JCT: Yes, I decided to take time off from work to go to the
Fill The Hill marijuana demonstration in Ottawa later today
on Parliament Hill, scene of so many others of my protests.
In the early 1980s, I picketed the Bank of Canada every
Thursday (Interest-rate setting day) at High Noon for 5
years and then up to Parliament Hill to picket the MPs going
in to the House of Commons between 1:30 and 2:15 pm. One
reason I'm a legend on Parliament Hill.

So I bring the message of the death of the cultivation (and
by implication possession) in the Supreme Court of Canada
and the government lawyers' culpability in not amending the
Criminal Code to reflect the Krieger invalidation by the
Alberta Court of Appeal as they amended the Criminal Code to
reflect the Parker invalidation by the Ontario Court of
Appeal.

Only dropping the 4000 pending charges laid while the law
was dead and not erasing criminal records of the 100,000
Canadians convicted during the same 26 months is the first
great medpot miscarriage of justice: the Parker Scandal,
better known as "Turmel was right since Terry Parker Day."

Not changing the Criminal Code to reflect the Krieger
invalidation and letting another 100,000 be charged since
the end of 2003 is the second great medpot miscarriage of
justice: the Krieger scandal, better known as the Frankel
Brothers Gang don't amend the Criminal Code."

My sign says:
Why is Supreme Court Krieger ruling:
"Marijuana prohibition is unconstitutional"
not in Criminal Code?

I hope to have it prominently displayed while almost every
major narc mole who opposed me is doing their speech:

- Alan Young (Osgoode Hall Law Professor) who says his
Hitzig case brought the marijuana prohibition back to life
on Oct 7 2003 after Terry Parker had killed it on Aug. 1
2001 while I say only Parliament can do that: POLCOA;

- Alison Myrden (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition) who
was one of the Hitzig complainants that got the law declared
alive again and the applause of Law Enforcement For
Prohibition the crowd: "Oops, law's back, sorry."

- Marco Renda (seed seller and marijuana medical license
holder) who who helped the effort to bring the law back to
life after Terry Parker had killed it two years earlier;

- Marc "the Narc" Emery, (Prince of Pot/Prince of Rot)
Cannabis Culture editor and who staged his own sheep-dipping
bust and conviction to help with the impression that the law
is still alive.

- Dominic Cramer, (Toronto Hemp Company) has bad-mouthed me
officially. Google for both of us to get his spin.

- Steve Bacon, narc gofer who does the bully work and talked
Barry Burkholder out of continuing his fight with my medpot
musketeers until the others got their exemptions and
Burkholder refiled his Turmel papers to then get his.

- Marco Ivancicevic (Ontario activist) who helped dis me at
a Toronto MMM March and lost his case without raising the
Krieger argument like most of the other Marc Emery crowd.

- David Malmo-Levine, the activist whose loss at the Supreme
Court has been put in the Criminal Code by the Feds to argue
that the law is still alive. Note how they put it:
CCC: "The criminalization of the possession of marijuana,
even for recreational purposes, does not violate ss.7 or 15
of the Charter [R. v. Malmo-Levine]"

JCT: Another oops from the Narc Emery crowd. Notice the
"even" for recreational purposes, it can be outlawed. The
statement "criminalization despite recreational purposes
does not violate" says it all. Why add "even."

It gives the impression subsuming all other groups as the
biggie? If it was a Parker loss such that "even despite
medical purposes, marijuana can be outlawed," that would make
sense. Right to life is the biggie so if even life can be
ignored, this is the biggie case. Trying to give the
impression that recreational right being ignored is subsumes
life right being ignored is a cheap ploy. Using the word
"even" in the light-weight category is sleazy wording by the
Crown. Though Malmo-Levine's Recreational rights may not be
sufficient to warrant Charter relief, Parker's medical
rights were and still are.

Incredibly, it's as if the only way to get to be a speaker
is to have in some way opposed Turmel's motion to invalidate
the law. These are the heroes of the day, including those
who brought the law back to life. Har har har har.

Russell Barth (Educators for Sensible Drug Policy) will no
doubt make all the sound arguments against the prohibition
he will accept is still alive though I decry it's still
dead; John Akpata (writer - broadcaster) I don't know but
I'd bet he will probably further the impression that the law
needs to be addressed; and BC Buddy the Beaver I don't know
but I'll bet on the spin he helps push about that bad law
that needs to be fixed.

And there I'll be, out in the crowd, with my "Supreme Court
Krieger says prohibition (cultivation and possession)
unconstitutional" exposing that their premise that they are
needed to fight the "live" law for us is false. Once we
admit it's still dead and Alan Young performed no miracles
on the CDSA corpse, it's over.

Let's see how the truth fares later today.


--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics