JCT: You'll remember my writing about Brantford shyster John
Renwick who has been told about the Krieger invalidation of
Section 7 offence but advises his clients to plead guilty to
marijuana offences he should know no longer exist. He's
helped another elderly couple plead guilty to the
cultivation section that the Supreme Court of Canada says
was invalidated by the Krieger case.

Brantford Expositor
May 15 2007
Struggling farmers grew marihuana
Scotland-area couple receive 15-month sentence

A farm couple who struggled to make ends meet now each have
criminal records and will have to spend the next 15 months
at home as a result of their poor choice of crops.
Walter Stys, 63, and his wife, Gladys, 61, of R4 Scotland
received the sentence on Monday after pleading guilty to
production of a controlled substance and possession for the
purpose of trafficking....
A pre-sentence report revealed that Walter and Gladys Stys
are a hard-working couple with no prior criminal records. A
series of economic setbacks, including a failed tobacco
farm, factory jobs lost due to plant closures and unreliable
livelihood in vegetable farming, had taken their toll on the
couple who raised six children and are the primary
caregivers for an adult paraplegic son.
Their dire circumstances gave rise to the "bad and illegal
idea" to grow marijuana to make money, said defence lawyer
John Renwick.
Justice Martha Zivolak agreed with the suggestion of a
lengthy conditional sentence for the couple.

JCT: Puts our tax money to work paying some civil servant to
supervise these "hurt no one" offenders for a few years.

Anyway, I wonder how much shyster Renwick squeezed out of
this old hard-working couple in payment for his getting them
convicted while the law happened to be invalid. I wonder how
many people he let be convicted of possession between Aug. 1
2001 and Oct 7 2003 while the courts admit the Section 4(1)
possession had been invalidated by Terry Parker.

That's the reason no lawyer could argue the Parker
invalidation and I could. I'm an engineer with nothing to
lose by the truth and they're the lawyers who were derelict
in letting their clients be convicted while the law was dead
and should probably owed them a refund of fees for their
inept legal performances!

Sadly, Editor David Judd's Expositor squelched any
information about the Nielsen case that would have permitted
the Stys family to find out about the Krieger invalidation
of the Section 7(1) cultivation offence.


--
Abolitionist Debt Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer"
Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution
C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel USENET blog: alt.fan.john-turmel