JCT: CBC had a large crew of Canadian medpot reformers on
radio this week.

>Subject: CBC Cannabis Radio Show
>Mark Ware, Pierre-Claude Nolin, Marc Emery, Ethan
>Nandlemann, Eugene Oscapella, and others, on
>Sounds Like Canada with Bernard St. Laurent.
>About 90 minutes in length, and about 10MB in size.
Sounds Like Canada - Realmedia
http://www.salvagingelectrons.com/sounds/cbc-slc-20030523-cannabis.rm

JCT: Without even reading it, I wonder if anyone on the
panel pointed out the ramifications of the the Rogin
decision on the nation. Or is it just more damage control? I
wonder if anyone says that the law has been dead Canada-wide
since Terry Parker Day Aug. 1 2001? But they probably would
not have been let on the show if they were any real danger.

Think about it. The guy who bet it all that the law is dead
- and they guy they don't yet know why he bet it all - is of
no interest the media. No one I know of, (haven't checked
the French media who are often really good) but no English
media know why I did it. Everyone's been left with the
impression that it was just a stunt, not a challenge. Of
course, it will eventually come out but not with the force
that it would have had if they'd explained it from the
start.

I don't mind. I know that having the government and media
suppress my real moves suggests that they're effective. If I
were a "do-nothing" reformer like Emery or a "go-
nowhere" advocate like "Wrong-Way" Young, I'm sure they'd
have me on the show too.

From the Marc "Cannabis Vulture" Emery's web site:

>From: sunn newbie
>Re: CBC Radio cannabis show - listen here
>Fri May 23 2003 04:13 PM

S: That ruled! I really found it funny, the last moral gap
of ridiculousness that the cop ended his bullshit with...
Man..but on other points, I guess it would be too agressive,
but when the cops in interviews say that they really want to
keep MJ illegal, why does no one confront them with the fact
that it is mostly their own personal problem with people
succumbing to a euphoric state?

JCT: Gee, did no one handle the issue of cannabis changing
people's perception? I know I did. Maybe I'm the only who
ever has?

S: some things I thought were missing though were:1. my all
time pet peeve, the issue of higher potency pot...it is
seldom mentioned (on these shows) that if you have to inhale
less smoke, then there is less risk, and that if you are to
look a little at the buds your smoking you can tell if it is
potent or not, and that smokers don't just smoke all they've
got regardless of potency and unknowingly find themselves
totally incapacitated, oh and 2. the fact that you don't
even have to smoke it, thus eliminating resperatory risks.

JCT: Oh, they missed that point too? That's the case which
my 19-year-old niece Marieve made during our debate with the
RCMP? And these experts didn't have the answer. Of course,
I'll admit I didn't either when she surprised me. I was
ready to say "so they smoke one puff instead of the whole
joint for the same buzz" but she made the logical extension
that that is good for you!

S: But I loved it, and will smoke in honor of Marc Emery's
greatness. He is an unstoppable force for truth.

JCT: Marc Emery, an unstoppable force. For censorship of the
truth at his site, maybe, but I've pointed out he and his
crew are downplaying the extent of our true victory in the
Rogin decision. But this kid needs not fear Marc Emery
censoring this sucking-up like Marc threatened to censor
other less brown-nosing contributors.

When I think of Marc Emery, chosen-by-the-media medpot
spokesman, challenging Ontarians to smoke a joint in public
since Justice Rogin declared the law gone last week, I'd
point that it applies nation wide. So, with the benefit of
the Rogin decision, doesn't Marc, the chicken, have the
balls to take his own challenge?

Did he miss me smoking my joint on Parliament Hill two days
BEFORE Rogin's decision? Marc Emery, even with the benefit
of Rogin and the unstoppable force is still just chicken
balls.

It would be sad to have cannabis RE-criminalized with no
major effort across the country to keep it legal. Except
from The Engineer, that is.

Regardless, I'm going into Superior Court Monday morning to
quash the biggest charge possible with three Superior Court
decisions in hand. Rogin on the technical failure to enact
the MMAR right, and Pitt and Lederman decisions on the
actual failure of the MMAR to protect Parker's rights.

Still, I have to wonder how they'll manage to forestall it.
Or this might be the straw that breaks camel's back. What if
they Crown somehow tries to introduce Alan Young as a friend
of the court again so he can try to sabotage my case like he
sabotaged Terry Parker's case? That would be high adventure.

But I think Alan's a spent force. His being reduced to
begging for the chance to present arguments on my case was
the sweetest victory he ever won. For both of us! He had to
argue it had merit even after having shafted it a year ago!
And I don't think there's any more he can do to shaft our
Lederman win.

Anyway, I'm so loud and aggressive so Marc, Alan et al have
no chance to argue they didn't know they were misleading
everyone by acting like the law wasn't dead in Canada but
only in Ontario.

At least Internet readers know the truth.

And actually, I can only be thankful for such a colorful
cast of villains.



--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel / http://www.medpot.net 613-562-0669