JCT: On the day Tuesday Apr 24 when I filed all five
applications for leave to appeal the Big Five Ontario Court
of Appeal medpot cases to the Supreme Court of Canada, there
was an article:

>Ottawa Citizen Apr 24 2007
>Caseload reduction baffles Supreme Court
>by Janice Tibbetts

The Supreme Court of Canada is being stumped by the case of
the shrinking docket. The number of appeals to be heard this
year is expected to dwindle to 50, significantly fewer than
the average number of about 90 annually over the last
decade. The court's spring session was supposed to begin
last week but the courtroom was empty every day because of a
shortage of cases and the judges do not begin sitting until
today.
From now until the end of June, the docket remains sparse
with only 13 appeals in all, compared to 28 cases last
spring. "It is not known whether this reduction in case load
represents a trend or an anomaly" the Supreme Court said
recently in an annual report to Parliament.
Court watchers suspect the drop is a result of fewer people
trying to take their cases to the Supreme Court, people
shying away from costly litigation that can take years to
settle, and the judge becoming more particular about which
cases fit their criteria of "national importance.

JCT: On the very same day of the article, I fixed that
problem by filing five applications, a record first for me,
five. I've filed a double but never a quintuple.

1) Pierre Drouin's Section 7 cultivating charge to claim the
Krieger invalidation of Section 7. He has since gotten his
exemption!!!
2) Real Martin's Section 7 cultivating charge to claim the
Krieger invalidation of Section 7. He can't find a doctor.
3) John Turmel's Section 5 intent to traffic charge to claim
the Krieger invalidation of Section 7 cultivation and Parker
invalidation of Section 4 possession prohibitions also
invalidated the possession with bad intent charge too.
4) John Turmel's claim to no jurisdiction without a jury
trial.
5) John Turmel's appeal against conviction on the grounds of
medical preventative use.
I'll publish their Memorandums soon.
But now the Crown has to answer five times in 30 days and no
Registrar or single prohibitionist judge can stop it from
getting before 3 judges. It brings everything into play, in
its own way. What a show it would be. A quintuple appeal.
What did Alan Young call me? Something like a 3-ring circus
lawyer? Remember the Heaven Eleven in Federal Court at the
Supreme Court of Canada building in 2001? But five in the
Supreme! That's what I call a real circus.

Anyway, the issues here are the 100,000 people who were
convicted over the two years the court finally ruled that
the law had been invalid but who have never had their
convictions expunged. After the 4000 charges they had to
drop in 2003, this is the second largest judicial screw-up
in Canadian history. The other issue is the largest snafu in
Canadian judicial history, the improper prosecution since
the Krieger decision invalidated the S.7 prohibition on
cultivation of 200,000 Canadians on the basis claimed by
Crown Attorney S. David Frankel of an Appellant's stay
continuing to exist after they lost their appeal and their
Appellant's status. Of course, the stay pending the Krieger
appeal expired when the appeal was dismissed but that bogus
reason is the only reason the Crown have got for all those
busts.


--
Abolitionist Debt Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer"
Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution
C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel USENET blog: alt.fan.john-turmel