JCT: In Pierre Drouin's last report on his pre-trial in
Ontario Superior Court, he mentioned a letter from the
Supreme Court. It was a May 4 2007 letter we all received:

Dear Mr. Turmel:
Re: John Turmel v. Her Majesty The Queen
File No 32011 (C/A file#: C44587)

This will acknowledge receipt of your application for leave
to appeal to the Supreme of Canada, which application has
been accepted for filing.
The Court file number in this case is 32011. All parties are
asked to refer to this number in any communication with the
Registry Branch concerning the above proceedings.
Please do not hesitate to contact and officer of the....
Michel Jobidon
Senior Registry Clerk
Cc: Mr. Steve Coroza, Mr. Francois Lacasse

JCT: What it means is that everything is in proper order and
the Crown had to respond to each in 30 days. once the Crown responds and
we Reply, it goes to three
judges for leave to appeal to all nine.

So we're in before three and no one Judge Binnie gets to
short circuit the question again. Except that almost 3000
epileptics have died who would not have died if Justice
Binnie had not delayed this life and death question for two
extra years because he didn't like the explanation for
submitting one document late. Imagine aborting the whole
ready case, all documents filed and ready to go to 3 judges,
because of such a flimsy technicality with 1500 preventable
epileptic deaths a year at stake! He's covered in blood and
I'm going to get to the the boots to him now that the Crown
have filed their responses and I'm free to do my job as an
attacking Parliamentarian.

Remember, I'm a Guinness Record "attempted-Parliamentarian"
who has so far forced the courts to admit a Guinness Record
Parker Screw-up 4000 mistakes they had to stay;
the "attempted-Parliamentarian" who is trying to force the
Crown to correct a Guinness Record "Parker Scandal" 100,000
bogus convictions made during the 2 years they admit the
possession prohibition was invalid, between my Terry Parker
"Invalidation of Prohibition" Day after July 2001 and Alan
Young's Hitzig "Revalidation of Prohibition" Day before
October 7 2003 when his Hitzig Court of Appeal for Ontario
said they were resurrecting the prohibition that had been
admittedly invalid for the past two years;
the "attempted-Parliamentarian" who is trying to force the
Crown to stay or correct a Guinness Record "Krieger scandal"
of all 150,000 bogus marijuana convictions since Krieger Day
February 4 2003.

So far, I've already scored more than 4,000 stayed
prosecutions. But that's only one month's worth of busts,
only a part of the main pot of erasing the 100,000 bogus
registered over the two years the law was invalid which I'm
still now claiming at the Supreme Court.
And I'm going after the latest round of bogus prosecutions
and convictions since the Krieger decision that invalidated
the cultivation prohibition with the possession prohibition.

The court deigns tell as Guinness Record Parliamentarian
that they are going to ignore the Interpretation Act and
create a new penal statute. Not without a fight they're not.
The Engineer was right and all Canada's bar and judiciary
were wrong about the Parker invalidation having taken effect
on Terry Parker Day and The Engineer will be right and all
Canada's bar and judiciary will be wrong about the Krieger
cultivation invalidation having taken effect on Feb 4 2003.

The fact Justice Binnie has delayed this day of reckoning
has cost the lives of 3000 Canadian epileptics whose rights
had been declared violated and who remained unprotected from
the unconstitutional prohibition due to manipulations by the
Crown in the courts.

Courts did wrongly decide.
Canadians wrongly died.
There's nowhere for Binnie to hide.

I didn't say much about the genocide of the Canada's sick
earlier because I wanted to let the Crown get on the record
first. You'll note that I never even raised all my "Hitzig
can't resurrect the law" arguments. I've given the Crown the
chance to make the argument the "Hitzig can resurrect the
law" argument because it wasn't made invalid pursuant to the
Interpretation Act, it was only made "absent" until the
Court could fix it if Parliament failed to do so.

I haven't even read the responses to my three applications
because I want to start my parsing with our best shot first,
Pierre Drouin's analogous Krieger shot at establishing that
Section 7 became invalid when the Crown failed to get a stay
out of the Supreme Court of Canada to stay the Krieger
invalidation because the fools relied on the Appellant's
stay out of the Alberta Court of Appeal continuing on after
the appeal had been dismissed. Har har har har, nyuk nyuk
nyuk nyuk.

Yes, yesterday, on the very 30th day, I got the Crown's
response in the mail to all three of my applications and I'd
bet Pierre and Real got theirs too.
I'll be typing them up and posting them in the order I filed
them with Pierre's Section 7 Krieger challenge, a perfect
Krieger analogy, cultivating with proven medical need,
first.
Then on to my Section 5(2) challenge to quash my conviction
for "possession for bad purpose" during the period that the
"possession" prohibition was invalid!
Then on to my Section 5(2) challenge to quash all marijuana
convictions under all sections.
And finally on to my challenge to allowing lies on the
indictment. I was charged with possession of under 3Kg.
That's not true. I had more which warranted a jury trial the
Crown did not want me to have. So they lied on the
indictment and Justice Peter Wright, Justice Macleod, and
Justices Labrosse, Sharpe and Blair say that's okay.

Stay tuned for the final real live arguments going on in
"Abolitionist v. Prohibitionist Herbal Remedy Wars."


--
Abolitionist Debt Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer"
Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution
C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel USENET blog: alt.fan.john-turmel