"Ian St. John" (istjohn@...) writes:
> "Kelly Bert Manning" <bo774@...> wrote in message
> news:da5amd$eem$1@....
>>
>> Turmel came to mind when I was watching "The Princess Bride" the other
>> night.
>>
>> Turmel kept using the term "Krieger Quash".
>>
>> I don't think that term meant what Turmel thought it did.
>>
>> Turmel reportedly presented no evidence that any of his customers used pot
>> for medical purposes.
>
> Would a doctor be permitted to use the 'medical marijuana' defense for his
> own recreational use?
>
JCT: This is the Ray Turmel cultivation charge that arose before
the Krieger ruling in 2002 abrogated Section 7(1) of the CDSA.

This is not the John Turmel cases.

The Malmo-Levine case says the doctor can't claim recreational use.
The Turmel case says the doctor can claim for medical prevention use.
If using marijuana to prevent epilepsy and all those other nasty
illnesses is his professional opinion, it would be better received
than that of a statistical engineer.




--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics