JCT: We finally got the Ontario Court of Appeal orders we
need to launch our applications for leave to appeal to the
Supreme Court of Canada.

One is the Charbonneau decision in Parker-Turmel-Paquette
and the other is the Lederman decision in Parker. This the
same Lederman decision that I had appealed on my own and
which was deked out of the highest court when the clerk
refused to send the application along without my asking for
an extension of time (which paupers don't need) and so I
asked for the extension of time and the judge refused! Neat
eh! Make me ask for something I didn't need then dismiss it
for lacking what I didn't need. Who'd have thunk they could
be so sleazy at the top.

So my dilemma is whether to just re-file my Lederman
challenge alone keeping Parker's in reserve in case the
court say their sleazing my previous Lederman appeal
precludes my re-filing another one again.

Or I file Terry's Lederman application while I re-file mine
so there's no reason not to let me in or they can kill mine
since his is getting in. It just stops me from presenting
our case for our side.

I'm aiming at filing all our applications on Oct 7, the
second anniversary of the Court of Appeal decisions. Since
Terry and I both qualify for "forma pauperis," it doesn't
matter since we don't need an extension of time.


--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics