JCT: Go check it out. Alan Young has claimed credit for the
4000 charges dropped due to the Terry Parker Day
Declaration. I and Marc Paquette were with Terry in the
demand to Declare the law became invalid on Aug. 1 2001.
Alan Young was not.

As a matter of fact, when the court did declare the law had
been invalid since Terry Parker Day 2001, Young was on TV
explaining to Canadians how his Hitzig case had brought the
period of legalisation to an end. A reverse way of saying he
had brought the law back to life.

He now ducks not only responsibility for bringing the law
that Terry had invalidated back to life but he's done it by
taking credit for requesting the Terry Parker Day
Declaration of invalidity on Aug. 1 2001.

It's all easily proven, I've published the Parker Order,
Turmel-Paquette Order and Hitzig Order in our Prohibition
kits. Anyone can see we asked to have the law declared
invalid since Aug. 1 Terry Parker Day and were thus
responsible for the 4000 charges being dropped.

Alan Young is responsible for those withdrawals being
limited to Oct 7 2003 when he brought it back to life on
Hitzig Day.

Professor Alan Young Acts for Medicinal Marijuana Patients
http://osgoode.yorku.ca/media2.nsf/83303ffe5af03ed585256ae60
05379c9/bd4fe9fb9cdc94cc85256df7006bbb05?OpenDocument

JCT: This is what the York University Osgoode Hall Law
School is publishing about their Professeur Saboteur, Judas
Goat now trying to white-wash his blackened record.

Globe and Mail
Ottawa stays pot charges in 4,000 case
At same time, rules changed to improve patients' access to pot
By KIM LUNMAN
Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2003

JCT: This is the very same article we use in our Prohibition
kits proving our demand to declare the prohibition invalid
since Terry Parker Day by the withdrawal of charges up until
Oct 7 2003 Hitzig day:

OTTAWA -- Ottawa is making it a green Christmas for 4,000
people -- it plans to stay thousands of charges of pot
possession as a result of legal battles over medicinal
marijuana.
The decision will apply to every person in Canada charged
with possession of marijuana between July 31, 2001, and Oct.
7, 2003, Justice Department spokeswoman Pascale Boulay said
yesterday.
The Justice Department intends to cease prosecutions on the
cases because of an Ontario court ruling in 2000 that found
medicinal-marijuana users had the right to possess less than
30 grams of pot.

JCT: Nowhere is 30 grams of pot mentioned in the law.

The judge delayed that ruling's effect for one year in the
hope the federal government would introduce a medicinal-
marijuana law. But the government did not.

JCT: Bingo. It did not on time so the law became invalid
since 1 year after the July 31 2000 suspended Parker
declaration.

Instead, the cabinet issued regulations for access to
medicinal marijuana one day before the year-long grace
period ended in 2001. The Ontario ruling created a legal
loophole, effectively invalidating Canada's marijuana
possession law as unconstitutional because it failed to
provide an exemption for medical use.

JCT: No mention of why it became invalid if they introduced
the regulations on time though it was then admitted it had.

"We estimate there are about 4,000 pending files," Ms.
Boulay said. However, she said that criminal charges of
marijuana possession will still be prosecuted today as a
result of the government's announcement yesterday that it
will not appeal the medicinal-marijuana case to the Supreme
Court.
"It still constitutes an offence and [anyone caught with
marijuana] would face charges."

JCT: No explanation of how an invalid law was still valid.

The federal government recently introduced legislation to
decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana.

JCT: That issue is short-circuited by whether the law had
died on Terry Parker Day. Why decriminalize that whose
prohibition was no longer valid?

Possession of marijuana now carries a maximum penalty of six
months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.

JCT: Still no mention how the law went from invalid to valid
again. Just the report that it had.

The decision not to proceed with 4,000 possession
prosecutions follows Health Canada's announcement yesterday
that it would not appeal an Ontario Court of Appeal ruling
in October that allows ill people to grow their own
marijuana supply or to obtain it from designated growers.

JCT: Actually, it had to do with the law having been invalid
since Terry Parker Day, not that the sick have better
regulations for access to a no longer prohibited substance.

Some police forces had virtually stopped enforcing the
possession law after the initial ruling threw its
constitutionality into question. Last January, a Windsor
judge cleared a 16-year-old on the grounds the federal pot-
possession laws were no longer valid.

JCT: For the wrong technical reason which eventually lost.
So why did J.P. still get acquitted if he had lost his
appeal? Because Parker had won the point that the law had
been invalid since Terry Parker Day. Same reason as the 4000
got off too. Because of the Terry Parker Day declaration
Terry asked for that the Legalist Plagiarist is now claiming
as words of his own demand.

Yesterday, Health Minister Anne McLellan said the government
would amend the Marijuana Medical Access Regulations to
provide reasonable access to a legal source of marijuana for
medical purposes.
"The amendments announced today will ensure that Canadians
who suffer from serious medical conditions for whom
conventional therapies have not been successful will have
reasonable access to a legal source of marijuana," she said.

JCT: Three years later, the medicine of the vast majority of
Canada's epileptics remains prohibited to them. "Success if
a few get it" wrote Justice Sidney Lederman. 99%
failure may be success for a lawyer, but not an engineer.

But the people at the centre of the court case are upset the
government will continue to strictly limit local growing
operations, forcing patients to obtain government pot, which
they consider inferior and overpriced.

"I've got mixed feelings about it," said Jari Dvorak, a 62-
year-old medicinal-marijuana user in Toronto who uses the
drug to alleviate symptoms of HIV. "They seem to be half-
hearted about the program."

JCT: One of the Hitzig litigants whose fight to fix the
access regulations helped bring the prohibition back to
life.

Mr. Dvorak is among 697 patients in Canada authorized by the
government to use medicinal marijuana. He is also among 11
patients to take Ottawa to court over the program's lack of
access.

JCT: Thanks to him wanting better access through a no longer
valid prohibition, the invalid prohibition was resurrected.

The lawyer representing the patients in the case, Alan
Young, also had concerns about whether the government would
ensure access to medicinal marijuana.

JCT: Stab-in-the-back Young who conspired with the Crown to
reassure a civil court judge that Parker agreed to have his
criminal court Pitt Order extending his protection "set
aside" as "not worth the paper it's printed on."

"All I've seen is crisis public-policy management," he said.
Under the new rules, it will be acceptable for a patient to
pay his or her supplier, and the price is left for them to
negotiate. But the rules will continue to prevent a grower
from supplying more than a single patient, and to prevent
more than three patients from cultivating together.

The new regulation contains some minor changes in the
procedure for obtaining approval for marijuana access. One
class of patients, which had previously required signatures
from two medical specialists, will now require only one
signature. Currently there is little scientific evidence
that pot has therapeutic benefits, but many patients say it
helps them deal with nausea, pain and lack of appetite.

Nota Bene: Alan Young has also been on "The Docket," CBC
Newsworld's live legal affairs program twice in the past
month. For more information on the show, and the episodes
featuring Young, click on www.cbc.ca/thedocket

Osgoode Hall Law School
York University
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Canada
M3J 1P3Telephone: 416.736.5030
Fax: 416.736.5736
http://www.osgoode.yorku.ca

JCT: Go watch the fraud who is stealing credit for the Terry
Parker Day Declaration from Terry after stabbing him in the
back to help the Crown talk a civil judge into setting aside
a criminal Order as a civil default judgment because the
Crown and Parker's friend, Professor Alan Young, agreed it
wasn't worth the paper it was printed on.

I'm happy to say Parker never once dissed the learned
Justice Romain Pitt by entertaining such a disparaging
notion of the champion who saw the emergency under the right
to life and extended his Superior Court's protection on
short notice and ex parte, after the Crown screwed up and
missed the hearing.

He granted his Order extending the 1-year protection granted
by the Ontario Court of Appeal "until the government has
complied with the court's ruling." Which it had not. And the
Court of Appeal eventually sustained the opinion that the
government had not yet complied with the Parker Court
ruling.

Imagine York University trying to build up its Osgoode Hall
Law School by passing Young off as the Appellant for the
Terry Parker Day Declaration of invalidity since Aug. 1 2001
when he was actually responsible for bringing the Parker
Period of invalidity to its end.

Unless the judges are wrong in declaring their Hitzig
decision brings the prohibition back to life and Parliament
must re-enact a new prohibition once an old one has been
invalidated and deemed repealed pursuant to Section 2 of the
Interpretation Act in which case Young's Hitzig victory he
says brought the law back to life and all those innocent
Canadians will have been convicted for nothing because Young
was wrong when he told Canada's police that the court had
resurrected the law.

Wow! York U. posts Professeur Saboteur's false record!


--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics