levels of HI antibody titers post-vaccination with inactivated influenza virus vaccine have not been correlated with protection from influenza virus. In some human studies, antibody titers of 1:40 or greater have been associated with protection from influenza illness in up to 50% of subjects."

You will find that paragraph in all the vaccine inserts.
 
What that paragraph says, is that the vaccine only works in half, or less, of those individuals who attain the specified level of seroconversion after vaccination. The FDA defines seroconversion as achieving an antibody titer of 1:40.
 
This means that if a vaccine was 100 percent effective at achieving this level of seroconversion, it would protect up to 50 percent of the recipients of the vaccine.

But none of the vaccines are 100 percent effective at achieving seroconversion.
 
CSL's vaccine insert, for example, (see pages 11-12), states that their H1N1 vaccine provides seroconversion for:
  • 48.7 percent of people aged 18-65
  • 34 percent for seniors, 65 and older
 
That means that, at best, their vaccine works in one out of every four people! (49 percent of 50 percent).
 
Which, of course, means that the vaccine does NOT work in three out of every four people…
 
swine flu posters
Is it REALLY worth it?
Final Thoughts
Hopefully, this compilation of data will help you weigh the risks and benefits, to make a more educated decision for yourself and your family.
 
You can also print out these fact-filled posters that we created. Feel free to share them any way you like around your community, at local stores, offices, and schools.
 
Lastly, please remember to bookmark the special section of my site devoted to all the latest H1N1 Swine Flu Alerts. It's an excellent go-to source to stay updated on all the new swine flu developments.
 
Related Links:
Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1115 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:22 pm
Subject: Soldier's warning over vaccine
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/Soldiers-warning-over-vaccine.5768722.jp

A former soldier who suffered Gulf War Syndrome as a result of anthrax injections is warning people about the use of the swine flu vaccine.
 
Mike Kirkby, 38, of Dale Grove, Leigh, who served in the Gulf in 1991, has battled with the MOD and health authorities over how he contracted Gulf War Syndrome.

To increase his survival time during chemical warfare, he was given multiple shots of the Plague Vaccine, which he claims contains adjuvant squalene – the same additive that will be used in the new swine flu vaccine.

He endured seizures, vomiting and diarrhoea and was declared medically unfit.

He is the North West area co-ordinator for the National Gulf War Veterans and Families Association, which is raising awareness of the link between Gulf War Syndrome and squalene.

He said: "It might be fine, but I want people to know about what's going on.. I understand people need the vaccine, but people should have the choice.

"We are trying to make sure the public are aware that there are two vaccines. I would rather people be safe than take it and have problems later in life."

But Dr Kate Ardern, executive director of public health for the Borough of Wigan, insists the vaccine is safe and squalene was not added to the vaccines given to war veterans. She added there was an alternative vaccine, Baxter vaccine, for those with egg allergies, which does not have the squalene.

She said: "Squalene is a naturally occurring substance found in plants, animals, and humans.

"There is a hypothesis squalene is linked to Gulf War syndrome because of the anti squalene anti bodies found in some veterans. Not all will have received the anthrax vaccine – it is a different vaccine. It is now known squalene is not added to the vaccine administered to these veterans."



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1114 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:24 am
Subject: CDC's Dr. Schuchat Said Nothing -- and That Says a Lot
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

CDC's Dr. Schuchat Said Nothing -- and That Says a Lot

Saying nothing By Anne Dachel
 
Last week I came across the video
(Watch HERE) featuring an hour long panel discussion of the H1N1 flu pandemic from the University of Rochester, NY that was aired on Public Television Oct 8. 
 
Participants included Dr. Peter Salgo, of New York Presbyterian Hospital as the host, along with Rear Admiral Anne Schuchat, MD Director, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the CDC, Lisa Harris, MD Primary Care Physician Temple Medical Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Richard Barbano, MD, PhD Professor, Department of Neurology University of Rochester Medical Center, Mark Shelly, MD Infectious Disease and Travel Medicine Highland Hospital Rochester, NY and Barbara Ferrer, PhD, MPH, Med Executive Director, Boston Public Health Commission.
 
This was a public forum with audience participation which led to some very important questions and some very controversial answers. 
 
The first half hour was about the H1N1 virus, who’s at risk, and about the vaccine that is being provided to fight the disease. 
 
Thirty minutes into the discussion came questions from the audience.  One woman brought up the thimerosal issue:
 
“I'm Heidi from New York and I'm also a mother of a 4-year-old.  And I'm concerned about mercury levels in the vaccine.  Is there a dangerous level of mercury in the vaccine, particularly for pregnant women and their unborn child.  And the rest of the general public..  And, can I request a vaccine with no mercury?”
 
 Schuchat was quick to respond with all the standard denials:
“So, the mercury that you're speaking about, a lot of people talk about thimerosal, which is a preservative that contains a type of mercury in it.  We know that some people are concerned about that, and we've produced vaccine that doesn't have the thimerosal in it.  There will be formulations, like the nasal spray, that doesn't have the, the thimerosal.  And some single syringes that don't have it.  And then there will be multidose vials that do have the thimerosal.  We've procured a whole lot of that, so we do think you're likely to be able to get that, if that's your preference.  As a scientist and a public health expert, I can say that, although there were some questions about thimerosal, there have been a lot of studies done, and there really isn't any scientific link between the thimerosal and problem, but we know that some people have concerns and we wanted to be able to address those.  So that's why both formulations will be available.”
 
Next came this question:
 
“Well, if it's [thimerosal], if it's not allowed for pregnant women and their unborn child, then why wouldn't it be a risk for the rest of the population?”
 
 Dr. Mark Shelly took on the issue and trashed ten years of supposed CDC statements about mercury.  Although he seemed flustered and his words were rambling, the message was clear:
 
“That rule was made by politicians and lawyers. (audience laughter)  It wasn’t made based on the best we could come out with.  And so to understand, that really is the key, that the politicians said it was that way and then we start to think that it has medical validity behind, but it really does not.
An adult, the amount of thimerosal in an adult, is is is an unreasonable concern.”
 
Salgo brought up the cautions against pregnant women eating tuna..
 
Shelly: “Well, I, I don't know the relative quantity of mercury in the tuna, or the risk factors in tuna.  I just know that, that we have made this a rule by extension, and basically, as we keep extending it out, become afraid of too many things.”
 
Salgo: “But if people are worried about mercury, and if there's a way to make a vaccine mercury free, what's the harm?”
 
Dr. Lisa Harris then added her opinion: “We, there's a lot of science.  Years and years and years of science that show that there's no link between the thimerosal preservative in vaccine and disease, specifically autism, if you want to throw it out there.  And we know that from just years and years and years and years of data.  We know that from looking at population studies in other countries outside of the United States where there is no autism.  So it's really, as Mark has said earlier, an unreasonable risk.  So we really need to, to educate people, that you're not ingesting a thermometer and putting yourself at risk.”

Salgo: “All right, I know that we are not going to settle the thimerosal…autism question right here on this stage at this moment.”
 
I was appalled listening to this exchange. The CDC is part of Dept of Health and Human Services.  On the website of HHS it states:
(HERE) 

“Exposure to mercury occurs from breathing contaminated air, ingesting contaminated water and food, and having dental and medical treatments. Mercury, at high levels, may damage the brain, kidneys, and developing fetus.
 
“The nervous system is very sensitive to all forms of mercury. Methylmercury and metallic mercury vapors are more harmful than other forms, because more mercury in these forms reaches the brain. Exposure to high levels of metallic, inorganic, or organic mercury can permanently damage the brain, kidneys, and developing fetus. Effects on brain functioning may result in irritability, shyness, tremors, changes in vision or hearing, and memory problems."
 
While HHS conveniently ignored the research by Dr Thomas Burbacher from the U of Washington showing that the ethylmercury used in vaccines is actually more likely to  become trapped in the brain, the statement that is undeniable here is “The nervous system is very sensitive to all forms of mercury.” 

And in 1999, the U.S. Public Health Service, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the  American Academy of Family Physicians, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention all asked pharmaceutical companies to remove mercury from vaccines.  Suddenly on Public Television, in the midst of a massive campaign that is particularly targeting pregnant women to get the flu vaccine, we are told that the USPHS, the AAP, the AAFP and the CDC were forced into that statement by “politicians and lawyers.”
 
Now maybe we needn’t take Shelly’s comments too seriously, after all, he’s not a government official.  However included in this panel was Anne Schuchat. director of CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. She’s been at the CDC since 1988 and must have first hand knowledge of the joint statement issued by the CDC and others in June of 1999.
 
During all of Shelly's comments, Schuchat said nothing.  When he claimed that the CDC really didn’t go along with the statement, but that they were somehow forced into it, Schuchat remained silent.  Not one person on that panel challenged Shelly. 
 
I went to the CDC website where
(HERE) the 1999 agency statement was supposed to be and I found this: “The page you are looking for has been moved to (HERE).”  And when I went to the site I read, “Page Not Found.”
 
We are in the midst of a national vaccination effort where pregnant women are told by everyone in the medical establishment that they should get two flu vaccines which could potentially expose their unborn child to 50 mcg of mercury at one time.  It’s at least a little embarrassing to have the CDC’s public statement on reducing mercury exposure from ten years ago brought up. 
 
Now it seems that the 1999 joint statement was nothing but a fraud designed to pacify politicians and lawyers.
 
It must have been..  After all, Schuchat said nothing.
--
Anne Dachel is Media Editor of Age of Autsim


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1113 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:30 am
Subject: Disingenuous CDC Study Confirms Danger of Chicken-pox Vaccine
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 

Disingenuous CDC Study Confirms Danger of Chicken-pox Vaccine

Chicken-pox By John Stone

A  newly published study co-authored by the US Centers for Disease Control  into the effectiveness of chicken-pox vaccine states in conclusion:

Varicella vaccine substantially decreases the risk of herpes zoster among vaccinated children and its widespread use will likely reduce overall herpes zoster burden in the United States. The increase in herpes zoster incidence among 10- to 19-year-olds could not be confidently explained and needs to be confirmed from other data sources.
(HERE)

While the authors are quick to claim causal benefit from the vaccination the negative effects can only be explained by them as aberrant. Yet such effects were also reported by a UK Health Protection Agency last year. Its press release stated:

If a chickenpox vaccine were to be added to the childhood immunisation programme concerns have been raised that there would be an increase of shingles cases in adults as a result. This is because people who have had chickenpox are less likely to have shingles later in life if they have been exposed occasionally to the chickenpox virus (for example through their children) as this exposure acts as a booster...

The modelling suggested that a two dose schedule at the levels of coverage likely to be achieved in the UK would lead to an increase of at least 20% of shingles in the medium term (approximately 15-20 years). This increase could be partially, but not completely, offset by introduction of a vaccination against shingles among those aged 60+.
Albert Jan van Hoek, who performed the research for the Health Protection Agency, said; “Our models suggest that vaccination would reduce the burden of chickenpox in the young. However, it will lead to an increase in shingles in the medium term in adults because they will not get that ‘boosting’ effect from being in contact with cases of chickenpox.
(HERE)

In fact, these effects have long been known about as a press release from Medical Veritas points out:

Interestingly, the published shingles (herpes zoster) incidence rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated children, as well as adolescents reported by VASP/CDC authors in this current study nicely agree with prior research findings by Goldman who served as Research Analyst for the Varicella Active Surveillance Project (VASP) in 2002 and published the incidence rates in 2005 (Universal Varicella Vaccination: Efficacy Trends and Effect on Herpes Zoster. Goldman GS. International Journal of Toxicology 2005 Jul/Aug; 24(4):203-213).
(HERE)
 
The Medical Veritas document goes on to explain:
 
In historical shingles studies, shingles incidence generally increases with age.  In his 1965 paper, Dr. Hope-Simpson suggested, “The peculiar age distribution of zoster may in part reflect the frequency with which the different age groups encounter cases of varicella and because of the ensuing boost to their antibody protection have their attacks of zoster postponed.” 
 
Lending support to this hypothesis that contact with children with chickenpox boosts adult cell-mediated immunity to help postpone or suppress shingles, is the study by Thomas et al. (Contacts with varicella or with children and protection against herpes zoster in adults: a case-control study. Thomas SL, Wheeler JG, Hall AJ. Lancet 2002 Aug 31;360(9334):678-82) that reported adults in households with children, had lower rates of herpes zoster (HZ) than households without children.. Also, the study by Terada et al. (Incidence of HZ in pediatricians and history of reexposure to varicella-zoster virus in patients with HZ. Kansenshiogaku Zasshi 1995 Aug.; 69(8):908-912) indicated that pediatricians reflected incidence rates from ½ to 1/8 that of the general population their age.  Older parents, in their late 50s, who no longer have children in their household, demonstrate HZ at an incidence rate of 550/100,000 person-years. (Of course, those very elderly adults do experience a sharp rise in shingles incidence due to age-related decline in immunity.) 
(HERE)

This is testimony to the CDC’s willingness to pursue a policy for which there are known and admitted  harms at a population level, but it also stands in contradiction to the policy elsewhere of targeting the young to protect adults (as with Hepatitis B and flu vaccine) since in this case it does the reverse: the only real consistent aim seems to be to push the most products to the great benefit only of the vaccine industry. 
 
John Stone is UK Contributing Editor to Age of Autism.

 
 
P.S. Let us NOT forget the fact that two mexican scientists found a link between this same virus and MS!!!


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1112 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:54 am
Subject: ISRAEL TRUTH TIMES: This is a letter addressed to Professor Engelhard of the Ministry of Health.
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
ISRAEL TRUTH TIMES: This is a letter addressed to Professor Engelhard of the Ministry of Health.
 
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2009/11/this-is-letter-that-i-will-be-sending.html

This is a letter addressed to Professor Engelhard of the Ministry of Health. It will also be a petition; please sign too, specially if you are an MD, an RN, etc. Either they listen, or we do a Bagatz. LAWYERS WELCOME TOO!!

To:

Professor Dan Engelhard
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases
Hadassah University Hospital, Ein-Kerem
POB 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
Fax: 02-6434579
Tel: 02-6778960, 050-7874040

Jerusalem, Nov. 4th, 2009

Dear Professor Engelhard,

A few days ago I spoke to you on the phone, and expressed my serious concerns to you regarding the decision of the Ministry of Health in Israel to administer Focetria and PandemRix, the two adjuvanted H1N1 vaccines respectively from Novartis and GSK, to the unsuspecting population of Israel.

I reminded you of the squalene and polysorbate 80 contained in these vaccines,  and about the dangers of auto-immune reactions, neurotoxicity, and infertility that these vaccines present. You responded to me that you were well aware of the dangers involved, but that you and your panel of physicians , specialists in their respective fields, had decided that benefits outweigh the risks, based on worldwide mortality statistics due to the H1N1 virus.

Professor Engelhard, please let me remind you of the following facts ( I have included one or two references for each topic, but there are many, many more, some peer- reviewed, some not. Time is of the essence and unfortunately I do not have time to include them all at present).

Main points:

1.The statistics presented by the CDC and other monitoring bodies are severely distorted: the proven number of deaths due to the actual H1N1 virus is much smaller than previously reported: most cases were of patients who died of underlying, concomitant conditions, yet were labeled as H1N1 related deaths. Furthermore, a large number of so-called H1N1 cases were never actually proven to be such, cases counted even including phone calls made to doctors by patients worried they might have the H1N1 virus.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/21/cbsnews_investigates/main5404829.shtml

2. H1N1 is a mild influenza virus, much milder even than regular, yearly seasonal influenza. The number of deaths is relatively small, compared to yearly influenza mortality rates.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx

3. The Southern Hemisphere winter season passed without any major catastrophe. The flu season already peaked in the USA.

http://articles.mercola..com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx

4. There IS vaccine available that does not contain either adjuvant or thimerosal. That vaccine is being used on 250,000 German soldiers.

http://www.fightbackh1n1.com/2009/10/german-soldiers-to-receive-different.html


5. Squalene is highly neurotoxic and causes severe auto-immune reactions, even deaths.

http://www.without-consent.com/media/SqualeneReferences-AnimalToxicology.pdf

6. The concentration of squalene in both Focetria and PandemRix is between half a million to a million times higher than the squalene contained in the anthrax vaccine administered to US soldiers in 1991, which was seriously implicated in the Gulf War Syndrome, and from which hundreds of thousands of soldiers suffered terribly, and many thousands died.

http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/08/26/million-times-more-squalene-in-h1n1%20-vax-than-caused-gwi/

Ongoing administration of unlisted vaccines in the US military caused severe reactions and even deaths in thousands of people. The IDF also recently participated in illegal anthrax vaccine experiments on 716 unsuspecting Israeli soldiers ; administration of toxic substances by the US and Israeli government is nothing new.

http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=638072

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7M_TZpQiIY

7. The unnecessary H1N1 vaccination campaign of 1976 caused many cases of Guillain-Barre, some of them permanent. Just as today, people were not informed of the potential dangers involved in taking these highly toxic substances.

http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/swine_flu_vaccine_2

8.Pandemrix has barely been tested on children at all, and has been banned from use in Switzerland below the age of 18, because of lack of clinical data.

http://www.physorg.com/news176099207.html

http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/pandemrix/emea-combined-h832en.pdf

9. The only studies done with Focetria, containing the MARKETABLE PRODUCT, were on a total of 132 people.

(http://www.emea.europa.eu/influenza/vaccines/focetria/focetria.html)

10. The combination of squalene and polysorbate 80 in a buffered solution has been shown to be an excellent anti-fertility combination, in anti-fertility research performed by scientists for the W.H.O., who were assigned the job of developing anti-fertility vaccines to reduce world population. Giving these vaccines to our young population is tantamount to sterilizing them.

(Fertility Impairing Vaccine And Methods of Use' This application claims the benefit of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/070,375, filed January 2,1998, U. S.. Provisional Application No. 60/071,406, filed January 15,1998).

11. Giving these vaccines to our population  is equivalent to using them as guinea pigs for the rest of Europe, the world, and specially for pharmaceutical companies, as they have not yet been properly tested in children or adults in other countries.

See reference , article #8.


12. Because of the recombinant nature of the H1N1 antigen used in the manufacture of these vaccines, there is significant risk that the vaccine itself will lead to a much more serious pandemic, by reassorting itself with other viruses in the community.


http://clareswinney.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/obamas-h1n1-swine-flu-national-emergency-evidences-vaccine-market-building-for-mass-murder/


I understand that, in accordance with W.H.O. directives, and with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's agreement, the goal of the Ministry of Health is to inject the WHOLE POPULATION OF ISRAEL WITH THESE DEADLY VACCINES by December 31st.

I urge you to cancel the decision to use PandemRix in our children ages 3-10, and desist as well from using Focetria in the rest of our population. The orders of the Ministry of Health significantly and unnecessarily endanger our whole population; the current risk of H1N1 pandemic clearly does not warrant such a step at this time. And even if there was a real need for a vaccine, using an adjuvanted vaccine that contains thimerosal is totally unwarranted and contraindicated.

Yours sincerely,

Daisy, J. Stern, MD
Family and Preventive Medicine.

USA and Israel.



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1111 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:01 am
Subject: Dangerous Mercury Still In Vaccines- Its Effects on the Brain and Immune System (Current Newsstory)
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
 

 


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1110 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:49 am
Subject: ** The Connection Between Migraines and Strokes
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
** The Connection Between Migraines and Strokes

-- by Jeff Jurmain, MA

A new study in the prestigious "British Medical Journal" says
that migraine headaches are linked with a twofold higher risk of
stroke -- when the migraine comes with temporary visual or
sensory disturbance.

Migraine is a common, chronic disorder that affects up to 20%
of the population. Women are affected up to four times more
often than men. Nearly one-third of sufferers also experience an
aura (disturbance) prior to or during a migraine headache (often
described as the perception of a strange light, an unpleasant
smell or confusing thoughts or experiences).

Doctors have long suspected a connection between migraine and
vascular events such as stroke. So, to investigate this further, an
international team of researchers analyzed the results of nine
studies on the association between any migraine (with and
without aura) and heart disease.

In those studies, they discovered that migraine with aura is
associated with a twofold increased risk of stroke. This risk is
further increased by being female and being a smoker.
Thankfully, there was no association between migraine and
heart attack or death due to cardiovascular disease.

Based on these findings, researchers recommend that women
who have migraine with aura should do their best to stop
smoking if they do. Meanwhile, more research is needed to
investigate the association between migraine and cardiovascular
disease in more detail.

If you suffer migraine headaches, your actual risk of stroke is
still low. So doubling a low risk remains a low risk, so there is
no need to panic. But when researchers look at something over
an entire population, the risk deserves attention, because the
prevalence of migraine is so high.

Migraine patients who have aura would be wise to speak to their
doctors about any risk factors for the heart. Paying attention to
cholesterol and triglyceride levels as well as high blood pressure
is a must. Limiting stress will go a long way to helping the heart,
as well as eating a healthy diet rife with fruits and vegetables.






Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1109 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:15 am
Subject: Why boys are turning into girls
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 


Gender-bending chemicals are largely exempt from new EU regulations, warns Geoffrey Lean
 
Girls will be girls and boys will be girls: everyday 'gender-bending' chemicals are feminising increasing numbers of babies... 
 
Here's something rather rotten from the State of Denmark. Its government yesterday unveiled official research showing that two-year-old children are at risk from a bewildering array of gender-bending chemicals in such everyday items as waterproof clothes, rubber boots, bed linen, food, nappies, sunscreen lotion and moisturising cream.
 
The 326-page report, published by the environment protection agency, is the latest piece in an increasingly alarming jigsaw. A picture is emerging of ubiquitous chemical contamination driving down sperm counts and feminising male children all over the developed world. And anti-pollution measures and regulations are falling far short of getting to grips with it.
Sperm counts are falling so fast that young men are less fertile than their fathers and produce only a third as much, proportionately, as hamsters. And gender-bending chemicals are increasingly being blamed for the mystery of the "lost boys": babies who should normally be male who have been born as girls instead.
 
The Danish government set out to find out how much contamination from gender-bending chemicals a two-year-old child was exposed to every day. It concluded that a child could be "at critical risk" from just a few exposures to high levels of the substances, such as from rubber clogs, and imperilled by the amount it absorbed from sources ranging from food to sunscreens.
 
The results build on earlier studies showing that British children have higher levels of gender-bending chemicals in their blood than their parents or grandparents. Indeed WWF (formerly the World Wildlife Fund), which commissioned the older research, warned that the chemicals were so widespread that "there is very little, if anything, individuals can do to prevent contamination of themselves and their families." Prominent among them are dioxins, PVC, flame retardants, phthalates (extensively used to soften plastics) and the now largely banned PCBs, one and a half million tons of which were used in countless products from paints to electrical equipment.
 
Young boys, like those in the Danish study, could end up producing less sperm and developing feminised behaviour. Research at Rotterdam's Erasmus University found that boys whose mothers were exposed to PCBs and dioxins were more likely to play with dolls and tea sets and dress up in female clothes.
And it is in the womb that babies are most vulnerable; a study of umbilical cords from British mothers found that every one contained hazardous chemicals. Scientists at the University of Rochester in New York discovered that boys born to women exposed to phthalates had smaller penises and other feminisation of the genitals.
The contamination may also offer a clue to a mysterious shift in the sex of babies. Normally 106 boys are born for every 100 girls: it is thought to be nature's way of making up for the fact that men were more likely to be killed hunting or in conflict. But the proportion of females is rising, so much so that some 250,000 babies who statistically should have been boys have ended up as girls in Japan and the United States alone.. In Britain, the discrepancy amounts to thousands of babies a year.
 
A Canadian Indian community living on ancestral lands at the eastern tip of Lake Huron, hemmed in by one of the biggest agglomerations of chemical factories on earth, gives birth to twice as many girls as boys. It's the same around Seveso in Italy, contaminated with dioxins from a notorious accident in the 1970s, and among Russian pesticide workers. And there's more evidence from places as far apart as Israel and Taiwan, Brazil and the Arctic.
 
Yet gender-benders are largely exempt from new EU regulations controlling hazardous chemicals. Britain, then under Tony Blair's premiership, was largely responsible for this – restricting their inclusion in the first draft of the legislation, and then causing even what was included to be watered down.Confidential documents show that it did so after pressure from George W Bush's administration, which protested that US exports "could be impacted".
 
Now the Danish government is planning to lobby to have the rules toughened up. It is particularly concerned by other studies which show that gender-bending chemicals acting together have far worse effects than the expected sum of their individual impacts. It wants this to be reflected in the regulations, citing its discovery of the many sources to which the two-year-olds are exposed – modern slings and arrows, as it were, of outrageous fortune.
 
 
 

Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1108 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:56 am
Subject: Disinfectant Overkill
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.womenandenvironment.org/campaignsandprograms/SafeCleaning/disinfectants/Disinfectant%20Overkill.pdf

A look at five common antimicrobial chemicals and

their associated health impacts.


Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1107 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:45 am
Subject: A Nurse Speaks Up About Flu Shots
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/11/a-nurse-speaks-up-about-flu-shots.html

Media Editor's Note: Lynette Volkers is an RN who's looked beyond the official claim, "vaccines are safe, vaccines save lives."  After talking with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny about vaccines, she started to question the things she’d been taught.  Lynette recently said, “I am new to questioning vaccines.  My children are 3 and 2 years old and have up to this point received their vaccinations, and me, well, up until this year I have received the flu vaccine.”  After what she’s learned about the damaging side effects of vaccinations she now writes, “If you were to ask me today if I would immunize against anything right now - HECK NO!!   It infuriates me that the pharmaceutical industry dictates so much of the medical field.”  As more courageous professionals in the medical community speak out, everyone will wake up to the truth about the unchecked, unsafe vaccine program and the link to the epidemic increase in autism. – Anne Dachel, Media Editor.
 
--
FLU SHOT:  Friend or Foe?
 
By Lynette Volkers  RN BSN
The timing is impeccable.  As the leaves morph into their vibrant fall colors so comes the onslaught of the dreaded flu season.  "Get your flu shot here" posters spring up in every corner.  The media does its job well. By repeatedly discussing outbreaks and flu-related deaths, the public is motivated by fear. Americans everywhere rush to get the magic flu ‘jab,” victims of media-hype and massive marketing.   
 
Why do we get flu shots?  Supposedly to protect us from fever, body aches and some upper respiratory illness that lasts at the most 3-5 days. However, studies show that the flu shot is not effective.  Both information from the FDA and the manufacturer’s package insert indicate that the flu shot should NOT be given to pregnant women; yet they are at the top of the priority list for receiving this fall’s flu shots. Vaccination of healthy adults reduces the risk of contracting influenza by a mere 6 percent. And there is no evidence that injecting children 6 to 24 months of age with a flu shot is any more effective than placebo.  Some reports actually suggest you have an increased chance of contacting the flu after you receive the flu shot. In other words, getting the flu shot offers no guarantee you will not become ill. 

Your doctor and the media are not telling you what is coming through that needle. Besides the formula of viruses scientists concoct by an admitted guess, you also get a big dose of problems. Flu shots contain formaldehyde, a known carcinogen, and all multi-dose flu shot vials have thimerosal, (mercury), a controversial ingredient linked to autism. Others ingredients include polysorbate 80, shown to cause infertility in mice; gentamycin, an antibiotic, and Triton X100, a strong detergent.

It is infuriating that the truth about both H1N1 Swine flu and the seasonal flu is not accurately portrayed in the media.  If you spend some time on the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) website, you would find that less than 1,000 people actually die each year from the flu, not the 36,000 deaths robotically reported by the media. One could speculate there is a conspiracy between the government, the drug companies, and the media. This game allows billions of dollars to pour into the deep pockets of Big Pharma while millions of Americans are injured by flu shots incessantly hyped by the fear-mongering press. 
The role of medicine is to treat disease. Anyone who takes time to learn the truth about vaccines will find that vaccinations do not prevent disease but rather they stoke the fires and perpetuate disease, insuring that doctors and pharmaceutical companies have diseases to treat in the future. 

Before you decide to get the flu shot, take responsibility for your health.. One of the most important preventions you can do is to get your vitamin D level checked; be sure the level is about 60ng/mL. Do some research on websites that are not sponsored by drug company money.  A few I like are listed below. If the flu gets you down this winter, let your body do what it was made to do – heal itself. Stay at home, increase your vitamin C and vitamin D, avoid junk food, get plenty of sleep, cough or sneeze into a tissue, and most importantly, wash your hands. 

Websites:
Pandemic Flu Online    
Dr. Tenpenny   
Vaccine Truth 
Medical Voices
 
--
Lynette Volkers is a neonatal intensive care Unit nurse affiliated with the Marshfield Clinic in Marshfield, Wis.



Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


#1106 From: Gabriela DeVelbiss <gabrieladevelbiss@...>
Date: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:13 pm
Subject: Genes Have "No Clinical Relevance" in Predicting Disease, Scientists Admit
gabrieladeve...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/027438_disease_genes_health.html

Genetic analysis is essentially useless in predicting a person's risk of cancer, heart attack or other common diseases, according to a set of commentaries published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The decoding of the human genome in 2003 led to a flood of research into the contributions that genetic variation might make to the risk of various chronic diseases that tend to develop late in life, such as diabetes, heart disease or cancer. Since then, a number of for-profit companies have begun offering genetic screenings and
disease risk assessments.

"With only a few exceptions, what the genomics companies are doing right now is recreational genomics," said David B. Goldstein of Duke University, author of one of the commentaries. "The information has little or in many cases no clinical relevance."

A few diseases, such as sickle cell anemia or Tay Sachs disease, can be caused by a mutation on a single gene. Most diseases, however, are much more complex, and develop due to an interaction between environmental factors and the contributions of a variety of
genes.

In order to calculate the genetic contribution to these diseases, geneticists developed the technique known as genomewide association study, in which the genomes of groups of healthy people are compared with the genomes of those with a certain disease. The hope among researchers has been that this analysis could point out genetic differences between the groups that might be linked to disease risk.

While genomewide analysis has successfully identified some differences between the genetic codes of healthy and diseased patients, these differences provide little information about disease risk. Researchers expected to find a small number of common genetic variations that were responsible for each disease. Instead, common gene variants appear to contribute to disease risk only very marginally.

Goldstein suggests that the genetic component of
chronic disease risk might arise from a large number of rare genetic variants, making genetic screening far less helpful in predicting risk. If only a small number of variants are involved, they might provide information on the biological pathways that lead to the development of the disease. If many different variations are implicated, however, this would tell researchers nothing except that an error in the functioning of nearly any bodily system can contribute to disease risk.

"In pointing at everything," Goldstein wrote, "genetics would point at nothing."

Based on the failure of more than 100 genomewide studies -- carried out on thousands of patients in a number of different countries -- to deliver useful results, Goldstein suggests that the approach should be abandoned as a waste of resources. Genomewide analysis is only effective at uncovering common variations with large effects, Goldstein says. Discovering rare variants with smaller effects is "beyond the grasp of the genomewide association studies."

A single genomewide analysis study costs several million dollars to carry out.

In addition, as more such studies are carried out, each one will deliver less new information on gene-related disease risk -- a problem of diminishing returns.

Also writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers Peter
Kraft and David J. Hunter of the Harvard School of Public Health disagree with Goldstein that the studies are incapable of providing useful data. They agree, however, that they have provided no clinically useful information to date.

Kraft and Hunter warned that any risk estimate based on genetic analysis is likely either too low or too high, because researchers simply do not have enough information on genetic contribution to disease. Risks that are calculated as lower than they actually are will likely never be reported to patients. This means that any genetic risk a patient actually gets told about is probably an overestimate, and only likely to cause unnecessary alarm.

Sources for this story include:
www..nytimes.com.

Love, Gabby. :0)
 
"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport
 


Messages 1106 - 1135 of 1208   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help